Abstract
Recent reforms in science education have supported the inclusion of engineering and their practices in K-12 curricula. To this end, many classrooms have incorporated engineering units that include design challenges. Design is an integral part of engineering and can help students think in creative and interdisciplinary ways. In this study, we examined students’ conceptions of design during and after participation in a design-based science curriculum unit. Our study was guided by the following research question: What are students’ views of design after participation in an engineering design-based science curriculum unit and how are these views reflected in their enactment throughout the unit? Using a qualitative approach, we examined students’ conversations throughout the enactment of the curriculum and interviews conducted after the completion of the unit. We found that students had complex and diverse views of design, and these views were reflected in their group discussions throughout the curriculum and design challenge. Students most frequently expressed design as learning and as a process of integration into a coherent whole. These aspects of design were also frequently observed in students’ conversations during the unit. Interestingly, we found evidence of students demonstrating several aspects of design throughout the curriculum that were not explicitly expressed during the student interviews. Taken together, these findings support the complex nature of design as seen at the middle school level.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 359–379.
Authors (2018). International Journal of Science Education.
Azevedo, F. S., Martalock, P. L., & Keser, T. (2015). The discourse of design-based science classroom activities. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(2), 285–315.
Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369–387.
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.
Chao, J., Xie, C., Nourian, S., Chen, G., Bailey, S., Goldstein, M. H., Purzer, S., Adams, R. S., & Tutwiler, M. S. (2017). Bridging the design science gap with tools: Science learning and design behaviors in a simulated environment for engineering design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(8), 1049–1096.
Chen, Y. C., Hand, B., & Norton-Meier, L. (2017). Teacher roles of questioning in early elementary science classrooms: A framework promoting student cognitive complexities in argumentation. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 373–405.
Crismond, D. (2001). Learning and using science ideas when doing investigate and redesign tasks: A study of naive, novice, and expert designers doing constrained and scaffolded design work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 791–820.
Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738–797.
Cross, S. E. (2001). Training the scientists and engineers of tomorrow: A person situation approach. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(2), 296–323.
Daly, S. R., Adams, R. S., & Bodner, G. M. (2012). What does it mean to design? A qualitative investigation of design professionals' experiences. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2), 187–219.
Dorst, K. (2006). Understanding design. Amsterdam: Bis Publishers.
Dorst, K., & Dijkhuis, J. (1995). Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Design Studies, 16(2), 261–274.
Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.
Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., Dershimer, R. C., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Design-based science and real world problem solving. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 855–879.
Go, J. C. (2012). Teaching as goal-less and reflective design: A conversation with Herbert a. Simon and Donald Schön. Teachers and Teaching, 18(5), 513–524.
Guzey, S. S. & Aranda, M. (2017). Student participation in engineering practices and discourse: An exploratory case study. Journal of Engineering Education, 106, 585–606.
Guzey, S., Moore, T., & Harwell, M. (2014). Development of an instrument to measure students’attitudes toward STEM. School Science and Mathematics, 114(6), 271–279.
Guzey, S. S., Ring-Whalen, E. A., Harwell, M. & Peralta, Y. (2017). Life STEM: A case study of life science learning through engineering design. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(1), 23–42.
Hynes, M. (2010). Middle-school teachers’ understanding and teaching of the engineering design process: A look at subject matter and pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(3), 307–320.
Jordan, M. E., & McDaniel, R. R., Jr. (2014). Managing uncertainty during collaborative problem solving in elementary school teams: The role of peer influence in robotics engineering activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(4), 490–536.
Kanter, D. E. (2010). Doing the project and learning the content: Designing project-based science curricula for meaningful understanding. Science Education, 94(3), 525–551.
Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting Learning by DesignTM into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547.
Lachapelle, C. P., Oh, Y., Shams, M. F., Hertel, J. D.,& Cunningham, C. M. (2015). HLM modeling of pre/post-assessment results from a large-scale efficacy study of elementary engineering. ASEE Annual Conference, Seattle, WA. https://peer.asee.org/24185. Accessed 15 April 2018.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lawson, B., & Dorst, K. (2009). Design expertise. Oxford: Architectural Press.
Mentzer, N., Becker, K., & Sutton, M. (2015). Engineering design thinking: High school students' performance and knowledge. Journal of Engineering Education, 104(4), 417–432.
Moje, E. B. (1995). Talking about science: An interpretation of the effects of teacher talk in a high school science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 349–371.
Moje, E. B. (2015). Doing and teaching disciplinary a social and cultural enterprise. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 254–279.
Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. W. (2001). “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 469–498.
Moore, P. L., Atman, C. J., Bursic, K. M., Shuman, L. J., & Gottfried, B. S. (1995). Do freshmen design texts adequately define the engineering design process? In Proceedings of the 1995 Annual ASEE Conference.
Mosborg, S., Adams, R., Kim, R., Atman, C. J., Turns, J., & Cardella, M. (2005). Conceptions of the engineering design process: An expert study of advanced practicing professionals. In Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 1–27).
National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education. Retrieved from www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13165. Accessed 15 April 2018.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press.
Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2015). Discursive cultures of learning in (everyday) mathematics teaching: A video-based study on mathematics teaching in German and Swiss classrooms. In L. B. Resnick, C. Asterhan, & C. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (pp. 181–193). Washington, DC: AERA.
Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.
Roth, W. M. (1996). Art and artifact of children's designing: A situated cognition perspective. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(2), 129–166.
Schubert, T. F., Jacobitz, F. G., & Kim, E. M. (2012). Student perceptions and learning of the engineering design process: An assessment at the freshmen level. Research in Engineering Design, 23(3), 177–190.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.
Wendell, K., & Rogers, C. (2013). Engineering design-based science, science content performance, and science attitudes in elementary school. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 513–540.
Wendell, K. B., Wright, C. G., & Paugh, P. (2017). Reflective decision making in elementary students’ engineering design. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(3), 356–397.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Murat Akarsu and Amanda Johnston for their help in the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lie, R., Aranda, M.L., Guzey, S.S. et al. Students’ Views of Design in an Engineering Design-Based Science Curricular Unit. Res Sci Educ 51, 663–683 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9813-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9813-9