Abstract
Teachers are central to providing high-quality science learning experiences called for in recent reform efforts, as their understanding of science impacts both what they teach and how they teach it. Yet, most elementary teachers do not enter the profession with a particular interest in science or expertise in science teaching. Research also indicates elementary schools present unique barriers that may inhibit science teaching. This case study utilizes the framework of identity to explore how one elementary classroom teacher’s understandings of herself as a science specialist were shaped by the bilingual elementary school context as she planned for and provided reform-based science instruction. Utilizing Gee’s (2000) sociocultural framework, identity was defined as consisting of four interrelated dimensions that served as analytic frames for examining how this teacher understood her new role through social positioning within her school. Findings describe the ways in which this teacher’s identity as a science teacher was influenced by the school context. The case study reveals two important implications for teacher identity. First, collaboration for science teaching is essential for elementary teachers to change their practice. It can be challenging for teachers to form an identity as a science teacher in isolation. In addition, elementary teachers new to science teaching negotiate their emerging science practice with their prior experiences and the school context. For example, in the context of a bilingual school, this teacher adapted the reform-based science curriculum to better meet the unique linguistic needs of her students.

Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, C. D., & Penuel, W. R. (2015). Studying teachers’ sensemaking to investigate teachers’ responses to professional development focused on new standards. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(2), 136–149.
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2012). The Australian curriculum: Science (version 3.0). Sydney: Commonwealth of Australia.
Avraamidou, L. (2013). Prospective elementary teachers' science teaching orientations and experiences that impacted their development. International Journal of Science Education, 35(10), 1698–1724.
Avraamidou, L. (2014a). Tracing a beginning elementary teacher’s development of identity for science teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(3), 223–240.
Avraamidou, L. (2014b). Studying science teacher identity: Current insights and future research directions. Studies in Science Education, 50(2), 145–179.
Avraamidou, L., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2005). Giving priority to evidence in science teaching: a first-year elementary teacher's specialized practices and knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(9), 965–986.
Avraamidou, L., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2010). In search of well-started beginning science teachers: insights from two first-year elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(6), 661–686.
Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 National Survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill: Horizon Research.
Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: an overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189.
Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107–128.
Beyer, C. J., & Davis, E. A. (2008). Fostering second graders’ scientific explanations: a beginning elementary teacher’s knowledge, beliefs, and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(3), 381–414.
Biggers, M., & Forbes, C. T. (2012). Balancing teacher and student roles in elementary classrooms: Preservice elementary teachers’ learning about the inquiry continuum. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2205–2229.
Brobst, J., Markworth, K., Tasker, T., & Ohana, C. (2017). Comparing the preparedness, content knowledge, and instructional quality of elementary science specialists and self-contained teachers. The Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21406.
Bullough, R. V. (1997). Practicing theory and theorizing practice. In J. Loughran & T. Russell (Eds.), Purpose, passion and pedagogy in teacher education (pp. 13–31). London: Falmer Press.
Burch, P., & Spillane, J. P. (2005). How subjects matter in district office practice: Instructionally relevant policy in urban school district redesign. Journal of Educational Change, 6(1), 51–76.
Coburn, C. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: school leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476–509.
Coldron, J., & Smith, R. (1999). Active location in teachers' construction of their professional identities. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(6), 711–726.
Craig, C. J. (1998). The influence of context on one teacher’s interpretive knowledge of team teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(4), 371–383.
Davis, K. S. (2003). “Change is hard”: what science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices. Science Education, 87, 3–20.
Davis, E. A., & Smithey, J. (2009). Beginning teachers moving toward effective elementary science teaching. Science Education, 93(4), 745–770.
Forbes, C. T., & Davis, E. A. (2012). Operationalizing identity in action: a comparative study of direct versus probabilistic measures of curricular role identity for inquiry-based science teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 267–292.
Forbes, C. T., Biggers, M., & Zangori, L. (2013). Investigating essential characteristics of scientific practices in elementary science learning environments: the practices of science observation protocol (P-SOP). School Science and Mathematics, 113(4), 180–190.
Furman, M., Barton, A. C., & Muir, B. (2012). Learning to teach science in urban schools by becoming a researcher of one’s own beginning practice. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(1), 153–174.
Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 99-125.
Gerretson, H., Bosnick, J., & Schofield, K. (2008). A case for content specialists as the elementary classroom teacher. The Teacher Educator, 43, 302–314.
Goodson, I. F., & Cole, A. L. (1994). Exploring the teacher's professional knowledge: Constructing identity and community. Teacher Education Quarterly, 21(1), 85–105.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
Lawrence Hall of Science. (2005). Full option science system: Levers and pulleys. Nashua: Delta Education.
Lee, O. (2004). Teacher change in beliefs and practices in science and literacy instruction with English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(1), 65–93.
Lee, O. (2005). Science education with English language learners: synthesis and research agenda. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 491–530.
Lee, O., & Buxton, C. A. (2013). Teacher professional development to improve science and literacy achievement of English language learners. Theory Into Practice, 52(2), 110–117.
Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to next generation science standards and with implications for common core state standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223–233.
Levy, A. J., Pasquale, M. M., & Marco, L. (2008). Models of providing science instruction in the elementary grades: A research agenda to inform decision makers. Science Educator, 17(2), 1–18.
Levy, A.J., Jia, Y., Marco-Bujosa, L., Gess-Newsome, J., & Pasquale, M. (2016). Science specialists or classroom teachers: Who should teach elementary science? Science Educator, 24(2), 1–12.
Madden, L., & Wiebe, E. N. (2013). Curriculum as experienced by students: how teacher identity shapes science notebook use. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2567–2592.
Mangiante, E. S. (2017). Planning for reform-based science: Case studies of two urban elementary teachers. Research in Science Education, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9566-2.
Marco-Bujosa, L. M. & Levy, A. J. (2016). Caught in the balance: An organizational analysis of science teaching in schools with science specialists. Science Education, 100(6), 983–1008.
McDonald, S. (2005). Studying actions in context: a qualitative shadowing method for organizational research. Qualitative Research, 5(4), 455–473.
Moore, F. M. (2008). Agency, identity, and social justice education: preservice teachers’ thoughts on becoming agents of change in urban elementary science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 38(5), 589–610.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The condition of education 2012 (NCES 2012-045). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2015). Guide to Implementing the Next Generation Science Standards. Committee on Guidance on Implementing the Next Generation Science Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Achieve, Inc. on behalf of the twenty-six states and partners that collaborated on the NGSS. Available at: http://www.nextgenscience.org/.
Pedretti, E. G., Bencze, L., Hewitt, J., Romkey, L., & Jivraj, A. (2008). Promoting issues-based STSE perspectives in science teacher education: problems of identity and ideology. Science & Education, 17(8–9), 941–960.
Rivera Maulucci, M. S. (2010). Resisting the marginalization of science in an urban school: coactivating social, cultural, material, and strategic resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 840–860.
Science Teacher Education Advanced Methods. (2010). Report on argumentation and teacher education in Europe. Trondheim: S-TEAM/NTNU.
Settlage, J., Southerland, S., Smith, L., & Ceglie, R. (2009). Constructing a doubt-free teaching self: self efficacy, teacher identity, and science instruction within diverse settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 102–125.
Spillane, J. P., & Hopkins, M. (2013). Organizing for instruction in education systems and school organizations: how the subject matters. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(6), 721–747.
Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., Walker, L. J., Halverson, R., & Jita, L. (2001). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 918–940.
Suárez-Orozco, C., Suárez-Orozco, M., & Todorova, I. (2008). Learning a new land: immigrant students in American society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Trygstad, P. J., Smith, P. S., Banilower, E. R. & Nelson, M. M. (2013). The status of elementary science education: Are we ready for the Next Generation Science Standards? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Puerto Rico.
Upadhyay, B. (2009). Narratives, choices, alienation, and identity: learning from an elementary science teacher. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(3), 601–610.
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Zembal-Saul, C. (2009). Learning to teach elementary school science as argument. Science Education, 93(4), 687–719.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation, DRL Award # 0910290, Elementary Science Specialists and Classroom Generalists: Are There Differences in Science Instruction, Student Achievement, and Cost? Thank you to Ivey Choi for your contributions to this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marco-Bujosa, L., Levy, A.J. & McNeill, K. A Case Study Exploring the Identity of an In-Service Elementary Science Teacher: a Language Teacher First. Res Sci Educ 50, 79–98 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9681-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9681-8

