Advertisement

Developing Environmentally Responsible Behaviours Through the Implementation of Argumentation- and Problem-Based Learning Models

  • Pınar Fettahlıoğlu
  • Mustafa Aydoğdu
Article
  • 116 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of using argumentation and problem-based learning approaches on the development of environmentally responsible behaviours among pre-service science teachers. Experimental activities were implemented for 14 weeks for 52 class hours in an environmental education class within a science teaching department. A mixed method was used as a research design; particularly, a special type of Concurrent Nested Strategy was applied. The quantitative portion was based on the one-group pre-test and post-test models, and the qualitative portion was based on the holistic multiple-case study method. The quantitative portion of the research was conducted with 34 third-year pre-service science teachers studying at a state university. The qualitative portion of the study was conducted with six pre-service science teachers selected among the 34 pre-service science teachers based on the pre-test results obtained from an environmentally responsible behaviour scale. t tests for dependent groups were used to analyse quantitative data. Both descriptive and content analyses of the qualitative data were performed. The results of the study showed that the use of the argumentation and problem-based learning approaches significantly contributed to the development of environmentally responsible behaviours among pre-service science teachers.

Keywords

Teaching environmental education Argumentation-based learning Problem-based learning Environmentally responsible behaviour 

References

  1. Albanese, M. A., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: a review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine, 68, 52–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldağ, H. (2005). The effects of textual and graphical-textual argumentation software as cognitive tools on development of argumentation skills. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, Cukurova University, Adana.Google Scholar
  3. Aldağ, H. (2006). The Toulmin model of argumentation. Journal of Çukurova University Institute of Social Sciences, 15(1), 13–34.Google Scholar
  4. Arı, E., & Yılmaz, V. (2017). Effects of environmental illiteracy and environmental awareness among middle school students on environmental behavior. Environment, Development & Sustainability, 19(5), 1779–1793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayotte-Beaudet, J.-P., Potvin, P., Lapierre, H. G., & Glackin, M. (2017). Teaching and learning science outdoors in schools’ immediate surroundings at K–12 levels: a meta-synthesis. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5343–5363.Google Scholar
  6. Barr, S. (2007). Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors: a UK case study of household waste management. Environment and Behavior, 39(4), 435–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: an approach to medical education, series on medical education. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Baysal, Z. N. (2017). The problem-based learning process: reflections of pre-service elementary school teachers. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(4), 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bergman, M. M. (Ed.). (2008). Advances in mixed methods research: theories and applications. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2011). Classroom communities’ adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 95(2), 191–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: a rherotical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bogner, F. X. (2002). The influence of a residential outdoor education programme to pupil’s environmental perception. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 17(1), 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bossley, J.P.(2016). Environmental impact from outdoor/environmental education programs: effects of frequent stream classes on aquatic macroinvertebrates. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Boud, D., & Feletti, G. (1991). The challenge of problem based learning. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  15. Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carter, R. L., & Simmons, B. (2010). The history and philosophy of environmental education. In A. Bodzin, B. S. Klein, & S. Weaver (Eds.), The inclusion of environmental education in science teacher education (pp. 3–16). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chao, S., & Lam, P. (2011). Measuring responsible environmental behavior: self-reported and other-reported measures and their differences in testing a behavioral model. Environment and Behavior, 43, 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Charles, C. & Louv R. (2009). Children’s nature deficit: what we know and don’t know. Children and Nature Network, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
  19. Cheng, J. C. H., & Monroe, M. C. (2010). Connection to nature: children’s affective attitude toward nature. Environment and Behavior, 44(1), 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chin, C. (2004). Students’ questions: fostering a culture of inquisitiveness in science classrooms. School Science Review, 86(314), 107–112.Google Scholar
