Skip to main content
Log in

A Longitudinal Study of Children’s Developing Knowledge and Reasoning in Science

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growth in science understanding and reasoning of 12 children is being traced through their primary school years. The paper reports findings concerning children’s growing understandings of evaporation, and their changing responses to exploration activities, that show the complexity and coherence of learning pathways. Children’s responses to identical explorations of flight, separated by two years, are used to explore the interactions between conceptual knowledge and scientific reasoning, and the manner in which they change over this time. The paper discusses the particular insights afforded by a longitudinal study design, and some attendant methodological issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arzi, H. J. (1988). From short- to long-term: Studying science education longitudinally. Studies in Science Education, 15, 17–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Lucas, A. (Eds.). (1993). Children’s informal ideas in science. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (1985a). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (1985b). Are children fundamentally different kinds of thinkers and learners than adults? In S. Chipman, J. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills (Vol. 2, pp. 485–514). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C., & Brown, D. (2000). Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 109–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Wood-Robinson, C. (1994). Young people’s understanding of science concepts: Implications of cross-age studies for curriculum planning. Studies in Science Education, 24, 75–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R., & Gitomer, D. (1991). Epistemological perspectives on conceptual change: Implications for classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 839–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel Clough, E., & Driver, R. (1986). A study of consistency in the use of students’ conceptual frameworks across different task contexts. Science Education, 70(4), 473–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel Clough, E., Driver, R., & Wood-Robinson, C. (1987). How do children’s scientific ideas change over time? School Science Review, 69(247), 255–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koslowski, B. (1996). Theory and evidence: The development of scientific reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P., Marx, R., & Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. (1994). The rise and fall of constructivism. Studies in Science Education, 23, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strike, K., & Posner, G. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. Duschl & R. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147–176). Albany, NY: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R. (1993). Developmental aspects of primary school children’s construction of explanations of air pressure: The nature of conceptual change. Research in Science Education, 23, 308–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R. (1994). Children’s construction of explanations in science. In J. D. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the third international seminar on misconceptions and educational strategies in science and mathematics (published electronically, disk 21). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R. (1998a). The nature of students’ informal science conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 20(8), 901–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R. (1998b). Children’s conceptions of air pressure: Exploring the nature of conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 20(8), 929–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R. (2000). A comparison of year 1 and year 6 students’ conceptions of evaporation and condensation: Dimensions of conceptual progression. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 447–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2001). Dimensions of evidence, the public understanding of science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 815–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2000). Deconstructing learning in science: Young children’s responses to a classroom sequence on evaporation. Research in Science Education, 30(4), 339–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2003a). Tracing young children’s scientific reasoning. Research in Science Education, 33(4), 433–465 (Theme Issue on Science in the Early Years).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2003b). The nature of growth in children’s science understandings: Insights from a longitudinal study. In D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, E. Hatzikraniotis, G. Fassoulopoulos, & M. Kallery (Eds.), Science education research in the knowledge based society (pp. 191–200). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2003c, July). Capturing the child: A longitudinal study of children’s science learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Melbourne, Australia.

  • Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2004a). From “try it and see” to strategic exploration: Characterizing young children’s scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(1), 94–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2004b). Young children learning about evaporation: Insights from a longitudinal study. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics & Technology Education, 4(1), 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., & Swatton, P. (1992). A critique of Attainment Target 1 based on case studies of students’ investigations. School Science Review, 74(266), 21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R., Goldsworthy, A., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1999). What is not fair with investigations? School Science Review, 80(292), 101–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R.T. (1988). Learning science. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R.T. (2001). The revolution in research on science teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 457–471). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Russell Tytler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tytler, R., Peterson, S. A Longitudinal Study of Children’s Developing Knowledge and Reasoning in Science. Res Sci Educ 35, 63–98 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-3434-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-3434-1

Keywords

Navigation