Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Towards a Conceptual Profile: Rethinking Conceptual Mediation in the Light of Recent Cognitive and Neuroscientific Findings

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One important focus for science education researchers over many years has been the attempts to replace students' commonsense and non-scientific explanations of various phenomena by scientific explanations. The approach we adopted almost three decades ago was conceptual mediation, and this was shown to have a considerable level of success with both conceptual and attitudinal change. However, since that time, advances have been made in the application of both cognitive science and neuroscience to science learning. In particular, evidence has accumulated that, rather than the replacement of the commonsense view, the reality is that learners develop a conceptual profile which includes both the commonsense and the scientific. If this is the case, instead of focussing on conceptual replacement, science educators need to aim more actively at strengthening the learner's executive processes which select contextually appropriate responses and inhibit inappropriate ones. In this paper, the initial development, theoretical basis and the practical applications of conceptual mediation are introduced, following which, these are re-examined in the light of more recent findings. Within this discussion, several potential links to recent cognitive and neuroscientific research are drawn, and these raise issues for further research into the most appropriate teaching approaches for tackling existing non-scientific conceptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvermann, D. E., & Hynd, C. R. (1989). Effects of prior knowledge activation modes and text structure on nonscience majors' comprehension of physics. The Journal of Educational Research, 83(2), 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babai, R., & Amsterdamer, A. (2008). The persistence of solid and liquid naïve conceptions: a reaction time study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 553–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babai, R., Sekal, R., & Stavy, R. (2010). Persistence of the intuitive conceptions of living things in adolescence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, P., Lyndon, H., Dole, S., Cooper, T., Battistutta, D., & Blakeley, J. (1997). Skill correction and accelerated learning in the workplace: an experimental field trial of the conceptual mediation program and old way/new way. Report on Australian National Training Authority Research Advisory Council Grant No. 95026.

  • Baxter, E. P., Lyndon, E. H., Dole, S., & Battistutta, D. (2004). Less spin, more gain: rapid skill development using old way new way. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 56(1), 21–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Zweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. E., & Hammer, D. (2008). Conceptual change in physics. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 127–154). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruer, J. T. (1997). Education and the brain: a bridge too far. Educational Researcher, 26(8), 4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, G. C., & Braver, T. S. (2010). Neural mechanisms of interference control in working memory: effects of interference expectancy and fluid intelligence. PLoS ONE, 5(9), e12861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, W. H. (1903). Retroactive amnesia: illustrative cases and a tentative explanation. American Journal of Psychology, 14, 382–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, R. (1975). Gearing the demands of instruction to the developmental capacities of the learner. Review of Educational Research, 45, 59–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, J. C. K., & McDermott, K. B. (2007). The testing effect in recognition memory: a dual process account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 431–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 129–160). Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61–82). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C. Y., Hong, Y. Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, N. D., & Lovat, T. (2012). Neuroscience and education: issues and challenges for the curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(4), 534–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. (2001). Conceptual Change. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/. Accessed 15 Jan 2013.

  • Dempster, F. N., & Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Interference and inhibition in cognition. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devonshire, I. M., & Dommett, E. J. (2010). Neuroscience: viable applications in education? The Neuroscientist, 16(4), 349–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewar, M. T., Cowan, N., & della Sala, S. (2007). Forgetting due to retroactive interference: a fusion of Muller and Pilzecher's (1900) early insights into everyday forgetting and recent research on anterograde amnesia. Cortex, 43, 616–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiSessa, A. (2006). A history of conceptual change research: threads and fault lines. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 265–282). West Nyack: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiSessa, A., Gillespie, N. M., & Esterly, J. B. (2004). Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force. Cognitive Science, 28(6), 8433RLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, K. S. (2013). The science of CBT: toward a metacognitive model of change? Behavior Therapy, 44(2), 224–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dole, S. (2003). Applying psychological theory to helping students overcome learned difficulties in mathematics. School Psychology International, 24(1), 95–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: research into children's ideas. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children's ideas in science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudai, Y. (2004). The neurobiology of consolidation, or, how stable is the engram? American Review of Psychology, 55, 51–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography. Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education. www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html. Accessed 25 Aug 2012.

  • Duit, R., & Treagust, D. (2003). Conceptual change: a powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 671–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, K. N., Fugelsang, J. A., & Stein, C. (2007). Do naïve theories ever go away? Using brain and behaviour to understand changes in concepts. In M. C. Lovett & P. Shah (Eds.), Thinking with data (p. ch8). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. A., & Hamilton, R. J. (1998). Conceptual change in science and in the learning of science. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), The international handbook of science education (pp. 1047–1065). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory capacity and inhibition. Paper presented at the 2005 meeting for the Place of Inhibitory Progress in Cognition, Arlington, TX.

