High-School Students’ Epistemic Knowledge of Science and Its Relation to Learner Factors in Science Learning

  • Fang-Ying Yang
  • Shiang-Yao Liu
  • Chung-Yuan Hsu
  • Guo-Li Chiou
  • Hsin-Kai Wu
  • Ying-Tien Wu
  • Sufen Chen
  • Jyh-Chong Liang
  • Meng-Jung Tsai
  • Silvia W.-Y. Lee
  • Min-Hsien Lee
  • Che-Li Lin
  • Regina Juchun Chu
  • Chin-Chung Tsai
Article
  • 244 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an online contextualized test for assessing students’ understanding of epistemic knowledge of science. In addition, how students’ understanding of epistemic knowledge of science interacts with learner factors, including time spent on science learning, interest, self-efficacy, and gender, was also explored. The participants were 489 senior high school students (244 males and 245 females) from eight different schools in Taiwan. Based on the result of an extensive literature review, we first identified six factors of epistemic knowledge of science, such as status of scientific knowledge, the nature of scientific enterprise, measurement in science, and so on. An online test was then created for assessing students’ understanding of the epistemic knowledge of science. Also, a learner-factor survey was developed by adopting previous PISA survey items to measure the abovementioned learner factors. The results of this study show that; (1) by factor analysis, the six factors of epistemic knowledge of science could be grouped into two dimensions which reflect the nature of scientific knowledge and knowing in science, respectively; (2) there was a gender difference in the participants’ understanding of the epistemic knowledge of science; and (3) students’ interest in science learning and the time spent on science learning were positively correlated to their understanding of the epistemic knowledge of science.

Keywords

Epistemic knowledge of science Online contextualized test 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, under grant contract numbers 103-2511-S-011-003-MY3 and 103-2511-S-011-009-MY3.

