Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tenure and Promotion Outcomes at Four Large Land Grant Universities: Examining the Role of Gender, Race, and Academic Discipline

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inclusion and diversity are highly visible priorities at many colleges and universities. Efforts to diversify the professoriate have necessitated a better understanding of career outcomes for current female faculty and faculty of color. We measure risk of leaving without tenure and years to promotion from associate to full professor at four large land grant universities. We model career outcomes as competing risks, and compute cumulative incidence functions to discern differences in tenure and promotion outcomes by gender and race. We find incidence rates vary significantly by academic discipline, and in many instances, show larger effects than gender and racial or ethnic differences. Our examination also indicates that in particular academic fields, females are more prone to leave without tenure, and less likely to be promoted to full professor. We also find that racial or ethnic minorities are less likely to be promoted to full professor in certain areas. The analysis suggests that for universities to address systemic issues of underrepresentation in academe, they must account for department level contexts, and align institutional practices to support the goal of inclusion and diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The discipline classifications loosely resemble smaller units of Biglan’s academic task areas. http://edshare.soton.ac.uk/15017/2/Biglan_-_1973_-_Relationships_between_subject_matter_characteristics_and_the_structure_and_output_of_university_departments.pdf.

References

  • Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos of disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, A. (2005). Linked ecologies: States and universities as environments for professions. Sociological Theory,23(3), 245–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguirre Jr., A. (2000). Women and minority faculty in the academic workplace: Recruitment, retention, and academic culture. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Vol. 27.

  • Ahmad, S. (2017). Family or future in the academy? Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 204–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2005). Final report. Task force on enhancing diversity, Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/pi/oema/resources/taskforce-report.pdf.

  • Armstrong, M. A., & Jovanovic, J. (2015). Starting at the crossroads: Intersectional approaches to institutionally supporting underrepresented minority women STEM faculty. Journal of Women & Minorities in Science & Engineering,21(1), 141–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baez, B. (1998). Negotiating and resisting racism: How faculty of color construct promotion and tenure. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED430420.pdf.

  • Baez, B. (2000). Race-related service & faculty of color: Conceptualizing critical agency in academe. Higher Education,39(3), 363–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, L., Snyder, L., & Mavriplis, C. (2009). Diverse faculty in STEM fields: Attitudes, performance, and fair treatment. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education,2(4), 195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Cunha, J. M., Varbanov, R. A., Hoh, Y. S., Knisley, M. L., & Holmes, M. A. (2015). Survival analysis of faculty retention and promotion in the social sciences by gender. PLoS ONE,10(11), e0143093.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, W.-Y., & Foley, D. (2015). The 2015 survey of doctorate recipients expands its population coverage and reporting on field of study. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. M., & Corcoran, M. (1986). Perspectives on the professional socialization of women faculty. The Journal of Higher Education,57(1), 20–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, M., Lee, Y.-G., & Savoy, J. N. (2015). Faculty hiring and tenure by sex and race: New evidence from a national survey. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 1–27). Chicago, IL: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cora-Bramble, D. (2006). Minority faculty recruitment, retention and advancement: Applications of a resilience-based theoretical framework. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved,17(2), 251–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139.

  • Crenshaw, K. (2011). Twenty years of critical race theory: Looking back to move foward. Connecticut Law Review,43(5), 1253–1353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Favero, M. (2006). An examination of the relationship between academic discipline and cognitive complexity in academic deans’ administrative behavior. Research in Higher Education,47(3), 281–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Favero, M. (2018). Academic disciplines—Disciplines and the structure of higher education, discipline classification systems, discipline differences. Retrieved 2018 from Education Encyclopedia—StateUniversity.com. http://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/1723/Academic-Disciplines.html“ .Academic Disciplines—Disciplines and the Structure of Higher Education, Discipline Classification Systems, Discipline Differences </a > .

  • Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Fuller, M. A., & Schneider, C. (2006). Research standards for promotion and tenure in information systems. MIS Quarterly,30(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dignam, J. J., & Kocherginsky, M. N. (2008). Choice and interpretation of statistical tests used when competing risks are present. Journal of Clinical Oncology,26(24), 4027–4034. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1997). Sex differenes in social behavior: Comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology. The American Psychologist,52(12), 1380–1383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Kite, M. E. (1987). Are stereotypes of nationalities applied to both women and men? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,53(3), 451–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. In P. A. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & T. E. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories in social psychology (pp. 458–476). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n49.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R., Kasper, H., & Rees, D. (1990). Faculty turnover at American colleges & universities: Analyses of AAUP Data. Economics of Education Review,10(2), 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, P. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society,24(2), 149–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, P., Allison, P., Li, S., Mark, N., Thompson, J., Budig, M. J., et al. (2007). Why are some academic fields tipping toward female: The sex composition of US fields of doctoral degree recipients. Sociology of Education,80(1), 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equity, Diversity & Inclusion. (2015). Faculty search committee toolkit. Los Angeles, CA: University of California-Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenelon, J. (2003). Race, research, andtenure: Institutional credibility and the incorporation of African, Latino, & American Indian faculty. Journal of Black Studies,34(1), 87–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association,94(446), 496–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S., & Blackstone, A. (2013). Putting in your time: Faculty experiences in the process of promotion to professor. Innovative Higher Education,38(5), 411–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginther, D. K., & Kahn, S. (2006). Does science promote women? Evidence from academia 1973–2001. Working Paper 12691. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w12691.

