Abstract
Choice of instructional language is influenced by both previous and current perceptions of the value of a given language. For many South African learners, this has contributed to their education being presented either partially or entirely in a second or third language. This effectively limits their cultural capital and educational opportunities. The negative impact of non-equivalence between home language and instructional language is arguably more influential for linguistically dense school subjects, for example Science more so than Mathematics. The Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2015 data allows exploration of the relationship between language non-equivalence and academic achievement as well as its differential association across subjects. The current paper also aims to investigate this relative to the impact of other contextual factors on Science and Mathematics achievement. Secondary analysis was performed on South African Grade 9 TIMSS 2015 country data using multiple regression procedures. Variables related to language were included in modelling at the learner, teacher and school levels. Results indicated that learner-level factors greatly outweighed those from the teacher and school levels. In line with expectations, resource availability as well as home language and instructional language equivalence significantly predicted Mathematics and Science achievement. Furthermore, the impact of language equivalence was higher in Science achievement. These results indicate that improvement of the processes leading to instructional language proficiency, be it at learner, teacher or school level, will contribute to higher academic achievement amongst South African learners and indeed for international second-language learners. With regard to classroom Science teaching and learning, it is also motivated that teachers need to be cognisant of the continuing impact of language for learners as they may need to incorporate innovative techniques and/or guidance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2015). “Science capital”: a conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending Bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 922–948. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21227.
Bangeni, B., & Kapp, R. (2007). Shifting language attitudes in linguistically diverse learning environment in South Africa. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 28(March 2014), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.2167/jmmd495.0.
Bantwini, B. D., & Letseka, M. (2016). South African teachers caught between nation building and global demands: is there a way out/forward? Educational Studies, 52(4), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2016.1190366.
Bharuthram, S., & Clarence, S. (2015). Teaching academic reading as a disciplinary knowledge practice in higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 29(2), 42–55.
Brock-Utne, B., & Holmarsdottir, H. B. (2004). Language policies and practices in Tanzania and South Africa: Problems and challenges. International Journal of Educational Development, 24(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2003.10.002.
Brown, J. D. (2009). Choosing the right type of rotation in PCA and EFA. JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 13(3), 20–25.
Brown, B. A., & Ryoo, K. (2008). Teaching science as a language: a “content-first” approach to science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 529–553. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20255.
Brown, B. A., Ryoo, K., & Rodriguez, J. (2010). Pathway towards fluency: using “disaggregate instruction” to promote science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 32(11), 1465–1493. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903117921.
Busch, B. (2010). School language profiles: valorizing linguistic resources in heteroglossic situations in South Africa. Language and Education, 24(4), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500781003678712.
Buxton, C., Lee, O., & Santau, A. (2008). Promoting science among English language learners: professional development for today’s culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(5), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9103-x.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (second edi). United States of America: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cummins, J. (2015). How to reverse a legacy of exclusion? Identifying high-impact educational responses. Language and Education, 29(3), 272–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.994528.
Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 280–299. Retrieved from. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.58.3.c43481778r528qw4.
Department of Basic Education. (2010). The status of the language of learning and teaching (LOLT) in South African public schools: a quantitative overview. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.
Department of Basic Education. (2011a). Curriculum and assessment policy statement grades 7–9: Mathematics. Policy. Pretoria: Government Printing Works /http://dx.doi.org/9771682584003-32963.
Department of Basic Education. (2011b). Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement Grades 7–9: Natural Sciences. Pretoria: Government Printing Works.
Desai, Z. (2016). Learning through the medium of English in multilingual South Africa: enabling or disabling learners from low income contexts? Comparative Education, 52(3), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2016.1185259.
du Plessis, E. (2013). Introduction to CAPS. Retrieved from http://www.unisa.ac.za/contents/colleges/col_education/docs/CAPS INTRODUCTION TO CAPS 2013.pdf.
Fung, D., & Yip, V. (2014). The effects of the medium of instruction in certificate-level physics on achievement and motivation to learn. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(10), 1219–1245. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21174.
Gee, J. P. (1989). Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: Introduction. The Journal of Education, 171(1), 5–176.
Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: ideology in discourses. In Critical Perspectives on Literacy and Education (pp. 142–145). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203944806.
Grimberg, B. I., & Gummer, E. (2013). Teaching science from cultural points of intersection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21066.
Gupta, A. F. (1997). When mother-tongue education is not preferred. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 18(6), 496–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434639708666337.
Heugh, K. (2009). Into the cauldron: an interplay of indigenous and globalised knowledge with strong and weak notions of literacy and language education in Ethiopia and South Africa. Language Matters, 40(2), 166–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/10228190903188559.
Howie, S. J., van Staden, S., Tshele, M., Dowse, C., & Zimmerman, L. (2012). PIRLS 2011: South African children’s reading literacy achievement. Pretoria: Centre for Evaluation and Assessment Retrieved from http://www.up.ac.za/media/shared/Legacy/sitefiles/file/publications/2013/pirls_2011_report_12_dec.pdf.
Hunter, M. (2015). Schooling choice in South Africa: The limits of qualifications and the politics of race, class and symbolic power. International Journal of Educational Development, 43, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.04.004.
Janks, H. (2014). Globalisation, diversity, and education: a South African perspective. The Educational Forum, 78(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2014.850981.
Kamwangamalu, N. M. (2000). A new language policy, old language practices: status planning for African languages in a multilingual South Africa. South African Journal of African Languages, 20(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2000.10587412.
Kamwangamalu, N. M., & Tovares, A. (2016). English in language ideologies, attitudes, and educational practices in Kenya and South Africa. World Englishes., 35, 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12207.
Kamwendo, G. (2015). Towards a vibrant African languages industry in the era of the African renaissance. International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity, 10(1), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/18186874.2015.1050220.
Lee, O. (2004). Teacher change in beliefs and practices in Science and literacy instruction with English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(1), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10125.
Lee, O., Luykx, A., Buxton, C., & Shaver, A. (2007). The challenge of altering elementary school teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding linguistic and cultural diversity in science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1269–1291. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.
Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to next generation science standards and with implications for common core state standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13480524.
Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. W. (2001). “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 469–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1014.
Noblit, G. W. (2013). Culture bound: Science, teaching and research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 238–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21072.
Plüddemann, P. (2015). Unlocking the grid: Language-in-education policy realisation in post-apartheid South Africa. Language and Education, 29(3), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.994523.
Pretorius, E. J., & Currin, S. (2010). Do the rich get richer and the poor poorer? The effects of an intervention programme on reading in the home and school language in a high poverty multilingual context. International Journal of Educational Development, 30, 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.06.001.
Pretorius, E. J., & Mampuru, D. M. (2007). Playing football without a ball: Language, reading and academic performance in a high-poverty school. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(1), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00333.x.
Probyn, M. (2001). Teachers voices: teachers reflections on learning and teaching through the medium of English as an additional language in South Africa. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 4(4), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050108667731.
Reddy, V., Prinsloo, C., Arends, F., Visser, M., Winnaar, L., Feza, N., … Maja, M. (2012). Highlights from TIMSS 2011: the South African perspective. Pretoria, South Africa. Retrieved from http://www.hsrc.ac.za/uploads/pageContent/2929/TIMSSHighlights2012Dec7final.pdf
Republic of South Africa. (1996). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa No. 108 of 1996, Statutes of the Republic of South Africa - constitutional law § (1996). Pretoria, South Africa: Government Printers, 38, 70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855300011499.
Rollnick, M. (2000). Current issues and perspectives on second language learning of science. Studies in Science Education, 35(1), 93–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260008560156.
Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Tucker-Raymond, E. (2015). Developing interpretive power in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(10), 1571–1600. Retrieved from. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21267.
Sen, A. (2003). Development as capability expansion. Readings in Human Development: Concepts, Measures and Policies for a Development Paradigm, 41–58.
Setati, M. (2005). Teaching mathematics in a primary multilingual classroom. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 447–466. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034945.
Setati, M. (2008). Access to mathematics versus access to the language of power: the struggle in multilingual mathematics classrooms. South African Journal of Education, 28, 103–116.
Spaull, N. (2013). Poverty & privilege: primary school inequality in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(5), 436–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.09.009.
Spaull, N. (2015). Schooling in South Africa: how low quality education becomes a poverty trap. South African Child Gauge, 12, 34–41 Retrieved from http://nicspaull.com/research/.
Tamim, T. (2014). The politics of languages in education: issues of access, social participation and inequality in the multilingual context of Pakistan. British Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 280–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3041.
Taylor, S., & von Fintel, M. (2016). Estimating the impact of language of instruction in South African primary schools: a fixed effects approach. Economics of Education Review, 50, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.01.003.
Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. P. (2001). A National study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academic achievement. Retrieved from http://www.usc.edu/dept/education/CMMR/CollierThomasExReport.pdf
Tikly, L. (2016). Language-in-education policy in low-income, postcolonial contexts: towards a social justice approach. Comparative Education, 52(3), 408–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2016.1185272.
Tikly, L., & Barrett, A. M. (2011). Social justice, capabilities and the quality of education in low income countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.06.001.
Webb, V., Lafon, M., & Pare, P. (2010). Bantu languages in education in South Africa: an overview. Ongekho akekho! - the absentee owner. The Language Learning Journal, 38(3), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730903208389.
Wildsmith-Cromarty, R., & Gordon, M. (2009). Policy versus practice: the role of the home language in learning mathematics and science in English-medium classrooms. The Language Learning Journal, 37(3), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730903208520.
Funding
TIMSS 2015 in South Africa was funded by the Department of Basic Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prinsloo, C.H., Harvey, J.C. The Differing Effect of Language Factors on Science and Mathematics Achievement Using TIMSS 2015 Data: South Africa. Res Sci Educ 50, 2207–2226 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9769-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9769-9