Abstract
Agriculture, industry and medicine are being altered by new biotechnologies. Biotechnology education is important because today’s students and citizens will make decisions about the development and application of these new molecular biologies. This article reports an investigation of the teaching of biotechnology in an Australian state, New South Wales (NSW). In NSW few students were electing to answer examination questions related to biotechnology, suggesting that few students were studying the topic. This study looks at why electives relating to biotechnology are chosen or not chosen by students and teachers, with the intention of developing a greater understanding of the requirements for provision of a successful unit of study in this subject. Data was obtained through a survey of secondary science teachers, interviews with teachers and two case studies of the teaching of a biotechnology unit. Teachers reported a range of obstacles to the teaching of biotechnology including the difficulty of the subject matter and a lack of practical work that was suited to the content of the teaching unit. If biotechnology is worth learning in school science, then further research is needed to identify ways to promote the effective teaching of this topic, which teachers regard as important for, and interesting to, students but which most teachers choose not to teach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altrichter, H., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (1993). Teachers investigate their work. London: Routledge.
Australian Education Council. (1994). Science–a curriculum profile for Australian schools. Carlton, Australia: Curriculum Corporation.
Baird, J. R., & Penna, C. (1996). Challenge in learning and teaching science. Research in Science Education, 26(3), 257–269.
Biotechnology Australia. (1999). Developing Australia’s biotechnology future. Canberra, Australia: Author.
Board of Studies, NSW, Australia. (1994). Syllabus, Years 11 and 12 science for life. North Sydney, Australia: Author.
Board of Studies, NSW, Australia. (1996). Biology 2 unit stage 6 syllabus. North Sydney, Australia: Author.
Bol, L., & Strage, A. (1996). The contradictions between teachers’ instructional goals and their assessment practices in high school biology courses. Science Education, 80(2), 145–163.
Coghlan, A. (2000). Reversal of fortune. New Scientist, 165(2241), 15–16.
Coghlan, A., Cohen, P., Kleiner, K., MacKenzie, D., Nowak, R., & Pearce, F. (2002). Raging between organic and intensive farming. Is there another way? New Scientist, 2343, 33–47.
Conner, L. (2000, April). The significance of an approach to the teaching of societal issues related to biotechnology. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Cross, R. T., & Price, R. F. (1994). Scientific issues and social awareness: The case of biological diversity. School Science Review, 75(273), 29–40.
Dawson, V. (2001). Addressing controversial issues in secondary school science. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 47(4), 38–44.
Dawson, V., & Taylor, P. (1999). Teaching bioethics in science: Does it make a difference? Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 45(1), 59–64.
Edmonston, J. (2000). The biotechnology revolution: Distinguishing fact from fantasy and folly? Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 46(4), 11–16.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research in teaching (3rd ed., pp. 1190–161). New York: McMillan.
Hall, R. (1997). The dynamics of coping with curriculum change. Curriculum Perspectives, 17, 31–44.
Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and learning science: Towards a personalized approach. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Jones, K. A. (1995). Classifying biotechnologies. In G. J. Persley (Ed.), Agricultural biotechnology. Opportunities for international development (pp. 25–28). Wallingford, UK: C.A.B. International.
Keiler, L. S., & Woolnough, B. E. (2002). Practical work in school science: The dominance of assessment. School Science Review, 83(304), 83–88.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G., (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Lock, R., Miles, C., & Hughes, S. (1995). The influence of teaching on knowledge and attitudes in biotechnology and genetic engineering contexts: Implications for teaching controversial issues and the public understanding of science. Secondary Science Review, 76(276), 47–59.
Marchant, R., & Marchant, E. M. (1999). GM plants: Concepts and issues. Journal of Biological Education, 34(1), 5–12.
Marshall, E. (2000). Gene therapy on trial. Science, 288, 951–957.
McInerney, J. D. (1990). Teaching biotechnology in schools. Paris: UNESCO.
McInerney, J. D. (1996). The Human Genome Project and biology education. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 42(1), 11–17.
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education. A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Morris, B. (1995). Science and our future; Biotechnology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Olsher, G. (1999). Biotechnologies as a context for enhancing junior high school students’ ability to ask meaningful questions about abstract biological processes. International Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 135–153.
Perry, D. (2000). Patient’s voices: The powerful sound in the stem cell debate. Science, 287, 1423.
Roberts, D. A. (1996). What counts as quality in qualitative research. Science Education, 80(3), 243–248.
Simmoneaux, L. (2000). A study of pupils’ conceptions and reasoning in connection with ‘microbes’ as a contribution to research in biotechnology education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(6), 619–644.
Solomon, J. (2001). Teaching for scientific literacy: What could it mean. School Science Review, 82(300), 93–96.
Solomon, J., & Thomas, J. (1999). Science education for the public understanding of science. Studies in Science Education, 33, 61–90.
Tesch, R. (1990), Qualitative research. Analysis type and software tools. London: Falmer.
Van Rooy, W. (1994). Teaching science using controversial issues: Some guidelines to enhance student learning and motivation. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 40(1), 24–27.
Venville, G. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Exploring conceptual change in genetics using a multi-dimensional interpretive framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(9), 1031–1055.
Venville, G. J., & Treagust, D. F. (2002). Teaching about the gene in the genetic information age. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 48(2), 20–24.
Wilkinson J. W., & Ward, M. (1997). The purposes and perceived effectiveness of laboratory work in secondary schools. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 43(2), 49–55.
Wilson, E., Kirby, B., & Flowers, J. (2002). Factors related to the intent of agriculture educators to adopt integrated agricultural biotechnology curriculum. Journal of Agricultural Education, 43(1), 69–81.
Zeller, M. F. (1994). Biotechnology in the high school biology curriculum: The future is here! The American Biology Teacher, 56(8), 460–464.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steele, F., Aubusson, P. The Challenge in Teaching Biotechnology. Res Sci Educ 34, 365–387 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-0842-1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-0842-1