Developing ‘Butterfly Warriors’: a Case Study of Science for Citizenship
- 517 Downloads
Given worldwide concern about a decline in student engagement in school science and an increasing call for science for citizenship in New Zealand Curriculum, this study focused on a butterfly unit that investigated how students in a year-4 primary classroom learnt about New Zealand butterflies through thinking, talking, and acting as citizen scientists. The butterfly unit included five lessons. The researchers observed the lessons and interviewed students and the classroom teacher. The students completed a unit evaluation survey after the unit. Findings indicate that the students enjoyed and were interested in activities such as reading about butterflies, learning and using new vocabulary, drawing butterfly life cycles, as well as hunting, tagging and releasing butterflies and publishing the data they had collected on a dedicated website. Through their participation in the unit, students had opportunities to act locally and globally, and to ‘see themselves’ in science through ‘being there’ experience. Units like this have the potential to develop students’ interest for longer-term engagement in science, even those students who may never envision themselves as professional scientists.
KeywordsPrimary science Classroom study Biology Qualitative Action
- Aikenhead, G., Orpwood, G., & Fensham, P. (2011). Scientific literacy for a knowledge society. In C. Linder, L. Ostman, D. Roberts, P. O. Wickman, G. Erickson, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 28–44). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bolstad, R., & Hipkins, R. (2008). Seeing yourself in science—the importance of the middle school years. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
- Bull, A., Gilbert, J., Barwick, H., Hipkins, R., & Baker, R. (2010). Inspired by science. Research document. New Zealand Council for Educational Research. http://www.pmcsa.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/NZCER-Inspired-by-science.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2012.
- Chin, C. (2002). Student generated questions: encouraging inquisitive minds in learning science. Teaching and Learning, 23(1), 59–67.Google Scholar
- Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: complementary research strategies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Corrigan, D., Dillon, J., & Gunstone, R. (Eds.). (2007). The re-emergence of values in science education. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
- Dillon, J., & Reid, A. (2007). Science, the environment and citizenship: teaching values at the Minstead Study Centre. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 77–88). Rotterdam The Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar
- Drake, C., Spillane, J. P., & Hufferd-Ackles, K. (2001). Storied identities: teacher learning and subject-matter context. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
- Eagan, K., Herrera, H., Sharkness, J., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. (2011). Crashing the gate: identifying alternative measures of student learning in introductory science, technology, engineering, and mathematics courses. Paper presented in the American Research in Education Association, New Orleans, Louisiana, USAGoogle Scholar
- Fasse, B., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Evaluating classroom practices using qualitative research methods: defining and refining the process. In B. Fishman & S. O’Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Fourth international conference of the learning sciences (pp. 193–198). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Fensham, P. (2008). Science education policy-making: eleven emerging issues. Scientific and Cultural Organization: United Nations Educational.Google Scholar
- Gluckman, P. (2011). Looking ahead: science education for the twenty-first century. http://www.pmcsa.org.nz/2011-archive-%E2%80%93-speeches-media-releases/. Accessed 4 June 2012.
- Harlen, W. (Ed.). (2010). Principles and big ideas of science education. Hatfield: ASE.Google Scholar
- Hodson, D. (1999). Going beyond cultural pluralism: science education for sociopolitical action. Science Education, 83(6), 775–796.Google Scholar
- Hodson, D. (2009). Teaching and learning about science: language, theories, methods, history, traditions and values. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
- Kerr, S. T. (1996). Technology and the future of schooling. Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education.Google Scholar
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
- Luehmann, A. L. (2001). Factors affecting secondary science teachers’ appraisal and adoption of technology-rich project-based learning environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
- Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.Google Scholar
- Moreland, J., Cowie, B., Otrel-Cass, K., & Jones, A. (2010). Planning for learning: building knowledge for teaching primary science and technology. http://www.tlri.org.nz/assets/A_Project-PDFs/9215-Cowie/InsitePlanning.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2012.
- Oberhauser, K. S., & Prysby, M. D. (2008). Citizen science: creating a research army for conservation. American Entomologist, 54, 97–99.Google Scholar
- Osborne, J. F., & Collins, S. (2000). Pupils’ and parents’ views of the school science curriculum. London: King’s College London.Google Scholar
- Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Springate, I., Atkinson, M., Straw, S., Lamont, E., & Grayson, H. (2008). Narrowing the gap in outcomes: early years (0~5 Years). Slough, England: NFER.Google Scholar
- Tytler, R. (2001). Describing and supporting effective science teaching and learning in Australian schools-validation issues. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 1–22.Google Scholar
- Tytler, R. (2007). Re-Imagining science education: engaging students in science for Australia's future. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
- Tytler, R., Osborne, J. F., Williams, G., Tytler, K., & Clark, J. C. (2008). Opening up pathways: engagement in STEM across the primary–secondary school transition. A review of the literature concerning supports and barriers to Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics engagement at primary–secondary transition. Canberra: Commissioned by the Australian Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.Google Scholar