Skip to main content
Log in

How Valid is Grit in the Postsecondary Context? A Construct and Concurrent Validity Analysis

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

College admissions leaders increasingly desire to incorporate non-cognitive factors like grit into admissions decisions. Consequently, we examined the validity of the short grit scale (Grit-S) using data collected on undergraduates attending 38 colleges. Using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), we found that Grit-S does not possess adequate model fit; however, a modified version of the scale does possess this property. Using multi-group CFA, we also found that Grit-S is relatively invariant across multiple demographic groups. Next, we examined the concurrent validity of grit with students’ engagement, perceived gains, time spent studying, and grades. These results confirmed previous research that most of the predictive power of grit is contained in its perseverance of effort, not consistency of interest, dimension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Higher-order factors require three subscales for a CFA model to be identified, without the imposition of unusual constraints. When Duckworth and Quinn’s (2009) model is replicated in AMOS 24 (Duckwork and Quinn used version 6.0), the following error message is produced along with the results: “Minimization was unsuccessful. The results that follow are therefore incorrect. The model is probably unidentified. In order to achieve identifiability, it will probably be necessary to impose 2 additional constraints.” Consequently, the results associated with the published higher-order factor grit solution are highly suspect, especially given that a standardized loading is greater than 1.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Fosnacht.

Appendix 1: Items in the Short Grit Scale

Appendix 1: Items in the Short Grit Scale

Variable

Variable label

Values and labels

GRM1601a

New ideas and projects distract me from previous onesa

1 = Not at all

2 = Not much

3 = Somewhat

4 = Mostly

5 = Very much

GRM1601b

Setbacks don’t discourage me

GRM1601c

I have been obsessed with a certain idea or project for a short time but later lost interesta

GRM1601d

I am a hard worker

GRM1601e

I set goals but later choose to pursue different onesa

GRM1601f

I have difficulty maintaining my focus on projects that take more than a few months to completea

GRM1601g

I finish whatever I begin

GRM1601h

I am diligent

  1. aReverse coded in the concurrent validity analyses

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fosnacht, K., Copridge, K. & Sarraf, S.A. How Valid is Grit in the Postsecondary Context? A Construct and Concurrent Validity Analysis. Res High Educ 60, 803–822 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9524-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9524-0

Keywords

Navigation