Advertisement

Research in Science Education

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 1455–1476 | Cite as

Nerdy, Brainy and Normal: Children’s and Parents’ Constructions of Those Who Are Highly Engaged with Science

  • Jennifer DeWittEmail author
  • Louise Archer
  • Jonathan Osborne
Article

Abstract

There is a continuing international concern about a decline in the pursuit of post-compulsory science. One suggested cause concerns the role that young people's narrow perceptions of scientists may play in deterring them from pursuing science qualifications and careers. Research would suggest that the ages of 10–14 appear to be a critical period for the development of such views. This paper looks at the early part of this period, when general liking for science is high, although views on science careers as ‘not for me’ also appear to be forming. Drawing on data collected from interviews conducted with 92 children and 78 parents (in which children described peers who are ‘really into’ science and parents described those who are likely to pursue a career in science), we examine the constructions children and parents have of those who are highly engaged with science. In the interviews, participants evoked a range of constructions, some of which were closely aligned with traditional stereotypical images of science and scientists (e.g. as ‘geeky’) while others moderated and/or challenged those images. Although very few participants held explicitly ‘negative’ representations of science/scientists, our analysis shows how popular constructions of science as ‘specialist’ and ‘clever’ may feed into an understanding of science as different and not for me. It is argued that more work needs to be done to open up science as a field that is accessible ‘for all’ and to increase students' awareness of the breadth of careers in and from science.