  • Eryilmaz, A. (2002). Effects of conceptual assignments and conceptual change discussions on students’ misconceptions and achievement regarding force and motion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 1001–1015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. (1985). Cognitive development (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frensch, P. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Expertise and intelligent thinking: When is it worse to know better? In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (p. ch5). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuselgang, J. A., & Dunbar, K. N. (2005). Brain-based mechanisms underlying complex causal thinking. Neuropsychologia, 43(8), 1204–1213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galili, I., & Bar, V. (1992). Motion implies force: where to expect vestiges of the misconceptions? International Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2009). Cognitive neuroscience. The biology of mind (3rd ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geake, J. G. (2009). The brain at school. Educational neuroscience in the classroom. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geelan, D. R. (2000). Sketching some postmodern alternatives: beyond paradigms and research programs as referents for science education. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 5(1). http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/7645/5412. Accessed 12 March 2013.

  • Goswami, U. (2006). Neuroscience and education: from research to practice? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 406–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. (2008). Byron review on the impact of new technologies on children: a research literature review: child development. Prepared for the Byron Review, Safer children in a digital world. Annex H. Annesley: DCSF Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (2007). Childrens’ cognitive development and learning. Primary review interim report 2/1a. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.

  • Griffin, M. (2011). Developing deliberative minds—Piaget, Vygotsky and the deliberative democratic citizen. Journal of Public Deliberation, 7(1), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gropen, J., Clark-Chiarelli, N., Hoisington, C., & Ehrlich, S. B. (2011). The importance of executive function in early science education. Child Development Perspectives, 5(4), 298–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanin, Y., Korjus, T., Jouste, P., & Baxter, P. (2002). Rapid technique correction using old way/new way: two case studies with Olympic athletes. The Sport Psychologist, 16(1), 79–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (2005). The emotions of teaching and educational change. In A. Hargreaves (Ed.), Extending educational change. International handbook of educational change (pp. 278–290). Dortrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helldén, G. F., & Solomon, J. (2004). The persistence of personal and social themes in context: long- and short-term studies of students' scientific ideas. Science Education, 88(6), 885–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, G., Aizenman, C. D., & Donoghue, J. P. (1996). Conditions for the induction of long-term potentiation in layer II/III horizontal connections of the rat motor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 75(5), 1765–1778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, P. W. (1982). A case study of conceptual change in special relativity: the influence of prior knowledge in learning. European Journal of Science Education, 4, 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikier, S., Yang, L., & Hasher, L. (2008). Implicit proactive interference, age, and automatic versus controlled retrieval strategies. Psychological Science, 19(5), 456–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannides, C., & Vosniadou, S. (2002). Exploring the changing meanings of force: from coherence to fragmentation. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 2(1), 5–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonides, J., & Nee, D. E. (2006). Brain mechanisms of proactive interference in working memory. Neuroscience, 139, 181–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2000). Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: limits on long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26(2), 336–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 139, 966–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloos, H., & Van Orden, G. C. (2005). Can a preschooler's mistaken belief benefit learning? Swiss Journal of Psychology, 64, 195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77, 319–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I., & Musgrave, A. (Eds.), (1970). Criticism and the growth of knowledge: proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, C. J. (1993). A challenge to conceptual change. Science Education, 77(3), 293–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna, B., & Sweeney, J. A. (2004). The emergence of collaborative brain function. fMRI studies of the development of response inhibition. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1021, 296–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyndon, E. H. (2000). Conceptual mediation: A new theory and new method of conceptual change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Adelaide, Australia.

  • Lyndon, H. (1989). I did it my way! An introduction to “old way/new way” methodology. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 13, 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyndon, H. (2002). Old way new way. New Dimensions Episode 13 (18/9/2002). http://www.abc.net.au/dimensions/dimensions_future/transcripts/s680275.htm. Accessed 23 Nov 2011.

  • Mangels, J. A., Butterfield, B., Lamb, J., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1, 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masson, S., & Foisy, L.-M. B. (2012). Les conceptions erronées des élèves en électricité ne disparaissent peut-être jamais de leur cerveau. Spectre, 42, 15–17. http://www.neuroeducationquebec.org/storage/articles/2012-11-01_Masson2012.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masson, S., Potvin, P., Ripel, M., Foisy, L.-M. B., & Lafortune, S. (2012). Using fMRI to study conceptual change: why and how? International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 7(1), 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConney, A. A. (1992). An application of constructivist theory: the effects of alternative framework diagnosis and conceptual change discussion on biology students' misconceptions, achievement, attitudes, and self-efficacy. Doctoral dissertation, Florida Institute of Technology. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53(12), 4270A.

  • McDermott, L. C. (2001). Oersted medal lecture. Physics education research—the key to student learning. American Journal of Physics, 69(11), 1127–1137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mefoh, P. C. (2010). Gender differences in proactive, retroactive and no interference conditions. Gender & Behaviour, 8(2), 3036–3047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, E. F. (1995). Conceptual change or conceptual profile change? Science & Education, 4, 267–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, G. E., & Pilzecker, A. (1900). Experimentelle Beiträge zur Lehre vom Gedächtnis. Z. Psychologie Ergänzungsband, 1, 1–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nader, K., Schafe, G. E., & LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval. Nature, 406, 722–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, J., & Novick, A. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: towards a principled teaching strategy. Instructional Science, 11, 183–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2007). Understanding the brain: the birth of a learning science. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofen-Noy, N., Dudai, Y., & Karni, A. (2003). Skill learning in mirror reading: how repetition determines acquisition. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 507–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlsson, S. (2009). Resubsumption: a possible mechanism for conceptual change and belief revision. Educational Psychologist, 44(1), 20–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (2011a). Teaching and learning evolution: testing the principles of a constructivist approach through action research. The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 57(1), 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (2011b). Towards an understanding of neuroscience for science educators. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 211–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R., Frey, P., & Bell, B. (1985). Learning in science: the implications of children's science. Auckland: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozdemir, G., & Clark, D. B. (2007). An overview of conceptual change theories. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(4), 351–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poldrack, R. A., & Packard, M. G. (2003). Competition among multiple memory systems: converging evidence from animal and human brain studies. Neuropsychologia, 41, 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). The power of testing memory: basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, J. A., & Dawson, C. J. (1977). Teaching about floating and sinking: an attempt to link cognitive psychology with classroom practice. Science Education, 61(2), 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, J. A., & Dawson, C. J. (1980). Mountain or mole hill: can cognitive psychology reduce the dimensions of conceptual problems in classroom practice? Science Education, 64(5), 693–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, J. A., & Dawson, C. J. (1981). Volume, conservation and instruction: a classroom based Solomon four group study of conflict. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18(6), 533–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, J. A., & Dawson, C. J. (1983). Laboratory counter-examples and the growth of understanding in science. European Journal of Science Education, 5, 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, J. A., & Dawson, C. J. (1985). Equilibration, conflict and instruction: a new classroom oriented perspective. European Journal of Science Education, 7, 331–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, J. A., Dawson, C. J., & Lyndon, H. (1990). Changing misconceptions: a challenge to science educators. International Journal of Science Education, 12, 167–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solaz-Portolés, J. J., & Sanjosé-López, V. (2009). Working memory in science problem solving: a review of research. Revista Mexicana de Psicologia, 26, 79–90. http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/src/inicio/ArtPdfRed.jsp?iCve=243016317008. Accessed Jan 11, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. (1983). Learning about energy: how pupils think in two domains. European Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology and educational theory and practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szpunar, K. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2008). Testing during study insulates against the buildup of proactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1392–1399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tommerdahl, J. (2010). A model for bridging the gap between neuroscience and education. Oxford Review of Education, 36(1), 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual change: a discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 297–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80(5), 352–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyson, L. M., Venville, G. J., Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1997). A multidimensional framework for interpreting conceptual change events in the classroom. Science Education, 81(4), 387–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, B. J. (1957). Interference and forgetting. Psychological Review, 64, 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valian, V. (2007). Women at the top in science—and elsewhere. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren't more women in science: Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 27–37). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varma, S., McCandliss, B. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (2008). Scientific and pragmatic challenges for bridging education and neuroscience. Educational Researcher, 37, 140–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(10), 45–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 1: Problems of general psychology. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldrip, B. G., & Taylor, P. C. (1999). Permeability of students’ worldviews to their school views in a non-Western developing country. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 289–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, L., & Pines, L. (1984). An interpretation of research in ‘conceptual understanding’ within a sources-of-knowledge framework. Research in Science Education, 14, 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1989). Metalearning and conceptual change: special issue. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 577–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wixted, J. T. (2004). The psychology and neuroscience of forgetting. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 235–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, G. C. R., & Lyndon, E. H. (2004). Conceptual mediation program in practice: educational outcomes from two sites. Research in Science Education, 34, 389–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zirkle, D. M. (2009). Long term potentiation principles to form an optimal repetition schedule. Ed. D. thesis. Seattle Pacific University Source: DAI-A 70/03 Publication number: 3351809.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, University of Adelaide, Nexus 10, Adelaide, Australia, 5005

    Chris Dawson

Authors
  1. Chris Dawson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Dawson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dawson, C. Towards a Conceptual Profile: Rethinking Conceptual Mediation in the Light of Recent Cognitive and Neuroscientific Findings. Res Sci Educ 44, 389–414 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9388-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9388-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation