Abstract
This study examined the extent to which the instructional practices of science teachers in Barbados are congruent with best practices for teaching for scientific literacy. Additionally, through observation of practice, it sought to determine the teachers’ demonstrated role in the classroom, their demonstration of learning through discourse, learning goals and the nature of classroom activities. Five hundred nineteen students from 12 of the 23 secondary schools on the island and 15 teachers across 8 schools participated in the study. Data were collected by means of a questionnaire, an observational schedule and field notes. It was found that while problem-solving and questioning were mainly used in the classroom, the use of experiments was among the least popular teaching strategies. Additionally, results showed that teachers’ display of the knowledge of the characteristics of scientific literacy was unsatisfactory. Generally, the findings indicate a gap between teaching for scientific literacy as expressed in the literature and current instructional practices in secondary science classrooms in Barbados.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057–95.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R., & Lederman, N. G. (1998a). The nature of science and instructional practice: making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417–436.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R., & Lederman, N. (1998b). The nature of science and instructional practice: making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417–436.
Archer-Bradshaw, R. (2014). Demystifying scientific literacy: charting the path for the 21st century. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(3), 165–172.
Bartholomew, H., Osborne, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2004). Teaching students ‘ideas-about-science’: five dimensions of effective practice. Science Education, 88(6), 655–682.
Bell, R. L. (2009). Teaching the nature of science: three critical questions. (best practices in science education monograph). Carmel: National Geographic School Publishing.
DeBoer, G. (2000). Scientific literacy: another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationships to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.
Dillon, J. (2009). On scientific literacy and curriculum reform. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 201–213.
Duncan, D. (2012). Improving student attitudes about learning science and student sceintific reasoning skills. Astronomy Education Review, 11.
European Commission. (2002). European report on quality indicators of lifelong learning. Brussels: European Commission.
Fensham, P. (2007). Competencies from within and without: new challenges and possibilities for scientific literacy. promoting scientific literacy: science education research in transaction (pp. 113–119). Sweden: Linnaeus.
Goolam, F. (2001). The scientific and technological literacy of 1st year physics students: The effects of a traditional school curriculum. (Doctoral Dissertation). (U. o. Pretoria, Ed.) Pretoria.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 275–288.
Hurd, P. (1971). New directions on teaching secondary school science. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Hurd, P. (1997). Scientific literacy: new minds for a changing world. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Impey, C., Buxner, S., Atonellis, J., Johnson, E., & King, C. (2011). A twenty year survey of science literacy among college graduates. Journal of Science Education Teaching, 40(4), 31–37.
Khishfe, R. (2012). Nature of science and decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 67–100.
King, W. (1993). Aims and practices in science education: A Barbadian case study. Bridgetown.
Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: a conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71–94.
Laugksch, R. (2001). The differential role of physical science and biology in achieving scientific literacy amongst selected matriculants: a possible explanation. South African Journal of Education, 21(3), 157.
Laugksch, R., & Spargo, P. (1996). Development of a pool of scientific literacy test-items based on AAAS literacy goals. Science Education, 80(2), 121–143.
Layton, D. (1986). Innovators’ dilemmas: Recontextualising science and technology education. In D. Layton, Innovations in science and technology education (pp. 16–17). UNESCO.
Leacock, C., Thompson, B., Burnett, A., & Obidah, J. (2007). The academic achievement of Barbados public primary and secondary schools 1999–2005. Cave Hill: The University of the West Indies Education Evaluation Centre.
Lederman, L. (2008). Science education and the future of mankind. Science News, 36.
Lubben, F., Kasanda, K., Campbell, B., Kapenda, H., Gaoseb, N., & Kandjeo-Marenga, U. (2003). Teachers’ use of textbooks: practice in Namibian science classrooms. Educational Studies, 29(2–3), 109–125.
Magnusson, S., & Palinscar, A. (2005). Teaching to promote the development if scientific knowledge and reasoning about light at the elementary school level. In S. M. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: science in the classroom (pp. 465–474). Washington: National Academy Press.
Mahatoo, J. (2011). Scientific literacy and nature of science as it impacts on students’ achievement in South Trinidad. Trinidad. Retrieved from http://uwispace.sta.uwi.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2139/12709/Judy%20Mahatoo.pdf?sequence=1.
Martin, L. (2010). Relationship between teacher preparedness and inquiry-based instructional practices to students’ science achievement: Evidence from TIMSS 2007. (Doctoral Dissertation). Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, U.S.A. Retrieved from Proquest Dissertation and Theses: http://dspace.iup.edu/bitstream/handle/2069/280/Lynn%20Martin.pdf?sequence=1.
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: science education for the future: a report with ten recommendations. London: Kings College.
Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, 112(2), 28–47.
Miller, J. (2009). A thin broth. American Scientist, 97(6), 509–510.
Ministry of Education, Youth Affairs and Culture. (2000). Rationale and guidelines for curriculum reform in Barbados. Bridgetown: Ministry of Education, Youth Affairs and Culture.
Murcia, K. (2007). Science for the 21st century: teaching for scientific literacy in the primary classroom. Teaching Science, 53 (2).
Niedermeyer, W. (2008). Scientific literacy without a text. Education Week, 28(3), 24–25.
Niles, M. (2005). The implementation of an integrated science curriculum: a study of a Barbadian school. (Master’s Thesis). Bridgetown, Barbados: University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus.
Odom, A., Stoddard, E., & LaNasa, S. (2007). Teacher practices and middle-school science achievements. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1329–1346.
OECD. (2007). PISA 2006: science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Paris: Author.
Osborne, J. (2007). Science education for the twenty-first century. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 173–184.
Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe. London: Nuffield Foundation.
Osborne, J., Duschl, R., & Fairbrother, R. (2002). Breaking the mould: Teaching science for public understanding. Retrieved from http://www.kcl.ac.uk/content/1/c6/01/32/03/breaking.pdf.
Palinscar, A., Anderson, C., & David, Y. (1993). Pursuing scientific literacy in the middle grades through collaborative problem-solving. Elementary School Journal, 93(5), 643–658.
Parker, L., Krockover, G., Lasher-Trapp, S., & Eichenger, D. (2008). Ideas about the nature of science held by undergraduate atmospheric science students. American Meteorological Society, 1681–1688.
Pella, M. (1975). Scientific literacy as a framework for science. Annual meeting of NARST. California: NARST.
Shamos, M. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
Trefil, J., & O’Brien-Trefil, W. (2009). The science students need to know. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 28–33.
Wenning, C. (2006). A framework for teaching the nature of science. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 3(3), 3–10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Archer-Bradshaw, R.E. Teaching for Scientific Literacy? An Examination of Instructional Practices in Secondary Schools in Barbados. Res Sci Educ 47, 67–93 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9490-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9490-x