Several studies have found active learning to enhance students’ motivation and attitudes. Yet, faculty indicate that students resist active learning and censure them on evaluations after incorporating active learning into their instruction, resulting in an apparent paradox. We argue that the disparity in findings across previous studies is the result of variation in the active learning instruction that was implemented. The purpose of this study was to illuminate sources of motivation from and resistance to active learning that resulted from a novel, exemplary active-learning approach rooted in essential science practices and supported by science education literature. This approach was enacted over the course of 4 weeks in eight sections of an introductory undergraduate biology laboratory course. A plant concept inventory, administered to students as a pre-, post-, and delayed-posttest indicated significant proximal and distal learning gains. Qualitative analysis of open-response questionnaires and interviews elucidated sources of motivation and resistance that resulted from this active-learning approach. Several participants indicated this approach enhanced interest, creativity, and motivation to prepare, and resulted in a challenging learning environment that facilitated the sharing of diverse perspectives and the development of a community of learners. Sources of resistance to active learning included participants’ unfamiliarity with essential science practices, having to struggle with uncertainty in the absence of authoritative information, and the extra effort required to actively construct knowledge as compared to learning via traditional, teacher-centered instruction. Implications for implementation, including tips for reducing student resistance to active learning, are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295–317.
Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 1–18.
Allen, D., & Tanner, K. (2005). Infusing active learning into the large enrollment biology class: seven strategies, from the simple to complex. CBE Life Sci Educ, 4, 262–268.
Allen, D., & Tanner, K. D. (2006). Rubrics: tools for making learning goals and evaluation criteria explicit for both teachers and learners. CBE Life Sci Educ, 5, 197–203.
Andrews, T. M., Leonard, M. J., Colgrove, C. A., & Kalinowski, S. T. (2011). Active learning not associated with student learning in a random sample of college biology courses. CBE Life Sci Educ, 10, 394–405.
Armbruster, P., Patel, M., Johnson, E., & Weiss, M. (2009). Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory biology. CBE Life Sci Educ, 8, 203–213.
Austin, A. W., Parrot, S. A., Korn, W. S., & Sax, L. J. (1997). The American freshman: thirty-year trends. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, University of California.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122.
Barab, S. A., Barnett, M. G., & Squire, K. (2002). Smart people or smart contexts? Cognition, ability and talent development in an age of situated approaches to knowing and learning. Educational Psychologist, 37, 165–182.
Bargh, J. A., & Schul, Y. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 593.
Benware, C. A., & Deci, E. L. (1984). Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 755–765.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC higher education reports (pp. 20036–21183). Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University.
Boyer, E. L. (1998). The Boyer commission on educating undergraduates in the research university, reinventing undergraduate education: a blueprint for America’s research universities. New York: Stony Brook.
Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). Committee on developments in the science of learning. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Brewer, C. A., & Smith, D. (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: a call to action. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Bunce, D. M., Flens, E. A., & Neiles, K. Y. (2010). How long can students pay attention in class? A study of student attention decline using clickers. Journal of Chemical Education, 87, 1438–1443.
Choi, Y., & Anderson, W. J. (2016). Self-directed learning with feedback. Journal of College Science Teaching, 46, 32.
Chory-Assad, R. M. (2002). Classroom justice: perceptions of fairness as a predictor of student motivation, learning, and aggression. Communication Quarterly, 50, 58–77.
Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Sci Scope, 23, 42–44.
Connell, G. L., Donovan, D. A., & Chambers, T. G. (2016). Increasing the use of student-centered pedagogies from moderate to high improves student learning and attitudes about biology. CBE Life Sci Educ, 15, 1–15.
Cortright, R. N., Collins, H. L., & DiCarlo, S. E. (2005). Peer instruction enhanced meaningful learning: ability to solve novel problems. Advances in Physiology Education, 29, 107–111.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69, 970–977.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
DeHaan, R. L. (2009). Teaching creativity and inventive problem solving in science. CBE Life Sci Educ, 8, 172–181.
Dewey, J. (1944). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press.
Dirks, C. (2011). The current status and future direction of biology education research. In Second Committee Meeting on the Status, Contributions, and Future Directions of Discipline-Based Education Research. Available: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.675.6018&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Dori, Y. J., & Herscovitz, O. (1999). Question-posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: analysis of an environmental case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 411–430.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A socio-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.
