Abstract
Agency is a construct facilitating our examination of when and how young people extend their own learning across contexts. However, little is known about the role played by adolescent learners’ sense of agency. This paper reports two cases of students’ agentively employing and developing science literacy practices—one in Singapore and the other in the USA. The paper illustrates how these two adolescent learners in different ways creatively accessed, navigated and integrated in-school and out-of-school discourses to support and nurture their learning of physics. Data were gleaned from students’ work and interviews with students participating in a physics curricular programme in which they made linkages between their chosen out-of-school texts and several physics concepts learnt in school. The students’ agentive moves were identified by means of situational mapping, which involved a relational analysis of the students’ chosen artefacts and discourses across time and space. This relational analysis enabled us to address questions of student agency—how it can be effected, realised, construed and examined. It highlights possible ways to intervene in these networked relations to facilitate adolescents’ agentive moves in their learning endeavours.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.
Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourse and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 50–73.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis: grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Midgley, C., Reuman, D., MacIver, D., & Feldlaufer, H. (1993). Negative effects of traditional middle schools on students’ motivation. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 553–574.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity.
Fang, Z. (2005). Scientific literacy: a systemic functional linguistics perspective. Science Education, 89(2), 335–347.
Gallagher, J. D. (2007). “You have to be bad or dumb to get in here”: reconsidering the in-school and out-of-school literacy practices of at-risk adolescents. In V. Purcell-Gates (Ed.), Cultural practices of literacy: case studies of language, literacy, social practice, and power (pp. 155–168). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Greenleaf, C. L., Schoenbach, R., Cziko, C., & Mueller, F. L. (2001). Apprenticing adolescent readers to academic literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 71(1), 79–129.
Guthrie, J. T. & Davis, M. H. (2003). Motivating struggling readers in middle school through an engagement model of classroom practice. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 59–85.
Heron, A. H. (2003). A study of agency: multiple constructions of choice and decision-making in an inquiry-based summer school program for struggling school readers. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 46(7), 568–579.
Hinchman, K. A., Alvermann, D. E., Boyd, F. B., Brozo, W. G., & Vacca, R. T. (2004). Supporting older students’ in- and out-of-school literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 47, 304–310.
Ivey, G. (1999). Reflections on teaching struggling middle school readers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42, 372–381.
Kuhn, D. (1995). Microgenetic study of change: what has it told us? Psychological Science, 6, 133–139.
Leander, K. M., & Lovvorn, J. F. (2006). Literacy networks: following the circulation of texts, bodies, and objects in the schooling and online gaming of one youth. Cognition and Instruction, 24(3), 291–340.
Luke, A. (2003). Literacy and the other: a sociological approach to literacy research and policy in multilingual societies. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 132–141.
Mazak, C. (2007). Appropriation and resistance in the (English) literacy practices of Puerto Rican farmers. In V. Purcell-Gates (Ed.), Cultural practices of literacy: case studies of language, literacy, social practice, and power (pp. 25–40). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mitchell, C., & Reid-Walsh, J. (2003). Researching children’s popular culture: the cultural spaces of childhood. London: Routledge.
Moje, E. B. (2000). To be part of the story: the literacy practices of gangsta adolescents. Teachers College Record, 102, 652–690.
Moje, E. B., & Lewis, C. (2007). Examining opportunities to learn literacy: The role of critical sociocultural literacy research. In E. B. Moje, C. Lewis, & P. Enciso (Eds.), Reframing sociocultural research on literacy; identity, agency, and power (pp. 15–48). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Moore, D. W., & Cunningham, J. W. (2006). Adolescent agency and literacy. In D. E. Alvermann, K. A. Hinchman, D. W. Moore, S. F. Phelps, & D. R. Waff (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents’ lives (2nd ed., pp. 129–146). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Nespor, J. (1997). Tangled up in school: politics, space, bodies, and signs in the educational process. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92.
O’Neil, C. (2007). School and home: contexts for conflict and agency. In V. Purcell-Gates (Ed.), Cultural practices of literacy: case studies of language, literacy, social practice, and power (pp. 169–178). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Perry, K. (2007). Sharing stories, linking lives: literacy practices among Sudanese Refugees. In V. Purcell-Gates (Ed.), Cultural practices of literacy: case studies of language, literacy, social practice, and power (pp. 169–178). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Purcell-Gates, V. (2007). Comprehending complexity. In V. Purcell-Gates (Ed.), Cultural practices of literacy: case studies of language, literacy, social practice, and power (pp. 197–216). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Siegler, R., & Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method: a direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist, 46, 606–620.
Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 134–164). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387.
Strauss, A. L. (1993). Continual permutations of action. NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Sullivan, A. M. (1991). The natural reading life: a high school anomaly. English Journal, 80(6), 40–46.
Tang, K. S. (2011). Hybridizing cultural understandings of the natural world to foster critical science literacy (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/86486.
Tang, K. S. (2013a). Instantiation of multimodal semiotic systems in science classroom discourse. Language Sciences, 37, 22–35.
Tang, K. S. (2013b). Out-of-school media representations of science and technology and their relevance for engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(1), 51–76.
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., & Rodriguez, D. (1998). The development of children’s motivation in school contexts. Review of Research in Education, 23, 73–118.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: design and methods (5th ed.). Washington D.C.: Sage.
Acknowledgments
This paper refers to data from the research project ‘Harnessing Popular Media for Science Learning and Critical Literacy’ (OER 5/12 TKS), funded by the Education Research Funding Programme, National Institute of Education (NIE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. The views expressed in this paper are the authors’ and do not necessarily represent the views of NIE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rappa, N.A., Tang, KS. Student Agency: an Analysis of Students’ Networked Relations Across the Informal and Formal Learning Domains. Res Sci Educ 47, 673–684 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9523-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9523-0