References

  1. Allie, S., Buffler, A., Campbell, B., & Lubben, F. (2003). Teaching measurement in the introductory physics laboratory. The Physics Teacher, 41, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: goals, structures and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aneill, C. (2011). Scientific literacy: what is it, are we teaching it, and does it matter? American Entomologist, 57, 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Antony, L. (1993). Quine as feminist: the radical import of naturalized epistemology. In L. Antony & C. Witt (Eds.), A mind of one’s own: feminist essays on reason and objectivity (pp. 185–226). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  6. Aries, E. (1987). Gender and communication. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology vol. 7 sex and gender (pp. 149–176). CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: gender related patterns in students’ intellectual development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., & Tarule, J. (1997). Women’s ways of knowing: the development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Book.Google Scholar
  9. Bendixen, L. D., & Rule, D. C. (2004). An integrative approach to personal epistemology: a guiding model. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bird, A. (2010). The epistemology of science— a bird’s-eye view. Synthese, 175, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education. Science Education, 92, 437–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buffler, A., Lubben, F., & Ibrahim, B. (2009). The relationship between students’ views of the nature of science and their views of the nature of scientific measurement. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1137–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bybee, R. (2010). The teaching of science: 21st century perspectives. Arlington: NSTA Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bybee, R., McCrae, B., & Laurie, R. (2009). PISA 2006: an assessment of scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 865–883. doi: 10.1002/tea.20333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cano, F. (2005). Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: there change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 203–221. doi: 10.1348/000709904X22683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chamberlain, K., & Crane, C. C. (2009). Reading, writing and inquiry in science classroom. UK: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  17. Chen, J. A., & Pajares, F. (2012). Implicit theories of ability of grade 6 science students: relation to epistemological beliefs and academic motivation and achievement in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 75–87. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change in and across ontological categories: examples from learning and discovery in science. In Cognitive models of science (pp. 129–160). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  19. Chiou, G.-L., Lee, M.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). High school students’ approaches to learning physics with relationship to epistemic views on physics and conceptions of learning physics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/02635143.2013.794134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DeBoer, G. E., Quellmalz, E. S., Davenport, J. L., Timms, M. J., Herrmann-Abell, C. F., Buckley, B. C., Jordan, K. A., Huang, C. W., & Flanagan, J. C. (2014). Comparing three online testing modalities: using static, active, and interactive online testing modalities to assess middle school students’ understanding of fundamental ideas and use of inquiry skills related to ecosystems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 523–554. doi: 10.1002/tea.21145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duran, J. (1991). Toward a feminist epistemology. Savage: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  23. Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291. doi: 10.3102/0091732X07309371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1159–1176. doi: 10.1002/tea.20442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greene, B. A., Miller, R. A., Growson, M., Duke, L. D., & Akey, A. L. (2004). Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement: contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 246–282. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Griffin, T., & Ohlsson, S. (2001). Beliefs versus knowledge: a necessary distinction for explaining, predicting, and assessing conceptual change. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-third annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 364–369). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Hodson, D. (1986). Philosophy of science and the science curriculum. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 20, 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hofer, B., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140. doi: 10.3102/00346543067001088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hogan, K., & Maglienti, M. (2001). Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students’ and scientists’ reasoning about conclusions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 663–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1347–1362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Keller, E. F. (1992). Secrets of life, secrets of death: essays on language, gender, and science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Kelly, G. J., McDonald, S., & Wickman, P. O. (2011). Science learning and epistemology. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobble (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 281–294). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  35. Kitchener, K. S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition: a three-level model of cognitive processing. Human Development, 26, 222–232. doi: 10.1159/000272885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kizilgunes, B., Teddaya, C., & Sungur, S. (2009). Modeling the relations among students’ epistemological beliefs, motivation, learning approach, and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 102, 243–256. doi: 10.3200/JOER.102.4.243-256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuo, C. Y., & Wu, H.-K. (2013). Toward an integrated model for designing assessment systems: an analysis of the current status of computer-based assessments in science. Computers & Education, 68, 388–403. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lavonen, J., & Laaksonen, S. (2009). Context of teaching and learning school science in Finland: reflections on PISA 2006 results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 922–944. doi: 10.1002/tea.20339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660290404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Relational analysis of college science-major students’ epistemological beliefs toward science and conceptions of learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 2273–2289. doi: 10.1080/09500690903397796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Liang, J.-C., Lee, M.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). The relations between scientific epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning science among science-major undergraduates in Taiwan. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(1), 43–59.Google Scholar
  42. Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Zurlo, G. (2006). Epistemological understanding in different judgment domains: relationships with gender, grade level, and curriculum. International Journal of Educational Research, 46, 43–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2006.08.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Matthews, M. R. (Ed.). (2009). Science, worldviews and education. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  44. Meichtry, Y. J. (1993). The impact of science curricula on student views about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 429–443. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660300503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Millar, M. G., & Tesser, A. (1989). The effects of affective–cognitive consistency and thought on the attitude–behavior relation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 189–202. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(89)90012-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Muis, K. R., & Gierus, B. (2014). Beliefs and knowledge, knowing, and learning: differences across knowledge types in physics. The Journal of Experimental Education, 82, 408–430. doi: 10.1080/00220973.2013.813371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (Eds.). (2015). TIMSS 2015 assessment framework. Chestnut Hill: Boston College. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/downloads/T15_Frameworks_Full_Book.pdf.Google Scholar
  48. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Ruddock, G. J., O’Sullivan, C. Y., Arora, A., & Erberber, E. (2007). TIMSS 2007 assessment frameworks. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.Google Scholar
  49. National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: a guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  50. Naugah, J., & Watts, M. (2013). Girls and science education in Mauritius: a study of science class practices and their effects on girls. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31, 252–268. doi: 10.1080/02635143.2013.833901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nussbaum, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Poliquin, A. (2008). Role of epistemic beliefs and scientific argumentation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1977–1999. doi: 10.1080/09500690701545919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. OECD. (2009). Highlights from education at a glance 2009. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/43619343.pdf.Google Scholar
  53. OECD. (2013). Draft PISA 2015 science framework. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2015draftframeworks.htm.Google Scholar
  54. Osborne, J., Duschl, R., & Fairbrother, R. (2002). Breaking the mould? Teaching science for public understanding. London: The Nuffield Fundation. http://www.kcl.ac.uk.Google Scholar
  55. Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Paulsen, M. B., & Feldman, K. A. (1999). Student motivation and epistemological beliefs. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1999, 17–25. doi: 10.1002/tl.7802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: a scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  58. Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Future challenges and directions for theory and research on personal epistemology. In P. R. Pintrich & B. Hofer (Eds.), Personal epistemology: the psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 389–414). NJ: Lawrence Eribaum Associates.Google Scholar
  59. Pluta, W. J., Chinn, C. A., & Duncan, R. G. (2011). Learners’ epistemic criteria for good scientific models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 486–511. doi: 10.1002/tea.20415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Popov, V., Noroozi, O., Barrett, J. B., Biemans, H. J. A., Teasley, S. D., Slof, B., & Mulder, M. (2014). Perceptions and experiences of, and outcomes for, university students in culturally diversified dyads in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 186–200. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.12008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Raved, L., & Assarf, O. B. Z. (2011). Attitudes towards science learning among 10th-grade students: a qualitative look. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1219–1243. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.508503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Routitsky, A., & Turner, R. (2003). Item format types and their influences on cross-national comparisons of student performance. Chicago: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  63. Rutheford, J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Ryder, J. (2002). School science education for citizenship: strategies for teaching about epistemology of science. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34, 637–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sandoval, W. A. (2003). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students’ scientific explanations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 5–51. doi: 10.1207/S15327809JLS1201_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schommer-Aikins, M., & Hutter, R. (2002). Epistemological beliefs and thinking about everyday controversial issues. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 136(1), 5–20. doi: 10.1080/00223980209604134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Whitmire, E. (2004). The relationship between undergraduates’ epistemological beliefs, reflective judgment, and their information-seeking behavior. Information Processing and Management, 40, 97–111. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4573(02)00099-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: a developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6(1), 49–78. doi: 10.1007/BF02209024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wirth, J., & Klieme, E. (2003). Computer-based assessment of problem solving competence. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10(3), 329–345. doi: 10.1080/0969594032000148172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wong, S. L., & Hodson, D. (2009). From the horse’s mouth: what scientists say about scientific investigation and scientific knowledge. Science Education, 93(1), 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wu, H.-C., Chang, C.-Y., Chen, C.-L., Yeh, T.-K., & Liu, C.-C. (2010). Comparison of earth science achievement between animation-based and graphic-based testing designs. Research in Science Education, 40, 639–673. doi: 10.1007/s11165-009-9138-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wylie, A. (2003). Why standpoint matter? In R. Figueroa & S. Harding (Eds.), Science and other cultures—issues in philosophies of science and technology. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Yang, F. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Reasoning on the science-related uncertain issues and epistemological perspectives among children. Instructional Science, 4, 325–3254. doi: 10.1007/s11251-008-9084-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yang, F. Y., Tseng, J. S., & Lin, M. H. (2012). The interaction between junior-high students’ academic and social motivations and the influences of the motivational factors on science performance. The Asia-Pacific Educational Researcher, 21, 92–106.Google Scholar
  75. Yang, F.-Y., Huang, R.-T., & Tsai, I. J. (2014). The effects of epistemic beliefs in science and gender difference on university students’ science-text reading: an eye-tracking study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 473–498. doi: 10.1007/s10763-014-9578-1.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fang-Ying Yang
    • 1
  • Shiang-Yao Liu
    • 1
  • Chung-Yuan Hsu
    • 2
  • Guo-Li Chiou
    • 3
  • Hsin-Kai Wu
    • 1
  • Ying-Tien Wu
    • 4
  • Sufen Chen
    • 3
  • Jyh-Chong Liang
    • 3
  • Meng-Jung Tsai
    • 3
  • Silvia W.-Y. Lee
    • 5
  • Min-Hsien Lee
    • 6
  • Che-Li Lin
    • 7
  • Regina Juchun Chu
    • 8
  • Chin-Chung Tsai
    • 3
  1. 1.Graduate Institute of Science EducationNational Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Child CareNational Pingtung University of Science and TechnologyPingtungTaiwan
  3. 3.Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and EducationNational Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan
  4. 4.Graduate Institute of Network Learning TechnologyNational Central UniversityTaoyuanTaiwan
  5. 5.Graduate Institute of Science EducationNational Changhua University of EducationChanghuaTaiwan
  6. 6.Center for Teacher EducationNational Sun Yat-sen UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan
  7. 7.Research Center for Curriculum and InstructionNational Academy for Educational ResearchTaipeiTaiwan
  8. 8.Center for Teacher EducationNational Tsing Hua UniversityHsinchuTaiwan

Personalised recommendations