Ebert-May, D., Derting, T. L., Hodder, J., Momsen, J. L., Long, T. M., & Jardeleza, S. E. (2011). What we say is not what we do: effective evaluation of faculty professional development programs. Bioscience, 61, 550–558.
Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 613–628.
Ellis, A. (1985). Overcoming resistance: rational-emotive therapy with difficult clients. New York: Springer.
Epstein, D. (2006). So that's why they're leaving. Inside Higher Education. Retrieved December 2, 2016, from http://insidehighered.com/news/2006/07/26/scipipeline.
Felder, R. M. (2011). Hang in there! Dealing with student resistance to learner-centered teaching. Chemical Engineering Education, 43, 131–132.
Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (1996). Navigating the bumpy road to student-centered instruction. College Teaching, 44, 43–47.
Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2004). The intellectual development of science and engineering students. Part 1: models and challenges. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 269–277.
Freeman, S., O’Connor, E., Parks, J. W., Cunningham, M., Hurley, D., Haak, D., Dirks, C., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2007). Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology. CBE Life Sci Educ, 6, 132–139.
Freeman, S., Haak, D., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2011). Increased course structure improves performance in introductory biology. CBE Life Sci Educ, 10, 175–186.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014a). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8410–8415.
Freeman, S., Quillin, K., & Allison, L. (2014b). Biological science (5th ed.). New York: Pearson.
Graham, M. J., Frederick, J., Byars-Winston, A., Hunter, A. B., & Handelsman, J. (2013). Increasing persistence of college students in STEM. Science, 341, 1455–1456.
Haak, D. C., HilleRisLambers, J., Pitre, E., & Freeman, S. (2011). Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science, 332, 1213–1216.
Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., et al. (2004). Scientific teaching. Science, 304, 521–522.
Huba, M. E., & Freed, J. E. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326, 1410–1412.
Katz, I., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2006). Interest as a motivational resource: feedback and gender matter, but interest makes the difference. Social Psychology of Education, 9, 27–42.
Keller, C., Finkelstein, N., Perkins, K., Pollock, S., Turpen, C., & Dubson, M. (2007). Research-based practices for effective clicker use. AIP Conference Proceedings, 951, 128–131.
Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15, 661–667.
Klionsky, D. J. (2004). Points of view: lectures: can’t learn with them, can’t learn without them talking biology: learning outside the book—and the lecture. CBE Life Sci Educ, 3, 204–211.
Kloss, R. J. (1994). A nudge is best: helping students through the Perry scheme of intellectual development. College Teaching, 42, 151–158.
Kracauer, S. (1952). The challenge of qualitative content analysis. Public Opin Q, 16, 631–642.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory Into Practice, 41, 215.
Kroll, B. M. (1992). Teaching hearts and minds: college students reflect on the Vietnam War in literature. Carbondale: SIU Press.
Kuh, G. D. (2005). Student engagement in the first year of college. In M. L. Upcraft, J. N. Gardner, & B. O. Barefoot (Eds.), Challenging and supporting the first-year student: a handbook for improving the first year of college (pp. 86–107). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77, 319–337.
Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science. Norwood: Ablex.
Lewin, J. D., Vinson, E. L., Stetzer, M. R., & Smith, M. K. (2016). A campus-wide investigation of clicker implementation: the status of peer discussion in STEM classes. CBE Life Sci Educ, 15, 1–12.
Marbach-Ad, G., & Sokolove, P. G. (2000a). Can undergraduate biology students learn to ask higher level questions? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 854–870.
Marbach-Ad, G., & Sokolove, P. (2000b). Good science begins with good questions. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30, 192–201.
Martyn, M. (2007). Clickers in the classroom: an active learning approach. Educause Quarterly, 30, 71–74.
Mazur, E. (1996). Peer instruction: a user’s manual. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
McComas, W. F. (1996). Ten myths of science: reexamining what we think we know about the nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 96, 10.
Messineo, M., Gaither, G., Bott, J., & Ritchey, K. (2007). Inexperienced versus experienced students’ expectations for active learning in large classes. College Teaching, 55, 125–133.
Michael, J. (2007). Faculty perceptions about barriers to active learning. College Teaching, 55, 42–47.
Momsen, J. L., Long, T. M., Wyse, S. A., & Ebert-May, D. (2010). Just the facts? Introductory undergraduate biology courses focus on low-level cognitive skills. CBE Life Sci Educ, 9, 435–440.
Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40, 120–123.
Moseley, D. V., Baumfield, V., Elliott, J., Gregson, M., Higgins, S. E., Miller, J., & Newton, D. P. (2005). Frameworks for thinking: a handbook for teachers and learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
National Research Council (NRC). (1997). Science teaching reconsidered: a handbook. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Newton, D. P., & Newton, L. D. (2009). Some student teachers’ conceptions of creativity in school science. Res Sci Technol Educ, 27, 45–60.
Novak, A. (1964). Scientific inquiry. Bioscience, 14, 25–28.
NRC. (2000). How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
NRC. (2003). Improving undergraduate instruction in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: report of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
NRC. (2004). BIO2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
NRC. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
NRC. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Orr, H. A. (1999). An evolutionary dead end? Science, 285, 343–344.
Owens, D. C. (2017). Issues with tissues: a tale of gameful learning in an introductory undergraduate biology laboratory course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 47, 38–42.
Patterson, C. H. (1984). Empathy, warmth, and genuineness in psychotherapy: a review of reviews. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 21, 431–438.
Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: a scheme. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology. (E. Duckworth, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 223–231.
Project Kaleidoscope. (2006). Recommendations for urgent action in support of undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: Author.
Scheyvens, R., Griffin, A. L., Jocoy, C. L., Liu, Y., & Bradford, M. (2008). Experimenting with active learning in geography: dispelling the myths that perpetuate resistance. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32, 51–69.
Schilling, K. M., & Schilling, K. L. (1999). Increasing expectations for student effort. About Campus, 4, 4–10.
Schmidt, A. L. (2011). Creativity in science: tensions between perception and practice. Creative Education, 2(5), 435.
Schmidt, L. D., & Strong, S. R. (1970). “Expert” and “inexpert” counselors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 17, 115–118.
Seidel, S. B., & Tanner, K. D. (2013). “What if students revolt?”—considering student resistance: origins, options, and opportunities for investigation. CBE Life Sci Educ, 12, 586–595.
Seymour, E., & Hewett, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder: Westview Press.
Shekhar, P., Demonbrun, M., Borrego, M., Finelli, C., Prince, M., Henderson, C., & Waters, C. (2015). Development of an observation protocol to study undergraduate engineering student resistance to active learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31, 597–609.
Shodell, M. (1995). The question-driven classroom: student questions as course curriculum in biology. The American Biology Teacher, 57, 278–281.
Silverthorn, D. U., Thorn, P. M., & Svinicki, M. D. (2006). It's difficult to change the way we teach: lessons from the integrative themes in physiology curriculum module project. Advances in Physiology Education, 30, 204–214.
Slavin, R. E. (1987). Cooperative learning: student teams. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association.
Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., & Su, T. T. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 323, 122–124.
Sousa, D. A. (2006). How the brain learns (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Springer, L., Stanne, M., & Donovan, S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering and technology: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 21–52.
Turpen, C., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2009). Not all interactive engagement is the same: variations in physics professors’ implementation of peer instruction. Phys Rev PER, 5, 020101-1-18.
Turpen, C., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2010). The construction of different classroom norms during peer instruction: students perceive differences. Phys Rev PER, 6, 0201231–0201222.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Innovation and Improvement. (2016). STEM 2026: a vision for innovation in STEM education. Washington, DC: Author.
Vaughan, M. (2014). Flipping the learning: an investigation into the use of the flipped classroom model in an introductory teaching course. Educ Res Perspect (Online), 41, 25–41.
Vodopich, D. S., & Moore, R. (2014). Biology laboratory manual (10th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill Education.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: five key changes to practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Weiss, I. R., Pasley, J. D., Smith, P. S., Banilower, E. R., & Heck, D. J. (2003). Looking inside the classroom: a study of K–12 mathematics and science education in the United States. Chapel Hill: Horizon Research.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wieman, C. E. (2014). Large-scale comparison of science teaching methods sends clear message. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8319–8320.
Wright, R., & Boggs, J. (2002). Learning cell biology as a team: a project-based approach to upper-division cell biology. CBE Life Sci Educ, 1, 145–153.
About this article
Cite this article
Owens, D.C., Sadler, T.D., Barlow, A.T. et al. Student Motivation from and Resistance to Active Learning Rooted in Essential Science Practices. Res Sci Educ 50, 253–277 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9688-1
- Active learning
- Essential science practices