Research in Science Education

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 27–52 | Cite as

Learning and Intending to Teach Evolution: Concerns of Pre-service Biology Teachers

Article

Keywords

Evolution Science teacher education Learning 

References

  1. Alberts, B., & Labov, J. B. (2004). From the national academies: teaching the science of evolution. Cell Biology Education, 3(2), 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M., & Norman, G. J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 952–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antolin, M. F., & Herbers, J. M. (2001). Perspective: evolution’s struggle for existence in America’s public schools. Evolution, 55(12), 2379–2388.Google Scholar
  4. Balgopal, M. M., & Montplaisir, L. M. (2011). Meaning making: what reflective essays reveal about biology students’ ideas about natural selection. Instructional Science, 39(2), 137–169.Google Scholar
  5. Battisti, B. T., Handegan, N., Sudweeks, R., & Cates, R. (2010). Using item response theory to conduct a distracter analysis on conceptual inventory of natural selection. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 845–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bizzo, N. M. V. (1994). From down house landlord to Brazilian high school students: what has happened to evolutionary knowledge on the way? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 537–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brem, S. K., Ranney, M., & Schnindel, J. (2003). Perceived consequences of evolution: college students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Science Education, 87, 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Catley, K., & Novick, L. R. (2009). Digging deep: exploring college students’ knowledge of macroevolutionary time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Sage handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: applications for advancing social justice studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507–536). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Crawford, B. A., Zembal-Saul, C., Munford, D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2005). Confronting prospective teachers’ ideas about evolution and scientific inquiry using technology and inquiry based tasks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 613–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Demastes-Southerland, S., Settlage, J., & Good, R. (1995). Students’ conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution: cases of replication and comparison. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(5), 535–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deniz, H., Donnelly, L. A., & Yilmaz, I. (2008). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 420–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Denzin, N. (1989). The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Englewood Cliff: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 35, 125–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dole, J. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: a powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Futuyma, D. J. (1998). Evolutionary biology (3rd ed.). Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
  21. Futuyma, D. J. (Ed.). (1999). Evolution, science, and society: evolutionary biology and the national research agenda. New Brunswick: Office of University Publications, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.Google Scholar
  22. Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: a critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1973). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Goldston, M. J. D., & Kyzer, P. (2009). Teaching evolution: narratives with a view from three southern biology teachers in the U.S. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(7), 762–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5–17.Google Scholar
  26. Greeno, J. G., & van de Sande. (2007). Perspectival understanding of conceptions ad conceptual growth in interaction. Educational Psychologist, 42(1), 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Griffith, J. A., & Brem, S. K. (2004). Teaching evolutionary biology: pressures, stress, and coping. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8), 791–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ha, M., Haury, D. L., & Nehm, R. H. (2012). Feeling of certainty: uncovering the missing link between knowledge and acceptance of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 95–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackson, D. F., Doster, E. C., Meadows, L., & Wood, T. (1995). Hearts and minds in the science classroom: the education of a confirmed evolutionist. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(6), 585–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnston, A., Southerland, S. A., & Sowell, S. (2006). Dissatisfied with the fruitfulness of “learning ecologies.” Science Education, 90(5), 907–911.Google Scholar
  31. Kalinowski, S. T., Leonard, M. J., & Andrews, T. M. (2010). Nothing in evolution makes sense except in the light of DNA. CBE Life Science Education, 9(2), 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of motivational beliefs in conceptual change. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: issues in theory and practice (pp. 115–136). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Long, D. E. (2012). The politics of teaching evolution, science education standards, and being a Creationist. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 122–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313(5788), 765–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moore, R. (2000). The revival of creationism in the United States. Journal of Biological Education, 35(10), 17–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moscovici, H. (2007). Mirror, mirrors on the wall, who is the most powerful of all: a self-study analysis of power relationships in science methods courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1370–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. National Academy of Sciences. (1998). Teaching evolution and the nature of science. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  40. Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2011). Item feature effects in evolution assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2008). Measuring knowledge of natural selection: a comparison of the CINS, an open-response instrument, and an oral interview. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), 1131–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2010). The future of natural selection knowledge measurement: a reply to Anderson et al. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 358–362.Google Scholar
  43. Niewswandt, M., & Bellomo, K. (2009). Written extended-response questions as classroom assessment tool for meaningful understanding of evolutionary theory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(3), 333–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Opfer, J. E., Nehmn, R. H., & Ha, M. (2012). Cognitive foundations for science assessment design: knowing what students know about evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 744–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. B. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: the role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Price, P. (1996). Biological evolution. Fort Worth: Saunders College Press.Google Scholar
  48. Rector, M. A., Nehm, R. H., & Pearl, D. (2012). Learning the language of evolution: lexical ambiguity and word meaning in student explanations. Research in Science Education. doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9296-z.Google Scholar
  49. Rowe, M. F. (2004). College students’ understandings of natural selection: moving from a Lamarckian perspective to a Darwinian point of view. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Association of Researchers of Science Teaching. British Columbia: Vancouver.Google Scholar
  50. Rutledge, M. L., & Warden, M. A. (2000). Evolutionary theory, the nature of science, and high school biology teachers: critical relationships. The American Biology Teacher, 62, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Settlage, J. & Jensen, M. (1996) Investigating the inconsistencies in college student responses to natural selection test questions. Electronic Journal of Science Education. 1(1). http://unr.edu/homepage/jcannon/ejse/settlage.html. Accessed Dec 2006.
  52. Sexton, D. M. (2008). Student teachers negotiating identity, role, and agency. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(3), 73–88.Google Scholar
  53. Shanahan, M.-C., & Nieswandt, M. (2011). Science student role: evidence of social structural norms specific to school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 367–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  55. Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students’ understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 510–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith, M. U. (1994). Counterpoint: belief, understanding and the teaching of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 591–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith, M. U. (2010a). Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: I. Philosophical/epistemological issues. Science Education, 19, 523–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smith, M. U. (2010b). Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: II. Pedagogical issues. Science Education, 19, 539–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Southerland, S. A., Abrams, E., Cummins, C. L., & Anzelmo, J. (2001). Understanding students’ explanations of biological phenomena: conceptual frameworks or p-prims? Science Education, 85, 328–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  61. Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147–176). New York: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  62. Stryker, S. (2008). From Mead to structural symbolic interactionism and beyond. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Trani, R. (2004). I won’t teach evolution; it’s against my religion. The American Biology Teacher, 66(4), 419–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Van Sickle, M., & Spector, B. (1996). Caring relationships in science classrooms: a symbolic interaction study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(4), 433–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Verhey, S. D. (2005). The effect of engaging prior learning on student attitudes toward creationism and evolution. BioScience, 55(11), 996–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Winslow, M. W., Staver, J. R., & Scharmann, L. C. (2011). Evolution and personal religious belief: Christian university biology-related majors’ search for reconciliation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(9), 1026–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations