Skip to main content
Log in

Supporting Teaching and Learning Using Authentic Scientific Texts: A Rejoinder to Danielle J. Ford

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In her commentary Danielle J. Ford mainly focused on three issues that highlight the promises and challenges for the use of Adapted Primary Literature (APL) in science curricula: the possible contribution of APL to authentic experiences in secondary schools, implementation issues of APL including the support required for the teachers, and the possibilities to extend the use of APL to younger and older students. In this rejoinder, we first offer some general comments on Ford’s commentary. Then we offer more specific comments on two areas of her response, authenticity and the support for teachers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandoni Muench, S. (2000). Choosing primary literature in biology to achieve specific educational goals. Journal of College Science Teaching, 29, 255–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • DebBurman, S. K. (2002). Learning how scientists work: Experiential research projects to promote cell biology learning and scientific process skills. Cell Biology Education, 1, 154–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, H. T. (1970). A strategy for education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, H., Brill, G., & Yarden, A. (2005). Scaffolding learning through research articles by a multimedia curriculum guide. In M. Ergazaki, J. Lewis, & V. Zogza (Eds.), Proceedings of The Vth Conference of The European Researchers in Didactics of Biology (ERIDOB) (pp. 175–192). Patras, Greece.

  • Falk, H., Brill, G., & Yarden, A. (2008). Teaching a biotechnology curriculum based on adapted primary literature. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1841–1866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janick-Buckner, D. (1997). Getting undergraduates to critically read and discuss primary literature. Journal of College Science Teaching, September–October, 29–32.

  • Norris, S. P., Macnab, J. S., Wonham, M., & de Vries, G. (2009). West Nile virus: Using adapted primary literature in mathematical biology to teach scientific and mathematical reasoning in high school. Research in Science Education. doi:10.1007/s11165-008-9112-y.

  • Smith, G. R. (2001). Guided literature explorations. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30, 465–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarden, A., Brill, G., & Falk, H. (2001). Primary literature as a basis for a high-school biology curriculum. Journal of Biological Education, 35(4), 190–195.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Danielle Ford for agreeing to take part in this collaboration and for offering us extremely insightful guidance for our future work. AY is the incumbent of the Helena Rubinstein Career Development Chair.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anat Yarden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yarden, A., Falk, H., Federico-Agraso, M. et al. Supporting Teaching and Learning Using Authentic Scientific Texts: A Rejoinder to Danielle J. Ford. Res Sci Educ 39, 391–395 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9116-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9116-7

Keywords

Navigation