Abstract
The demographic changes in Greek schools underline the need for reconsidering the way in which migrant pupils move from their everyday culture into the culture of school science (a process known as “cultural border crossing”). Migrant pupils might face difficulties when they attempt to transcend cultural borders and this may influence their progress in science as well as the construction of suitable academic identities as a means of promoting scientific literacy. In the research we present in this paper, adopting the socioculturally driven thesis that learning can be viewed and studied as a meaning-making, collaborative inquiry process, we implemented an action research program (school year 2008–2009) in cooperation with two teachers, in a primary school of Athens with 85% migrant pupils. We examined whether the two teachers, who became gradually acquainted with cross-cultural pedagogy during the project, act towards accommodating the crossing of cultural borders by implementing a variety of inclusive strategies in science teaching. Our findings reveal that both teachers utilized suitable cross-border strategies (strategies concerning the establishment of a collaborative inquiry learning environment, and strategies that were in accordance with a cross-border pedagogy) to help students cross smoothly from their “world” to the “world of science”. A crucial key to the teachers’ expertise was their previous participation in collaborative action research (school years 2004–2006), in which they analyzed their own discourse practices during science lessons in order to establish more collaborative inquiry environments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 26, 1–52.
Aikenhead, G. S. (2001). Students’ ease in crossing cultural borders into school science. Science & Education, 85, 180–188.
Applebee, A. (1996). Curriculum as conversation. Transforming traditions of teaching and learning. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Barnes, D., & Todd, F. (1995). Communication and learning revisited. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook Publishers, Inc.
Brown, B. A. (2004). Discursive identity: assimilation into the culture of science classroom and its implications for minority students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8), 810–834.
César, M., & Kumpulainen, K. (Eds.). (2009). Social interactions in multicultural settings. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Cobern, W. W., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1998). Cultural aspects of learning science. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 39–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Coelho, E. (1998). Teaching and learning in multicultural schools: An integrated approach. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Costa, V. B. (1995). When science is “another world”: relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science. Science & Education, 79(3), 313–333.
Gee, P. J. (1999). An introdauction to discourse analysis. Theory and method. London: Routledge.
Gee, J. P., & Green, L. J. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice: a methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119–169.
Giroux, H. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.
Giroux, H. (1997). Pedagogy and the politics of hope: Theory, culture, and schooling. Boulder: Westview Press.
Hanrahan, M. (2002). Applying CDA to the analysis of productive hybrid discourses in science classrooms. Paper presented at the Annual paper conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education. Brisbane, Queensland, 1–5 December 2002.
Hewson, M. G. (1988). The ecological context of knowledge: implications for learning science in developing countries. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20, 317–326.
Hicks, D. (1996). Contextual inquiries: A discourse-oriented study of classroom learning. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 104–141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodson, D. (1993). In search of a rationale for a multicultural science education. Science & Education, 77(6), 685–711.
Jegede, O., & Aikenhead, S. (1999). Transcending cultural borders: implications for science teaching. Journal for Science & Technology Education, 17(1), 45–66.
Jegede, O., & Aikenhead, G. (2004). Transcending cultural borders: Implications for science teaching. In E. Scanlon, P. Murphy, J. Thomas, & E. Whitelegg (Eds.), Reconsidering science learning (pp. 153–175). London: Routledge.
Kamberelis, G. (2001). Producing heteroglossic classroom (micro)cultures through hybrid discourse practice. Linguistics and Education, 12(1), 85–125.
Kelly, G. J. (2007). Discourse in science classrooms. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 443–469). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kelly, G., & Sezen, A. (2010). Activity, discourse & meaning. Some directions for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 39–52.
Kittleson, J., & Southerland, S. (2004). The role of discourse in group knowledge construction: a case study of engineering students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 267–293.
Kovalainen, M., & Kumpulainen, K. (2007). The social construction of participation in an elementary classroom community. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(3–4), 141–158.
Kumpulainen, K., & Wray, D. (Eds.) (2002). Classroom interaction and social learning: From theory to practice. New York: Routledge Falmer.
Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1998). Science for all, including students from non-english- language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27(4), 12–21.
Lee, O., & Luykx, A. (2006). Science education and student diversity: Synthesis and research agenda. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, O., & Luykx, A. (2007). Science education and student diversity: Race/ethnicity, langauge, culrure, and socioeconomic status. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 171–197). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood: Ablex.
Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296–316.
McIntyre, E., Rosebery, A., & González, N. (Eds.). (2001). Classroom diversity: Connecting curriculum to students’ lives. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Moje, E., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. (2001). Maestro, what is ‘quality’? Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 469–498.
Mortimer, E., & Scott, Ph. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Phelan, P., Davidson, A., & Cao, H. (1991). Students’ multiple worlds: negotiating the boundaries of family, peer, and school cultures. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 22, 224–250.
Pomeroy, D. (1994). Science education and cultural diversity: mapping the field. Studies in Science Education, 24, 49–73.
Reveles, J., Brown, M., & Bryan, A. (2008). Contextual shifting: teachers emphasizing students’ academic identity to promote scientific literacy. Science & Education, 92(6), 1015–1041.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: University Press.
Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Conant, F. R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: findings from language minority classrooms. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(1), 61–94.
Roth, W.-M. (1995). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inqiry laboratories. Dortrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Roth, W.-M. (2010). Language, learning, context: Talking the talk. London: Routledge.
Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2002). Scientific literacy as collective praxis. Public Understanding of Science, 11, 33–56.
Shepardson, D. P., & Britsch, S. J. (2006). Zones of interaction: differential access to elementary science discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 443–466.
Snively, G. (1995). Bridging traditional science and Western science in the multicultural classroom. In G. Snively & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Thinking globally about mathematics and science education (pp. 53–75). Vancouver: Centre for the Study of Curriculum and Instruction, University of British Columbia.
Taylor, C. A. (1994). Science as cultural practice: a rhetorical perspective. Technical Communication Quarterly, 3, 67–81.
Wallace, C., & Narayan, R. (2002). Acquiring the social language of science: Building science language identities through inquiry-based investigations. International Conference: Ontological, Epistemological, Linguistic and Pedagogical Considerations of Language and Science Literacy: Empowering Research and Informing Instruction. University of Victoria, BC, Canada, September 12.
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wells, G. (2007). Semiotic mediation, dialogue and the construction of knowledge. Human Development, 50(5), 244–274.
Wells, G., & Claxton, G. (2002). Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 1–18). London: Blackwells.
Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Yerrick, R., & Roth, W.-M. (Eds.) (2005). Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities: Multiple voices of research on teaching and learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Piliouras, P., Evangelou, O. Teachers’ Inclusive Strategies to Accommodate 5th Grade Pupils’ Crossing of Cultural Borders in Two Greek Multicultural Science Classrooms. Res Sci Educ 42, 329–351 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9198-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9198-x