Research in Science Education

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 313–335 | Cite as

An Investigation of Effectiveness of Conceptual Change Text-oriented Instruction on Students' Understanding of Solution Concepts

  • Tacettin PinarbaŞi;
  • NurtaÇ Canpolat
  • Samih BayrakÇeken
  • Ömer Geban
Research Article

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of conceptual change text-oriented instruction over traditional instruction on students' understanding of solution concepts (e.g., dissolving, solubility, factors affecting solubility, concentrations of solutions, types of solutions, physical properties of solutions) and their attitudes towards chemistry. The sample of this study consisted of 87 undergraduate students from two classes enrolled in an introductory chemistry course. One of the classes was assigned randomly to the control group, and the other class were assigned randomly to the experimental group. During teaching the topic of solution concepts in the chemistry curriculum, a conceptual change text-oriented instruction was applied in the experimental group whereas traditional instruction was followed in the control group. The results showed that the students in the experimental group performed better with respect to solution concepts. In addition, it has been found that there was no significant difference between the attitudes of students in the experimental and control groups towards chemistry.

Key Words

alternative conceptions conceptual change conceptual change text instruction solutions 

References

  1. Abraham, M. R., Williamson, V. M., & Westbrook, S. L. (1994). A cross-age study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alparslan, C., Tekkaya, C., & Geban, Ö. (2003). Using the conceptual change instruction to improve learning. Journal of Biological Education, 37(3), 133–137.Google Scholar
  3. Alvermann, D. E., & Hague, S. A. (1989). Comprehension of counterintuitive science text: Effects of prior knowledge and text structure. Journal of Educational Research, 82(4), 197–202.Google Scholar
  4. Alvermann, D. E., & Hynd, C. R. (1989). Effects of prior knowledge activation modes and text structure on nonscience majors' comprehension of physics. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 97–102.Google Scholar
  5. Basili, P. A., & Standford, J. P. (1991). Conceptual change strategies and cooperative group work in chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(3), 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanco, A., & Prieto, T. (1997). Pupils' views on how stirring and temperature affect the dissolution of a solid in a liquid: A cross-age study (12 to 18). International Journal of Science Education, 19(3), 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cakir, O. S., Geban, O., & Yuruk, N. (2002). Effectiveness of conceptual change text-oriented instruction on students' understanding of cellular respiration concepts. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 30(4), 239–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Case, M. J., & Fraser, D. M. (1999). An investigation into chemical engineering students' understanding of the mole and the use of concrete activities to promote conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 21(12), 1237–1249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chambers, S. K., & Andre, T. (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chi, M. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  11. Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1–49.Google Scholar
  12. Diakidoy, I. N., Kendeou, P., & Ioannides, C. (2003). Reading about energy: The effects of text structure in science learning and conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dole, J. A. (2000). Readers, texts and conceptual change learning. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 16, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dole, J. A., & Niederhauser, D. D. (1990). Student's level of commitment to their naive conceptions and their conceptual change learning from texts. In J. Zutell & McCormick (Eds.), Literacy theory and research: Analyses from multiple paradigms. Chicago: National Reading Conference.Google Scholar
  15. Ebenezer, J. V. (2001). A hypermedia environment to explore and negotiate students' conceptions: Animation of the solution process of table salt. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(1), 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ebenezer, J. V., & Erickson, G. L. (1996). Chemistry students' conceptions of solubility: A phenomenography. Science Education, 80(2), 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ebenezer, J. V., & Gaskel, P. J. (1995). Relational conceptual change in solution chemistry. Science Education, 79(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fellows, N. J. (1994). A window into thinking: Using student writing to understand conceptual change in science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 985–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J., & Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children's science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education, 66(4), 623–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guzzetti, B. J. (2000). Learning counter-intuitive science concepts: What have we learned from over a decade of research. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 16, 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guzzetti, B. J., Snyder, T. E., Glass, G. V., & Gamas, W. S. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 117–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guzzetti, B. J., Hynd, C. R., Skeels, S. A., & Williams, W. O. (1995). Improving high school physics texts: Students speak out. Journal of Reading, 36, 656–663.Google Scholar
  23. Guzzetti, B. J., Williams, W. O., Skeels, S. A., & Wu, S. M. (1997). Influence of text structure on learning counter-intuitive physics concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 700–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haidar, A. H., & Abraham, M. R. (1991). A comparison of applied and theoretical knowledge of concepts based on the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), 919–938.Google Scholar
  25. Hewson, M. G., & Hewson, P. W. (1983). Effect of instruction using students' prior knowledge and conceptual change strategies on science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(8), 731–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hewson, P. W., & Hewson, M. G. (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in concep-tual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hynd, C. (2001a). Refutational texts and the change process. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 699–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hynd, C. (2001b). Persuasion and its role in meeting educational goals. Theory Into Practice, 40(4), 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hynd, C., & Alvermann, D. E. (1986). The role of refutation text in overcoming diffuculty with science concepts. Journal of Reading, 29(5), 440–446.Google Scholar
  30. Hynd, C. R., McWhorter, Y. J., Phares, V. L., & Suttles, C. W. (1994). The role of instructional variables in conceptual change in high school physics topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 933–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hynd, C., Alvermann, D., & Qian, G. (1997). Preservice elementary school teachers' conceptual change about projectile motion: Refutation text, demonstration, affective factors and relevance. Science Education, 81, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Janiuk, R. M. (1993). The process of learning chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(10), 828–829.Google Scholar
  33. Johnson, P. (1998). Progression in children's understanding of a basic particle theory: Longitudinal study. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 393–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kokkotas, P., & Vlachos, I. (1998). Teaching the topic of the particulate nature of matter in prospective teachers' training course. International Journal of Science Education, 20(3), 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee, O., Eichinger, D. C., Anderson, C. W., Berkheimer, G. D., & Blakeslee, T. D. (1993). Changing middle school students' conceptions of matter and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(3), 249–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Longden, K., Black, P., & Solomon, J. (1991). Children's interpretation of dissolving. International Journal of Science Education, 13(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maria, K., & MacGinite, W. (1987). Learning from texts that refute the reader's prior knowledge. Reading Research and Instruction, 26, 222–238.Google Scholar
  38. Mason, L. (2001). Introducing talk and writing for conceptual change: A classroom study. Learning and Instruction, 11, 305–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mikkila-Erdmann, M. (2001). Improving conceptual change concerning photosynthesis through text design. Learning and Instruction, 11, 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don't learn chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 69, 191–196.Google Scholar
  41. Niaz, M. (1998). A lakatosian conceptual change teaching strategy based on student ability to build models with varying degrees of conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium. Science Education, 7, 107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Osborne, R. J., & Wittrock, M. C. (1983). Learning science: A generative process. Science Education, 67(4), 489–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Petrucci, R. H., & Harwood, W. S. (1993). General chemistry: Principles and modern applications (6th ed.) New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  44. Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (2000). Bibliography: Students' alternative frameworks and science. Kiel, Germany: IPN.Google Scholar
  45. Pınarbaşı, T., & Canpolat, N. (2003). Students' understanding of solution chemistry concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(11), 1328–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Prieto, T., Blanco, A., & Rodriguez, A. (1989). The ideas of 11 to 14-year-old students about the nature of solutions. International Journal of Science Education, 11(4), 451–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Salisbury-Glennon, J. D., & Stevens, R. J. (1999). Addressing preservice teachers' conceptions of motivation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 741–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Slone, M., & Bokhurst, F. D. (1992). Children's understanding of sugar water solutions. International Journal of Science Education, 14(2), 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith, E. L., Blakeslee, T. D., & Anderson, C. W. (1993). Teaching strategies associated with conceptual change learning in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stavy, R. (1990). Children's conception of changes in the state of matter: From liquid (or solid) to gas. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(3), 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stofflett, R. T., & Stoddart, T. (1994). The ability to understand and use conceptual change pedagogy as a function of prior content learning experience. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Strike, K., & Posner, G. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147–176). Albany, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  54. Sungur, S., Tekkaya, C., & Geban, Ö. (2001). The contribution of conceptual change texts accompanied by concept mapping to students' understanding of the human circulatory system. School Science and Mathematics, 101(2), 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thorley, N. R., & Stofflett, R. T. (1996). Representation of the conceptual change model in science. Teacher Education, 80(3), 317–339.Google Scholar
  56. Treagust, D. F., Harrison, A. G., & Venville, G. J. (1996). Using an analogical teaching approach to engender conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 18(2), 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wandersee, J., Mintzes, J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177–210). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  58. Wang, T., & Andre, T. (1991). Conceptual change text versus traditional text application questions versus no questions in learning about electricity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tacettin PinarbaŞi;
    • 1
  • NurtaÇ Canpolat
    • 1
  • Samih BayrakÇeken
    • 1
  • Ömer Geban
    • 2
  1. 1.K.K. Eğitim Fakültesi, Kimya Eğitimi A.B.D.Atatürk ÜniversitesiErzurumTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Science and Mathematics EducationMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations