The Lived Experience of Out-of-field STEM Teachers: a Quandary for Strategising Quality Teaching in STEM?
- 306 Downloads
Strategising quality teaching in science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM) domains turns focus to teachers’ capacity to teach these subjects (UWIRE Text 2017) when they are not suitably qualified in them. Against the backdrop of research that claims that 75% of the fastest growing occupations will require STEM skills, this investigation provides new information about lived experiences of, and those surrounding, out-of-field teaching practices in STEM subject areas, and the implications these experiences have for teaching and learning environments (Office of the Chief Scientist 2014). The out-of-field teaching phenomenon is defined in this paper as occurring when teachers teach subjects or year levels outside their fields of qualification or expertise. The qualitative investigation applies a Gadamerian theoretical philosophy to develop in-depth understanding through the shared perceptions of educational directors, principals, and the lived experiences of teachers and parents from two countries. Leadership perceptions and the complexities involved in out-of-field teaching practices in science and related subject areas are investigated through the lens of multiple interviews, observations, and document analyses. Concluding remarks offer recommendations for educational leaders, reflections on improvement strategies and educational policies. Proposals for further research of the out-of-field teaching phenomenon’s impact on STEM subject areas are offered.
KeywordsOut-of-field teaching phenomenon Quality science teaching STEM education Policy development Leadership perceptions and decisions Student achievements
I wish to acknowledge teachers, school leaders, and parents who eagerly shared their views, perceptions, and experiences.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
- Almy, S., & Theokas, C. (2010). Not prepared for class: high-poverty schools continue to have fewer in-field teachers. Washington, DC: The Education Trust.Google Scholar
- Berry, B., Daughtrey, A., & Wieder, A. (2010). Teacher leadership: leading the way to effective teaching and learning. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509719.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2017.
- Bhathal, R. (2015). Compulsory science and maths is great but there’s more to be done. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/compulsory-science-and-maths-is-great-but-theres-more-to-be-done-42542. Accessed 23 Sept 2017.
- Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1994). Introduction: language and relationship to language in the teaching situation. In P. Bourdieu, J. C. Passeron, & M. S. Martin (Eds.), Academic discourse: linguistic misunderstanding and professorial power (pp. 1–34). Cambridge: Policy Press.Google Scholar
- Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar
- Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., & Norby, M. M. (2004). Cognitive psychology and instruction. Columbus: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Bybee, R. W. (2010a). Advancing STEM education: a 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30–35.Google Scholar
- Churchill, R., Ferguson, P., Godinho, S., Johnson, N., Keddie, A., Letts, W., … Vick, M. (2011). Teaching: making a difference. Queensland: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Cook, H. (2015). Christopher Pyne pushes for maths or science to be compulsory for year 11 and 12 students. The Sydney Morning Herald. http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/christopher-pyne-pushes-for-maths-or-science-to-be-compulsory-for-year-11-and-12-students-20150525-gh9kjv.html. Accessed 13 Sept 2017.
- Corrigan, D. (2006). No wonder kids are confused: the relevance of science education to science. Paper presented in the Australian Council for Educational Research Conference, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
- Corrigan, D., & Smith, K. (2015). The role of values in teaching and learning science. In J. M. Deppeler, T. Loreman, R. Smith, & L. Florian (Eds.), International perspectives on inclusive education (pp. 99–117). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
- Cosgrove, J., Shiel, G., Oldham, E., & Sofroniou, N. (2004). A survey of mathematics teachers in Ireland. The Irish Journal of Education/Iris Eireannach an Oideachais, 35, 20–44.Google Scholar
- Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: how America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Departments of Basic Education and Higher Education and Training Secretariat. (2011). Integrated strategic planning framework for teacher education and development in South Africa, 2011–2025 (Technical Report). Pretoria: The Departments of Basic Education and Higher Education and Training.Google Scholar
- Du Plessis, A. E. (2014). Understanding the out-of-field teaching experience (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Australia: University of Queensland.Google Scholar
- Du Plessis, A. (2017b). Professional support beyond initial teacher education: how to manage teaching out-of-field. Singapore: Springer Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Du Plessis, A. (2018). Being a teacher…and the being of teachers: conceptualising the impact of the out-of-field phenomenon on teacher wellbeing. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
- Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014). STEM for citizenship. Educational Leadership, 72(4), 86–87.Google Scholar
- Gadamer, H. G. (1975). Truth and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Gadamer, H. G. (1976). Philosophical hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: a modified Husserlian approach. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
- Giorgi, A., & Giorgi, B. (2003). The descriptive phenomenological psychological method. In P. Camic, J. Rhodes, & L. Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: expanding perspective in methodology and design (pp. 243–273). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goldhaber, D., & Walch, J. (2014). Gains in teacher quality. Education Next, 14(1), 38–45.Google Scholar
- Goodrum, D., Rennie, L. J., & Hackling, M. W. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools: a research report. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.Google Scholar
- Groundwater-Smith, S., Ewing, R. A., & Cornu, R. J. L. (2011). Teaching: challenges and dilemmas. South Melbourne: Cengage Learning Australia.Google Scholar
- Guskey, T. R. (2002). Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 45–51.Google Scholar
- Hare, S. (2002). We teach who we are: the intersection of teacher formation and educator dispositions. In M. E. Diez & J. D. Raths (Eds.), Dispositions in teacher education (pp. 139–149). Charlotte: IAP/Information Age Pub.Google Scholar
- Hobbs, L., Clark, J. C., & Plant, B. (2016). Successful students—STEM program: teacher learning through a multifaceted vision for STEM education. In Proceedings of the 3rd TAS collective symposium: Researching teaching out-of-field in math, science and beyond (pp. 133–168). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
- Hofmeyr, J., & Draper, K. (2015). Teacher supply and demand 2013–2025. South Africa (Technical Report). Johannesburg: Centre for Development and Enterprise.Google Scholar
- Ingersoll, R. M. (2002). Out of field teaching, educational inequality, and the organisation of schools: an exploratory analysis. CPRE Research Reports. http://www.cal.literacy.org/sites/default/files/researchreport/796_outoffield-ri-01-2002.pdf; http://www.cal.literacy.org/. Accessed 4 Aug 2017.
- Ingersoll, R. M., Merrill, L., & May, H. (2014). What are the effects of teacher education and preparation on beginning teacher attrition? (Research Report No. RR–82). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
- Jackson, A., & Kiersz, A. (2016). The latest ranking of top countries in maths, reading and science is out and the US didn’t crack the top 10. Business Insider Australia. http://www.businessinsider.com.au/pisa-worldwide-ranking-of-math-science-reading-skills-2016-12?r=US&IR=T. Accessed 12 Oct 2017.
- Kelchtermans, G. (2009). Career stories as gateway to understanding teacher development. In M. Bayer, U. Brinkkjӕr, H. Plauborg, & S. Rolls (Eds.), Teachers’ career trajectories and work lives, professional learning and development in schools and higher education (pp. 29–47). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Lewis, A. (1996). Teacher quality. The Education Digest, 62(3), 69–70.Google Scholar
- Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2010). Choosing science: understanding the declines in senior high school science enrolments. Armidale: University of New England, SiMERR National Research Centre.Google Scholar
- Lyons, T., Quinn, F., Rizk, N., Anderson, N., Hubber, P., Kenny, J., … Wilson, S. A. (2012). Starting out in STEM: a study of young men and women in first year science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Armidale: University of New England, SiMERR National Research Centre.Google Scholar
- Mastascusa, E. J., Snyder, W. J., Hoyt, B. S., & Weimer, M. (2011). Effective instruction for STEM disciplines: from learning theory to college teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Ni Rỉodáin, M. (2014). Out-of-field mathematics teaching and the need for professional development: the Irish context. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research ECER 2014. In Proceedings of the 1st TAS collective symposium (pp. 19). Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
- Ni Rỉodáin, M., & Hannigan, A. (2009). Out-of-field teaching in post-primary mathematics education: an analysis of the Irish context: a research report. Limerick: National Centre for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching and Learning.Google Scholar
- Nyman, R. (2017). Interest and engagement: perspectives on mathematics in the classroom (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Gothenburg, Sweden. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/51917. Accessed 30 May 2018.
- Office of the Chief Scientist. (2014). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Australia’s future. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
- Panizzon, D., Westwell, M., & Elliott, K. (2010). Exploring the profile of teachers of secondary science: what are the emerging issues for future workforce planning? Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 56(4), 18–40.Google Scholar
- Raison, M., & Etheridge, M. (2006). Macquarie University: science, engineering and technology study. Sydney: Macquarie University Press.Google Scholar
- Rennie, L. J., Rennie, L., Venville, G., & Wallace, J. (2012). Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: issues, reflections, and ways forward. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Roffey, S. (2012). Pupil wellbeing—teacher wellbeing: two sides of the same coin? Educational & Child Psychology, 29(4), 8–17.Google Scholar
- Sanders, M. E. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.Google Scholar
- Sgard, F. (2006). Organisation for economic co-operation and development global science forum: evolution of student interest in science and technology studies, policy report. Paris: OECD Global Science Forum Secretariat.Google Scholar
- Shepherd, J. (2013). More schools hiring unqualified teachers “to save money.” The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2013/mar/31/schools-hiring-unqualified-teachers-money. Accessed 12 Nov 2017.
- Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Sullivan, P. (2008). Knowledge for teaching mathematics: an introduction. In P. Sullivan & T. L. Wood (Eds.), Knowledge and beliefs in mathematics teaching and teaching development (pp. 1–9). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Törner, G. (2014). Underqualified mathematics teachers or out-of-field teaching in mathematics in Germany—a blank spot in the research of mathematics education. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research ECER 2014. In 1st TAS collective symposium (pp. 89–102). Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
- Tucker, M. (2012). Teacher quality: what’s wrong with US strategy? Educational Leadership, 69(4), 42–46.Google Scholar
- United Nations Development Programme. (2014). Human development report 2014: sustaining human progress: reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-report-2014. Accessed 30 May 2018.
- UWIRE Text. (2017). MfA president ponders STEM education crisis, solutions. Academic OneFile (pp. 1). http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A490233035/AONE?u=acuni&sid=AONE&xid=3d0f601e. Accessed 19 Jan 2018.
- Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Weldon, P. R. (2015). The teacher workforce in Australia: supply, demand and data issues. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
- Weldon, P. R. (2016). Out-of-field teaching in Australian secondary schools. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
- Wienk, M. (2016). Discipline profile of the mathematical sciences. Victoria: AMSI: Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute.Google Scholar
- Wyatt-Smith, C., Du Plessis, A., Wang, J., Hand, K., Alexander, C., & Colbert, P. (2017). Why choose teaching? A matter of choice: evidence from the field. A report prepared for the Queensland College of Teachers. Brisbane: Learning Sciences Institute Australia.Google Scholar