It is one of the most beautiful compensations of life that no man can sincerely try to help another without helping himself – Ralph Waldo Emerson
Abstract
Educational research has emphasized the importance of help-seeking in learning and engagement. However, little is known about the impact that help-giving may potentially have on student engagement and academic achievement. There is also a lack of knowledge about the environmental factors that might facilitate help-giving. This study investigated how help-giving is associated with student engagement and academic achievement by drawing on the Chinese College Student Survey (CCSS), which involved data from 67,182 Chinese college students. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. Results showed that students who experienced a positive social climate, particularly those who had positive social interactions with their peers, teachers, and university staff members were more likely to help their peers with schoolwork. In turn, these students who helped their peers were more cognitively, emotionally, and behaviorally engaged. They also had higher levels of academic achievement themselves. The results applied to students of different demographic characteristics and different school types. Theoretical and practical implications of the research are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Notes
As the students were nested within institutions, one reviewer suggested that we use hierarchical linear modelling (HLM) to analyze the data. However, due to a data embargo, we are unable to re-analyse the data using the HLM approach. As a workaround, we readjusted the p-value to 0.01 and only take as significant those results that are less than p < .01. We also conducted multi-group invariance tests to show that the results were similar across different institutional types. The use of an SEM approach also offers some advantages over HLM as SEM is able to take into account relationships among multiple types of outcome variables and it can model the latent nature of the data. We note that each statistical analysis has strengths and weaknesses, and we recommend future studies to use HLM when analysing data from students across multiple institutions (Raudenbush & Bryk, 2002; Rocconi, 2013).
References
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.
Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518–529.
Atherwood, S., & Sánchez-Soto, G. (2023). Does social class matter equally for the timely transition into and out of college? Evidence from the NLSY97. Research in Higher Education, 64(1), 95–128.
Bernardi, R. A., & Nash, J. (2023). The importance and efficacy of controlling for social desirability response bias. Ethics & Behavior, 33(5), 413–429.
Bjerkedal, T., Kristensen, P., Skjeret, G. A., & Brevik, J. I. (2007). Intelligence test scores and birth order among young Norwegian men (conscripts) analyzed within and between families. Intelligence, 35, 503–514.
Bornschlegl, M., Meldrum, K., & Caltabiano, N. J. (2020). Variables related to academic help-seeking behaviour in higher education – findings from a multidisciplinary perspective. Review of Education, 8(2), 486–522.
Bowman, N. A., & Hill, P. L. (2011). Measuring how college affects students: Social desirability and other potential biases in college student self-reported gains. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011(150), 73–85.
Bravo, R., Catalán, S., & Pina, J. M. (2019). Analysing teamwork in higher education: An empirical study on the antecedents and consequences of team cohesiveness. Studies in Higher Education, 44(7), 1153–1165.
Bretag, T., Harper, R., Burton, M., Ellis, C., Newton, P., Rozenberg, P., Saddiqui, S., & van Haeringen, K. (2019). Contract cheating: A survey of Australian university students. Studies in Higher Education, 44(11), 1837–1856.
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C., Bandura, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2000). Prosocial foundations of children’s academic achievement. Psychological Science, 11, 302–306.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
Cho, H. J., Levesque-Bristol, C., & Yough, M. (2021). International students’ self-determined motivation, beliefs about classroom assessment, learning strategies, and academic adjustment in higher education. Higher Education, 81(6), 1215–1235.
Coates, H., & Matthews, K. E. (2018). Frontier perspectives and insights into higher education student success. Higher Education Research & Development, 37, 903–990.
Coates, H., & McCormick, A. C. (2014). Engaging University Students: International Insights from System-wide Studies. Heidelberg: Springer.
Colby, A., Ehrlich, T., Beaumont, E., Stephens, J., & Shulman, L. S. (2003). Educating citizens: Preparing America’s undergraduates for lives of moral and civic responsibility. Jossey-Bass/Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Hoboken: Wiley.
Cole, J. S., & Gonyea, R. M. (2010). Accuracy of self-reported SAT and ACT test scores: Implications for research. Research in Higher Education, 51, 305–319.
Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77, 113–143.
Cortese, C. G. (2005). Learning through teaching. Management Learning, 36(1), 87–115.
Crichton, H., Gil, V., F., & Hadfield, C. (2021). Reflections on peer micro-teaching: Raising questions about theory informed practice. Reflective Practice, 22(3), 345–362.
Crocker, J., Canevello, A., & Brown, A. A. (2017). Social motivation: Costs and benefits of selfishness and otherishness. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 299–325.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability Independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354.
Curtis, G. J., & Vardanega, L. (2016). Is plagiarism changing over time? A 10-year time-lag study with three points of measurement. Higher Education Research and Development, 35(6), 1167–1179.
