Abstract
The challenge of teaching new subject matter is a familiar one for most teachers. This paper investigates the content knowledge gains made by seven teachers as they learn to teach the topic of semiconductors through a process of self-study. ‘Semiconductors’ is a new topic in the curriculum which looks at the sub-microscopic properties of materials used in electronics and is important because of its applications in modern technology. We present a phenomenographic analysis of 21 concept maps produced by seven teachers at various stages of their self-study project. Four categories of description emerged in the analysis, viz. no meaning, orientation to understanding of subject matter (SMK), a pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) context focus, and a PCK strategy focus. The last category proved to be the most interesting as it suggested that the teacher saw the learning of SMK and learning to teach the SMK as a single process. This finding was considered as important in understanding how teachers learn new SMK for teaching. We found that experienced teachers make sense of their new SMK in different ways. There is a variation of orientation in their learning and sense-making. The data also showed progression of teachers’ understanding of the topic through the self-study process. The findings suggest that learning SMK for the purposes of teaching is different to learning for fulfilling the requirements of a study programme.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In South Africa, students do a 1-year honours degree before they are admitted to a masters degree, in the case of education, generally while teaching full time.
References
Abell, S. A. (2007). Research on Science Teacher Knowledge. In S. A. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 1105–1150). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Abell, S. A. (2008). Twenty years later: does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405–1416.
Adamczyk, P., & Willson, M. (1996). Using concept maps with trainee physics teachers. Physics Education, 31(6), 374–381.
Åkerlind, G. S. (2005). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research and Development, 24(4), 321–334.
Angell, C., Ryder, J., & Scott, P. (2005). Becoming an expert teacher: Novice physics teachers’ development of conceptual and pedagogical knowledge. Paper presented at the European Science Education Research Association Conference. Retrieved from http://folk.uio.no/carla/ARS_2005.pdf 3 March 2012.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407.
Bullough, R. V., & Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher, 30, 13–21.
Deng, Z. (2007). Knowing the subject matter of a secondary-school science subject. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(5), 503–535.
Department of Education. (2003). National Curriculum Statement—Grades 10–12 Physical Sciences. Retrieved from http://www.education.gov.za/Curriculum/Curriculum.asp.
Emanuelsson, J. (2001). A question about questions: how teachers’ questioning makes it possible to learn about the students’ ways of understanding the content taught in mathematics and science. In Swedish with summary in English. Göteborg: Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
García-Carmona, A., & Criado, A. M. (2009). Introduction to semiconductor physics in secondary education: evaluation of a teaching sequence. International Journal of Science Education, 31(16), 2205–2245.
Geddis, A. N., & Wood, E. (1997). Transforming subject matter and managing dilemmas: a case study in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(6), 611–626.
Gess-Newsome, J. (1999a). Pedagogical content knowledge: an introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 3–20). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Gess-Newsome, J. (1999b). Secondary teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and their impact on instruction. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 51–94). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (1995). Biology teachers’ perceptions of subject matter structure and its relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 301–325.
Giorgi, S., Pozzo, R., & Concari, S. (2000). Representations of pre-college students about bodies with translational movement. In R. Pinto & S. Surinach (Eds.), Physics teacher education beyond (pp. 381–382). Paris: Elsevier.
Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Guruswamy, C., Somers, M., & Hussey, R. (1997). Students’ understanding of the transfer of charge between conductors. Physics Education, 32(2), 91–96.
Halim, L., & Meerah, S. M. (2002). Science trainee teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and its influence on physics teaching. Research in Science and Technological Education, 20(2), 215–225.
Hashweh, M. (1987). Effects of subject-matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(2), 109–120.
Hoz, R., Tomer, Y., & Tamir, P. (1990). The relations between disciplinary and pedagogical knowledge and the length of teaching experience of biology and geography teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 973–985.
Jenkins, T. (2005). A brief history of… semiconductors. Physics Education, 40(5), 430–439.
Kinchin, I. M., & Hay, D. B. (2000). How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educational Research, 42(1), 43–57.
Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204.
LaBoskey, V. K. (2007). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 2, pp. 817–869). Dordrecht: Springer.
Lee, O. (1995). Subject matter knowledge, classroom management, and instructional practices in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 423–440.
Loughran, J. J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370–391.
MacGillivray, A. (2010). Leadership in a network of communities: a phenomenographic study. The Learning Organization, 17(1), 24–40.
Marshall, D., & Linder, C. (2005). Students’ expectations of teaching in undergraduate physics. International Journal of Science Education, 27(10), 1255–1268.
Marton, F. (1994). On the structure of teachers’ awareness. In I. Carlgren, G. Handal, & S. Vaage (Eds.), Teachers’ minds and actions: research on teachers’ thinking and practice (pp. 29–44). London: Falmer.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Mitchell, I., & Mitchell, J. (2009). The project for enhancing effective learning (PEEL): 22 years of praxis. In A. P. Samaras, A. R. Freese, C. Kosnik & C. Beck (Eds.), Learning Communities In Practice (Vol. 4, pp. 7–18).
Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: a useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937–949.
Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct Them, Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006–01 Rev 01–2008, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. Retrieved from http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf.
Novick, S., & Menis, J. (1976). A study of student perceptions of the mole concept. Journal of Chemical Education, 53, 720–722.
Park, S., Jang, J.-Y., Chen, Y.-C., & Jung, J. (2011). Is pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) necessary for reformed science teaching?: evidence from an empirical study. Research in Science Education, 41, 245–260.
Rollnick, M. (2008). Using Self Study to Learn to teach new chemistry topics in the curriculum—Case Studies from South Africa. Paper presented at the 20th International Conference on Chemical Education (ICCE).
Rollnick, M. (2011). Development of Teachers’ content knowledge and PCK as they learn to teach a new topic. Paper presented at the European Science Education Research Association, Lyon, France.
Rollnick, M., Bennett, J., Rhemtula, M., Dharsey, N., & Ndlovu, T. (2008). The place of subject matter knowledge in PCK—a case study of South African teachers teaching the amount of substance and equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1365–1387.
Rollnick, M., Mundalamo, F., & Booth, S. (2009). Teachers’ meanings and intentions in constructing concept maps while learning to teach semiconductors. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Garden Grove, CA.
Sanders, L. R., Borko, H., & Lockard, J. D. (1993). Secondary science teachers’ knowledge base when teaching science courses in and out of their area of certification. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(7), 723–736.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 4–14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Smith, D., & Neale, D. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(1), 1–20.
Sperandeo-Mineo, R. M., Fazio, C., & Tarantino, G. (2006). Pedagogical content knowledge development and pre-service physics teacher education: a case study. Research in Science Education, 36, 235–268.
Stoddart, T., Abrams, R., Gasper, E., & Canady, D. (2000). Concept maps as assessment in science inquiry learning—a report of methology. International Journal of Science Education, 22(12), 1221–1246.
Warren, B., & Ogonowski, M. (1998). From knowledge to knowing: an inquiry into teacher learning in science. Newton: Education Development Center.
Wettergren, J. (2002). Understanding concepts needed for semiconductor physics. European Journal of Engineering Education, 27(1), 105–111.
Zeichner, K. (1999). The new scholarship in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(9), 4–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rollnick, M., Mundalamo, F. & Booth, S. Concept Maps as Expressions of Teachers’ Meaning–Making while Beginning to Teach Semiconductors. Res Sci Educ 43, 1435–1454 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9314-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9314-1