Research in Science Education

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 581–603 | Cite as

Global Patterns in Students’ Views of Science and Interest in Science

  • Ralf A. L. F. van GriethuijsenEmail author
  • Michiel W. van Eijck
  • Helen Haste
  • Perry J. den Brok
  • Nigel C. Skinner
  • Nasser Mansour
  • Ayse Savran Gencer
  • Saouma BouJaoude


International studies have shown that interest in science and technology among primary and secondary school students in Western European countries is low and seems to be decreasing. In many countries outside Europe, and especially in developing countries, interest in science and technology remains strong. As part of the large-scale European Union funded ‘Science Education for Diversity’ project, a questionnaire probing potential reasons for this difference was completed by students in the UK, Netherlands, Turkey, Lebanon, India and Malaysia. This questionnaire sought information about favourite courses, extracurricular activities and views on the nature of science. Over 9,000 students aged mainly between 10 and 14 years completed the questionnaire. Results revealed that students in countries outside Western Europe showed a greater interest in school science, in careers related to science and in extracurricular activities related to science than did Western European students. Non-European students were also more likely to hold an empiricist view of the nature of science and to believe that science can solve many problems faced by the world. Multilevel analysis revealed a strong correlation between interest in science and having such a view of the Nature of Science.


Interest in science Nature of science Large-scale studies International Comparisons Empiricism 



This publication received funding from the European Union Science in Society Framework 7 Programme (FP7/2007/2013) under grant agreement 244717. We would like to thank the following people for collecting data and contributing to this research project: Roel Janssen, Huseyin Bag, Lindsay Hetherington, Alun Morgan, Keith Postlethwaite, Rupert Wegerif, Ng Swee Chin, Choy Siew Chee, Oo Pou San, Chin Fui Chung, Teh Lee Wah, Sugra Chunawala, Chitra Natarajan and Beena Choksi.


  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aikenhead, G. S. (1997). Student views on the influence of culture on science. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 419–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument—views on science-technology-society (VOSTS). Science Education, 76, 477–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akkerman, S., & van Eijck, M.W. (2013). Re-theorising the student dialogically across and between boundaries of multiple communities. British Educational Research Journal, 39, 60–72.Google Scholar
  5. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1990). The liberal art of science: agenda for action. Washington, DC. American Association for the Advancement of Science (2009). The Nature of Science. Project 2061: Benchmarks Online. Retrieved from
  6. Bennett, J., & Hogarth, S. (2009). Would you want to talk to a scientist at a party? High school students’ attitudes to school science and to science. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1975–1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bybee, R., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deng, F., Chen, D. T., Tsai, C. C., & Chai, C. S. (2011). Students’ views of the nature of science: a critical review of research. Science Education, 95, 961–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dogan, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2008). Turkish grade 10 students’ and science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: a national study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 1083–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eijkelhof, H. M. C., & Kortland, J. (1988). Broadening the aims of physics education. In P. J. Fensham (Ed.), Development and dilemmas in science education (pp. 282–305). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gago, J. M., Ziman, J., Caro, P., Constantinou, C., Davies, G., Parchman, I., Rannikmäe, I., & Sjøberg, S. (2004). Europe needs more scientists: report by the high level group on increasing human resources for science and technology in Europe. Retrieved from Scholar
  12. Hagay, G., Baram-Tsabari, A., Ametller, J., Cakmakci, G., Lopes, B., Moreira, A., et al. (2013). The generalizability of students’ interests in biology across gender, country and religion. Research in Science Education, 43, 895–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jehng, J.-C., Johnson, S. D., & Anderson, R. C. (1993). Schooling and students’ epistemological beliefs and learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kang, S. J., Scharmann, L. C., & Noh, T. (2005). Examining students’ views on the nature of science: results from Korean 6th, 8th, and 10th graders. Science Education, 89, 314–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kawasaki, K. (1996). The concepts of science in Japanese and Western education. Science & Education, 5, 1–20.Google Scholar
  16. Kind, P., Jones, K., & Barmby, P. (2007). Developing attitudes towards science measures. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 871–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions about the nature of science: a review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu, S.-Y., & Lederman, N. (2002). Taiwanese gifted students’ views of nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 102, 114–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu, S.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2008). Differences in the scientific epistemological views of undergraduate students. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1055–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McComas, W. F., & Olson, J. (2002). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies (pp. 41–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (2002). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies (pp. 3–39). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts and core ideas. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  24. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Volume 1: Analysis. Retrieved from
  25. Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rasbash, J., Charlton, C., Browne, W.J., Healy, M., & Cameron, B. (2005). MLwiN Version 2.02. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  27. Schommer-Aikins, M., Duell, O. K., & Barker, S. (2003). Epistemological beliefs across domains using Biglan’s classification of academic disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 44, 347–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2010). Science education and young people’s identity construction—two mutually incompatible projects? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), Re-emergence of values in science curriculum (pp. 231–247). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2005a). The ROSE Project: an overview and key findings. Retrieved from
  30. Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2005). How do learners in different cultures relate to science and technology? Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 1–17. Retrieved from Scholar
  31. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Solomon, J. (1991). Teaching about the nature of science in the British national curriculum. Science Education, 75, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Speering, W., & Rennie, L. (1996). Students’ perceptions about science: the impact of transition from primary to secondary school. Research in Science Education, 26, 283–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralf A. L. F. van Griethuijsen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michiel W. van Eijck
    • 1
  • Helen Haste
    • 2
  • Perry J. den Brok
    • 1
  • Nigel C. Skinner
    • 3
  • Nasser Mansour
    • 4
  • Ayse Savran Gencer
    • 5
  • Saouma BouJaoude
    • 5
  1. 1.Eindhoven School of EducationEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenNetherlands
  2. 2.Harvard Graduate School of EducationHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  3. 3.Graduate School of EducationUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
  4. 4.Faculty of EducationPamukkale UniversityDenizliTurkey
  5. 5.Center for Teaching and Learning & Science and Math Education CenterAmerican University of BeirutBeirutLebanon

Personalised recommendations