Keywords

Attitudes Aspirations Identity Images of scientists Peers 

References

  1. Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). ‘Doing’ science vs ‘being’ a scientist: examining 10/11 year old school children’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). Science aspirations and family habitus: how families shape children’s identification and engagement with science. American Educational Research Journal. doi: 10.3102/0002831211433290.
  3. Archer, L., & Francis, B. (2007). Understanding minority ethnic achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Atherton, G., Cymbir, E., Roberts, K., Page, L., Remedios, R., Aimhigher Central London Partnership & University of Westminster. (2009). How young people formulate their views about the future—exploratory research. Research Report DCSF-RR152. London: University of Westminster.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, D., & Leary, R. (1995). Letting girls speak out about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basu, S. J., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2007). Developing a sustained interest in science among urban minority youth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 466–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basu, S. J., Calabrese Barton, A., Clairmont, N., & Locke, D. (2009). Developing a framework for critical science agency through case study in a conceptual physics context. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4, 345–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett, J., & Hogarth, S. (2009). Would you want to talk to a scientist at a party? High school students’ attitudes to school science and to science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(14), 1975–1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bleeker, M. M., & Jacobs, J. E. (2004). Achievement in math and science: do mothers’ beliefs matter 12 years later? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boe, M. V., Henriksen, E. K., Lyons, T., & Schreiner, C. (2011). Participation in science and technology: young people’s achievement-related choices in late-modern societies. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 37–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 441–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, B. A. (2004). Discursive identity: assimilation into the culture of science and its implications for minority students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8), 810–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buck, G. A., Plano Clark, V. L., Leslie-Pelecky, D., Lu, Y., & Cerda-Lizarraga, P. (2008). Examining the cognitive processes used by adolescent girls and women in identifying science role models: a feminist approach. Science Education, 92(4), 688–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burman, E., & Parker, I. (Eds.). (1993). Discourse analytic research: repertoires and readings of texts in action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Calabrese Barton, A. (1998). Teaching science with homeless children: pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4), 379–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2010). We Be Burnin’! Agency, identity, and science learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 187–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Calabrese Barton, A., Tan, E., & Rivet, A. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carlone, H. B. (2003). (Re)producing good science students: girls’ participation in high school physics. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9(1), 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carlone, H. B. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: girls’ access, participation, and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 392–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carlone, H. B., Kimmel, J., Lowder, C., Rockford, J., Scott, C. (2011). Becoming (less) scientific in the figured worlds of school science learning: a longitudinal study of students' identities. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Education. Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
  22. Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: the Draw-a-Scientist Test. Science Education, 67(2), 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cleaves, A. (2005). The formation of science choices in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 27(4), 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Davies, B. (1993). Shards of glass: children reading and writing beyond gendered identities. Cresskill: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  25. DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Archer, L., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2011). Young children’s aspirations in science: the unequivocal, the uncertain and the unthinkable. International Journal of Science Education. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.608197.
  26. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  27. European Commission. (2004). Europe needs more scientists: report by the high level group on increasing human resources for science and technology. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  28. Ferry, T. R., Fouad, N. A., & Smith, P. L. (2000). The role of family context in a social cognitive model for career-related choice behavior: a math and science perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57(3), 348–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Finson, K. D. (2002). Drawing a scientist: what we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Flick, L. (1990). Scientist in residence program improving children’s image of science and scientists. School Science and Mathematics, 90(3), 204–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  32. Francis, B., Read, B., & Skelton, C. (2010). The simultaneous production of educational achievement and popularity: how do some pupils accomplish it? British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 317–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gilbert, J., & Calvert, S. (2003). Challenging accepted wisdom: looking at the gender and science education question through a different lens. International Journal of Science Education, 25(7), 861–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gilmartin, S. K., Li, E., & Aschbacher, P. (2006). The relationship between secondary students’ interest in physical science or engineering, science class experiences, and family contexts: variations by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 12(2–3), 179–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hannover, B., & Kessels, U. (2004). Self-to-prototype matching as a strategy for making academic choices. Why high school students do not like math and science. Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M.-C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: a gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978–1003.Google Scholar
  37. Treasury, H. M. (2006). Science and innovation investment framework: next steps. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  38. Huber, R. A., & Burton, G. M. (1995). What do students think scientists look like? School Science and Mathematics, 95(7), 371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ipsos Mori Social Research Institute. (2011). Public attitudes to science 2011. London: Ipsos Mori.Google Scholar
  40. Jackson, C. (2002). Laddishness’ as a self-worth protection strategy. Gender and Education, 14(1), 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jenkins, E. W., & Nelson, N. W. (2005). Important but not for me: students’ attitudes towards secondary school science in England. Research in Science and Technological Education, 23(1), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Koren, P., & Bar, V. (2009). Pupils’ image of 'the scientist’ among two communities in Israel: a comparative study. International Journal of Science Education, 31(18), 2485–2509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lee, J. D. (1998). Which kids can “become” scientists? Effects of gender, self-concepts, and perceptions of scientists. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(3), 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Losh, S. C. (2010). Stereotypes about scientists over time among US adults: 1983 and 2001. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 372–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Losh, S. C., Wilke, R., & Pop, M. (2008). Some methodological issues with “Draw a Scientist Tests” among young children. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 773–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2010). Choosing science: understanding the declines in senior high school science enrolments. Armidale: University of New England.Google Scholar
  47. Mead, M., & Metraux, R. (1957). Image of the scientist among high-school students. Science, 126(3270), 384–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mendick, H. (2005). A beautiful myth? The gendering of being/doing ‘good at maths’. Gender and Education, 17(2), 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mendick, H. (2006). Masculinities in mathematics. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Mendick, H. (2008). Subtracting difference: troubling transitions from GCSE to AS-level mathematics. British Educational Research Journal, 34(6), 711–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Mills, M. (2001). Challenging violence in schools: an issue of masculinities. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  53. National Academy of Sciences: Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy. (2005). Rising above the gathering storm: energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  54. Newton, L. D., & Newton, D. P. (1998). Primary children's conceptions of science and the scientist: is the impact of a National Curriculum breaking down the stereotype? International Journal of Science Education, 20(9), 1137–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Olitsky, S. (2006). Structure, agency, and the development of students' identities as learners. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 745–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Olitsky, S., Flohr, L. L., Gardner, J., & Billups, M. (2010). Coherence, contradiction, and the development of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(10), 1209–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Osborne, J., Simon, S., Tytler, R. (2009). Attitudes towards science: an update. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego, California.Google Scholar
  58. Palmer, D. H. (1997). Investigating students' private perceptions of scientists and their work. Research in Science and Technological Education, 15(2), 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Renold, E. (2005). Girls, boys and junior sexualities. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  60. Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  61. Salisbury, J., & Jackson, D. (1996). Challenging macho values: practical ways of working with adolescent boys. London: Palmer Press.Google Scholar
  62. Scherz, Z., & Oren, M. (2006). How to change students’ images of science and technology. Science Education, 90(6), 965–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schreiner, C., & Sjoberg, S. (2007). Science education and young people's identity construction—two mutually incompatible projects? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in the science curriculum (pp. 1–17). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  64. Shanahan, M.-C., & Nieswandt, M. (2011). Science student role: evidence of social structural norms specific to school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 367–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smith, W. S., & Erb, T. O. (1986). Effect of women science career role models on early adolescents’ attitudes toward scientists and women in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(8), 667–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Solomon, J., Duveen, J., & Duveen, L. (1994). Pupils’ images of scientific epistemology. International Journal of Science Education, 16(3), 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Song, J., & Kim, K.-S. (1999). How Korean students see scientists: the images of the scientist. International Journal of Science Education, 21(9), 957–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Steinke, J., Knight Lapinski, M., Crocker, N., Zietsman-Thomas, A., Williams, Y., Higdon Evergreen, S., et al. (2007). Assessing media influences on middle school aged children’s perceptions of women in science using the Draw-a-Scientist Test (DAST). Science Communication, 29(1), 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Taconis, R., & Kessels, U. (2009). How choosing science depends on students’ individual fit to ‘science culture’. International Journal of Science Education, 31(8), 1115–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tan, E., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2008). Unpacking science for all through the lens of identities-in-practice: the stories of Amelia and Ginny. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(1), 43–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Thompson, J. (2011). Engaging girlsidentities in science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  72. Turner, S. L., Steward, J. C., & Lapan, R. T. (2004). Family factors associated with sixth-grade adolescents' math and science career interests. The Career Development Quarterly, 53, 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Varelas, M., Kane, J. M., & Wylie, C. D. (2011). Young African American children's representations of self, science, and school: Making sense of difference. Science Education, 95(5), 824–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Widmeyer Research & Polling (2009). Attitudes toward math and science education among American students and parents. Report commissioned by Carnegie-IAS.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer DeWitt
    • 1
    Email author
  • Louise Archer
    • 1
  • Jonathan Osborne
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Education and Professional StudiesKing’s College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Stanford University School of EducationStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations