Abstract
In her commentary Danielle J. Ford mainly focused on three issues that highlight the promises and challenges for the use of Adapted Primary Literature (APL) in science curricula: the possible contribution of APL to authentic experiences in secondary schools, implementation issues of APL including the support required for the teachers, and the possibilities to extend the use of APL to younger and older students. In this rejoinder, we first offer some general comments on Ford’s commentary. Then we offer more specific comments on two areas of her response, authenticity and the support for teachers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bandoni Muench, S. (2000). Choosing primary literature in biology to achieve specific educational goals. Journal of College Science Teaching, 29, 255–260.
DebBurman, S. K. (2002). Learning how scientists work: Experiential research projects to promote cell biology learning and scientific process skills. Cell Biology Education, 1, 154–172.
Epstein, H. T. (1970). A strategy for education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Falk, H., Brill, G., & Yarden, A. (2005). Scaffolding learning through research articles by a multimedia curriculum guide. In M. Ergazaki, J. Lewis, & V. Zogza (Eds.), Proceedings of The Vth Conference of The European Researchers in Didactics of Biology (ERIDOB) (pp. 175–192). Patras, Greece.
Falk, H., Brill, G., & Yarden, A. (2008). Teaching a biotechnology curriculum based on adapted primary literature. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1841–1866.
Janick-Buckner, D. (1997). Getting undergraduates to critically read and discuss primary literature. Journal of College Science Teaching, September–October, 29–32.
Norris, S. P., Macnab, J. S., Wonham, M., & de Vries, G. (2009). West Nile virus: Using adapted primary literature in mathematical biology to teach scientific and mathematical reasoning in high school. Research in Science Education. doi:10.1007/s11165-008-9112-y.
Smith, G. R. (2001). Guided literature explorations. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30, 465–469.
Yarden, A., Brill, G., & Falk, H. (2001). Primary literature as a basis for a high-school biology curriculum. Journal of Biological Education, 35(4), 190–195.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank Danielle Ford for agreeing to take part in this collaboration and for offering us extremely insightful guidance for our future work. AY is the incumbent of the Helena Rubinstein Career Development Chair.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yarden, A., Falk, H., Federico-Agraso, M. et al. Supporting Teaching and Learning Using Authentic Scientific Texts: A Rejoinder to Danielle J. Ford. Res Sci Educ 39, 391–395 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9116-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9116-7