Aguiar, O. G., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2010). Learning from and responding to students’ questions: the authoritative and dialogic tension. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(2), 174–193.
Aikenhead, G. S. (2005). Science for everyday life: Evidence—based practice. New York: Teachers College.
Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2005). Characterizing children’s spontaneous interest in science and technology. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 803–826.
Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2008). Girls’ biology, boys’ physics: evidence from free-choice science learning settings. Research in Science & Technological Education, 26(1), 75–92.
Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2009). Identifying meta-clusters of students’ interest in science and their change with age. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(9), 999–1020.
Baram-Tsabari, A., Sethi, R. J., Bry, L., & Yarden, A. (2006). Using questions sent to an Ask-A-Scientist site to identify children’s interest in science. Science Education, 90(6), 1050–1072.
Baram-Tsabari, A., Sethi, R. J., Bry, L., & Yarden, A. (2009). Asking scientists: a decade of questions analyzed by age, gender and country. Science Education, 93(1), 131–160.
Bennett, J., & Hogarth, S. (2009). Would you want to talk to a scientist at a party? High school students’ attitudes to school science and to science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(14), 1975–1998.
Bennett, J., Hogarth, S., & Lubben, F. (2003). A systematic review of the effects of context-based and Science-Technology-Society (STS) approaches in the teaching of secondary science. Version 1.1. In: Research evidence in education library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
Campbell, B., Lazonby, J., Millar, R., Nicholson, P., Ramsden, J., & Waddington, D. (1994). Science the Salters’ approach—A case study of the process of large scale curriculum development. Science Education, 78(5), 415–447.
Chin, C. (2004). Students’ questions: fostering a culture of inquisitiveness in science classrooms. School Science Review, 86(314), 107–112.
Chin, C. (2006). Using self-questioning to promote pupils’ process skills thinking. School Science Review, 87(321), 113–122.
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: a potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1–39.
Chin, C., Brown, D. E., & Bruce, B. C. (2002). Student-generated questions: a meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521–549.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (Eds.). (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Colbert, J. T., Olson, J. K., & Clough, M. P. (2007). Using the web to encourage student-generated questions in large format introductory biology classes. Journal of Cell Biology-Life Sciences Education, 6, 42–48.
Dillon, J. T. (1984). The classification of research questions. Review of Educational Research, 54(3), 327–361.
Educate to Innovate Campaign (2009). Educate to Innovate. Retrieved December 10, 2009, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/education/educate-innovate.
Elstgeest, J. (1985). The right question at the right time. In W. Harlen (Ed.), Primary science: Taking the plunge. Oxford: Heinemann Educational.
Eurydice (Information of Educational System and Policies Europe). (2008). Structures of education, vocational training and adult education systems in Europe: Turkey 2008. Retrieved December 10, 2009, from http://www.eurydice.org.
Falchetti, E., Caravita, S., & Sperduti, A. (2007). What do laypersons want to know from scientists? An analysis of a dialogue between scientists and laypersons on the web site Scienzaonline. Public Understanding of Science, 16(4), 489–506.
Fensham, P. J. (1998). Students’ response to the TIMSS tests. Research in Science Education, 28(4), 481–489.
Fensham, P. J. (2007). Interest in science: Lessons and non-lessons from TIMSS and PISA. In R. Pinto & D. Couso (Eds.), Contributions from science education research (pp. 3–10). Dordrecht: Springer.
Finson, K. D. (2002). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 335–346.
Fraser, B. J., & Tobin, K. G. (Eds.). (1998). International handbook of science education (2 vols). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Gago, J. M., Ziman, J., Caro, P., Constantinou, C., Davies, G., Parchmann, I., et al. (2004). Europe needs more scientists, Report by the High Level Group on Increasing Human Resources for Science and Technology in Europe 2004, European Commission.
Glenn, J. (2000). Before it’s too late: A report to the nation from the national commission on mathematics and science teaching for the 21st century. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Hidi, S., Renninger, A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition (pp. 89–115). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jenkins, E. W. (2006). The student voice and school science education. Studies in Science Education, 42(1), 49–88.
Jenkins, E. W., & Nelson, N. W. (2005). Important but not for me: students’ attitudes towards secondary school science in England. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(1), 41–57.
Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 383–409.
Lavonen, J., Byman, R., Juuti, K., Meisalo, V., & Uitto, A. (2005). Pupil interest in physics: a survey in Finland. NorDiNa, Nordic Studies in Science Education, 2(1), 72–85.
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of the nature of science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learner’s conceptions of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521.
Lyons, T. (2006). Different countries, same science classes: students’ experiences of school science in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 591–614.
Mahaffy, P. (2004). The future shape of chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5(3), 229–245.
MEB (Turkish Ministry of National Education). (2005). Science and technology curriculum. Retrieved November 10, 2010, from http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/ogretmen/.
Millar, R. (2006). Twenty first century science: insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1499–1521.
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000. Science education for the future. London: King’s College- Nuffield Foundation.
Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424–436.
Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
National Science Board. (2010). Science and engineering indicators 2010. (Chapter 7: Science and technology: public attitudes and understanding). Arlington: National Science Foundation.
Nuffield 21st Century Science. (2007). Nuffield 21st century science. Retrieved October 25, 2010, from http://www.21stcenturyscience.org/.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2008). PISA 2006 Executive summary: Today’s education and tomorrow’s society. Budapest: OECD. Retrieved October 25, 2010, from http://oecd-pisa.hu/english/PISA2006-HungarianReport-English.pdf.
Osborne, J. (2006). Message from the president. E-NARST News, 49(2), 1–2. Retrieved December 10, 2009, from http://www.narst.org/news/e-narstnews_july_2006_.pdf.
Osborne, J. (2007). Science education for the twenty first century. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 173–184.
Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2000). Pupils’ and parents’ views of the school science curriculum. London: King’s College London.
Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: a focus group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441–467.
Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. A report to the Nuffield Foundation. London: King’s College London.
Osborne, J., Duschl, R., & Fairbrother, R. (2002). Breaking the mould? Teaching science for public understanding. London: The Nuffield Foundation.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.
Pedrosa De Jesus, M. H., Teixeira-dias, J. J. C., & Watts, D. M. (2003). Questions of chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8), 1015–1030.
Ramsden, J. M. (1997). How does a context-based approach influence understanding of key chemical ideas at 16+? International Journal of Science Education, 19(6), 697–710.
Rocard, M., Csermely, R., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. LuxembourgBelgium: European Commission.
Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: a review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181–221.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
Schreiner, C. (2006). Exploring a ROSE-garden: Norwegian youth’s orientations towards science—seen as signs of late modern identities. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Oslo, Norway.
Sjøberg, S. (2000). Science and scientists: The SAS study. Oslo: University of Oslo. Retrieved December 10, 2009, from http://folk.uio.no/sveinsj/SASweb.htm.
Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2002). ROSE handbook: Introduction, guidelines and underlying ideas. Oslo: University of Oslo. Retrieved December 10, 2009, from http://www.ils.uio.no/english/rose/.
Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2005). How do learners in different cultures relate to science and technology? Results and perspectives from the project ROSE. Asia Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 1–16.
Stake, J. E. (2006). The critical mediating role of social encouragement for science motivation and confidence among high school girls and boys. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1017–1045.
White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Probing understanding. London: Falmer.
Yarden, A., Hasson, E., Gelbart, H., Cohen, R., Falk, H., Yarden, H., et al. (2008). Students’ interest and scientific knowledge: Making ends meet. Retrieved December 10, 2009, from http://www.weizmann.ac.il/Biology/open_day/book/Abstracts/Anat_yarden.pdf.
Yerdelen-Damar, S., & Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Questions about physics: the case of a Turkish ‘Ask a Scientist’ website. Research in Science Education, 40(2), 223–238.