  21. Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: a potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chu, H.-E., Shin, D. H., & Lee, M. N. (2006). Korean students’ environmental literacy and variables affecting environmental literacy. In S. Wooltorton & D. Marinova (Eds.), Sharing wisdom for our future: Environmental education in action: proceedings of the 2006 Conference of the Australian Association for Environmental Education. Bellingen, Australia: Australian Association for Environmental Education.Google Scholar
  23. Clayton, S., & Myers, G. (2009). Conservation psychology: understanding and promoting human care for nature. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Conceicao, S. C., & Taylor, L. (2007). Using a constructivist approach with online concept maps: relationship between theory and nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 28(5), 268–275.Google Scholar
  25. Corey, G. (2012). Theory and practice of counselling and psychotherapy (9th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  26. Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Delisle, R. (1997). How to use problem-based learning in the classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar
  28. Demirkaya, H., Mutlu, M., & Uşak, M. (2003). 4MAT teaching system model and it’s applications to environmental education. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 2(14), 68–82.Google Scholar
  29. Derman, A., Sahin, E., & Hacieminoglu, E. (2016). Does outdoor education make any difference in environmental literacy of pre-service classroom teachers? International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(15), 8491–8506.Google Scholar
  30. Dinsinger, J. F., & Roth, C. E. (1998). Environmental literacy. ERIC/CSMEE Digest. Colombus, OH, ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education, ED 351201.Google Scholar
  31. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 25, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E., & Allen, D. E. (2001). The power of problem-based learning: a practical ‘how to’ for teaching undergraduate courses in any discipline. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Dwyer, W. O., Leeming, F. C., Cobern, M. K., Porter, B. E., & Jackson, J. M. (1993). Critical review of behavioral interventions to preserve the environment: research since 1980. Environment and Behavior, 25, 275–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Edens, K. M. (2000). Preparing problem solvers for the 21st century through problem-based learning. College Teaching, 48(2), 55−60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Erdoğan, M.(2009). Fifth grade students’ environmental literacy and the factors affecting students’ environmentally responsible behaviors. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, The Graduate School of Social Sciences Middle East Technical University, Ankara.Google Scholar
  37. Erduran, S., Ardaç, D., & Yakmacı-Güzel, B. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: case studies of pre-service secondary science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(2), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ernst, J. (2007). Factors associated with K-12 teachers’ use of environment-based education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(3), 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Erten, S. (2003). By the study of a teaching model on development of awareness on “garbage reduction” for the fifth class students, HacettepeÜniversity. Journal of Education, 25, 94–103.Google Scholar
  40. Erten, S. (2005). Investigation of preservice preschool teachers’ behaviors related to environmental awareness. The Journal of HacettepeÜniversity Education Faculty., 28, 91–100.Google Scholar
  41. Eshach, H. (2006). Bringing in-school and out-of-school learning: formal, non-formal and informal education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fägerstam, E. (2014). High school teachers’ experience of the educational potential of outdoor teaching and learning. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 14(1), 56–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fägerstam, E., & Blom, J. (2013). Learning biology and mathematics outdoors: effects and attitudes in a Swedish high school context. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 13(1), 56–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Farmer, J., Knapp, D., & Benton, M. G. (2007). An elementary school environmental education field trip: long-term effects on ecological and environmental knowledge and attitude development. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(3), 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Fettahlıoğlu, P. (2014). Argumentation-based learning teaching approach. In G. Ekici, & M. Güven (Ed.), Learning teaching approaches and examples of its implementation (pp. 158-198). Ankara: PEGEM A.Google Scholar
  46. Foss, S., Foss, K., & Trapp, R. (2001). Contemporary perspectives on rhetoric prospect heights. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Pr Inc..Google Scholar
  47. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education (5th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill, Inc..Google Scholar
  48. Friedman S., & Deek F. P.(2003). The integration of problem-based learning and problem-solving tools distributed education environments. http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie2002/papers/1208.pdf.
