Categorization of Alternative Conceptions in Electricity and Magnetism: the Case of Ethiopian Undergraduate Students
- First Online:
The purpose of this study was to categorize 35 Ethiopian undergraduate physics students’ alternative conceptions in the concepts of electric potential and energy. A descriptive qualitative research design was used to categorize the students’ alternative conceptions. Four independently homogeneous ability focus groups were formed to elicit the students’ conceptual perceptions. A five-stage thematic (categorical) framework analysis—familiarization, identifying a thematic framework, coding, charting, and interpretation—was made to analyze data of the focus group discussions. The categories of alternative conceptions were based on the students’ epistemological and ontological descriptions of the concepts investigated. Consequently, the following categories were diagnosed: naive physics, lateral alternative conceptions, ontological alternative conceptions, Ohm’s phenomenological primitives, mixed conceptions, and loose ideas. The extensiveness of the alternative conceptions from the epistemological and ontological perspectives was comparable and considerable. The naïve physics and lateral alternative conceptions were more extensive than the others. The alternative conceptions were less frequently and inconsistently revealed within and across the categories. In general, it was concluded that the categories have common characteristics of diversified distribution of alternative conceptions and multiple alternative conceptions of specific concepts within and across the categories. Finally, instructional and theoretical implications are forwarded.
KeywordsAlternative conception Categories of alternative conceptions Conceptual change Electricity and magnetism Ethiopia Framework thematic analysis
- Baser, M., & Durmus, S. (2010). The effectiveness of computer supported versus real laboratory inquiry learning environments on the understanding of direct current electricity among pre-service elementary school teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 47–61.Google Scholar
- Bilal, E., & Erol, M. (2009). Investigating students’ conceptions of some electricity concepts. Latin American Journal of Physics Education, 3(2), 193–201.Google Scholar
- Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
- Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: belief revision, mental model transformation and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), Handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61–82). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., & de Leeuw, J. (1994). From thins to processes: a theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 27–43.Google Scholar
- Ding, L., Chabay, R., Sheewood, B., & Beichner, R. (2006). Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: brief electricity & magnetism assessment. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 2, 1–7.Google Scholar
- Duit, R. (2009). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education. Kiel: Institute for Science Education (IPN) (Distributed electronically).Google Scholar
- Elby, A. (2010). Coherence vs. fragmentation in student epistemologies: a reply to Smith & Wenk. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
- Fosnot, C. T. (Ed.) (1996) Constructivism: theory, perspectives and practice. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.Google Scholar
- Ioannides, C., & Vosniadou, S. (2002). The changing meaning of force. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 2(1), 5–61.Google Scholar
- Marx, J. D. (1998). Creation of a Diagnostic Exam for Introductory, Undergraduate Electricity and Magnetism (Doctoral dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute). Retrieved from http://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=3786&DocID=114.Accessed 5 December 2010.
- MOE. (2009). Harmonized curriculum for BSc Degree program in Physics. Addis Ababa: Ethiopia.Google Scholar
- Osborne, R. (1981). Children’s ideas about electric current. New Zealand Science Teacher, 29, 12–19.Google Scholar
- Pollock, S. (2008, July 23–24). Comparing student learning with multiple research-based conceptual surveys: CSEM and BEMA. Paper presented at Physics Education Research Conference 2008, Edmonton, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=8109&DocID=742. Accessed 5 January 2011.
- Saglam, M., & Millar, R. (2004). Diagnostic test of students’ ideas in electromagnetism. Retrieved from http://www.york.ac.uk/depts/educ/research/ResearchPaperSeries/index.htm. Accessed 29 October 2010.
- Von Glasersfeld, E., & Steffe, L. P. (1991). Conceptual models in educational research and practice. Journal of Educational Thought, 25(2), 91–103.Google Scholar
- Zavala, G., & Alarcon, H. (2008, July 23–24). Evaluation of Instruction Using the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism in Mexico. Paper presented at Physics Education Research Conference 2008, Edmonton, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=8126&DocID=759. Accessed 1 December 2010.