Daumiller, M., Janke, S., Rinas, R., Dickhäuser, O., & Dresel, M. (2022). Need satisfaction and achievement goals of university faculty: An international study of their interplay and relevance. Higher Education, 83(6), 1183–1206.
Davison, K., Malmberg, L. E., & Sylva, K. (2023). Academic help-seeking interactions in the classroom: A microlongitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 33–55.
De Backer, L., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2015). Promoting university students’ metacognitive regulation through peer learning: The potential of reciprocal peer tutoring. Higher Education, 70, 469–486.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nauta, A. (2009). Self-interest and other-orientation in organizational behavior: Implications for job performance, prosocial behavior, and personal initiative. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 913–926.
Dimitrov, D. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43, 121–149.
Eisenberg, N., Eggum-Wilkens, N. D., & Spinrad, T. L. (2015). The development of prosocial behavior. In D. A. Schroeder & W. G. Graziano (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 114–136). England: Oxford University Press.
Fisher, G. G., Matthews, R. A., & Gibbons, A. M. (2016). Developing and investigating the use of single-item measures in organizational research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(1), 3–23.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Fryer, L. K., Zeng, L. M., & Zhao, Y. (2021). Assessing university and programme experiences: Towards an integrated Asia-Pacific approach. Frontiers in Education, 6, 1–10.
Gasiewski, J. A., Eagan, M. K., Garcia, G. A., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. J. (2012). From gatekeeping to engagement: A multicontextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses. Research in Higher Education, 53(2), 229–261.
Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 73–96.
Grant, A. M., & Shandell, M. S. (2022). Social motivation at work: The organizational psychology of effort for, against, and with others. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 301–326.
Green, T. (2016). A methodological review of structural equation modelling in higher education research. Studies in Higher Education, 41(12), 2125–2155.
Hagenauer, G., & Volet, S. E. (2014). Teacher-student relationship at university: An important yet under-researched field. Oxford Review of Education, 40(3), 370–388.
Haggis, T. (2004). Meaning, identity and “motivation”: Expanding what matters in understanding learning in higher education? Studies in Higher Education, 29(3), 335–352.
Hao, Q., Wright, E., Barnes, B., & Branch, R. M. (2016). What are the most important prediction of computer science students’ online help-seeking behaviors? Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 467–474.
Henderson, J. B. (2019). Beyond active learning: How the ICAP framework permits more acute examination of the popular peer instruction pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 89(4), 611–634.
Hockings, C., Thomas, L., Ottaway, J., & Jones, R. (2018). Independent learning–what we do when you’re not there. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(2), 145–161.
Hodge, B., Wright, B., & Bennett, P. (2018). The role of grit in determining engagement and academic outcomes for university students. Research in Higher Education, 59(4), 448–460.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Measuring model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications. California: Sage.
Hu, S., & Wolniak, G. C. (2010). Initial evidence on the influence of college student engagement on early career earnings. Research in Higher Education, 51(8), 750–766.
Jean-Francois, E. (2019). Exploring the perceptions of campus climate and integration strategies used by international students in a US university campus. Studies in Higher Education, 44(6), 1069–1085.
Kahn, P. E. (2014). Theorising student engagement in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6), 1005–1018.
Karabenick, S. A., & Gonida, E. N. (2018). Academic help seeking as a self-regulated learning strategy: Current issues, future directions. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 421–433). England: Routledge.
King, R. B., & McInerney, D. M. (2019). Family-support goals drive engagement and achievement in a collectivist context: Integrating etic and emic approaches in goal research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 93, 48–58.
Knight, R. A., Dipper, L., & Cruice, M. (2018). Viva survivors–the effect of peer-mentoring on pre-viva anxiety in early-years students. Studies in Higher Education, 43(1), 190–199.
Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we are learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change, 35(2), 24–32.
Kuh, G. D. (2009). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. Using NSSE in institutional research. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 5–20.
Kuh, G. D. (2011). Understanding campus environments. In G. S. McClellan & J. Stringer (Eds.), The handbook of student affairs administration (pp. 59–80). Hoboken: Jossey-Bass.
Martin-Arbos, S., Castarlenas, E., & Duenas, J. M. (2021). Help-seeking in an academic context: A systematic review. Sustainability, 13(8), 4460.
Lambert, C. E., Arbuckle, S. A., & Holden, R. R. (2016). The Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale outperforms the BIDR Impression Management Scale for identifying fakers. Journal of Research in Personality, 61, 80–86.
Leung, S. O., & Xu, M. L. (2013). Single-item measures for subjective academic performance, self-esteem, and socioeconomic status. Journal of Social Service Research, 39(4), 511–520.
Levontin, L., & Bardi, A. (2018). Prosocial goals in achievement situations: Amity goal orientation enhances the positive effects of mastery goal orientation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 1258–1269.
Lewis, H. R. (2007). Excellence without a soul. Does liberal education have a future? New York: Public Affairs.
Loes, C. N., & An, B. P. (2021). Collaborative learning and need for cognition: Considering the mediating role of deep approaches to learning. The Review of Higher Education, 45(2), 149–179.
Longobardi, C., Settanni, M., Lin, S., & Fabris, M. A. (2021). Student–teacher relationship quality and prosocial behaviour: The mediating role of academic achievement and a positive attitude towards school. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 547–562.
Luo, Y., Ross, H., & Cen, Y. (2009). Higher education measurement in the context of globalization: The cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of NSSE-China. Fudan Education Forum, 7, 12–18.
Luo, Y., Xie, M., & Lian, Z. (2019). Emotional engagement and student satisfaction: A study of Chinese college students based on a nationally representative sample. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28, 283–292.
Marsh, H. W. (1993). The multidimensional structure of academic self-concept: Invariance over gender and age. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 841–860.
Micari, M., & Calkins, S. (2021). Is it OK to ask? The impact of instructor openness to questions on student help-seeking and academic outcomes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 22, 143–157.
Miles, S. B., & Stipek, D. (2006). Contemporaneous and longitudinal associations between social behavior and literacy achievement in a sample of low-income elementary school children. Child Development, 77, 103–117.
Müller, L., & Klein, D. (2023). Social inequality in dropout from higher education in Germany. Towards combining the student integration model and rational choice theory. Research in Higher Education, 64(2), 300–330.
Orehek, E., Forest, A. L., & Barbaro, N. (2018). A people-as-means approach to interpersonal relationships. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 373–389.
Pavey, L., Greitemeyer, T., & Sparks, P. (2011). Highlighting relatedness promotes prosocial motives and behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 905–917.
Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2371–2391.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. California: Sage.
Rienties, B., & Héliot, Y. (2018). Enhancing (in) formal learning ties in interdisciplinary management courses: A quasi-experimental social network study. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3), 437–451.
Rocconi, L. M. (2013). Analyzing multilevel data: Comparing findings from hierarchical linear modeling and ordinary least squares regression. Higher Education, 66, 439–461.
Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement. Review of Educational Research, 81, 493–529.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
Schmidt, E. K., & Faber, S. T. (2016). Benefits of peer mentoring to mentors, female mentees and higher education institutions. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24, 137–157.
Sharafizad, J., & Redmond, J. (2020). Discretionary effort of higher education sector employees: Motivators and inhibitors. Studies in Higher Education, 45(6), 1261–1279.
Shi, J., Wen, W., Li, Y., & Chu, J. (2014). China college student survey (CCSS): Breaking the black box of the process of learning. International Journals of Chinese Education, 3, 132–159.
Tan, H. C., Ho, J. A., Kumarusamy, R., & Sambasivan, M. (2021). Measuring social desirability bias: Do the full and short versions of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability scale matter? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 17(3), 382–400.
Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M., & Soenens, B. (2020). Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motivation and Emotion, 44(1), 1–31.
Wang, C., Zhang, X., & Yao, M. (2019). Enhancing Chinese college students’ transfer of learning through service-learning. Studies in Higher Education, 44(8), 1316–1331.
Wang, Y., King, R. B., Wang, F., & Leung, S. O. (2021). Need-supportive teaching is positively associated with students’ well-being: A cross-cultural study. Learning and Individual Differences, 92, 102051.
Wentzel, K. R., Muenks, K., McNeish, D., & Russell, S. (2018). Emotional support, social goals, and classroom behavior: A multilevel, multisite study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110, 611–627.
Wentzel, K. R., Jablansky, S., & Scalise, N. R. (2021). Peer social acceptance and academic achievement: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(1), 157–180.
Won, S., Hensley, L. C., & Wolters, C. A. (2019). Sense of belonging and academic help-seeking as self-regulated. The Journal of Experimental Education, 89, 112–124.
Xie, M., King, R. B., & Luo, Y. (2023). Social motivation and deep approaches to learning: A nationwide study among Chinese college students. Higher Education, 85(3), 669–687.
Yeager, D. S., Henderson, M., Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., D’Mello, S., Spitzer, B. J., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). Boring but important: A self-transcendent purpose for learning fosters academic self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 559–580.
Yin, H., Lu, G., & Wang, W. (2014). Unmasking the teaching quality of higher education: Students’ course experience and approaches to learning in China. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 949–970.
Zeng, L. M., Fryer, L. K., & Zhao, Y. (2021). A comparison of three major instruments used for the assessment of university student experience: Toward a comprehensive and distributed approach. Higher Education Quarterly, 77(1), 27–44.
Zepke, N. (2018). Student engagement in neo-liberal times: What is missing? Higher Education Research and Development, 37(2), 433–446.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
King, R.B., Luo, Y. & Xie, M. Good Begets Good: The Role of Helping Others on Engagement and Achievement Among University Students. Res High Educ 65, 989–1006 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-023-09768-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-023-09768-1