  • Ginther, D. K., & Kahn, S. (2012). Education and academic career outcomes for women of color in science & engineering. In Conference for the Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, & Medicine. Washington, DC.

  • Goulden, M., Mason, M. A., & Frasch, K. (2011). Keeping women in the science pipeline. The Annals of the American Academy of Political & Social Science,638(1), 141–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. J. (1988). A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Annals of Statistics,16(3), 1141–1154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumpertz, M., Durodoye, R. O., Wilson, A., & Griffith, E. (2017). Retention andpromotion of women andunderrepresented minority faculty in science and engineering at four large land grant instituitions. PLOS ONE, 12(11), e0187285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardre, P., & Cox, M. (2009). Evaluating faculty work: Expectations and standards of faculty performance in research universities. Research Papers in Education,24(4), 383–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardre, P., Cox, M., & Kollmann, S. (2010). Faculty performance standards: Patterns within disciplines in the research university. The Journal of Faculty Development,24(3), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, A. L., Jawitz, J. W., McCarty, C., Goldman, A., & Basu, N. B. (2013). Disparities in publication patterns by gender, race andethnicity based on a survey of a random sample of authors. Scientometrics,96(2), 515–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, S. V. (2007). Camouflaging power and privilege: A critical race analysis of university diversity policies. Educational Administration Quarterly,43(5), 586–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. K., Latimer, M., & Stoiko, R. (2017). The dynamic between knowledge production andfaculty evaluation: Perceptions of the promotion andtenure process across disciplines. Innovative Higher Education,42(3), 193–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagacinski, C. M. (1987). Engineering careers: Women in a male-dominated field. Psychology of Women Quarterly,11(1), 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayakumar, U. M., Howard, T. C., Allen, W. R., & Han, J. C. (2009). Racial privilege in the professoriate: An exploration of campus climate, retention, andsatisfaction. The Journal of Higher Education,80(5), 538–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsrud, L. K., & Des Jarlais, C. (1994). Barriers to tenure for women and minorities. The Review of Higher Education,17(4), 335–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, J. (2012). Faculty research productivity in Hong Kong across academic discipline. Higher Education Studies,2(4), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education. Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,11(1), 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (2004). Landing on the wrong note: The price we paid for brown. Educational Researcher,33(7), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langan, A. (2018). Female managers andgender disparities: The case of academic department chairs. Retrieved from https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/alangan/files/langan_jmp_current.pdf.

  • Leslie, S.-J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science,347(6219), 262–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, D., & Koedel, C. (2017). Representation and salary gaps by race-ethnicity andgender at selective public universities. Educational Researcher,46(7), 343–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, G. R. (2003). The (racially neutral) politics of education: A critical race theory perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly,39(1), 68–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M. A., Wolfinger, N., & Goulden, M. (2013). Do babies matter: Gender and family in the ivory tower. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthew, P. A. (2016, Nov 23). What is faculty diversity worth to a university. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2016/11/what-is-faculty-diversity-worth-to-a-university/508334/.

  • McCall, Leslie. (2005). The Complexity of Intersectionality. Signs,30(3), 1771–1800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menges, R. J., & Exum, W. H. (1983). Barriers to the progress of women andminority faculty. The Journal of Higher Education,54(2), 123–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E., Rudd, E., & Nerad, M. (2011). Onto, up, off the academic faculty ladder: The gendered effects of family on career transitions for a cohort of social science PhDs. The Review of Higher Education,34(4), 525–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). The condition of education 2017. Washington, DC: Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2017/2017144.pdf.

  • National Center for Science & Engineering Statistics. (2017). 2017 Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Report 17-310. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17310/.

  • National Institute on Minority Health & Health Disparities. (2018, May). Scientific advancement plan. Retrieved from U.S. Department of Health & Human Services: https://www.nimhd.nih.gov/about/overview/scientific-advancement.html.

  • National Research Council. (2001). From scarcity to visibility: Gender differences in the careers of doctoral scientists and engineers. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (2008). Thirty-three years of women in S&E faculty positions. Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences, NSF 08-308. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation.

  • Nunez-Smith, M., Ciarleglio, M., Sandoval-Schaefer, T., Elumn, J., Castillo-Page, L., Peduzzi, P., et al. (2012). Institutional variation in the promotion of racial/ethnic minority faculty at US medical schools. American Journal of Public Health,102(5), 852–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Faculty Development & Diversity. (2018, May). Stanford Medicine. Retrieved from excellence through an inclusive faculty community: http://med.stanford.edu/facultydiversity.html.

  • Patel, U. (2015, February 6). New diversity initiatives include faculty hiring commitment, graduate recruiting programs. From Princeton University—News: Retrieved from https://www.princeton.edu/news/2018/02/28/new-diversity-initiatives-include-faculty-hiring-commitment-graduate-recruiting.

  • Perna, L. W. (2001). Sex andrace differences in faculty tenure andpromotion. Research in Higher Education,42(5), 541–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L. W. (2005). Sex differences in faculty tenure andpromotion: The contribution of family ties. Research in Higher Education,46(3), 277–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L., Gerald, D., Baum, E., & Milem, J. (2007). The status of equity for Black faculty and administrators in public higher education in the south. Research in Higher Education,48(2), 193–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pifer, M. J. (2011). Intersectionality in context: A mixed-methods approach to researching the faculty experience. New Directions for Institutional Research,2011(151), 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebne, D. S., & Davidson, N. B. (1992). Understanding patterns of publishing activity in academic research occupations. Decision Sciences,23(4), 944–956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, V. J. (2004). Faculty members intentions to leave: A national study on their work life & satisfaction. Research in Higher Education,45(3), 285–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeby, J. (1996). Disciplinary differences in university teaching. Studies in Higher Education,21(1), 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. G., Tovar, E., & Garcia, H. A. (2012). Where are they? A multilens examiniation of the distribution of full-time faculty by institutional type, race/ethnicity, gender, and citizenship. New Directions for Institutonal Research,2012(155), 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G., & Bensimon, E. M. (1996). Promotion and tenure: Community and socialization in Academe. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G., & Rhoads, R. A. (1994). Faculty socialization as cultural process: A mirror of institutional commitment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • UCLA. (2015). Faculty search committee toolkit.

  • Umbach, P. D. (2007). Gender equity in the academic labor market: An analysis of academic disciplines. Research in Higher Education,48(2), 169–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villalpando, O., & Bernal, D. D. (2002). A critical race theory analysis of barriers that impede the success of faculty of color. In W. A. Smith, P. G. Altbach, & K. Lomotey (Eds.), The racial crisis in American higher education: Continuing challenges for the twenty-first century (Revised (Edition ed., pp. 243–269). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakeling, P. (2007). White faces, black faces: Is British sociology a White discipline. Sociology,41(5), 945–960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, K., & Canche, M. G. (2018). Is there a gendered path to tenure? A multi-state approach to examine the academic trajectories of US doctoral recipients in the sciences. Research in Higher Education,59(7), 897–932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, S. L. (2008). Monitoring faculty diversity: The need for a more granular approach. The Journal of Higher Education,79(4), 365–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, J. A., & Montgomery, B. L. (2014). Cultivating institutional transformation and sustainable STEM diversity in higher education through integrative faculty development. Innovative Higher Education,39(4), 263–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2001). Unbending gender. Why family and work conflict and what to do about it: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y. J. (2008). Faculty turnover: Discipline specific attention is warranted. Research in Higher Education,49(1), 40–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L., & Webber, K. L. (2015). A decade beyond the doctorate: The influence of a US postdoctoral appointment on faculty career, productivity, andsalary. Higher Education,70(4), 667–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuret, T. (2018). Tenure and turnover of academics in six undergraduate programs in the United States. Scientometrics,116, 101–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zambrana, R. E., Ray, R., Espino, M. M., Castro, C., Cohen, B. D., & Eliason, J. (2015). “Don’t leave us behind”: The importance of mentoring for underrepresented minority faculty. American Educational Research Journal,52(1), 40–72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. WestEd, San Francisco, USA

    Raifu Durodoye Jr.

  2. Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA

    Marcia Gumpertz, Alyson Wilson & Emily Griffith

  3. Delaware Department of Education, Dover, USA

    Seher Ahmad

Authors
  1. Raifu Durodoye Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcia Gumpertz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alyson Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Emily Griffith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Seher Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raifu Durodoye Jr..

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 4 and 5.

Table 4 Number of assistant professors appointed, by gender and by URM status, For each institution (n = 4352)
Full size table
Table 5 Number of associate professors appointed, by gender and by URM status for each institution
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Durodoye, R., Gumpertz, M., Wilson, A. et al. Tenure and Promotion Outcomes at Four Large Land Grant Universities: Examining the Role of Gender, Race, and Academic Discipline. Res High Educ 61, 628–651 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-019-09573-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-019-09573-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation