Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Australian Secondary Students’ Views About Global Warming: Beliefs About Actions, and Willingness to Act

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 44-item questionnaire was constructed to determine secondary students’ views about how useful various specific actions might be at reducing global warming, their willingness to undertake the various actions, and the extent to which these two might be linked. Responses (n = 500) were obtained from students in years 7 to 10 in three schools in NSW, Australia. For some pro-environmental actions, the degree to which students professed a willingness to act was greater than might be expected from the extent to which they believed the action to be useful. Such actions are those that involve minimal inconvenience such as switching off un-used electrical appliances, or those that are becoming well embedded in social practice, such as recycling. For other pro-environmental actions, the degree to which students were willing to act seemed less than might be expected, given the extent to which they believed the action to be useful. Actions concerning personal transport, such as buying smaller cars or using public rather than private transport, and obtaining more electricity from nuclear power stations, fell into this category. Here, there are disincentives to acting in a pro-environmental manner relating to personal inconvenience, or concern about nuclear power. The data were also explored to determine the strength of the relationships, for each action, between students’ professed willingness to act and their belief that an action would be effective. This suggested a measure of the potential effectiveness of education about that action. For some actions, this relationship was weak; in such cases, altering belief about the usefulness of the action might not be expected to produce major changes in behaviour. Issues concerning public transport were of this type; clearly, for issues such as these, other approaches and/or inducements may be needed to persuade people to adopt pro-environmental behaviour patterns. For other actions the relationship was stronger, so that in these areas environmental education could well be effective, especially if a large proportion of the population are not already willing to undertake that action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this paper, for economy of words, we use the term ‘global warming’ to refer to the exacerbation of the natural greenhouse effect by the addition of anthropogenic pollutants to the atmosphere.

References

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1981). Self referent thought: A development analysis of self-efficacy. In J. H. Flavell, & L. Ross (Eds.), Social cognitive development frontiers and possible futures (pp. 200–239). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1993). The ‘greenhouse effect’: children’s perceptions of causes, consequences, and cures. International Journal of Science Education, 15(5), 531–552. doi:10.1080/0950069930150507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1997). Children’s models of understanding of two major global issues (ozone layer and greenhouse effect). Research in Science & Technological Education, 15(1), 19–28. doi:10.1080/0263514970150102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (2001). Plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose? School students’ ideas about the ‘greenhouse effect’ a decade on. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6, 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyes, E., Stanisstreet, M., Skamp, K., Rodriguez, M., Fortner, R., & Malandrakis, G. (2008, April). Sustainable development: Doing what you believe to be helpful for global warming. Paper to the American Education Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting, New York, NY.

  • Brody, M. (2005). Learning in nature. Environmental Education Research, 11(5), 603–621. doi:10.1080/13504620500169809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, B., & Troyna, B. (1988). Children and controversial issues: Strategies for the early and middle years. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clover, D. (2002). Traversing the gap: concientizacion. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 315–323. doi:10.1080/13504620220145465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtenay-Hall, P., & Rogers, L. (2002). Gaps in mind: problems in environmental education knowledge/behaviour modelling research. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 283–297. doi:10.1080/13504620220145438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine-Wright, P., Devine-Wright, H., & Fleming, P. (2004). Situational influences upon children’s beliefs about global warming and energy. Environmental Education Research, 10(4), 493–505. doi:10.1080/1350462042000291029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., & Stern, P. (Eds.). (2002). New tools for environmental protection: Education, information and voluntary measures. Washington, DC: US National Academy of Science.

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortner, R., Lee, J., Corney, J., Romanello, S., Bonnell, J., Luthy, B., et al. (2000). Public understanding of climate change: certainty and willingness to act. Environmental Education Research, 6(2), 127–141. doi:10.1080/713664673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, K., & Tilbury, D. (2004). Whole-school approaches to sustainability: An international review of whole-school sustainability programs. Report prepared by Australian Research Institute in Education for Sustainability for the Department of the Environment and Heritage, Australian Government. Retrieved September 17, 2007, from http://www.aries.mq.edu.au/pdf/international_review.pdf.

  • Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, P., Skamp, K., & Brookes, L. (2005). Development of an instrument: mentoring for effective primary science teaching. Science Education, 89(4), 657–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (1997). Executive Summary of the North American Chapter on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2001). Third Assessment Report. Retrieved May 23, 2007, from http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar.

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) Retrieved November 15, 2007, from http://www.ipc.ch/.

  • International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001). Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. New York: IPCC/Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Union for Health Promotion and Education (2000). The evidence of health promotion effectiveness: A report to the European Commission (2nd ed.). Brussels: ECSC-EC-EAEC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E., & Pell, R. (2006). Me and the environmental challenges: a survey of English secondary school students’ attitudes towards the environment. International Journal of Science Education, 28(7), 765–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R. (2002). Knowledge, action and pro-environmental behaviour. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F., Wolfing, S., & Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitudes and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalinowski, C. M. (2006). Recycling as a reflection of balanced self-interest. Environment and Behaviour, 38(3), 333–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, M., & Murray, J. (2001). The role of equity and lifestyles in education about climate change: experiences from a large-scale teacher development program. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6(Spring), 32–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, M., & Smith, S. (1999/2000). Teaching responsibility for climate change: three neglected issues. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 15/16, 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, T., & McEwen, D. (1999). Measurement of environmental sensitivity. Journal of Environmental Education, 30(4), 38–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NSW Council for EE (NSW CEE) (2006). Learning for sustainability. Sydney: NSW Council for Environmental Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSW Department of Environment and Conservation. (2006). Sydney: NSW DEC. Retrieved September 19, 2007, from http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/whocares/whocares2006.htm.

  • Nutbeam, D., & Harris, E. (2004). Theory in a nutshell. Sydney: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posch, P. (1993). Research issues in environmental education. Studies in Science Education, 21, 21–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruneau, D., Doyon, A., Langis, J., Vasseur, L., Ouellet, E., McLaughlin, E., et al. (2007). When teachers adopt environmental behaviours in the aim of protecting the climate. Journal of Environmental Education, 37(3), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajecki, D. W. (1982). Attitudes: Themes and advances. Sunderland, MA: Sinnauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROSE Project. (2004). Relevance of Science Education project. Retrieved June 10, 2006, from http://www/ils.uio.no/forskning/rose.

  • Rye, J. A., Rubba, P. A., & Weisenmayer, R. L. (1997). An investigation into middle school students’ alternative conceptions of global warming. International Journal of Science Education, 19(5), 527–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner, C., Henriksen, E., & Kirkeby Hansen, P. (2005). Climate education: empowering today’s youth to meet tomorrow’s challenges. Studies in Science Education, 41, 3–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W., & Gough, N. (2003). Sustainable development and learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvek, D. J., & Hungerford, H. (1989). Predictors of responsible behaviour in members of three Wisconsin conservation organisations. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(2), 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skamp, K., Bergmann, I., Taplin, R., & Cooke, K. (2007). A review of air quality community education. Sydney: ARIES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. (2006). Environment and education: a view of a changing scene. Environmental Education Research, 12(3), 247–264 (Reprinted from Environmental Education on Research, 1(1), 3–20).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, S. (2004). Linking thinking. Perthshire, Scotland: World Wildlife Fund-Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. (2006). What is the economics of climate changes? Retrieved June 20, 2007, from http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/213/42/What_is_the_Economics_of_Climate_Change.pdf.

  • Summers, M., Childs, A., & Corney, G. (2005). Education for sustainable development in initial teacher training: issues for interdisciplinary collaboration. Environmental Education Review, 11(5), 623–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The NSW Greenhouse Office. (2005). NSW greenhouse plan. Sydney: NSW Government. Retrieved June 20, 2007, from http://www.greenhouseinfo.nsw.gov.au.

  • Wandersee, J., Mintzes, J., & Novak, J. (1995). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177–210). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, H. (2006). Climate change—a burning curriculum issue. Primary and Middle Years Educator, 4(2), 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, J., Sheehy, N., McGuinness, C., & Orhard, G. (1998). Children’s thinking about air pollution: a systems theory analysis. Environmental Education Research, 4(2), 117–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yencken, D. (2000). Young people and the environment: The implications for environmentaliam. In D. Yencken, J. Fien, & H. Sykes (Eds.),Environment, education and society in the Asia-Pacific: Local traditions and global discourses (pp. 212–250). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Children and Young People, School of Education, Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia

    Keith Skamp

  2. Environmental Education Research Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

    Edward Boyes & Martin Stanisstreet

Authors
  1. Edward Boyes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keith Skamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martin Stanisstreet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith Skamp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyes, E., Skamp, K. & Stanisstreet, M. Australian Secondary Students’ Views About Global Warming: Beliefs About Actions, and Willingness to Act. Res Sci Educ 39, 661–680 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9098-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9098-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation