Research in Science Education

, Volume 36, Issue 1–2, pp 111–139 | Cite as

Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning

  • Gregory Schraw
  • Kent J. Crippen
  • Kendall Hartley
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to review recent research on self-regulated learning and discuss the implications of this research for science education. We draw on examples of self-regulated learning from the science education literature to summarise and illustrate effective instructional methods and the development of metacognitive understanding (Gunstone; 1999a; Rickey & Stacy, 2000; White & Mitchell, 1994). We also focus on the crucial role that metacognition plays in self-regulation (Baird & White, 1996; Nichols, Tippins, & Wieseman, 1997; White, 1998).

We divide our discussion into two main parts. The first focuses on three components of self-regulated learning, including cognition, metacognition, and motivation. We relate these aspects of self-regulation to current practices in science education. The second section focuses on six general instructional strategies for improving self-regulation in the science classroom. We focus on the use of inquiry based learning, the role of collaborative support, strategy and problem solving instruction, the construction of mental models, the use of technology to support learning, and the role of personal beliefs such as self-efficacy and epistemological world views. These instructional strategies are selected because they reflect extensive research agendas over the last decade within the science education literature and are essential to metacognition and self-regulation (Butler & Winne, 1995; Gunstone, 1999b).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, J. M., Carr, M., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1995). Development of metacognition in gifted children: Directions for future research. Developmental Review, 15(1), 1–37. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, C. W., & Hogan, K. (2000). Preface: Designing programs for science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 627–628. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 181–214. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baird, J. R., & White, R. T. (1996). Metacognitive strategies in the classroom. In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit, & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics (pp. 190–200). New York: Teachers College Press. Google Scholar
  6. Baker, W. P., & Lawson, A. E. (2001). Complex instructional analogies and theoretical concept acquisition in college genetics. Science Education, 85(6), 665–683. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Google Scholar
  8. Beeth, M. E. (1997). Teaching for conceptual change: Using status as a metacognitive toolkit. Science Education, 82(1), 343–356. Google Scholar
  9. Beeth, M. E. (1998). Facilitating conceptual change learning: The need for teachers to support metacognition. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(1), 49–61. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2002). Beliefs about science: How does science instruction contribute? In B. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 321–346). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  11. Bendixen, L. D., Schraw, G., & Dunkle, M. E. (1998). Epistemic beliefs and moral reasoning. The Journal of Psychology, 13(3), 187–200. Google Scholar
  12. Bianchini, J. A. (1997). Where knowledge construction, equity, and context intersect: Student learning of science in small groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(10), 1039–1065. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blank, L. M. (2000). A metacognitive learning cycle: A better warranty for student understanding. Science Education, 84(4), 486–506. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brooks, D. W., & Crippen, K. J. (2001). Learning difficult content using the web: Strategies make a difference. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(4), 283–285. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., Norby, M. M., & Ronning, R. R. (2003). Cognitive psychology and instruction (4th ed.). Columbus, OH: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
  16. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cannon, J. R., & Scharmann, L. C. (1996). Influence of cooperative early field experience on preservice elementary teachers' science self-efficacy. Science Education, 80(4), 419–436. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chang, C. (1999). The use of problem-solving based instructional model in initiating change in students' achievement and alternative frameworks. International Journal of Science Education, 21(4), 373–388. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1–49. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chinn, C., & Brown, D. A. (2002). Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521–549. Google Scholar
  21. Chinn, C. A., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2002). Authentic inquiry: Introduction to the special section. Science Education, 86(1), 171–174. Google Scholar
  22. Chinn, C. A., & Malhorta, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in the schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175–218. Google Scholar
  23. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  24. Davis, E. A. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 91–142. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Delclos, V. R., & Harrington, C. (1991). Effects of strategy monitoring and proactive instruction on children's problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 35–42. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dhillon, A. S. (1998). Individual differences with problem-solving strategies used in physics. Science Education, 82(3), 379–405. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(3), 239–264. Google Scholar
  28. Dufresne, R., Mestre, J., Hart, D. M., & Rath, K. A. (2002). The effect of Web-based homework on test performance in large enrollment introductory physics courses. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(3), 229–251. Google Scholar
  29. Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2002). What sort of science education do we really need? International Journal of Science Education, 24(7), 661–679. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85(5), 554–567. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts, sciences, sports, and games (pp. 1–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  32. Feldman, A. I., Campbell, R. L., & Lai, M. K. (1999). Improving elementary school science teaching by cross-level mentoring. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(1), 55–67. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gilbert, J. K., & Reiner, M. (2000). Thought experiments in science education: Potential and current realization. International Journal of Science Education, 22(3), 265–283. Google Scholar
  34. Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: It's meaning, measure and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479–508. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Greca, I. M., & Moreira, M. A. (2000). Mental models, conceptual models, and modeling. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 1–11. Google Scholar
  36. Gunstone, R. (1999a). Content knowledge, a reflection, and their intertwining: A response to the paper set. Science Education, 83(3), 393–396. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gunstone, R. (1999b). The importance of specific science content in the enhancement of metacognition. In P. J. Fensham, R. F. Gunstone, & R. T. White (Eds.), The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning (pp. 131–146). London, England: The Falmer Press. Google Scholar
  38. Gunstone, R., & Mitchell, I. J. (1998). Metacognition and conceptual change. In J. L. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Noval (Eds.), Teaching for science education: A human constructivist view (pp. 133–163). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  39. Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. American Psychologist, 53(9), 449–455. Google Scholar
  40. Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169–190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  41. Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1996). Secondary students' mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry. Science Education, 80(5), 509–534. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 99–136. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hogan, K. (1999). Sociocognitive roles in science group discourse. International Journal of Science Education, 21(8), 855–882. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hogan, K. (2000). Exploring a process view of students' knowledge about the nature of science. Science Education, 84(1), 51–70. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hogan, K. (2002). Small groups' ecological reasoning while making an environmental management decision. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 341–368. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hogan, K., & Thomas, D. (2001). Cognitive comparisons of students' systems modeling in ecology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(4), 319–345. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. House, D. J. (2002). The motivational effects of specific teaching activities and computer use for science learning: Findings from the third international mathematics and science study (TIMSS). International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(4), 423–440. Google Scholar
  49. Huffman, D. (1997). Effect of explicit problem solving instruction on high school students' problem-solving performance and conceptual understanding of physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 551–570. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hurd, P. D. (2002). Modernizing science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 3–9. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jehng, J. J., Johnson, S. D., & Anderson, R. C. (1993). Schooling and student's epistemological beliefs about learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(1), 23–35. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jonassen, D. H., Carr, C., & Yueh, H. P. (1998). Computers as mind tools for engaging learners in critical thinking. TechTrends, 43(2), 24–32. Google Scholar
  53. Kahle, J. B., & Boone, W. (2000). Strategies to improve student science learning: Implications for science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(2), 93–107. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kardash, C. M., & Scholes, R. J. (1996). Effects of preexisting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 260–271. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kelly, G. J., & Anderson, C. W. (2000). Learning with understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 757–759. Google Scholar
  56. Khishfe, R., & Fouad, A. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551–578. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
  58. King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 338–368. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Koch, A. (2001). Training in metacognition and comprehension of physics texts. Science Education, 85(6), 758–768. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96(4), 674–689. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  62. Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(1), 16–26. Google Scholar
  63. Kuhn, D., & Weinstock, M. (2002). What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter? In B. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 103–177). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  64. Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The developmental of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15(3), 309–328. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lave, J., & Wegner, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  66. Linn, M. C. (2000). Designing the knowledge integration environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 781–796. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mason, L. (1994). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects in conceptual change by analogy. Instructional Science, 22(2), 157–187. Google Scholar
  68. McRobbie, C. J., & Thomas, G. P. (2000). Changing the learning environment to enhance explaining and understanding in a year 12 chemistry classroom. Learning Environments Research, 3(3), 209–227. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Meyer, K., & Woodruff, E. (1997). Consensually driven explanation in science teaching. Science Education, 81(2), 173–192. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Neber, H., & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: The role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13(1), 59–74. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Niaz, M. (2001). Response to contradiction: Conflict resolution strategies used by students in problem solving of chemical equilibrium. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(2), 205–211. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Nichols, S. E., Tippins, D., & Wieseman, K. (1997). A toolkit for developing critically reflective science teachers. Research in Science Education, 27(2), 175–194. Google Scholar
  73. Nieswandt, M. (2001). Problems and possibilities for learning in an introductory chemistry course from a conceptual change perspective. Science Education, 85(2), 158–179. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate prepositional hierarchies leading to the empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548–571. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Osman, M. E., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Effects of advance questioning and prior knowledge on science learning. Journal of Educational Research, 52(1), 5–13. Google Scholar
  76. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pea, R. D. (1993a). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47–87). New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  78. Pea, R. D. (1993b). Learning scientific concepts through material and social activities: Conversational analysis meets conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 28(3), 265–277. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pell, T., & Jarvis, T. (2001). Developing attitude to science scales for use with children of ages five to eleven years. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 847–862. Google Scholar
  80. Penn, J. H., Nedeff, V. M., & Gozdzik, G. (2000). Organic chemistry and the Internet: A web-based approach to homework and testing using the WE_LEARN system. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(2), 227–231. Google Scholar
  81. Perkins, D. N. (1993). Person-plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 88–110). New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  82. Peterson, R. F., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Learning to teach primary science through problem-based learning. Science Education, 82(2), 215–237. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Pintrich, P. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452–501). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  84. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 167–199. Google Scholar
  85. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227. Google Scholar
  86. Pressley, M., Borkowski, J., & Schneider, W. (1989). Good information processing: What is it and what education can do to promote it. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 43(2), 194–211. Google Scholar
  87. Pressley, M., & Ghatala, E. S. (1990). Self-regulated learning: Monitoring learning from text. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 19–33. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Pressley, M., & Wharton-McDonald, R. (1997). Skilled comprehension and its development through instruction. School Psychology Review, 26(4), 448–466. Google Scholar
  89. Puntambekar, S. (1995). Helping students learn ‘how to learn’ from texts: Towards and ITS for developing metacognition. Instructional Science, 23(1–3), 163–182. Google Scholar
  90. Puntambekar, S., & duBoulay, B. (1997). Design and development of MIST: A system to help students develop metacognition. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(1), 1–35. Google Scholar
  91. Ramaswamy, S., Harris, I., & Tschirner, U. (2001). Student peer teaching: An innovative approach to instruction in science and engineering education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(2), 165–171. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Ramey-Gassert, L., Shroyer, M. G., & Staver, J. R. (1998). A qualitative study of factors influencing science teaching self-efficacy of elementary level teachers. Science Education, 80(3), 283–315. Google Scholar
  93. Reiner, M., & Gilbert, J. (2000). Epistemological resource for thought experimentation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 489–505. Google Scholar
  94. Reybold, L. E. (2001). Encouraging the transformation of personal epistemology. Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(3), 413–428. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Rickey, D., & Stacy, A. M. (2000). The role of metacognition in learning chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(7), 915–919. Google Scholar
  96. Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181–221. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Roth, W. (1998). Science teaching as knowledgability: A case study of knowing and learning during coteaching. Science Education, 82(3), 357–377. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Roth, W., & Tobin, K. (2001). The implications of coteaching/cogenerative dialogue for teacher evaluation: Learning from multiple perspectives of everyday practice. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15(1), 7–29. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Roth, W., McRobbie, C. J., Lucas, B., & Boutonne, S. (1997). Why may students fail to learn from demonstrations? A social practice perspective on learning in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(5), 509–533. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Roth, W., Tobin, K., & Zimmermann, A. (2002). Coteaching/cogenerative dialoguing: Learning environments research as classroom praxis. Learning Environments Research, 5(1), 1–18. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 249–268). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  102. Schommer, M. (1994). Synthesizing epistemological belief research: Tentative understandings and provocative confusions. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 293–320. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). An evolving theoretical framework for an epistemological beliefs system. In B. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 103–177). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  104. Schoon, K. J., & Boone, W. J. (1998). Self-efficacy and alternative conceptions of science of preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 82(5), 553–568. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Schraw, G., & Olafson, L. J. (2002). Teachers' epistemological world views and educational practices. Issues in Education, 8(2), 99–148. Google Scholar
  107. Schunk, D. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children's cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 359–382. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Shepardson, D. P. (1999). The role of anomalous data in restructuring fourth graders' frameworks for understanding electric circuits. Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 77–94. Google Scholar
  109. Stratford, S. J. (1997). A review of computer-based model research in precollege science classrooms. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16(1), 3–23. Google Scholar
  110. Tabachnick, B. R., & Zeichner, K. M. (1999). Idea and action: Action research and the development of conceptual change teaching of science. Science Education, 83(3), 309–322. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Thomas, G. P., & McRobbie, C. J. (1999). Using metaphors to probe students' conceptions of chemistry learning. International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 667–685. Google Scholar
  112. Thomas, G. P., & McRobbie, C. J. (2001). Using a metaphor for learning to improve students' metacognition in the chemistry classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 222–259. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Tobin, K., & Tippins, D. J. (1996). Metaphors as seeds for conceptual change and the improvement of science teaching. Science Education, 80(6), 711–730. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Toth, E. E., Suthers, D. D., & Lesgold, A. M. (2002). The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry. Science Education, 86(2), 264–286. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Tsai, C. (2001). Collaboratively developing instructional activities of conceptual change through the Internet: Science teachers' perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5), 619–622. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Tsai, C. (2002). Collaboratively developing instructional activities of conceptual change through the Internet: Science teachers' perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5), 619–622. Google Scholar
  117. Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (1999). Teachers' knowledge of models and modeling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 1141–1153. Google Scholar
  118. Van See, E. H. (2000). Analysis of a student-generated discussion. Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 115–142. Google Scholar
  119. Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45–69. Google Scholar
  120. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. and Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  121. Weaver, G. C. (1998). Strategies in K-12 science instruction to promote conceptual change. Science Education, 82(4), 455–472. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Webb, N. W., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), The handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841–873). New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar
  123. White, B. C. (2000). Pre-service teachers' epistemology viewed through perspectives on problematic classroom situations. Journal of Education for Teaching, 26(3), 279–305. Google Scholar
  124. White, R. T. (1998). Decisions and problems in research on metacognition. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1207–1213). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar
  125. White, R. T., & Mitchell, I. J. (1994). Metacognition and the quality of learning. Studies in Science Education, 23(1), 21–37. Google Scholar
  126. Windschitl, M. (2002). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112–143. Google Scholar
  127. Zembal-Saul, C., Blumenfeld, P., & Krajcik, J. (2000). Influence of guided cycles of planning, teaching, and reflection on prospective elementary teachers' science content representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 318–339. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Zimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining self-regulated learning: A social-cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory Schraw
    • 1
  • Kent J. Crippen
    • 1
  • Kendall Hartley
    • 1
  1. 1.University of NevadaUSA

Personalised recommendations