The purpose of this article is to review recent research on self-regulated learning and discuss the implications of this research for science education. We draw on examples of self-regulated learning from the science education literature to summarise and illustrate effective instructional methods and the development of metacognitive understanding (Gunstone; 1999a; Rickey & Stacy, 2000; White & Mitchell, 1994). We also focus on the crucial role that metacognition plays in self-regulation (Baird & White, 1996; Nichols, Tippins, & Wieseman, 1997; White, 1998).
We divide our discussion into two main parts. The first focuses on three components of self-regulated learning, including cognition, metacognition, and motivation. We relate these aspects of self-regulation to current practices in science education. The second section focuses on six general instructional strategies for improving self-regulation in the science classroom. We focus on the use of inquiry based learning, the role of collaborative support, strategy and problem solving instruction, the construction of mental models, the use of technology to support learning, and the role of personal beliefs such as self-efficacy and epistemological world views. These instructional strategies are selected because they reflect extensive research agendas over the last decade within the science education literature and are essential to metacognition and self-regulation (Butler & Winne, 1995; Gunstone, 1999b).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Alexander, J. M., Carr, M., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1995). Development of metacognition in gifted children: Directions for future research. Developmental Review, 15(1), 1–37.
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.
Anderson, C. W., & Hogan, K. (2000). Preface: Designing programs for science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 627–628.
Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 181–214.
Baird, J. R., & White, R. T. (1996). Metacognitive strategies in the classroom. In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit, & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics (pp. 190–200). New York: Teachers College Press.
Baker, W. P., & Lawson, A. E. (2001). Complex instructional analogies and theoretical concept acquisition in college genetics. Science Education, 85(6), 665–683.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Beeth, M. E. (1997). Teaching for conceptual change: Using status as a metacognitive toolkit. Science Education, 82(1), 343–356.
Beeth, M. E. (1998). Facilitating conceptual change learning: The need for teachers to support metacognition. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(1), 49–61.
Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2002). Beliefs about science: How does science instruction contribute? In B. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 321–346). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bendixen, L. D., Schraw, G., & Dunkle, M. E. (1998). Epistemic beliefs and moral reasoning. The Journal of Psychology, 13(3), 187–200.
Bianchini, J. A. (1997). Where knowledge construction, equity, and context intersect: Student learning of science in small groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(10), 1039–1065.
Blank, L. M. (2000). A metacognitive learning cycle: A better warranty for student understanding. Science Education, 84(4), 486–506.
Brooks, D. W., & Crippen, K. J. (2001). Learning difficult content using the web: Strategies make a difference. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(4), 283–285.
Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., Norby, M. M., & Ronning, R. R. (2003). Cognitive psychology and instruction (4th ed.). Columbus, OH: Prentice-Hall.
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.
Cannon, J. R., & Scharmann, L. C. (1996). Influence of cooperative early field experience on preservice elementary teachers' science self-efficacy. Science Education, 80(4), 419–436.
Chang, C. (1999). The use of problem-solving based instructional model in initiating change in students' achievement and alternative frameworks. International Journal of Science Education, 21(4), 373–388.
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1–49.
Chinn, C., & Brown, D. A. (2002). Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521–549.
Chinn, C. A., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2002). Authentic inquiry: Introduction to the special section. Science Education, 86(1), 171–174.
Chinn, C. A., & Malhorta, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in the schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175–218.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Davis, E. A. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 91–142.
Delclos, V. R., & Harrington, C. (1991). Effects of strategy monitoring and proactive instruction on children's problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 35–42.
Dhillon, A. S. (1998). Individual differences with problem-solving strategies used in physics. Science Education, 82(3), 379–405.
Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(3), 239–264.
Dufresne, R., Mestre, J., Hart, D. M., & Rath, K. A. (2002). The effect of Web-based homework on test performance in large enrollment introductory physics courses. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(3), 229–251.
Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2002). What sort of science education do we really need? International Journal of Science Education, 24(7), 661–679.
Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85(5), 554–567.
Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts, sciences, sports, and games (pp. 1–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Feldman, A. I., Campbell, R. L., & Lai, M. K. (1999). Improving elementary school science teaching by cross-level mentoring. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(1), 55–67.
Gilbert, J. K., & Reiner, M. (2000). Thought experiments in science education: Potential and current realization. International Journal of Science Education, 22(3), 265–283.
Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: It's meaning, measure and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479–508.
Greca, I. M., & Moreira, M. A. (2000). Mental models, conceptual models, and modeling. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 1–11.
Gunstone, R. (1999a). Content knowledge, a reflection, and their intertwining: A response to the paper set. Science Education, 83(3), 393–396.
Gunstone, R. (1999b). The importance of specific science content in the enhancement of metacognition. In P. J. Fensham, R. F. Gunstone, & R. T. White (Eds.), The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning (pp. 131–146). London, England: The Falmer Press.
Gunstone, R., & Mitchell, I. J. (1998). Metacognition and conceptual change. In J. L. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Noval (Eds.), Teaching for science education: A human constructivist view (pp. 133–163). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. American Psychologist, 53(9), 449–455.
Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169–190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1996). Secondary students' mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry. Science Education, 80(5), 509–534.
Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 99–136.
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140.
Hogan, K. (1999). Sociocognitive roles in science group discourse. International Journal of Science Education, 21(8), 855–882.
Hogan, K. (2000). Exploring a process view of students' knowledge about the nature of science. Science Education, 84(1), 51–70.
Hogan, K. (2002). Small groups' ecological reasoning while making an environmental management decision. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 341–368.
Hogan, K., & Thomas, D. (2001). Cognitive comparisons of students' systems modeling in ecology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(4), 319–345.
House, D. J. (2002). The motivational effects of specific teaching activities and computer use for science learning: Findings from the third international mathematics and science study (TIMSS). International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(4), 423–440.
Huffman, D. (1997). Effect of explicit problem solving instruction on high school students' problem-solving performance and conceptual understanding of physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 551–570.
Hurd, P. D. (2002). Modernizing science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 3–9.
Jehng, J. J., Johnson, S. D., & Anderson, R. C. (1993). Schooling and student's epistemological beliefs about learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(1), 23–35.
Jonassen, D. H., Carr, C., & Yueh, H. P. (1998). Computers as mind tools for engaging learners in critical thinking. TechTrends, 43(2), 24–32.
Kahle, J. B., & Boone, W. (2000). Strategies to improve student science learning: Implications for science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(2), 93–107.
Kardash, C. M., & Scholes, R. J. (1996). Effects of preexisting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 260–271.
Kelly, G. J., & Anderson, C. W. (2000). Learning with understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 757–759.
Khishfe, R., & Fouad, A. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551–578.
King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 338–368.
Koch, A. (2001). Training in metacognition and comprehension of physics texts. Science Education, 85(6), 758–768.
Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96(4), 674–689.
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(1), 16–26.
Kuhn, D., & Weinstock, M. (2002). What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter? In B. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 103–177). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The developmental of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15(3), 309–328.
Lave, J., & Wegner, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Linn, M. C. (2000). Designing the knowledge integration environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 781–796.
Mason, L. (1994). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects in conceptual change by analogy. Instructional Science, 22(2), 157–187.
McRobbie, C. J., & Thomas, G. P. (2000). Changing the learning environment to enhance explaining and understanding in a year 12 chemistry classroom. Learning Environments Research, 3(3), 209–227.
Meyer, K., & Woodruff, E. (1997). Consensually driven explanation in science teaching. Science Education, 81(2), 173–192.
Neber, H., & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: The role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13(1), 59–74.
Niaz, M. (2001). Response to contradiction: Conflict resolution strategies used by students in problem solving of chemical equilibrium. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(2), 205–211.
Nichols, S. E., Tippins, D., & Wieseman, K. (1997). A toolkit for developing critically reflective science teachers. Research in Science Education, 27(2), 175–194.
Nieswandt, M. (2001). Problems and possibilities for learning in an introductory chemistry course from a conceptual change perspective. Science Education, 85(2), 158–179.
Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate prepositional hierarchies leading to the empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548–571.
Osman, M. E., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Effects of advance questioning and prior knowledge on science learning. Journal of Educational Research, 52(1), 5–13.
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578.
Pea, R. D. (1993a). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47–87). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pea, R. D. (1993b). Learning scientific concepts through material and social activities: Conversational analysis meets conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 28(3), 265–277.
Pell, T., & Jarvis, T. (2001). Developing attitude to science scales for use with children of ages five to eleven years. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 847–862.
Penn, J. H., Nedeff, V. M., & Gozdzik, G. (2000). Organic chemistry and the Internet: A web-based approach to homework and testing using the WE_LEARN system. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(2), 227–231.
Perkins, D. N. (1993). Person-plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 88–110). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Peterson, R. F., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Learning to teach primary science through problem-based learning. Science Education, 82(2), 215–237.
Pintrich, P. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452–501). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 167–199.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.
Pressley, M., Borkowski, J., & Schneider, W. (1989). Good information processing: What is it and what education can do to promote it. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 43(2), 194–211.
Pressley, M., & Ghatala, E. S. (1990). Self-regulated learning: Monitoring learning from text. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 19–33.
Pressley, M., & Wharton-McDonald, R. (1997). Skilled comprehension and its development through instruction. School Psychology Review, 26(4), 448–466.
Puntambekar, S. (1995). Helping students learn ‘how to learn’ from texts: Towards and ITS for developing metacognition. Instructional Science, 23(1–3), 163–182.
Puntambekar, S., & duBoulay, B. (1997). Design and development of MIST: A system to help students develop metacognition. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(1), 1–35.
Ramaswamy, S., Harris, I., & Tschirner, U. (2001). Student peer teaching: An innovative approach to instruction in science and engineering education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(2), 165–171.
Ramey-Gassert, L., Shroyer, M. G., & Staver, J. R. (1998). A qualitative study of factors influencing science teaching self-efficacy of elementary level teachers. Science Education, 80(3), 283–315.
Reiner, M., & Gilbert, J. (2000). Epistemological resource for thought experimentation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 489–505.
Reybold, L. E. (2001). Encouraging the transformation of personal epistemology. Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(3), 413–428.
Rickey, D., & Stacy, A. M. (2000). The role of metacognition in learning chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(7), 915–919.
Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181–221.
Roth, W. (1998). Science teaching as knowledgability: A case study of knowing and learning during coteaching. Science Education, 82(3), 357–377.
Roth, W., & Tobin, K. (2001). The implications of coteaching/cogenerative dialogue for teacher evaluation: Learning from multiple perspectives of everyday practice. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15(1), 7–29.
Roth, W., McRobbie, C. J., Lucas, B., & Boutonne, S. (1997). Why may students fail to learn from demonstrations? A social practice perspective on learning in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(5), 509–533.
Roth, W., Tobin, K., & Zimmermann, A. (2002). Coteaching/cogenerative dialoguing: Learning environments research as classroom praxis. Learning Environments Research, 5(1), 1–18.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 249–268). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schommer, M. (1994). Synthesizing epistemological belief research: Tentative understandings and provocative confusions. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 293–320.
Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). An evolving theoretical framework for an epistemological beliefs system. In B. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 103–177). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schoon, K. J., & Boone, W. J. (1998). Self-efficacy and alternative conceptions of science of preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 82(5), 553–568.
Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371.
Schraw, G., & Olafson, L. J. (2002). Teachers' epistemological world views and educational practices. Issues in Education, 8(2), 99–148.
Schunk, D. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children's cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 359–382.
Shepardson, D. P. (1999). The role of anomalous data in restructuring fourth graders' frameworks for understanding electric circuits. Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 77–94.
Stratford, S. J. (1997). A review of computer-based model research in precollege science classrooms. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16(1), 3–23.
Tabachnick, B. R., & Zeichner, K. M. (1999). Idea and action: Action research and the development of conceptual change teaching of science. Science Education, 83(3), 309–322.
Thomas, G. P., & McRobbie, C. J. (1999). Using metaphors to probe students' conceptions of chemistry learning. International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 667–685.
Thomas, G. P., & McRobbie, C. J. (2001). Using a metaphor for learning to improve students' metacognition in the chemistry classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 222–259.
Tobin, K., & Tippins, D. J. (1996). Metaphors as seeds for conceptual change and the improvement of science teaching. Science Education, 80(6), 711–730.
Toth, E. E., Suthers, D. D., & Lesgold, A. M. (2002). The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry. Science Education, 86(2), 264–286.
Tsai, C. (2001). Collaboratively developing instructional activities of conceptual change through the Internet: Science teachers' perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5), 619–622.
Tsai, C. (2002). Collaboratively developing instructional activities of conceptual change through the Internet: Science teachers' perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5), 619–622.
Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (1999). Teachers' knowledge of models and modeling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 1141–1153.
Van See, E. H. (2000). Analysis of a student-generated discussion. Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 115–142.
Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45–69.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. and Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weaver, G. C. (1998). Strategies in K-12 science instruction to promote conceptual change. Science Education, 82(4), 455–472.
Webb, N. W., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), The handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841–873). New York: Macmillan.
White, B. C. (2000). Pre-service teachers' epistemology viewed through perspectives on problematic classroom situations. Journal of Education for Teaching, 26(3), 279–305.
White, R. T. (1998). Decisions and problems in research on metacognition. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1207–1213). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
White, R. T., & Mitchell, I. J. (1994). Metacognition and the quality of learning. Studies in Science Education, 23(1), 21–37.
Windschitl, M. (2002). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112–143.
Zembal-Saul, C., Blumenfeld, P., & Krajcik, J. (2000). Influence of guided cycles of planning, teaching, and reflection on prospective elementary teachers' science content representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 318–339.
Zimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining self-regulated learning: A social-cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
About this article
Cite this article
Schraw, G., Crippen, K.J. & Hartley, K. Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning. Res Sci Educ 36, 111–139 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
- Science Education
- Main Part
- Current Practice
- Mental Model
- Research Agenda