Skip to main content
Log in

‘Brown Paper Packages’? A Sociocultural Perspective on Young Children's Ideas in Science

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How do we see young children's thinking in science? Is it, as much previous research has led us to believe, that their ideas can be neatly boxed like “brown paper packages tied up with strings” – as the song from The Sound of Music goes? Or are their ideas like “wild geese that fly with the moon on their wings” (Sound of Music): fluid, complex, rich. . .? Drawing on the author's research into young children's ideas about natural phenomena such as the rain and clouds, and on Rogoff's three foci of analysis (personal, interpersonal and contextual), this paper illustrates how a consideration of sociocultural theory can be useful in framing research with young children, and allow us to see beyond the boxes. Emphasis is placed on recognising that children's thinking in science is embedded within particular sociocultural contexts, is guided by others and integrated with their use of certain mental and physical cultural tools. Thus, the article aims to present an alternative method for the generation of data on young children's thinking. Specific analysis of this data will, it is intended, be presented in a subsequent article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alloway, N. (1997). Early childhood education encounters the postmodern: What do we know? What can we count as ‘true’? Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 22(2), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar, V. (1989). Children's views about the water cycle. Science Education, 73(4), 481–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, J. (1993). The relevance of Piaget to research in children's conceptions. In P. J. Black & A. M. Lucas (Eds.), Children's informal ideas in science (pp. 20–44). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannella, G. S., & Bailey, C. (1999). Postmodern research in early childhood education. In S. Reifel (Ed.), Advances in early education and day care (Vol. 10). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobern, W. W. (1996). Constructivism and non-Western science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 18(3), 295–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and Pedagogy. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dove, J. (1998). Alternative conceptions about the weather. School Science Review, 79(289), 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dove, J. E., Everett, L. A., & Preece, P. F. W. (1999). Exploring a hydrological concept through children's drawings. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 485–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1998). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. In D. Faulkiner, K. Littleton, & M. Woodhead (Eds.), Learning relationships in the classroom (pp. 258–275). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edens, K., & Potter, E. (2003). Using drawing as a conceptual change strategy in elementary science. School Science and Mathematics, 103(3), 103–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2000). Research and practice: Is there a dialogue? In H. Penn (Ed.), Early childhood services: Theory, policy and practice (pp. 184–199). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M. (2002a). Sociocultural assessment in early childhood education – Myth or reality? International Journal of Early years Education, 10(2), 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M. (2002b). Sociocultural theory: Rebuilding the theoretical foundations of early childhood education. Policy and Practice in Education, 54(1), 105–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M., & Robbins, J. (2002, December). ‘He lie down and watch the satellite going over.’ Science education meets sociocultural theory. Invited keynote: Contemporary Issues in Science, Mathematics and Technology Symposium. Deakin University, Melbourne.

  • Fleer, M., & Robbins, J. (2003). “Hit and run” research with “Hit and miss” results in early childhood education. Research in Science Education, 33(4), 405–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauvain, M. (1998). Thinking in niches: Sociocultural influences on cognitive development. In D. Faulkiner, K. Littelton, & M. Woodhead (Eds.), Learning relationships in the classroom (pp. 67–89). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göncü, A. (1999). Children's and researchers' engagement in the world. In A. Göncü (Ed.), Children's engagement in the world: Sociocultural perspectives (pp. 3–21). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerstein, O. (1959). My favorite things. In R. Rodgers & O. Hammerstein, The Sound of Music. London: Williamson Music.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D., & Symington, D. (1988). Purposes achieved by drawing during art activities. Research in Science Education, 18, 104–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D., Symington, D., & Martin, M. (1994). Drawing during science activity in the primary school. International Journal of Science Education, 16(3), 265–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, L. (2002). Children's ideas about weather: A review of the literature. School Science and Mathematics, 102(5), 202–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, G. L. (1989). Students' “untutored” beliefs about natural phenomena: primitive science or commonsense? Science Education, 73(2), 155–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and learning science: Towards a personalized approach. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 191–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marín, N., Benarroch, A., & Jiménez Gómez, E. (2000). What is the relationship between social constructivism and Piagetian constructivism? An analysis of the characteristics of the ideas within both theories. International Journal of Science Education, 22(3), 225–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Loughlin, M. (1992). Rethinking science education: Beyond Piagetian constructivism toward a sociocultural model of teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(8), 791–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R. (1985). Building on children's intuitive ideas. In R. Osborne & P. Freyberg (Eds.), Learning in science: The implications of children's science (pp. 41–50). Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn, H. (2000). How do children learn? Early childhood services in a global context. In H. Penn (Ed.), Early childhood services: Theory, policy and practice (pp. 7–14). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1973). The child's conception of the world. St. Albans, Herts: Paladin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philips, W. C. (1991). Earth science misconceptions. The Science Teacher, February 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, J. (2002). Shoes and ships and sealing wax – Taking a sociocultural approach to interviewing young children. New Zealand Research in Early Childhood Education, 5, 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, J. (2003). Moving through understanding rather than to understanding: A sociocultural perspective on young children's conceptions of the rain. Journal of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 10(1), 93–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeships. In J. V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1997). Evaluating development in the process of participation: Theory, methods, and practice building on each other. In E. Amsel & K. A. Renninger (Eds.), Change and development: Issues of theory, method and application (pp. 265–285). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In W. Damon (Chief Ed.) and D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Volume Eds.), Cognition, perceptions and language (5th ed.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 679–744). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B., & Chavajay, P. (1995). What's become of research on the cultural basis of cognitive development. American Psychologist, 50(10), 859–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T., Bell, D., Longden, K., & McGuigan, L. (1993). Primary SPACE project research report: Rocks, soil and weather. Liverpool, UK: Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepardson, D. P. (2002). Bugs, butterflies, and spiders: Children's understandings about insects. International Journal of Science Education, 24(6), 627–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. (1993). The social construction of children's scientific knowledge. In P. J. Black & A. M. Lucas (Eds.), Children's informal ideas in science (pp. 85–101). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiropoulou, D., Kostopoulos, D., & Jacovides, C. P. (1999). Greek children's alternative conceptions on weather and climate. School Science Review, 81(194), 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprod, T., & Jones, B. L. (1997). “The sun can't bounce of a bird”: Young children and their understanding of vision. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 22(2), 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepans, J., & Kuehn, C. (1985). What research says: Children's conceptions of weather. Science and Children, 23(1), 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stetsenko, A. P. (1999). Social interaction, cultural tools and the zone of proximal development: In search of synthesis. In S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, & U. J. Jensen (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice: Cultural-historical approaches (pp. 235–252). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taiwo, A. A., Ray, H., Motswiri, M. J., & Masene, R. (1999). Perceptions of the water cycle among primary school children in Botswana. International Journal of Science Education, 21(4), 413–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R. (2000). A comparison of Year 1 and Year 6 students' conceptions of evaporation and condensation: Dimensions of conceptual progression. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 447–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2000). Deconstructing learning in science – Young children's responses to a classroom sequence on evaporation. Research in Science Education, 30(4), 339–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welzel, M., & Roth, W. M. (1998). Do interviews really assess students' knowledge? International Journal of Science Education, 20(1), 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, L. (1997). Children's misconceptions and conceptual change. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 22(2), 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, M. (2000). Towards a global paradigm for research into early childhood. In H. Penn (Ed.), Early childhood services: Theory, policy and practice (pp. 15–35). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jill Robbins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robbins, J. ‘Brown Paper Packages’? A Sociocultural Perspective on Young Children's Ideas in Science. Res Sci Educ 35, 151–172 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-0092-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-0092-x

Keywords

Navigation