Two Crucial Years of Science and Technology Schooling: A Longitudinal Study of the Major Influences on and Interactions Between Self-Concept, Interest, and the Intention to Pursue S&T

  • Patrice Potvin
  • Abdelkrim Hasni
  • Ousmane Sy
  • Martin Riopel


This longitudinal study (N = 540, grades 7 and 8) was conducted over 2 years (four measurement points) with a perceptual construct questionnaire and access to students’ report cards. The changes in interest, self-concept, and the intention to pursue studies and a career in science and technology were explored as well as the reciprocal causal links between them, while also integrating four exogenous variables: achievement, perceived easiness, gender, and pedagogical novelty. Structural equation modeling was used with the partial least squares (PLS) regression technique. The findings indicate that interest and self-concept do not appear to be mutually dependent and that interest mostly depends on pedagogical novelty, perceived easiness, and the intention to pursue while self-concept depends on achievement and perceived easiness. Easiness was identified as a potentially strong predictor of most constructs about the students’ relationship with the topic and even of the intention to pursue.


Longitudinal Interest Self-concept Career intentions Easiness Gender Novelty 



Special thanks to the following school boards for their financial and organizational help with this project: Commissions scolaires de Montréal, Rivière-du-Nord, des Hautes-Rivières, des Grandes-Seigneuries, and Marie-Victorin. We would also like to thank David Covino (CSDGS), Bénédicte Boissard (CSRDN), Maria Naciri (CDMV), Jean-François Michaud (CSHR), Geneviève Morin (CSDM), and Daniel Lytwynuk (CSDM) for their help collecting data, and all the teachers who accepted to devote class time to this project. Thank you also to the participants for their honesty and their time, to Yannick Skelling-Desmeules for his insight on data analysis, and to Amine Mahhou for his help with data entry.


  1. Anderhag, P., Wickman, P.-O., Bergqvist, K., Jakobson, B., Hamza, K. M., & Säljö, R. (2016). Why do secondary school students lose their interest in science? Or does it never emerge? A possible and overlooked explanation. Science Education, 100(5), 791–813. Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1988). Self-regulation of motivation and action through goal systems. In V. Hamilton, G. H. Bower, & N. H. Frijda (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on emotion and motivation (Vol. 44). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2007). Interest in biology: A developmental shift characterized using self-generated questions. American Biology Teacher, 69(9), 532–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barmby, P., Kind, P. M., & Jones, K. (2008). Examining changing attitudes in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1075–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boeve-de Pauw, J., Van Hoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2018). Effective field trips in nature: The interplay between novelty and learning. Journal of Biological Education, 1–13.
  6. Bong, M., Lee, S. K., & Woo, Y.-K. (2015). The roles of interest and self-efficacy in the decision to pursue mathematics and science. In K. A. Renninger, M. Nieswandt, & S. Hidi (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning (pp. 33–48). Washington D.C.: AERA Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cavas, P. (2011). Factors affecting the motivation of Turkish primary students for science learning. Science Education International, 22(1), 31–42.Google Scholar
  8. Chinn, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah: Lawrence Earlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Christidou, V. (2011). Interest, attitudes and images related to science: Combining students’ voices with the voices of school science, teachers, and popular science. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6(2), 141–159.Google Scholar
  10. Ganley, C. M., & Lubienski, S. T. (2016). Mathematics confidence, interest, and performance: Examining gender patterns and reciprocal relations. Learning and Individual Differences, 47(April), 182–194. Scholar
  11. Garon-Carrier, G., Boivin, M., Guay, F., Kovas, Y., Dionne, G., Lemelin, J.-P., et al. (2016). Intrinsic motivation and achievement in mathematics in elementary school: a longitudinal investigation of their association. Child Development, 87(1), 165–175. Scholar
  12. Geertje, L., Patrick, O., & Hilde, C. (2010). Teacher–child interactions: Relations with children's self-concept in second grade. Infant and Child Development, 19(4), 385–405. Scholar
  13. George, R. (2006). A cross-domain analysis of change in students’ attitudes toward science and attitudes about the utility of science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 571–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gogol, K., Brunner, M., Preckel, F., Goetz, T., & Martin, R. (2016). Developmental dynamics of general and school-subject-specific components of academic self-concept, academic interest and academic anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(356).
  15. Gottfried, A. E., Marcoulides, G. A., Gottfried, A. W., & Oliver, P. H. (2009). A latent curve model of parental motivational practices and developmental decline in math and science academic intrinsic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 729–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guvercin, O., Tekkaya, C., & Sungur, S. (2010). A cross age study of elementary students’ motivation towards science learning. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 39, 233–243.Google Scholar
  17. Hanewald, R. (2013). Transition between primary and secondary school: Why it is important and how it can be supported. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(1), 62–74 Article 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hango, D. (2013). Les différences entre les sexes dans les programmes de sciences, technologies, génie, mathématiques et sciences informatiques (STGM) à l’université. Retrieved from
  19. Hasni, A., & Potvin, P. (2015a). L’intérêt pour les sciences et la technologie à l’école: Résultats d’une enquête auprès d’élèves du primaire et du secondaire au Québec (Interest in science and technology in schools: Results of a survey of elementary and secondary school students in Quebec). Retrieved from:
  20. Hasni, A., & Potvin, P. (2015b). Student’s interest in science and technology and its relationships with teaching methods, family context and self-efficacy. International Journal of Environmental and ScienceEducation, 10(3), 337–366.
  21. Helmke, A., & van Aken, M. A. G. (1995). The causal ordering of academic achievement and self-concept of ability during elementary school: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), 624–637. Scholar
  22. Hidi, S., & Baird, W. (1986). Interestingness—a neglected variable in discourse processing. Cognitive Science, 10(2), 179–194. Scholar
  23. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hong, Z.-R., & Lin, H.-s. (2011). An investigation of students’ personality traits and attitudes toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(7), 1001–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jansen M., Lüdtke O., & Schroeders, U. (2016). Evidence for a positive relation between interest and achievement: Examining between-person and within-person variation in five domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 46, 116–127. Scholar
  26. Kashdan, T. B., & Silvia, P. J. (2009). Curiosity and interest: The benefits of thriving on novelty and challenge. In C. R. Snyder & M. J. Lopez (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (pp. 367–378). New-York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kirikkaya, E. B. (2011). Grade 4 to 8 primary school students’ attitudes towards science: Science enthusiasm. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(4), 374–382.Google Scholar
  28. Koballa, T. R., & Crawley, F. E. (1985). The influence of attitude on science teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics, 85(3), 222–232. Scholar
  29. Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and Findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lacroux, A. (2011). Les avantages et les limites de la méthode “Partial Least Square” (PLS) : une illustration empirique dans le domaine de la GRH. Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines, 80(2), 45–64. Scholar
  31. Leibham, M. B., Alexander, J. M., & Johnson, K. E. (2013). Science interests in preschool boys and girls: Relation to later self-concept and science achievement. Science Education, 97(4), 574–593. Scholar
  32. Lent, R. W., Lopez, F. G., & Bieschke, K. J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(4), 424–430. Scholar
  33. Liu, Y., & Hou, S. (2017). Potential reciprocal relatioship between motivation and achievement: a longitudinal study. School Psychology International, 118.
  34. Logan, M., & Skamp, K. (2008). Engaging students in science across the primary secondary interface: listening to the students’ Voice. Research in Science Education (38).Google Scholar
  35. Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 669–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2005). Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76(2), 397–416. Scholar
  37. McCleary, N., Ramsay, C. R., Francis, J. J., Campbell, M. K., & Allan, J. (2014). Perceived difficulty and appropriateness of decision making by general practitioners: A systematic review of scenario studies. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 621. Scholar
  38. Murphy, C., Ambusaidi, A., & Beggs, J. (2006). Middle East meets west: Comparing children’s attitudes to school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 405–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 94(3), 328–346. Scholar
  40. Oliver, J. S., & Simpson, R. D. (1988). Influences of attitude toward science, achievement motivation, and science self-concept: A longitudinal study. Science Education, 72(2), 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Palmer, D. H. (2009). Situational interest generated Duriong an inquiry skills lesson. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 147–165. Scholar
  43. Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014a). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: a systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85–129. Scholar
  44. Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014b). Analysis of the decline in interest towards school science and technology from grades 5 through 11. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 784–802. Scholar
  45. Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2017a). Encouraging students with different profiles of perceptions to pursue science by choosing appropriate teaching methods for each age group. Research in Science Education.
  46. Potvin, P., Hasni, A., & Sy, O. (2017b). Using inquiry-based interventions to improve secondary students’ interest in science and technology. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(3), 262–270.Google Scholar
  47. Reid, N., & Skryabina, E. A. (2002). Attitudes towards physics. Research in Science and Technological Education, 20(1), 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. E. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. New-York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Rotgans, J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2017). The relation between individual interest and knowledge acquisition. British Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 350–371. Scholar
  50. Siddiqui, N. (2014). Is a summer school programme a promising intervention in preparation for transition from primary to secondary school? International education studies, 7(7), 125–135. Scholar
  51. Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1985). Attitude toward science and achievement motivation profiles of male and female science students in grades six through ten. Science Education, 69(4), 511–525. Scholar
  52. Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1990). A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education, 74(1), 1–18. Scholar
  53. Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sorge, C. (2007). What happens? Relationship of age and gender with science attitudes from elementary to middle school. Science Educator, 16(2), 33–37.Google Scholar
  55. Taskinen, P. H., Schütte, K., & Prenzel, M. (2013). Adolescents’ motivation to select an academic science related-career: The role of school factors, individual interest, and science self-concept. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19(8), 717–733. Scholar
  56. Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2011). Adolescents’ declining motivation to learn science: Inevitable or not? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Venturini, P. (2007). L’envie d’apprendre les sciences (The desire to learn science). Paris: Fabert.Google Scholar
  58. Vygotski, L. (1997). Pensée et langage (Thought and language). Paris: La dispute/Inédit.Google Scholar
  59. Weidinger, A. F., Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2017). Math grades and intrinsic motivation in elementary school: A longitudinal investigation of their association. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 187–204. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Département de didactiqueUniversité du Québec à MontréalMontréalCanada
  2. 2.Faculté d’éducationUniversité de SherbrookeSherbrookeCanada

Personalised recommendations