Shared vision is an important process for change projects, serving to amplify success, increase participation, and erode the divide between project leaders and constituents. Yet there are few empirical examinations of the process of building shared vision within academic departments. Using focus groups and participant observation, this study examines shared vision development within 13 large-scale change projects in engineering and computer science higher education. We find that teams of faculty, staff, administrators, and students built shared vision with stakeholders through co-orientation, formational communication, and recognition of stakeholder autonomy. Our results delineate practices for developing shared vision for academic change projects and demonstrate the benefits of inclusive stakeholder empowerment.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
The program was originally named “Revolutionizing Engineering Departments” but expanded with the inclusion of Computer Science departments. From the 2019 solicitation for proposals the scope has narrowed again to Engineering only, and the name has reverted to the original.
Ansay, S. J., Perkins, D. F., & Nelson, C. J. (2004). Interpreting outcomes: Using focus groups in evaluation research. Family Relations, 53(3), 310–316.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
Barnard, M., & Stoll, N. (2010). Organisational change management: a rapid literature review (No. 10/01). Bristol, UK: Centre for Understanding Behaviour Change, University of Bristol, UK. Retrieved June 21, 2019 from https://www.bristol.ac.uk/cubec/portal/pr1.pdf
Beer, M. (1980). A social systems model for organization development. In T. G. Cummings (Ed.), Systems theory for organization development. Chichester, NY: Wiley.
Beer, M., Eisenstat, R. A., & Spector, R. (1990). The Critical path to corporate renewal. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.
Bergmark, U., & Westman, S. (2016). Co-creating curriculum in higher education: promoting democratic values and a multidimensional view on learning. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 28–40.
Brownell, S. E., & Tanner, K. D. (2012). Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training, time, incentives, and … tensions with professional identity? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 339–346.
Bruhn, J. G., Zajac, G., & Al-Kazemi, A. A. (2016). Ethical perspectives on employee participation in planned organizational change. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(2), 208–228.
Carlson, J. A. (2010). Avoiding traps in member checking. Qualitative Report, 15(5), 1102–1113.
Case, J. M., & Light, G. (2011). Emerging methodologies in engineering education research. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 186–210.
Chandler, D., & Munday, R. (2011). Informational communication. A Dictionary of Media and Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Charmaz, K. (2001). Grounded theory. In R. M. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research: Perspectives and formulations. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Charmaz, K. (2009). Shifting the grounds: Constructivist grounded theory methods. In J. Morse (Ed.), Developing grounded theory: The second generation. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Clark, B. (2004). Sustaining change in universities: Continuities in case studies and concepts. New York: Open University Press.
Fry, C. L. (2014). Achieving systemic change: A sourcebook for advancing and funding undergraduate STEM education. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities, Coalition for Reform of Undergraduate STEM Education.
Cooperrider, D. L., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In R. Woodman & W. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 1, pp. 129–169). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Coser, L. A. (1957). Social conflict and the theory of social change. The British Journal of Sociology, 8(3), 197–207.
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130.
Curtin, M., & Fossey, E. (2007). Appraising the trustworthiness of qualitative studies: Guidelines for occupational therapists. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 54(2), 88–94.
D’Avanzo, C. (2013). Post–vision and change: Do we know how to change? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 373–382.
Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2005). Managing group behavior: The Interplay between procedural justice, sense of self, and cooperation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 151–218.
DeAro, J., Bird, S., & Ryan, S. M. (2019). NSF ADVANCE and gender equity: Past, present and future of systemic institutional transformation strategies. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 38(2), 131–139.
DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington: National Education Service.
Gerber, L. G. (2001). “Inextricably linked”: Shared governance and academic freedom. Academe, 87(3), 22–24.
Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448.
Gioia, D. A., & Thomas, J. B. (1996). Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 370–403. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393936.
Guest, D. E. (1998). Is the psychological contract worth taking seriously? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(S1), 649–664.
Gurley, D. K., Peters, G. B., Collins, L., & Fifolt, M. (2015). Mission, vision, values, and goals: An exploration of key organizational statements and daily practice in schools. Journal of Educational Change, 16(2), 217–242.
Hargrave, T. J., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2006). A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 864–888.
Hattori, R. A., & Lapidus, T. (2004). Collaboration, trust and innovative change. Journal of Change Management, 4(2), 97–104.
Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952–984.
Hurtado, S., White-Lewis, D., & Norris, K. (2017). Advancing inclusive science and systemic change: The convergence of national aims and institutional goals in implementing and assessing biomedical science training. BMC Proceedings, 11(12), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12919-017-0086-5.
Jones, W. A. (2011). Faculty involvement in institutional governance: A literature review. Journal of the Professoriate, 6(1), 117–135.
Kanter, R. M., Stein, B., & Jick, T. (1992). The Challenge of organizational change: How companies experience it and leaders guide it. New York: Free Press.
Kavanagh, P. J. (2000). A Vision of democratic governance in higher education: The stakes of work in academia. Social Policy, 30(4), 24.
Kezar, A. (2014). How colleges change: Understanding, leading, and enacting change. New York: Routledge.
Kezar, A., & Eckel, P. (2002a). Examining the institutional transformation process: The importance of sensemaking, interrelated strategies, and balance. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 295–328.
Kezar, A., & Eckel, P. D. (2002b). The effect of institutional culture on change strategies in higher education: Universal principles or culturally responsive concepts? The Journal of Higher Education, 73(4), 435–460.
Kezar, A., & Lester, J. (2009). Supporting faculty grassroots leadership. Research in Higher Education, 50(7), 715–740.
Kose, B. W. (2011). Developing a transformative school vision: Lessons from peer-nominated principals. Education and Urban Society, 43(2), 119–136.
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Kuhn, T. (2008). A communicative theory of the firm: Developing an alternative perspective on intra-organizational power and stakeholder relationships. Organization studies, 29(8–9), 1227–1254.
Litosseliti, L. (2003). Using focus groups in research. New York: Continuum.
Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (2006). Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Lozano, R. (2006). Incorporation and institutionalization of SD into universities: breaking through barriers to change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9–11), 787–796.
Lueddeke, G. R. (1999). Toward a constructivist framework for guiding change and innovation in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 70(3), 235–260.
Lund, T. J., & Stains, M. (2015). The importance of context: An exploration of factors influencing the adoption of student-centered teaching among chemistry, biology, and physics faculty. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0026-8.
Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). Managing change: The role of the change agent. International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration, 13(1), 1–6.
Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(6), 695–706.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Michel, A., Stegmaier, R., & Sonntag, K. (2010). I scratch your back—you scratch mine. Do procedural justice and organizational identification matter for employees’ cooperation during change? Journal of Change Management, 10(1), 41–59.
Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 129–152.
Mulford, B. (2006). Leading change for student achievement. Journal of Educational Change, 7(1), 47–58.
National Science Foundation. (2014). IUSE/Professional Formation of Engineers: Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (RED) Program Solicitation NSF 14–602. Retrieved June 21, 2019 from https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2014/nsf14602/nsf14602.htm
National Science Foundation. (2015). IUSE/Professional Formation of Engineers: REvolutionizing engineering and computer science Departments (RED) Program Solicitation NSF 15–607. Retrieved June 21, 2019 from https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2015/nsf15607/nsf15607.htm
National Science Foundation. (2016). IUSE/Professional Formation of Engineers: REvolutionizing engineering and computer science Departments (RED) Program Solicitation NSF 17–501. Retrieved June 21, 2019 from https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2017/nsf17501/nsf17501.htm
Oreg, S. (2003). Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 680.
Oreg, S., Vakola, M., & Armenakis, A. (2011). Change recipients’ reactions to organizational change: A 60-year review of quantitative studies. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(4), 461–524.
Oswald, S. L., Mossholder, K. W., & Harris, S. G. (1994). Vision salience and strategic involvement: Implications for psychological attachment to organization and job. Strategic Management Journal, 15(6), 477–489.
Pekarsky, D. (2007). Vision and education: Arguments, counterarguments, rejoinders. American Journal of Education, 113(3), 423–450.
Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), 795–843.
Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 574–599.
Rose, K. H. (2013). A Guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (5th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute Inc.
Rousseau, D. M. (1998). The ‘problem’ of the psychological contract considered. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(S1), 665–671.
Rousseau, D. M., Hansen, S. D., & Tomprou, M. (2018). A dynamic phase model of psychological contract processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(9), 1081–1098.
Schoorman, D., & Acker-Hocevar, M. (2010). Viewing faculty governance within a social justice framework: Struggles and possibilities for democratic decision-making in higher education. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(3), 310–325.
Shadle, S. E., Marker, A., & Earl, B. (2017). Faculty drivers and barriers: Laying the groundwork for undergraduate STEM education reform in academic departments. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0062-7.
Singh, S. (2002). Technical cooperation and stakeholder ownership. Development Policy Journal, 2, 47–71.
Small, E. E., & Rentsch, J. R. (2010). Shared leadership in teams. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9, 203–211.
Stains, M., Harshman, J., Barker, M. K., Chasteen, S. V., Cole, R., DeChenne-Peters, S. E., et al. (2018). Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities. Science, 359(6383), 1468–1470.
Stouten, J., Rousseau, D. M., & De Cremer, D. (2018). Successful organizational change: Integrating the management practice and scholarly literatures. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 752–788. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0095.
Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Taylor, J. (2005). Co-orientation theory. In G. M. Broom (Ed.), Encyclopedia of public relations. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412952545
Taylor, J. (2009). Organizational co-orientation theory. In S. Littlejohn & K. Foss (Eds.), Encyclopedia of communication theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412959384.n268
Taylor, J. R. (2016). Coorientation. In K. B. Jensen, E. W. Rothenbuhler, J. D. Pooley, & R. T. Craig (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect003
Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186.
van Knippenberg, B., Martin, L., & Tyler, T. (2006). Process-orientation versus outcome-orientation during organizational change: The role of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(6), 685–704.
Vest, C. M. (2005). Educating engineers for 2020 and beyond. In Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
This material is based upon work supported by the United States National Science Foundation under Grants No. 1649318, 1649379, 1540072, and 1540042. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Doten-Snitker, K., Margherio, C., Litzler, E. et al. Developing a Shared Vision for Change: Moving toward Inclusive Empowerment. Res High Educ 62, 206–229 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-020-09594-9
- Academic change
- Computer science
- Shared vision