  49. Gan, D., Pizmony-Levi, O., &Peled, O. (2002). Environmental education in primary school- The Environmental Guardian Program. SPNI [Hebrew].Google Scholar
  50. Ghosh, S. (1993). Exercise in inducing creativity in undergraduate engineering students through challenging examinations and open-ended design problems. IEEE Transactions on Education, 36(1), 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gigliotti, L. (1990). Environmental education: what went wrong? What can be done? The Journal of Environmental Education, 22(1), 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Van den Bossche, P., & Segers, M. (2005). Effects of problem-based learning: a meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 27–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Goldman, D., Yavetz, B., & Pe'er, S. (2006). Environmental literacy in teacher training in Israel: Environmental behavior of new students. Journal of Environmental Education, 38(1), 3-22.Google Scholar
  54. Halpenny, E. A. (2010). Pro-environmental behaviours and park visitors: the effect of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2010), 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hancock, D. R., & Algozzine, B. (2006). Doing case study research. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  56. Hand, B., & Keys, C. (1999). Inquiry investigation: a new approach to laboratory reports. The Science Teacher, 66, 27–29.Google Scholar
  57. Harlow, D., & Otero, V. (2004). An examination of children’s scientific argumentation. Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, 720, 145–148.Google Scholar
  58. Hartig, T., Kaiser, E., & Bowler, P. (2001). Psychological restoration in nature as a positive motivation for ecological behavior. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 590–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Harvey, G. (1977). A conceptualization of environmental education. In J. Aldrich, A. Balckburn, & G. Abel (Eds.), A report on the north american regional seminar on environmental education (pp. 66–77). Columbus, OH: ERIC/SMEAC.Google Scholar
  60. Hines, J., Hungerford, H., & Tomera, A. (1986/87). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: a meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1–8.Google Scholar
  61. Hogan, K. (2002). Small groups’ ecological reasoning while making an environmental management decision. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 341–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hohenshell, L. M., & Hand, B. (2006). Writing-to-learn-strategies in secondary school cell biology: a mixed method study. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 261–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hornik, J., Cherian, J., Madansky, M., & Narayana, C. (1995). Determinants of recycling behavior: a synthesis of research results. Journal of SocioEconomics, 24(1), 105–127.Google Scholar
  64. Hovardas, T. (2016). Primary school teachers and outdoor education: varying levels of teacher leadership in informal networks of peers. The Journal of Environmental Education, 47(3), 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hsu, S. J. (1997). An assessment of environmental literacy and analysis of predictors of responsible environmental behavior held by secondary teachers in Hualien country of Taiwan. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University (UMI Number: 9731641).Google Scholar
  66. Hsu, S. J., & Roth, R. E. (1998). An assessment of environmental literacy and analysis of predictors of responsible environmental behavior held by secondary teachers in the Hualien area of Taiwan. Environmental Education Research, 4(3), 229–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Huang, H.-P., & Yore, L. D. (2005). A comparative study of Canadian and Taiwanese grade 5 children's environmental behaviors, attitudes, concerns, emotional dispositions, and knowledge. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(4), 419–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., Rodriguez, A., & Duschl, R. (2000). Doing the lesson or doing science: argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Pereiro-Munoz, C. (2002). Knowledge producers or knowledge consumers? Argumentation and decision making about environmental management. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1171–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Johnson, P. (1999). Problem-based, cooperative learning in the engineering classroom. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 125(1), 8–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Jonassen, D. H., & Hung, W. (2008). All problems are not equal: implications for problem-based learning. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 2(2), 6–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Kals, F., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 178–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Kaptan, F., & Korkmaz, H. (2001). Problem-based learning approach in science education. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 20, 191–192.Google Scholar
  75. Karen, E., & Downing, J. (2013). Using problem-based learning to facilitate student learning. ACRL, 621–624.Google Scholar
  76. Kaya, O. N., Doğan, A., Kılıç, Z., & Ebenezer, J. (2004). Preservice science teachers views on their online argumentations about what is happening in the middle school science classrooms during their practicum periods. Paper presented at the 18th International Conference on Chemical Education, Istanbul, Turkey. (ED 500727).Google Scholar
  77. Kingir, S., Geban, Ö., & Günel, M. (2011). Students’ ideas about the implementation of the argumentation based science inquiry approach in their chemistry course. Journal of Selcuk University Ahmet Keleşoğlu Education Faculty, 32, 15–28.Google Scholar
  78. Klineberg, S. L. (1998). Environmental attitudes among Anglos, Blacks, and Hispanics in Texas: has the concern gap disappeared? Race, Gender and Class, 6, 70–82.Google Scholar
  79. Kostova, Z., & Atasoy, E. (2008). Methods of successful learning in environmental education. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 4(1), 49–78.Google Scholar
  80. Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003). The development of argument skills. Child Development, 74, 1245–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kutluca, A. Y., & Aydin, A. (2016). An examination of prospective elementary science teachers’ perspective towards socio-scientific argumentation. Science Education International, 27(3), 323–343.Google Scholar
  82. Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods: saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  83. Marcinkowski, T. (2006). Analysis of the “forerunners” and their contributions. [EDS5410 Course notes]. Foundations of Environmental Education, Department of Science and Math Education, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  84. Marcinkowski, T. J. (1988). An analysis of correlates and predictors of responsible environmental behavior. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.Google Scholar
  85. Marinopoulos, D., & Stavridou, H. (2002). The influence of a collaborative learning environment on primary students’ conceptions about acid rain. Journal of Biological Education, 37(1), 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Mason, L., & Scirica, F. (2006). Prediction of students’ argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding. Learning and Instruction, 16, 492–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Mathews, L.M. (2011). Problem-based learning and knowledge transfer in a vocational nursing program. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Capella University (UMI Number: 3460637).Google Scholar
  88. McCrea, E. J. (2006). The roots of environmental education: how the past supports the future. Environmental Education and Training Partnership (EETAP).Google Scholar
  89. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  90. Muijs, D. (2004). Doing quantitative research in education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Newton, D. P. (2013). Moods, emotions and creative thinking: a framework for teaching. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 553–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Newton, M.H. (2016). A longitudinal examination of a SSI-embedded experiential environmental education course and environmental behaviors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, USA.Google Scholar
  94. Nisbet, G., Hendry, G. D., Rolls, G., & Field, M. J. (2008). Interprofessional learning for prequalification health care students: an outcomes-based evaluation. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 22(1), 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Nitowski, H. (2014). An investigation of the factors that influence students’ long term application of environmental literacy skills. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Western Connecticut State University.Google Scholar
  96. Norman, G. R., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). The psychological basis of problem-based learning: a review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 67(9), 557–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Nussbaum, M. E., & Bendixen, L. D. (2003). Approaching and avoiding arguments: the role of epistemological beliefs, need for cognition, and extraverted personality traits. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 573–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Oh, J. Y. (2014). Understanding the alternative conceptions of pre-service secondary science teachers about tidal phenomena based on Toulmin’s argumentation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(2), 353–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Osbaldiston, R. (2004). Meta-analysis of the responsible environmental behavior literature. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Missouri, Columbia (UMI Number: 3144447).Google Scholar
  100. Oweini, A., & Houri, A. (2006). Factors affecting environmental knowledge and attitudes among Lebanese college students. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 5(2), 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Pike, J. C., Spangler, W., Williams, V., & Kollar, R. (2017). Role-playing and problem-based learning: the use of cross-functional student teams in business application development. Information Systems Education Journal, 15(4), 75–83.Google Scholar
  102. Pooley, J., & O’Conner, M. (2000). Environmental education and attitudes: emotions and beliefs are what is needed. Environment and Behavior, 32(5), 711–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Poortinga, W., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2004). Values, environmental concern and environmental behavior: a study into household energy use. Environment and Behavior, 36(1), 70–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Puvirajah, A. (2007). Exploring the quality and credibility of students‟ argumentation: teacher facilitated technology embedded scientific inquiry. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University.Google Scholar
  105. Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. Shrewsbury, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research and King’s College London.Google Scholar
  106. Roth, C. E. (1992). Environmental literacy: its roots, evolution and directions in the 1990s. Columbus: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  107. Saltan, F., & Divarci, O. F. (2017). Using blogs to ımprove elementary school students’ environmental literacy in science class. European Journal of Educational Research, 6(3), 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Scannella, A., & McCarthy, S. (2014). Teacher evaluation adversity or opportunity? Principal Leadership, 14(5), 52–55.Google Scholar
  109. Schmidt, H. G. (1993). Foundations of problem-based learning: some explanatory notes. Medical Education, 27, 422–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Shepard, L. (2005). Linking formative assessment to scaffolding. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 66–70.Google Scholar
  111. Shin, D., Chu, H., Lee, E., Ko, H., Lee, M., Kang, K., Min, B., & Park, J. (2005). An assessment of Korean students’ environmental literacy. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 26(4), 358–364.Google Scholar
  112. Sia, A. P., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1985). Selected predictors of responsible environmental behavior: an analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 17(2), 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Siegel, H. (1995). Why should educators care about argumentation? Informal Logic, 17, 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Simmons, D. (1995). Working paper 2: developing a framework for national environmental education standards. In: Papers on the Development of Environmental Education Standards (pp. 53–58). Troy, OH: NAAEE.Google Scholar
  115. Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Sivek, D. J., & Hungerford, H. (1989/1990). Predictors of responsible behavior in members of three Wisconsin conservation organizations. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(2), 35–40.Google Scholar
  117. Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Licoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  118. Stapp, W. B. (1969). The concept of environmental education. Environmental Education, 1(1), 30–31.Google Scholar
  119. Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Stepien, W. J., Gallagher, S. A., & Workman, D. (1993). Problem-based learning for traditional and interdisciplinary classrooms. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16(4), 338–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Timur, S. (2011). Determining environmental literacy levels of preservice science teachers. Unpublished doctoral thesis, GaziÜniversity, Ankara.Google Scholar
  122. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  123. Toulmin, S. E., Rieke, R. D., & Janik, A. (1984). An introduction to reasoning (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  124. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2005). Guidelines and recommendations for reorienting teacher education to address sustainability. Paris: UNESCO: Education for Sustainable Development in Action Technical Paper No. 2.Google Scholar
  125. Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, F. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory. A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  126. ​Volk, T. L. & McBeth, B. (1998). Environmental literacy in the United States: what should be…what is…getting from here to there. Washington, DC: North American Association for Environmental EducationGoogle Scholar
  127. Walton, D. (2006). Fundamentals of critical argumentation. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  128. Wilke, R. (1995). Literacy model development and framework. In: R. Wilke (ed.), Environmental education literacy/needs assessment project: assessing environmental literacy of students and environmental education needs of teachers. Final Report for 1993–1995 (pp. 5–6). (Report to NCEET/University of Michigan under U.S. EPA Grant NT901935–01-2). Stevens Point, WI: University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point.Google Scholar
  129. Winther, A. A., Sadler, K. C., & Saunders, G. (2010). Approaches to environmental education. In A. Bodzin, B. S. Klein, & S. Weaver (Eds.), The inclusion of environmental education in science teacher education (pp. 31–49). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Yavetz, B., Goldman, D., & Peer, S. (2009). Environmental literacy of pre-service teachers in Israel: a comparison between students at the onset and end of their studies. Environmental Education Research, 15(4), 393–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research design and methods. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  132. Young, A. J., & McElhone, M. J. (1986). Guidelines for the development of non-formal environmental education. UNESCO. Environmental Education Series No. 23.Google Scholar
  133. Zheng, Q., Xu, A., & Kong, D. (2017). Environmental education, knowledge management and professional performance in eco-tourism: the impact relatedness. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4679–4687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Science Education DepartmentCukurova UniversityAdanaTurkey
  2. 2.Science Education DepartmentGazi UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations