In the 1990s, the field of geoethics started its development, associated with a set of ethical principles that regulate the profession of geologists in their relationship with society and with nature. Given the importance of this field, but also its youth, 36 higher education students attending a Master’s of Geology course were surveyed (20 were from an educational branch and 16 were from a scientific branch). The questionnaire applied to them aimed to achieve the following goals: (a) to identify the knowledge of the respondents about this new field and to verify their position about the inclusion of geoethics in the curriculum, (b) to understand how they consider the importance of geological knowledge in political decisions and (c) to investigate possible differences in the thinking of the respondents, given the specificities of their educational branches. The study concluded that the field of geoethics is unknown to the majority of the respondents. However, the recognition of its importance was also verified, after getting familiar with the definition of the concept, as well as the need for its inclusion in formal education. The respondents also considered relevant the creation of a deontological code that could provide geologists with ethical guidance. They also considered that geology should influence political decisions, but they did not consistently recognise the limits of its influence, which seems to reveal the need of a deeper understanding of the specific nature of geological knowledge when compared with other sciences. Almost all the results were similar in both groups, but the students from the educational branch offered more elaborate answers about the issues present in the questionnaire.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Portugal has 12 years of non-superior schooling. The basic education is the first 9 years divided in three cycles, respectively, of 4, 2 and 3 years. Secondary education is the 3 years after basic education.
Almeida, A., & Amador, F. (2006). A Geologia e a Promoção de uma perspetiva Antropocêntrica da Natureza: Uma Associação Inevitável? In J. Medina, B. Aguado, J. Praia, & L. Marques (Eds.), Simpósio Ibérico do ensino da geologia. Livro de atas (pp. 449–454). Aveiro: Universidade de Aveiro.
Bacon, F. (2007). New Atlantis. Melbourne: Book Jungle.
Brilha, J. (2005). Património geológico e geoconservação. A conservação da natureza na sua vertente geológica. Braga: Palimage Editores.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
Coutinho, C. P. (2013). Metodologia de investigação em ciências sociais e humanas. teoria e prática. Coimbra: Almedina.
Franklin, A. (2008). Animals & modern cultures. London: Sage Publications Inc.
Frodeman, R. (2000). Preface. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), Earth matters. The earth sciences, philosophy, and claims of community (pp. vii–xiii). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Frodeman, R. (2003). Geo-logic. Breaking ground between philosophy and the earth sciences. New York: State University of New York Press.
Frodeman, R. (2004). Philosophy in the field. In B. V. Foltz & R. Frodeman (Eds.), Rethinking nature. essays in environmental philosophy (pp. 149–164). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Frodeman, R. (2010). O raciocínio geológico: a geologia como ciência interpretativa e histórica. TERRÆ DIDATICA, 6 (2), 85-99.
Fullick, L., & Ratcliffe, M. (1996). Teaching ethical aspects of science. Totton: Bassett Press.
Galopim de Carvalho, A. M. (1994). Dinossáurios e a Batalha de Carenque. Lisboa: Editorial Notícias.
Gray, M. (2004). Geodiversity. Valuing and conserving abiotic nature. Chichester: Wiley.
International Association of Promoting Geoethics (n. d.). http://www.iapg.geoethics.org/home/what. Accessed 5 May 2014.
Leopold, A. (1989). A Sand County Almanac. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lucchesi, S., & Giardino, M. (2012). The role of geoscientists in human progress. Annals of Geophysics, 55(3), 355–359.
Martinez-Frías, J. (2008). Geoethics: proposal of a geosciences-oriented formal definition and future planetary perspectives. TIERRA: Spanish Thematic Network of Earth and Planetary Sciences. http://tierra.rediris.es/documentos/Geoethics_Tierra_Network_2008.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2014.
Martínez-Frías, J., González, J. L., & Pérez, F. R. (2011). Geoethics and deontology: from fundamentals to applications in planetary protection. Episodes, 34(4), 257–262.
Matteucci, R., Gosso, G., Peppoloni, S., Piacente, S., & Wasowski, J. (2012). A Hippocratic oath for geologists? Annals of Geophysics, 55(3), 365–369.
Miller, G. T. (2012). Living in the environment (17ªth ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Oelschlaeger, M. (2000). Natural aliens reconsidered: causes, consequences, and cures. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), Earth matters. The Earth sciences, philosophy, and claims of community (pp. 107–118). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Patrão Neves, M. (2002). A bioética e a sua exigência de fundamentação. In J. R. Silva, A. Barbosa, & F. M. Vale (Eds.), (Coord.). Contributos para a Bioética em Portugal (pp. 137–159). Lisboa: Edições Cosmos.
Pemberton, M. (2001). Conserving geodiversity, the importance of valuing our geological heritage. Paper presented to the Geological Society of Australia National Conference, 2001.
Pemberton, M. (2007). A brief consideration of geodiversity and geoconservation. Environment, Conference Series No. 19, New Zealand Geographical Society. http://www.proceedings.com.au/quarrying2007/papers/paper_pemberton.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2014.
Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship. Teaching socio-scientific issues. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Rolston, H., III. (1994). Conserving natural value. New York: Columbia University Press.
Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as Qualitative Research. A Guide for Researchers in Education and Social Sciences (2nd ed.). New York, London: Teachers College Press.
Sarewitz, D. (2000). Science and environmental policy: an excess of objectivity. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), Earth matters. The earth sciences, philosophy, and claims of community (pp. 79–98). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Schumm, S. A. (2000). To interpret the earth. Ten ways to be wrong. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, L. (1995). The medusa and the snail. New York: Penguin.
Turner, C. (2000). Messages in stone: field geology in the American West. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), Earth matters. The earth sciences, philosophy, and claims of community (pp. 51–62). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Williams, R. S. (2000). The modern earth narrative: natural and human history of the Earth. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), Earth matters. The earth sciences, philosophy, and claims of community (pp. 35–49). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
About this article
Cite this article
Almeida, A., Vasconcelos, C. Geoethics: Master’s Students Knowledge and Perception of Its Importance. Res Sci Educ 45, 889–906 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9449-3
- Deontological code for geologists
- Geology and society
- Geoethics and formal education