Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Expansion of Biology Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) During a Long-Term Professional Development Program

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experienced teachers possess a unique teaching knowledge comprised of an inter-related set of knowledge and beliefs that gives direction and justification to a teacher’s actions. This study examined the expansion of two components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of three in-service teachers in the course of a professional development program aimed at designing new teaching and learning materials suggested by the teachers themselves. The research presents an enlargement of previous PCK representations by focusing on a detailed representation of two main PCK domains: teaching and learning, including ten PCK components that emerged in the course of data analysis. This representation enabled revealing the unique PCK held by each teacher and to characterize the expansion of the two components of the participating teachers’ PCK during the long-term professional development program. Retention of major parts of the expanded PCK a year after termination of the program implies that designing and implementing new teaching and learning materials based on the teachers’ experiences, needs, and knowledge in a workshop format accompanied by biology and science education courses might provide a powerful means for PCK expansion. We recommend that designers of professional development programs be aware of the unique PCK held by each teacher in order to promote meaningful professional development of each teacher. Moreover, the PCK representations that were identified in the course of this study enabled clarifying the “orientation toward teaching science” category of PCK which appears to be unclear in current literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405–1416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ainley, J., & Luntley, M. (2006). Towards an articulation of expert classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), 1127–1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1996). Teacher development: A model from science education. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, A., Loughran, J., & van Driel, J. H. (2008). Revisiting the roots of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1271–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W., Short, J. B., Landes, N. M., & Powel, J. C. (2003). Professional development and science curriculum implementation—A perspective for leadership. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R., & Yarden, A. (2009). Experienced junior-high-school teacher’s PCK in light of curriculum change: “The cell is to be studied longitudinally”. Research in Science Education, 39(1), 131–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). A framework for design. In C. D. Laughton & V. Novak (Eds.), Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (pp. 15–26). Lincoln, Nebraska: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Da-Silva, C., Ruiz, V. M. C., & Porlan, R. (2006). Evolution of the conceptions of a secondary education biology teacher: Longitudinal analysis using cognitive maps. Science Education, 91(3), 461–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, O., & Van Der Valk, A. E. (2007). Science teachers’ PCK and teaching practice: Learning to scaffold students’ open-inquiry Learning. In R. Pinto & D. Couso (Eds.), Contributions from Science Education Research (pp. 107–118). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Even, R. (2008). Facing the challenge of educating educators to work with practicing mathematics teachers. In B. J. T. Wood (Ed.), International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education: The Mathematics Teacher Educator as a Developing Professional. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eylon, B., & Bagno, E. (2006). Research-design model for professional development of teachers: Designing lessons with physics education research. Physics Education Research, 2(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Balboa, J., & Stiehl, J. (1995). The generic nature of pedagogical content knowledge among college professors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(3), 293–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichsen, P. J., Abell, S. K., Pareja, E. M., Brown, P. L., Lankford, D. M., & Volkmann, M. J. (2009). Does teaching experience matter? Examining biology teachers’ prior knowledge for teaching in an alternative certification program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(4), 357–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichsen, P. J., Van Driel, J. H., & Abell, S. K. (2011). Taking a closer look at science teaching orientations. Science Education, 95(2), 358–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G., Colins, A., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. (In Berliner, D. & Calfee, R. (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 15–46): MacMillan).

  • Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New-York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, P., Maringe, F., & Ratcliffe, M. (2008). Evaluation of professional development: Deploying a process-focused model. International Journal of Science Education, 30(5), 711–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimlich, J. E., & Norland, E. (2002). Teaching style: Where are we now? New directions for adult and continuing education, 2002(93), 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henze, I., & Verloop, N. (2009). Experienced science teachers’ learning in the context of educational innovation. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 184–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henze, I., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2007). The change of science teachers’ personal knowledge about teaching models and modeling in the context of science education reform. International Journal of Science Education, 29(15), 1819–1846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henze, I., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2008). Development of experienced science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of models of the solar system and the universe. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1321–1342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, P. W. (2007). Teacher professional development in science. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research in Science Education (pp. 1179–1203). New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlmaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., Carmi, M., & Ben-Zvi, R. (2003). The development of leadership among chemistry teachers in Israel. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(1), 39–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E., & Luft, J. A. (2008). Experienced secondary science teachers’ representation of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1343–1363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., & Bonner, J. J. (2007). The Influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers’ use of inquiry teaching practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1318–1347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J., Milroy, P., Berry, A., Gunstone, R., & Mulhall, P. (2001). Documenting science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge through PaP-eRs. Research in Science Education, 31(2), 289–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2008). Exploring pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1301–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge: PCK and Science Education (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer academic publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareja, E. M. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Chen, Y. (2011). Mapping out the integration of the components of pedagogical content knowledge for teaching photosynthesis and heredity. Orlando, Florida: Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST).

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008a). National Board Certification (NBC) as a catalyst for teachers’ learning about teaching: the effects of the NBC process on candidate teachers’ PCK development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 812–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008b). Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers and professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., Jang, J., Chen, Y., & Jung, J. (2011). Is pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) necessary for reformed science teaching? Evidence from an empirical study. Research in Science Education, 41(2), 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parke, H. M., & Coble, C. R. (1997). Teachers designing curriculum as professional development: A model for transformational science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(8), 773–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postholm, M. B. (2008). Teachers developing practice: Reflection as a key activity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1717–1728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, R. M., & Plasman, K. (2011). Science teacher learning progressions: A review of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 530–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shkedi, A. (2003). Words of Meaning: Qualitative Research—Theory and Practice. (Tel Aviv, Israel: Ramot (in Hebrew).).

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. P. I., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconcieved: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(8), 115–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, P. (1988). Subject matter and related pedagogical content knowledge in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2), 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., Symington, D., & Smith, C. (2009). A curriculum innovation framework for science, technology and mathematics education. Research in Science Education, 39(6).

  • Tytler, R., Symington, D., & Smith, C. (2011). A curriculum innovation framework for science, technology and mathematics education. Research in Science Education, 41(1), 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Valk, A. E., & Broekman, H. G. B. (1999). The lesson preparation method: A way of investigating pre-service teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge. European Journal of Teacher Education, 22(1), 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, E. M., & Kattmann, U. (2007). A research model for the study of science teachers’ PCK and improving teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 558–897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., & Beijaard, D. (2003). Enhancing Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge Through Collegial Interaction. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., Bulte, A. M. W., & Verloop, N. (2007). The relationships between teachers’ general beliefs about teaching and learning and their domain specific curricular beliefs. Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 156–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthesis, 80(1), 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Cambridge, London: Harvard university press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarden, A. (2009). Reading scientific texts: Adapting primary literature for promoting scientific literacy. Research in Science Education, 39(3), 307–311.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to the teachers who participated in this study, to the Rothschild-Weizmann Program for Excellence in Science Education, and to The Israel Science Foundation (grant No. 836/09) for funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Science Teaching, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76100, Israel

    Ronit Rozenszajn & Anat Yarden

Authors
  1. Ronit Rozenszajn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anat Yarden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anat Yarden.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 41 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 47 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rozenszajn, R., Yarden, A. Expansion of Biology Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) During a Long-Term Professional Development Program. Res Sci Educ 44, 189–213 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9378-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9378-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation