Advertisement

Choosing College in the 2000s: An Updated Analysis Using the Conditional Logistic Choice Model

  • Benjamin T. Skinner
Article

Abstract

In this paper I investigate the college enrollment decisions of a nationally representative cohort of students who first attended in the mid-2000s. I find that while cost, distance, and match continued to be important in the choice between colleges, characteristics of the most-likely college choice appear less important in the choice of whether to enroll at all when controlling for student characteristics and local labor market conditions. Subpopulation analyses on students with high SAT scores and students with low family income, two groups that remain the focus of many financial aid policies, indicate some differences in the way these particular students chose college. Extending prior work by modeling discrete steps in the enrollment decision process—application and enrollment conditional on application—I find choice characteristics were most significant in the application stage. These results support other research that shows students may self-select out of potentially better college matches due to lack of information about actual costs or limited geographic opportunity.

Keywords

College access College choice Conditional logistic choice model Geographic opportunity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Brent Evans, Laura Perna, and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments on previous iterations of this paper. I would also like to thank Will Doyle, Dale Ballou, Dominique Baker, and Richard Blissett for their thoughts and suggestions throughout. All errors and mistakes in interpretation remain my own.

References

  1. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the Distance. Technical Report Babson Survey Research Group.http://www.babson.edu/Academics/centers/blank-center/global-research/Documents/going-the-distance.pdf.
  2. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States. Technical Report. Babson Survey Research Group. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED541571.pdf.
  3. Allen, I. E., et al. (2016). Online Report Card: Tracking Online Education in the United States. Technical Report. Babson Survey Research Group.Google Scholar
  4. Avery, C., & Hoxby, C. M. (2004). Do and should financial aid packages affect students’ college choices? In C. M. Hoxby (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 239–299). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avery, C., et al. (2006). Cost should be no barrier: An evaluation of the first year of Harvard’s financial aid initiative. Working Paper 12029. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  6. Baker, D. J., & Doyle, W. R. (2017). Impact of community college student debt levels on credit accumulation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 671(1), 132–153.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217703043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baum, S., Little, K., & Payea, K. (2011). Trends in community college education: Enrollment, prices, student aid, and debt levels. Trends in higher education series (p. 11b-3741). New York: College Board.Google Scholar
  8. Baum, S., & Ma, J. (2012). Trends in college pricing., Trends in higher education series New York: The College Board.Google Scholar
  9. Becker, G. S. (2009). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bettinger, E. P., & Long, B. T. (2009). Addressing the needs of underprepared students in higher education: Does college remediation work? Journal of Human Resources, 44(3), 736–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bettinger, E. P., et al. (2012). The role of application assistance and information in college decisions: Results from the H&R block FAFSA experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(3), 1205–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bettinger, E. P., et al. (2017). Virtual classrooms: How online college courses affect student success. American Economic Review, 107(9), 2855–2875.  https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151193. http://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.20151193.
  13. Betts, J. R., & McFarland, L. L. (1995). Safe port in a storm: The impact of labor market conditions on community college enrollments. The Journal of Human Resources, 30(4), 741–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Black, D. A., & Smith, J. A. (2004). How robust is the evidence on the effects of college quality? Evidence from matching. Journal of Econometrics, 121(1), 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Black, D. A., & Smith, J. A. (2006). Estimating the returns to college quality with multiple proxies for quality. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), 701–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In J. Karabel & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Power and ideology (p. 485). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bowen, W. G. (2013). Higher education in the digital age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Buck, S. F. (1960). A method of estimation of missing values in multivariate data suitable for use with an electronic computer. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 22, 302–306.Google Scholar
  19. Card, D. (1999). The causal effect of education on earnings. Handbook of Labor Economics, 3, 1801–1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cheng, S., & Long, S. J. (2007). Testing for IIA in the multinomial logit model. Sociological Methods & Research, 35(4), 583–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cottom, T. M. (2017). Lower ed: The troubling rise of for-profit colleges in the new economy. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  23. de Souza Briggs, X., & Wilson, W. J. (2006). The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in metropolitan America., James A. Johnson Metro Series Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  24. Deming, D., & Dynarski, S. (2009). Into college, out of poverty? Policies to increase the postsecondary attainment of the poor. Working Paper 15387. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  25. Deming, D. J., Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2012). The for-profit postsecondary school sector: Nimble critters or agile predators? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(1), 139–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Doyle, W. R., & Skinner, B. T. (2016). Estimating the education-earnings equation using geographic variation. Economics of Education Review, 53, 254–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Doyle, W. R., & Skinner, B. T. (2017). Does postsecondary education result in civic benefits? The Journal of Higher Education.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2017.1291258. Google Scholar
  28. Drewes, T., & Michael, C. (2006). How do students choose a university? An analysis of applications to universities in Ontario, Canada. Research in Higher Education, 47(7), 781–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dynarski, S. (2002). The behavioral and distributional implications of aid for college. American Economic Review, 92(2), 279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dynarski, S., & Scott-Clayton, J. (2013). Financial aid policy: Lessons from research. Working Paper 18710. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  31. Eagan, K., et al. (2016). The American Freshman: Fifty-year trends 1966–2015. Technical Report. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.Google Scholar
  32. Eide, E., Brewer, D. J., & Ehrenberg, R. G. (1998). Does it pay to attend an elite private college? Evidence on the effects of undergraduate college quality on graduate school attendance. Economics of Education Review, 17(4), 371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fuller, W. C., Manski, C. F., & Wise, D. A. (1982). New evidence on the economic determinants of postsecondary schooling choices. The Journal of Human Resources, 17(4), 477–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  35. Grubesic, T. H. (2008). Zip codes and spatial analysis: Problems and prospects. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 42(2), 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hart, C. M., Friedmann, E., & Hill, M. (2016). Online course-taking and student outcomes in California community colleges. Education Finance and Policy, 13(1), 42–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hillman, N., & Weichman, T. (2016). