Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the Situational Adequacy of Teacher Questions in Science Classrooms

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Notes

  1. Excerpt taken from lesson one—which is one of the eight analyzed lessons

References

  • Aagaard, S. A. (1973). Oral questioning by the teacher: influence on student achievement in eleventh-grade chemistry. (Doctoral dissertation), New York University. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/302743253?accountid=8579 ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database.

  • Andersen, H. M., & Nielsen, B. L. (2013). Video-based analyses of motivation and interaction in science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 35(6), 906–928. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.627954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., et al. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. White Plains: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson-Bakken, E., & Klette, K. (2016). Teachers’ use of questions and responses to students’ contributions during whole class discussions: comparing language arts and science classrooms. In K. Klette, O. K. Bergem, & A. Roe (Eds.), Teaching and learning in lower secondary schools in the era of PISA and TIMSS (pp. 63–84). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, E., & Sørvik, G. O. (2013). Reality lost? Re-use of qualitative data in classroom video studies. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-14.3.1941.

  • Andre, T. (1979). Does answering higher-level questions while reading facilitate productive learning? Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 280–318. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543049002280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barden, L. M. (1995). Effective questioning and the ever-elusive higher-order question. The American Biology Teacher, 57(7), 423–426. https://doi.org/10.2307/4450031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of education goals: Handbook 1: Cognitive domain (Vol. 1). New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blosser, P. E. (1973). Handbook of effective questioning techniques. Worthington: Education Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blosser, P. E. (2000). How to ask the right questions. Washington: National Science Teachers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, M. P. (1985). The social context for language learning—a neglected situation? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(2), 135–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. (1986). Teacher influences on student achievement. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1069–1077. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen, W. S. (1991). Questioning in classrooms: a sociolinguistic perspective. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen, W. S., & Hall, K. (1997). Never ask a question if you don’t know the answer: the tension in teaching between modeling scientific argument and maintaining law and order. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 32(2), 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazden, C. B. (1986). Classroom discourse. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (Vol. 3, pp. 432–463). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815–843. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C., & Langsford, A. (2004). Questioning students in ways that encourage thinking. Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 50(4), 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christenbury, L., & Kelly, P. P. (1983). Questioning: a path to critical thinking. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, A. A. (1987). Why questions. In W. W. Wilen (Ed.), Questions, questioning techniques, and effective teaching (pp. 11–22). Washington D C: National Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: the issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1973). On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 47, 5–20. https://doi.org/10.2307/3129898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, J. T. (1978). Using questions to depress student thought. The School Review, 87(1), 50–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, J. T. (1988). The remedial status of student questioning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(3), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027880200301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunkin, M. J., & Biddle, B. J. (1974). The study of teaching. Oxford: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (2012). Common knowledge: the development of understanding in the classroom. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eshach, H., Dor-Ziderman, Y., & Yefroimsky, Y. (2014). Question asking in the science classroom: teacher attitudes and practices. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9451-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrar, M. T. (1986). Teacher questions: the complexity of the cognitively simple. Instructional Science, 15(2), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/23368989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furst, E. J. (1981). Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives for the cognitive domain: philosophical and educational issues. Review of Educational Research, 51(4), 441–453. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543051004441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furtak, E. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (2009). Guidance, conceptual understanding, and student learning: an investigation of inquiry-based teaching in the US. In T. Janik & T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp. 181–203). Münster: Waxmann Verlag GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. (2004). Truth and method. New York: Continuum publishing group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gall, M. D. (1970). The use of questions in teaching. Review of Educational Research, 40(5), 707–721. https://doi.org/10.2307/1169463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J. J., & Aschner, M. J. (1963). A preliminary report on analyses of classroom interaction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 9(3), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.2307/23082786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gayle, B. M., Preiss, R. W., & Allen, M. (2006). How effective are teacher-initiated classroom questions in enhancing student learning. In B. M. Gayle, R. W. Preiss, N. Burrell, & M. Allen (Eds.), Classroom communication and instructional processes: advances through meta-analysis (pp. 279–293). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, T. L., Slavings, R. L., Harel, K. H., & Emerson, H. (1987). Student passivity: a study of question asking in K-12 classrooms. Sociology of Education, 60(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. L. (1983). Research on teaching as a linguistic process: a state of the art. In E. W. Gordon (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 10, pp. 151–252). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. (2010). Can we re-use qualitative data via secondary analysis? Notes on some terminological and substantive issues. Sociological Research Online, 15(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannel, I. (2009). Insufficient questioning. The Phi Delta Kappan, 91(3), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/40345093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargie, O. D. (1978). The importance of teacher questions in the classroom. Educational Research, 20(2), 99–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, D. G. E. (2005). Why do teachers ask the questions they ask? RELC Journal, 36(3), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688205060052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, C. (2012). Practicing college learning strategies (6th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth, Cengage learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawalkar, A., & Vijapurkar, J. (2013). Scaffolding science talk: the role of teachers’ questions in the inquiry classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2004–2027. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.604684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayima, F. (2016). Question classification taxonomies as guides to formulating questions for use in chemistry classrooms. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(3), 353–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaassen, C. W. J. M., & Lijnse, P. L. (1996). Interpreting students’ and teachers’ discourse in science classes: an underestimated problem? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(2), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199602)33:2<115::AID-TEA1>3.0.CO;2-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2013). Teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: the role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(1), 90–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (1999). Critical classroom discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 453–484. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., Kinzie, M. B., & Whittaker, J. V. (2012). Impact of online support for teachers’ open-ended questioning in pre-k science activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 568–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: language, learning, and values. Norwoord: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, T., & Long, R. (1981). Effectiveness instruction. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louca, L. T., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tzialli, D. (2012). Identification, interpretation—evaluation, response: an alternative framework for analyzing teacher discourse in science. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1823–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.671971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangano, N. G., & Benton, S. L. (1984). Comparison of question-response-feedback interactions during basal reader instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 78(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/27540105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, S. R., Rice, C. T., Berliner, D. C., Rosseau, E. W., & Rousseau, E. W. (1980). The correspondence between teacher questions and student answers in classroom discourse. The Journal of Experimental Education, 48(3), 194–204. https://doi.org/10.2307/20151341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehring, A., Päßler, A., & Tiemann, R. (2017). The complexity of teacher questions in chemistry classrooms: an empirical analysis on the basis of two competence models. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9683-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1997). The big picture: language and learning in hundreds of English lessons. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), Opening dialogue: understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom (pp. 30–74). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E. (1979). Introduction: what child language can contribute to pragmatics. In E. Ochs & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 1–17). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: first results from TALIS. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/17/51/43023606.pdf

  • Oliveira, A. W. (2010). Improving teacher questioning in science inquiry discussions through professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 422–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsolini, M., & Pontecorvo, C. (1992). Children’s talk in classroom discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 9(2), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0902_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, P. (2005). Crafting qualitative research: working in the post-positivist traditions. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, C. L. (1979). A comparative laboratory study of the effects of lower level and higher level questions on students’ abstract reasoning and critical thinking in two non-directive high school chemistry classrooms. (Doctoral dissertation), The Florida State University. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/302898075?accountid=8579 ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database.

  • Redfield, D. L., & Rousseau, E. W. (1981). A meta-analysis of experimental research on teacher questioning behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51(2), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543051002237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riegle, R. P. (1976). Classifying classroom questions. Journal of Teacher Education, 27(2), 156. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248717602700219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K. J., Druker, S. L., Garnier, H. E., Lemmens, M., Chen, C., Kawanaka, T., et al. (2006). Teaching science in five countries: results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Washington: National Center for Education Statistics (NCES 2006–011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. M. (1996). Teacher questioning in an open-inquiry learning environment: interactions of context, content, and student responses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 709–736. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199609)33:7<709::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-R.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T. L. (1983). Analyzing arguments in science classroom discourse: can teachers’ questions distort scientific authority? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660200104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samson, G. E., Strykowski, B., Weinstein, T., & Walberg, H. J. (1987). The effects of teacher questioning levels on student achievement: a quantitative synthesis. The Journal of Educational Research, 80(5), 290–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, N. M. (1966). Classroom questions: what kinds? New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, R. E. (1993). The art of effective trainer questioning. ISA Transactions, 32(1), 19–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-0578(93)90007-J.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: the English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. B., & Marshall, J. C. (2013). Interactions between classroom discourse, teacher questioning, and student cognitive engagement in middle school science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(2), 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. O., Meux, M. O., & Coombs, J. (1960). A study of the logic of teaching. Urbana: Bureau of Educational Research, College of Education, University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., Tucker, P. D., & Hindman, J. L. (2007). What is the relationship between teacher quality and student achievement? An exploratory study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20(3), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9053-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The TIMSS Video Study. (1999). Retrieved from http://www.timssvideo.com/timss-video-study

  • Tofade, T., Elsner, J., & Haines, S. T. (2013). Best practice strategies for effective use of questions as a teaching tool. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(7), 155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D. F., & Tsui, C.-Y. (2014). General instructional methods and strategies. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 303–320). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., & Meyer, D. K. (2000). Studying and understanding the instructional contexts of classrooms: using our past to forge our future. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3502_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Discourse as structure and process: discourse studies: a multidisciplinary introduction. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Retrieved from http://sk.sagepub.com/books/discourse-as-structure-and-process. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221884.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Zee, E. H. (2000). Analysis of a student-generated inquiry discussion. International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Zee, E. H., Iwasyk, M., Kurose, A., Simpson, D., & Wild, J. (2001). Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 159–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<159::AID-TEA1002>3.0.CO;2-J.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Zee, E. H., & Minstrell, J. (1997). Using questioning to guide student thinking. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(2), 227–269. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0602_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogler, K. E. (2005). Improve your verbal questioning. The Clearing House, 79(2), 98–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/30182119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilen, W. W. (1991). Questioning skills for teachers: what research says to the teacher. Washington, DC: National Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H. (1979). Experiments relating teachers’ use of higher cognitive questions to student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 49(1), 13–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/1169925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (2006). Interpretation and method: empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip, D. Y. (2004). Questioning skills for conceptual change in science instruction. Journal of Biological Education, 38(2), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2004.9655905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, University of Bergen, Allégaten 41, 5007, Bergen, Norway

    Festo Kayima

  2. Department of Education and Sports Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway

    Arne Jakobsen

Authors
  1. Festo Kayima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arne Jakobsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Festo Kayima.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors reported no potential conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kayima, F., Jakobsen, A. Exploring the Situational Adequacy of Teacher Questions in Science Classrooms. Res Sci Educ 50, 437–467 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9696-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9696-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation