Abstract
During their years of schooling, students develop perceptions about learning and teaching, including the ways in which teachers impact on their learning experiences. This paper presents student perceptions of teacher pedagogy as interpreted from a study focusing on students' experience of Year 7 science. A single science class of 11 to 12 year old students and their teacher were monitored for the whole school year, employing participant observation, and interviews with focus groups of students, their teacher and other key members of the school. Analysis focused on how students perceived the role of the teacher's pedagogy in constructing a learning environment that they considered conducive to engagement with science learning. Two areas of the teacher's pedagogy are explored from the student perspective of how these affect their learning: instructional pedagogy and relational pedagogy. Instructional pedagogy captures the way the instructional dialogue developed by the teacher drew the students into the learning process and enabled them to “understand” science. How the teacher developed a relationship with the students is captured as relational pedagogy, where students said that they learned better when teachers were passionate in their approach to teaching, provided a supportive learning environment and made them feel comfortable. The ways in which the findings support the direction for the middle years and science education are considered.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Australian Curriculum Studies Association. (1996). From alienation to engagement: Opportunities for reform in the middle years of schooling. A three-volume report of a national research project. Canberra, ACT: ACSA.
Barratt, R. (Ed.). (1998). Point and counterpoint. The future: The shape of middle schooling in Australia. Curriculum Perspectives, 18(1), 53–75.
Bennett, J. (2003). Teaching and learning science. London: Continuum.
Biggs, J. B., & Moore, P. J. (1993). The process of learning (3rd ed.). Sydney: Prentice Hall.
Campbell, J., Smith, D., Boulton-Lewis, G., Brownlee, J., Burnett, P. C., Carrington, S., et al. (2001). Students' perceptions of teaching and learning: The influence of students' approaches to learning and teachers' approaches to teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 7(2), 173–187.
Carr, M., Barker, M., Bell, B., Biddulph, F., Jones, A., Kirkwood, V., et al. (1994). The constructivist paradigm and some implications for science content and pedagogy. In R. F. Gunstone & R. T. White (Eds.), The content of science (pp. 147–160). London: The Falmer Press.
Carspecken, P. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge.
Centre for Applied Educational Research. (2002). Middle Years Research and Development (MYRAD) Project. Executive summary. February–December 2001. (Report to the Learning & Teaching Innovation Division, Department of Education & Training by the Centre for Applied Educational Research, The University of Melbourne.) Retrieved June, 2003, from Victorian Department of Education and Training, SOFWeb Web site: http://www.sofweb.vic.edu.au/mys/docs/research/MYRADExecSummary.doc
Department of Education, Employment & Training. (1999). The middle years: A guide for strategic action in Years 5–9. Melbourne, Victoria: DEET.
Department of Education, Science & Training. (2003). Australia's teachers: Australia's future. Advancing innovation, science, technology and mathematics. Main report. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching (pp. 119–159). New York: Macmillan.
Ferguson, P. D., & Fraser, B. J. (1998). Student gender, school size and changing perceptions of science learning environments during the transition from primary to secondary school. Research in Science Education, 28, 387–397.
Fraser, B. J. (1990). Students' perceptions of their classroom environments. In K. Tobin, J. B. Kahle, & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), Windows into science classrooms: Problems associated with higher-level cognitive learning (pp. 199–221). London: The Falmer Press.
Fraser, B. J. (1994). Research on classroom and school climate. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 493–541). New York: Macmillan.
Fraser, B. J., & Tobin, K. (1990). Environments for learning science and mathematics (Key Centre Monograph Number 2). Perth, WA: Key Centre for School Science and Mathematics.
Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative education research. Sydney: Academic Press.
Goodrum, D., Hackling, H., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools. Canberra, ACT: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
Hand, B., Treagust, D., & Vance, K. (1997). Student perceptions of the social constructivist classroom. Science Education, 81, 561–575.
Hanrahan, M. (1998). The effect of learning environment factors on students' motivation and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 20(6), 737–753.
Hanrahan, M. (1999). Rethinking science literacy: Enhancing communication and participation in school science through affirmational dialogue journal writing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(6), 699–717.
Harlen, W. (1999). Effective teaching of science. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
Henderson, D., Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). Interpersonal behaviour, laboratory learning environments, and student outcomes in senior biology classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(1), 26–43.
Hogan, K., & Pressley, M. (1997). Scaffolding scientific competencies within classroom communities of inquiry. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 74–107). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Noddings, N. (1993). Constructivism and caring. In R. B. Davis & C. A. Maher (Eds.), Schools, mathematics and the world of reality (pp. 35–50). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Oldfather, P. (1994). When students do not feel motivated for literacy learning: How a responsive classroom culture helps (Reading Report No. 8). Athens, GA: National Reading Research Centre, Universities of Georgia and Maryland.
Oppenheim, A. N. (1992). Questionnaire design, interviewing, and attitude measurement. London: Pinter Publishers.
Roehler, R., & Cantlon, D. J. (1997). Scaffolding: A powerful tool in social constructivist classrooms. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 6–42). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
SIS Project Team. (2003). The science in schools research project: Report on phase 3. Melbourne, Victoria: Deakin University Consultancy and Development Unit.
Speering, W. (1995). Great expectations: Science in the secondary school. In M. W. Hackling (Ed.), Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the Western Australian Science Education Association (pp. 99–104). Mount Lawley, WA: Edith Cowan University Department of Science Education.
Speering, W., & Rennie, L. (1996). Students' perceptions about science: The impact of transition from primary to secondary school. Research in Science Education, 26(3), 283–298.
Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 293–302.
Tobin, K., Tippins, D. J., & Gallard, A. J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 45–93). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Treagust, D., & Harrison, A. (1999). The genesis of effective scientific explanations for the classroom. In J. Loughran (Ed.), Researching teaching: Methodologies and practices for undertaking pedagogy (pp. 28–43). London: Falmer Press.
Tytler, R. (2002, October). Effective science teaching and learning: A value position? Paper presented at the Values Conference, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria.
Tytler, R. (2003). A window for a purpose: Developing a framework for describing effective science teaching and learning. Research in Science Education, 33, 273–298.
van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London: The Althouse Press.
van Manen, M. (1999). The language of pedagogy and the primacy of student experience. In J. Loughran (Ed.), Researching teaching: Methodologies and practices for understanding pedagogy (pp. 13–27). London: Falmer Press.
Varelas, M., Luster, B., & Wenzel, S. (1999). Meaning making in a community of learners: Struggles and possibilities in an urban science class. Research in Science Education, 29(2), 227–245.
Watts, M., & Bentley, D. (1987). Constructivism in the classroom: Enabling conceptual change by words and deeds. British Educational Research Journal, 13(2), 121–135.
Weinstein, R. S. (1983). Student perceptions of schooling. Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 286–312.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Darby, L. Science Students' Perceptions of Engaging Pedagogy. Res Sci Educ 35, 425–445 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-4488-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-4488-4