This is one of the first studies to examine the educational entrepreneur in K-12 public schools and the first to present an instrument designed to measure entrepreneurial thinking among teachers using a type of reasoning, effectual reasoning, which has been proposed in the business literature on entrepreneurs. This study situates entrepreneurial thinking within the K-12 education arena and examines the relationship between high school and middle school teachers’ use of effectual reasoning and their corresponding implementation of high, medium, or low levels of innovation in STEM areas within their classrooms, districts, or across districts. Our findings correlated higher use of effectual reasoning, a component of entrepreneurial thinking, with higher levels of implementation of innovations among teachers within an NSF grant, Entrepreneurial Leadership in STEM Teaching and learning, which centered on deeper content, reform-oriented pedagogies, and entrepreneurial thinking. We found that high innovators viewed uncertainty’ differently than low innovators by associating it with more positive cognitive structures and that innovators at different levels hold distinct notions of what constitutes high and low risk innovations. Contrary to the common notion that entrepreneurs are high-risk takers, results reveal that the types of innovations perceived by high innovators as low risk are viewed as high risk by low innovators. Furthermore, the results are consistent with the idea that entrepreneurs do certain types of things to lower/manage the risk of innovations before and, if necessary, during the implementation of an innovation. NSF: Award 0831820
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Martin, A. (2011, April). Entrepreneurial leadership in stem teaching & learning (EnLiST): the partnership’s conceptual framework and approach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the national association for research in science teaching, Orlando, FL.
Babb, E., & Babb, S. (1992). Psychological traits of rural entrepreneurs. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 21(4), 355–362.
Barkham, R. (1994). Entrepreneurial characteristics and the size of the new firm: a model and an econometric test. Small Business Economics, 6(2), 117–125.
Begley, T., & Boyd, D. (1987). A comparison of entrepreneurs and managers of small business firms. Journal of Management, 13, 99–108.
Bernardi, R. A. (1994). Validating research results when Cronbach’s alpha is below. 70: a methodological procedure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(3), 766–775.
Bresler, L. (2009). University faculty as intellectual entrepreneurs: vision, experimental learning, and animation. Visual Arts Research, 12–23.
Bird, B., & Jelinek, M. (1988). The operation of entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13(2), 21–29.
Brockhaus, R. (1980). Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 509–520.
Brockhaus, R., & Horwitz, P. (1986). The psychology of the entrepreneur. In D. L. Sexton & R. W. Smilar (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship (pp. 25–48). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Busenitz, L., & Barney, J. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 9–30.
Carland, J. C., & Carland, J. W. (1997). Entrepreneurship: an American dream. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 33–45.
Carland III, J. W., Carland, J. W., Carland, J. A., & Pearce, J. W. (1995). Risk-taking propensity among entrepreneurs, small business owners, and managers. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 7, 15–23.
Carland, J. W., Carland, J. C., Hoy, F., & Boulton, W. (1988). Distinctions between entrepreneurial and small business ventures. International Journal of Management, 5(1), 98–103.
Chen, C., Greene, P., & Crick, A. (1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers? Journal of Business Venturing, 13(4), 295–316.
Collins, C., Hanges, P., & Locke, E. (2004). The relationship of achievement motivation to entrepreneurial behavior: a meta-analysis. Human Performance, 17(1), 95–117.
Cunningham, J., & Lischeron, J. (1991). Defining entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 29, 45–61.
d’Amboise, G., & Muldowney, M. (1988). Management theory for small business: attempts and requirements. Academy of Management Review, 13(2), 226–240.
Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Forlani, D., & Mullins, J. (2000). Perceived risks and choices in entrepreneurs’ new venture decisions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(4), 305–322.
Gartner, W. (1988). “Who is an entrepreneur?” is the wrong question. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13(4), 11–32.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Balkin, D. B. (1989). Effectiveness of individual and aggregate compensation strategies. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 28(3), 431–445.
Gooding, R. (1989). Decision-making and the structuring of strategic problems. Paper presented at the Working Conference on Managerial Cognition, Washington, DC.
Hochberg, Y., & Benjamini, Y. (1990). More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. Statistics in Medicine, 9(7), 811–818.
Hess, F. (2006). Educational entrepreneurship: realities, challenges, possibilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press.
Hinkin, T. (1998). A brief tutorrial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104–121.
Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. (1993). Timid choices and bold forecasts: a cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Science, 39(1), 17–31.
Kaizer, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.
Kent, C. (1990). Entrepreneurship education: current developments, future directions. Greenwood Publishing Group
Kotey, B., & Meredith, G. G. (1997). Relationships among owner/manager personal values, business strategies, and enterprise performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(2), 37–64.
Krueger, N. (2007). What lies beneath? The experiential essence of entrepreneurial thinking. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(1), 123–138.
Levine, D. U., & Lezotte, L. W. (1995). Effective schools research. ERIC. (ED 330 032).
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology.
MacCrimmon, K. R., & Wehrung, D. A. (1990). Characteristics of risk taking executives. Management Science, 36(4), 422–435.
McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
McKenzie, B., Ugbah, S. D., & Smothers, N. (2007). “Who is an entrepreneur?” Is it still the wrong question? Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 13(1), 23–43.
Miner, J., Smith, N., & Bracker, J. (1989). Role of entrepreneurial task motivation in the growth of technologically innovative firms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 554–560.
Mitton, D. (1989). The Compleat entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13(3), 9–19.
Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1995). The big five personality dimensions: implications for theory and practice in human resource management. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 13, 153–200.
Onstenk, J. (2003). Entrpreneurship and vocational education. European Educational Research Journal, 2(1), 74–89.
Onstenk, J., & Blokhuis, F. (2007). Apprenticeship in the Netherlands: connecting school- and work-based learning. Education + Training, 49(6), 489–499.
Palich, L. E., & Bagby, D. R. (1995). Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(6), 425–438.
Perry, C. (1990). After further sitings of the Heffalump. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 5(2), 22–31.
Poon, J. M., Ainuddin, R. A., & Junit, S. O. H. (2006). Effects of self-concept traits and entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance. International Small Business Journal, 24(1), 61–82.
Rauch, A., & Frese, M. (2007). Born to be an entrepreneur? Revisiting the personality approach to entrepreneurship. In J. R. Baum, M. Frese, & R. A. Baron (Eds.), The psychology of entrepreneurship (pp. 41–65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Read, S., & Sarasvathy, S. (2005). Knowing what to do and doing what you know: effectuation as a form of entrepreneurial expertise. The Journal of Private Equity, 9(1), 45–62.
Sarasvathy, S. (2001). What makes entrepreneurs entrepreneurial. Harvard Business Review, 21, 2001.
Sarasvathy, S. (2008). Effectuation. Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
Sarasvathy, S., & Dew, N. (2008). Effectuation and over trust: debating Goel and Karri. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 727–737.
Sarasvathy, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2011). Entrepreneurship as method: open questions for an entrepreneurial future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 113–135.
Sexton, D. L., & Bowman, N. (1983). Determining entrepreneurial potential of students. In academy of management proceedings. Academy of Management, 1983(1), 408–412.
Shane, & Venkataraman (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
Shepherd, D. A., & Douglas, E. J. (1997). Is management education developing, or killing, the entrepreneurial spirit. In Proceedings of the 1997 USASBE Annual National Conference Entrepreneurship: The Engine of Global Economic Development, San Francisco, California.
Simon, M., Houghton, S., & Aquino, K. (2000). Cognitive biases, risk perception, and venture formation: how individuals decide to start companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2), 113–134.
Sitkin, S. B., & Weingart, L. R. (1995). Determinants of risky decision-making behavior: a test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and risk propensity. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1573–1592.
Stewart, W. H., & Roth, P. L. (2001). Risk propensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 145–153.
Stewart, W. H., & Roth, P. L. (2004). Data quality affects meta-analytic conclusions: a response to miner and Raju (2004) concerning entrepreneurial risk propensity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 14–21.
Stewart, W. H., & Roth, P. L. (2007). A meta-analysis of achievement motivation differences between entrepreneurs and managers. Journal of Small Business Management, 45, 401–421.
Teske, P., & Williamson, A. (2006). Entrepreneurs at work. In F. Hess (Ed.), Educational entrepreneurship: realities, challenges, possibilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
van Dam, K., Schipper, M., & Runhaar, P. (2010). Developing a competency-based framework for teachers’ entrepreneurial behaviour. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 965–971.
Van de Ven, H. (1993). The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(3), 211–230.
Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: a meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 259–227.
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Award Number 0831820.
Research was conducted at the University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign
About this article
Cite this article
Martin, A.M., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Mustari, E. et al. Effectual Reasoning and Innovation among Entrepreneurial Science Teacher Leaders: a Correlational Study. Res Sci Educ 48, 1297–1319 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9603-1
- Reform efforts
- Implementing innovations
- Educational entrepreneurs
- Reasoning, risk