Developing Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Teaching a New Topic: More Than Teaching Experience and Subject Matter Knowledge
- 1.5k Downloads
Teaching experience has been identified as an important factor in pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) development. However, little is known about how experienced teachers may draw on their previous experience to facilitate their PCK development. This study examined how two experienced high school biology teachers approached the teaching of a newly introduced topic in the curriculum, polymerase chain reaction and their PCK development from the pre-lesson planning phase through the interactive phase to the post-lesson reflection phase. Multiple data sources included classroom observations, field notes, semi-structured interviews and classroom artefacts. It was found that the teachers’ previous experience informed their planning for teaching the new topic, but in qualitatively different ways. This, in turn, had a bearing on their new PCK development. Subject matter knowledge (SMK) can not only facilitate but may also hinder this development. Our findings identify two types of experienced teachers: those who can capitalise on their previous teaching experiences and SMK to develop new PCK and those who do not. The critical difference is whether in the lesson planning stage, the teacher shows the disposition to draw on a generalised mental framework that enables the teacher to capitalise on his existing SMK to develop new PCK. Helping teachers to acquire this disposition should be a focus for teacher training in light of continuous curriculum changes.
KeywordsPedagogical content knowledge (PCK) Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Curriculum change Teaching new topics Experienced teachers
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Sources of Funding
The first author was supported by the Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme during his dissertation study. The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those by the funding body of the Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme.
Conflict of Interest
There is no potential conflict of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
The research involved human participants. Signed informed consents were collected from the participants before the data collection began. The informed consents detailed the rights of the participants.
- Aydin, S., Demirdogen, B., Tarkin, A., Kutucu, S., Ekiz, B., Akin, F. N., ... & Uzuntiryaki, E. (2013). Providing a set of research-based practices to support preservice teachers’ long-term professional development as learners of science teaching. Science Education, 97(6), 903–935.Google Scholar
- Chan, K. K. H. (2014). Experienced teachers’ development of pedagogical content knowledge for teaching a new topic. (PhD), The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
- Erickson, F. (1985). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). New York: MacMillan Press.Google Scholar
- Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: results of the thinking from the PCK summit. In A. Berry, P. J. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hashweh, M. Z. (2013). Chapter 6 pedagogical content knowledge: twenty-five years later. In C. J. Craig, P. C. Meijer, & J. Broeckmans (Eds.), From teacher thinking to teachers and teaching: the evolution of a research community (pp. 115–140). Bingley, England: Emerald Group Pub. Ltd.Google Scholar
- Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: maximizing impact on learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: the construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
- McNicholl, J., Childs, A., & Burn, K. (2013). School subject departments as sites for science teachers learning pedagogical content knowledge. Teacher Development, 1–20.Google Scholar
- Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Nilsson, P. (2012). What do we know and where do we go? Formative assessment in developing student teachers’ professional learning of teaching science. Teachers and Teaching, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2013.741838.
- Rollnick, M. (2014). Using self-study to learn new topics in chemistry—a case study of three practising teachers. In H. Venkat, M. Rollnick, J. Loughran, & M. Askew (Eds.), Exploring mathematics and science teachers’ knowledge: windows into teacher thinking. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rollnick, M., & Mavhunga, E. (2016). Can the principles of topic-specific PCK be applied across science topics? Teaching PCK in a pre-service programme. In N. Papadouris, A. Hadjigeorgiou, C. Constantinou (Eds.), Insights from research in science teaching and learning (pp. 59–72). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- van Driel, J. H., Berry, A., & Meirink, J. A. (2014). Research on science teacher knowledge. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 848–870). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Veal, W. R., & Kubasko, D. S. J. (2003). Biology and geology teachers. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision., 18, 344–352.Google Scholar