Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Making the Band: Constructing Competitiveness in Faculty Hiring Decisions

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. https://www.eeoc.gov/prohibited-employment-policiespractices.

References

  • Adedokun, O. A., & Burgess, W. D. (2012). Analysis of paired dichotomous data: A gentle introduction to the McNemar test in SPSS. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 8(17), 125–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1999). Statistics for psychology. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

  • Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2013). Blindspot: Hidden biases of good people. Bantam.

  • Beattie, G., Cohen, D., & McGuire, L. (2013). An exploration of possible unconscious ethnic biases in higher education: The role of implicit attitudes on selection for university posts. Semiotica, 2013(197), 171–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendels, M. H. K., Muller, R., Brueggmann, D., & Groneberg, D. A. (2018). Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals. PLOS ONE, 13(1): e0189136.

  • Bernstein, R. H., Macy, M. W., Williams, W. M., Cameron, C. J., Williams-Ceci, S. C., & Ceci, S. J. (2022). Assessing gender Bias in Particle Physics and Social Science Recommendations for Academic Jobs. Social Sciences, 11(2), 74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013.

  • Bohnet, I. (2016). What works: Gender equality by design. Harvard University Press.

  • Bohnet, I., Van Geen, A., & Bazerman, M. (2016). When performance trumps gender bias: Joint vs. separate evaluation. Management Science, 62(5), 1225–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla-Silva, E. (2006). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Rowman & Littlefield.

  • Castleman, B. L., & Page, L. C. (2014). Freshman year financial aid nudges: An experiment to increase FAFSA renewal and college persistence. Journal of Human Resources, 51(2), 389–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. Y., Kahanamoku, S. S., Tripati, A., Alegado, R. A., Morris, V. R., Andrade, K., & Hosbey, J. (2022). Decades of systemic racial disparities in funding rates at the National Science Foundation. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/xb57u.

  • Cheryan, S., & Markus, H. R. (2020). Masculine defaults: Identifying and mitigating hidden cultural biases. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1022–1052. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd Edition). Sage.

  • Culpepper, D. (2021). We have a partner hire situation: The personal and professional lives of dual-career academic couples. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Maryland.

  • Culpepper, D., White-Lewis, D., O’Meara, K., Templeton, L., & Anderson, J. (2023). Do rubrics live up to their promise? Examining how faculty search committees use rubrics in candidate evaluation and selection. The Journal of Higher Education, 94(7), 823–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damgaard, M. T., & Nielsen, H. S. (2018). Nudging in education. Economics of Education Review, 64, 313–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, A. A., Saunders, J. F., Jacobson, R. K., & West, K. (2020). How gender and race stereotypes impact the advancement of scholars in STEM: Professors’ biased evaluations of physics and biology post-doctoral candidates. Sex Roles, 82(3), 127–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, J. (2015). Improving student performance using nudge analytics. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Educational Data Mining https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED560905.pdf.

  • Fine, E., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Searching for excellence and diversity: A guide for search committees (2nd Ed.). WISELI. https://wiseli.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/662/2018/11/SearchBook_Wisc.pdf.

  • Fine, E., Sheridan, J., Carnes, M., Handelsman, J., Pribbenow, C., Savoy, J., & Wendt, A. (2014). Minimizing the influence of gender bias on the faculty search process. In V. Demos, C. W. Berheid, & M. T. Segal (Eds.), Gender research: Gender transformation in the academy (Vol. 19, pp. 267–289). Emerald Insight. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-212620140000019012.

  • Ginther, D. K., Shaffer, W. T., Schnell, J., Masimore, B., Liu, F., Hakk, L. L., & Kington, R. (2011). Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards. Science, 333(6045), 1015–1019.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., & Lai, C. K. (2020). Implicit social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 419–445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. A., Kravitz, D. A., Mayer, D. M., Leslie, L. M., & Lev-Arey, D. (2006). Understanding attitudes toward affirmative action programs in employment: Summary and Meta-Analysis of 35 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1013–1036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, T. A., Litovitz, A., Willis, K. A., Meseroll, R. A., Perkins, M. J., Hutchins, A., Davis, A. F., Lauer, M. S., Valantine, H. A., Anderson, J. M., & Santangelo, G. M. (2019). Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/Black scientists. Science Advances, 5(10), 1–12.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaschik, S. (2017). White perceptions of affirmative action. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/admissions/article/2017/10/30/survey-draws-attention-white-perceptions-affirmative-action.

  • Jimenez, M. F., Laverty, T. M., Bombaci, S. P., Walkins, K., Bennett, D. E., & Pejchar, L. (2019). Underrepresented faculty play a disproportionate role in advancing diversity and inclusion. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3, 1030–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. K., Hekman, D. R., & Chan, E. T. (2016). If there’s only one woman in your candidate pool, there’s statistically no chance she’ll be hired. Harvard Business Review, 26(04).

  • Kachchaf, R., Ko, L., Hodari, A., & Ong, M. (2015). Career–life balance for women of color: Experiences in science and engineering academia. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 8(3), 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.

  • Kazmi, M., Spitzmueller, C., Yu, J., Madera, J. M., Tsao, A. S., Dawson, J. F., & Pavlidis, I. (2021). Search committee diversity and applicant pool representation of women and underrepresented minorities: A quasi-experimental field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(8), 1414–1427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liera, R. (2020). Equity advocates using equity-mindedness to interrupt faculty hiring’s racial structure. Teachers College Record, 122(9), 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liera, R., & Hernandez, T. E. (2021). Color-evasive racism in the final stage of faculty searches: Examining search committee hiring practices that jeopardize racial equity policy. The Review of Higher Education, 45(2), 181–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubienski, S. T., Miller, E. K., & Saclarides, E. S. (2018). Sex differences in doctoral student publication rates. Educational Researcher, 47(1), 76–81.

  • Luke, K., & Grosche, M. (2018). What do I think about inclusive education? It depends on who is asking. Experimental evidence for a social desirability bias in attitudes towards inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Educationm, 22(1), 38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madera, J. M., Hebl, M. R., Dial, H., Martin, R., & Valian, V. (2019). Raising doubt in letters of recommendation for academia: Gender differences and their impact. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(3), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9541-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, K. (2020, September 24). Why is diversity in engineering a major opportunity? The American Society of Mechanical Engineers [ASME]. https://www.asme.org/topics-resources/content/why-is-diversity-in-engineering-a-major-opportunity.

  • Mendoza-Denton, R., Patt, C., Fisher, A., Eppig, A., Young, I., Smith, A., & Richards, M. A. (2017). Differences in STEM doctoral publication by ethnicity, gender and academic field at a large public research university. PLOS ONE, 12(4): e0174296.

  • Milkman, K. (2021). How to change: The science of getting from where you are to where you want to be. Penguin.

  • Mitchneck, B. (2020). Synthesizing research on gender biases and intersectionality in citation analyses and practices. ADVANCE Resource and Coordination (ARC) Network.

  • Moody, J. (2012). Faculty diversity: Removing the barriers. Routledge.

  • Moore, D. A., & Schatz, D. (2017). The three faces of overconfidence. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(8), e12331.

  • Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474–16479.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P., & Epstein, S. (2011). An experiential thinking style: Its facets and relations with objective and subjective criterion measures. Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1043–1080.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, K., Kuvaeva, A., & Nyung, G. (2017). Constrained choices: A view of campus service inequality from annual faculty reports. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(5), 672–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, K., Culpepper, D., & Templeton, L. L. (2020). Nudging toward diversity: Applying behavioral design to faculty hiring. Review of Educational Research, 90(3), 311–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, K., Culpepper, D., Lennartz, C., & Braxton, J. (2022). Leveraging nudges to improve the academic workplace: Challenges and possibilities. Higher education: Handbook of theory and research: Volume 37 (pp. 277–346). Springer.

  • O’Meara, K., Templeton, L., White-Lewis, D., Culpepper, D., & Anderson, J. (2023). The safest bet: Identifying and assessing risk in faculty selection. American Educational Research Journal, 60(2), 330–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrida, D. (2022, August 11). Promoting diversity and inclusion in robotics education. RobotLab. https://www.robotlab.com/blog/promoting-diversity-and-inclusion-in-robotics-education.

  • Pearlman, L., Combs, S., Murray, J., & Bunim, M. E. (2000–2009). Making the band [TV series]. Bunim/Murray Productions; Trans Continential Pictures; Bad Boy Films; The Ted & Perry Company; MTV Series Entertainment.

  • Perez, A. B. (2022, January 27). A racial reckoning for college access in America. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/angelperez/2022/01/27/a-racial-reckoning-for-college-access-in-america/?sh=4b9c50ba5f8c.

  • Posselt, J., Hernandez, T. E., Villarreal, C. D., Rodgers, A. J., & Irwin, L. N. (2020). Evaluation and decision making in higher education: Toward equitable repertoires of faculty practice. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research: Volume, 35, 1–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, V. (2019). A theory of racialized organizations. American Sociological Review, 84(1), 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418822335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, L. A. (2017). When two bodies are (not) a problem: Gender and relationship status discrimination in academic hiring. American Sociological Review, 82(6), 1111–1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.).). Sage.

  • Settles, I. H., Jones, M. K., Buchanan, N. T., & Dotson, K. (2020). Epistemic exclusion: Scholar (ly) devaluation that marginalizes faculty of color. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(4), 493–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheltzer, J. M., & Smith, J. C. (2014). Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(28), 10107–10112.

  • Shoben, E. (1997). From antinepotism rules to programs for partners. In M. Ferber, & J. W. Loeb (Eds.), Academic couples: Problems and practices (pp. 226–247). Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois.

  • Steinpreis, R. E., Anders, K. A., & Ritzke, D. (1999). The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. Sex Roles, 41(7), 509–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.

  • Tzioumis, K. (2018). Demographic aspects of first names. Scientific Data, 5(180025), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of California, Los Angeles [UCLA]. (2024). Life sciences: The mentor professor initiative. https://equity.ucla.edu/initiatives/life-sciences-the-mentor-professor-initiative/

  • Weeden, K. A., Thébaud, S., & Gelbgiser, D. (2017). Degrees of difference: Gender segregation of US doctorates by field and program prestige. Sociological Science, 4(6), 123–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White-Lewis, D. (2019). The facade of fit and preponderance of power in faculty search processes: Facilitators and inhibitors of diversity. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of California, Los Angeles.

  • White-Lewis, D. (2020). The facade of fit in faculty search processes. The Journal of Higher Education, 91(6), 833–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White-Lewis, D., Bennett, J., & Redd, K. (2022). Setting a national agenda for systemic reform in postsecondary faculty careers. Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities (APLU).

  • Williams, W. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2015). National hiring experiments reveal 2: 1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(17), 5360–5365.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Damani K. White-Lewis

  2. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

    KerryAnn O’Meara

  3. College of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, USA

    Jennifer Wessel

  4. College of Education, Department of Educational Administration, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

    Julia Anderson

  5. College of Education, Department of Counseling, Higher Education, and Special Education, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, USA

    Dawn Culpepper

  6. Higher Education Resource Services, Denver, CO, USA

    Lindsey Templeton

Authors
  1. Damani K. White-Lewis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. KerryAnn O’Meara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jennifer Wessel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Julia Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dawn Culpepper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lindsey Templeton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damani K. White-Lewis.

Ethics declarations

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation Division of Human Resource Development (grant number 1820975).

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

White-Lewis, D.K., O’Meara, K., Wessel, J. et al. Making the Band: Constructing Competitiveness in Faculty Hiring Decisions. Res High Educ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-024-09779-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-024-09779-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation