Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Experienced Junior-High-School Teachers’ PCK in Light of a Curriculum Change: “The Cell is to be Studied Longitudinally”

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the new science and technology junior-high-school curriculum in Israel, it is recommended that the cell topic be taught “longitudinally in conjunction with other study contents”. This recommendation confers a change in teaching the cell topic and provides an opportunity to form meaningful relationships between biological phenomena at the macro-level and their cellular explanations. Here, we examine junior-high-school science and technology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) with regard to the cell topic and the formation of macro-micro relations, ten years following the publication of the change in the curriculum. Teachers in this study participated in three focus groups (n = 59) and one workshop (n = 12). In addition, six experienced teachers were interviewed in the course of this study. Specific tools were developed to capture the teachers’ PCK. We found that the teachers had changed their way of teaching the cell topic only superficially: they did not undergo any deep change. Despite the importance the teachers placed on teaching and learning the cell topic, their concerns about their students’ comprehension difficulties reduced the time they devoted to teaching the topic in class. The teachers were also found to have no PCK capacity to integrate biological phenomena at the macro-level with their cellular explanations. In addition, a duality was identified among the teachers with regards to relating macro- and micro-levels in biology and in chemistry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: A project 2061 report. New York, NY: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. D., & Mitchener, C. P. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning: A project of the National Science Teachers Association (pp. 3–44). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avraamidou, L., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2005). Giving priority to evidence in science teaching: a first-year elementary teacher's specialized practices and knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(9), 965–986. DOI 10.1002/tea.20081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avrahami, M., Eran-Zoran, Y., Mizrahi, E., Piontkevitz, Y., & Yarden, A. (2003). To the cell and back: Learning activities for teaching the living cell topic as a longitudinal axis. Rehovot: The Amos de-Shalit Israeli Center for Science Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. A., & Lederman, N. G. (1999). Assessment and measurement of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 147–161). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12. DOI 10.3102/0013189X032006003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R., & Yarden, A. (2008). “The cell is to be studied longitudinally": Experienced junior-high-school teachers’ PCK in light of the reform. In M. Reiss, C. Boulter, & M. Hammann (Eds.), Proceedings of the VIth conference of The European Researchers in Didaktik of Biology (ERIDOB). London, UK: Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, O., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2005). Preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge using particle models in teaching chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 947–964. DOI 10.1002/tea.20078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douvdevany, O., Dreyfus, A., & Jungwirth, E. (1997). Diagnostic instruments for determining junior high-school science teachers’ understanding of functional relationships within the ‘living cell’. International Journal of Science Education, 19(5), 593–606. DOI 10.1080/0950069970190507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, A., & Jungwirth, E. (1988). The cell concept of 10th graders: curricular expectations and reality. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 221–229. DOI 10.1080/0950069880100210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, A., & Jungwirth, E. (1989). The pupil and the living cell: taxonomy of dysfunctional ideas about an abstract idea. Journal of Biological Education, 23(1), 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, A., & Jungwirth, E. (1990). Macro and micro about the living cell: Which explains what? Paper presented at the Relating Macroscopic Phenomena to Microscopic Particles: A Central Problem in Secondary Education Conference, Utrecht.

  • Flores, F., Tovar, M. E., & Gallegos, L. (2003). Representation of the cell and its processes in high school students: an integrated view. International Journal of Science Education, 25(2), 269–286. DOI 10.1080/09500690210126793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 3–17). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic .

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teacher College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, J. J., Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(9), 971–993. DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199611)33:9<971::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israeli Ministry of Education. (1988). Science and technology studies in junior high school. Jerusalem: State of Israel Ministry of Education Curriculum Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israeli Ministry of Education. (1992). Tomorrow 98: Report of the Superior Committee on Science Mathematics and Technology Education in Israel. Jerusalem: State of Israel Ministry of Education Curriculum Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israeli Ministry of Education. (1996). Science and technology studies in junior high school Hebrew edition ed. Jerusalem: State of Israel Ministry of Education Curriculum Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapteijn, M. (1990). The functions of organisational levels in biology for describing and planning biology education. Paper presented at the Relating Macroscopic Phenomena to Microscopic Particles: A Central Problem in Secondary Science Education, Utrecht.

  • Kapulnik, E. (2004). Characterization of change process occurring in science and technology's teachers, during and after long in-service training programs. Unpublished PhD, The Feinberg Graduate School, Weizmann Institute of Science (in Hebrew), Rehovot, Israel.

  • Knippels, M. C. P. J. (2002). Coping with the abstract and complex nature of genetics in biology education: The yo-yo learning and teaching strategy. Unpublished PhD, University of Utrecht, Utrecht.

  • Lewis, J., Leach, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000). What's in a cell? Young people's understanding of the genetic relationship between cells, within an individual. Journal of Biological Education, 34(3), 129–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J., & Wood-Robinson, c. (2000). Genes, chromosomes, cell division and inheritance – do students see any relationship? International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 177–195. DOI 10.1080/095006900289949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. Y., & Hu, R. (2003). Students’ understanding of energy flow and matter cycling in the context of the food chain, photosynthesis, and respiration. International Journal of Science Education, 25(12), 1529–1544. DOI 10.1080/0950069032000052045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical knowledge in science: developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370–391. DOI 10.1002/tea.20007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge, the construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2000). Students’ cellular and molecular explanations of genetics phenomena. Journal of Biological Education, 34(4), 200–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markuze-Haas, A. (1998). The secrets of the cell. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1985). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1997). This is biology: The science of the living world. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meitzav-National Authority for Measurement and Evaluation in Education. (2005). http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/Rama/MivchaneyMetzavVechomesh/MivchaneiMeitzavChemed/Mada8.htm. Retrieved July 6 2007.

  • National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunez, F., & Banet, E. (1997). Students’ conceptual patterns of human nutrition. International Journal of Science Education, 19(5), 509–526. DOI 10.1080/0950069970190502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piontkevitz, Y., Kedem, O., & Yarden, A. (1998). Senses and Sensors. Rehovot, Israel: The Amos de-Shalit Israeli Center for Science Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shkedi, A. (2003). Words of meaning: Qualitative research – theory and practice. Tel Aviv, Israel: Ramot (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivan, A., Cohen, S., Nahman, B., & Kave, D. (1986). The cell: Unity in the living world. Jerusalem: State of Israel Ministry of Education Curriculum Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L. (1991). Put to the test: the effects of external testing on teachers. Educational Researcher, 20(5), 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L., Edelsky, C., Draper, K., Rottenberg, C., & Cheland, M. (1989). The role of testing in elementary schools. Los Angeles, CA: Center for Research on Educational Standards and Student Tests, Graduate School of Education, UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Songer, C. J., & Mintzes, J. J. (1994). Understanding cellular respiration: an analysis of conceptual change in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(6), 621–637. DOI 10.1002/tea.3660310605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. L., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). The frame and the tapestry: Standards-based reform and professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond, & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–158. DOI 10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<137::AID-TEA1001>3.0.CO;2-U

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., De Jong, O., & Verloop, N. (2002). The development of preservice chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 86(4), 572–590. DOI 10.1002/sce.10010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695. DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<673::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-J.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeff, R. P. (2003). Towards systems thinking in cell biology education. Unpublished PhD, Proefschrift Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht.

  • Wandersee, J. H., Fisher, K. M., & Moody, D. E. (2000). The nature of biology knowledge. In J. H. Wandersee, K. M. Fisher, & D. E. Moody (Eds.), Mapping Biology Knowledge (pp. 25–37). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarden, A., & Bartov, D. (1997). A journey into the living cell. Rehovot, Israel: The Amos de-Shalit Israeli Center for Science Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarden, A., Brill, G., Levine, N., Hadad, S., & Guy, H. (2001). A close look at the living cell: A computerized learning environment. Tel Aviv: The Center for Educational Technology.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the teachers that participated in this study. AY is the Incumbent of the Helena Rubinstein Career Development Chair.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anat Yarden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohen, R., Yarden, A. Experienced Junior-High-School Teachers’ PCK in Light of a Curriculum Change: “The Cell is to be Studied Longitudinally”. Res Sci Educ 39, 131–155 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9088-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9088-7

Keywords

Navigation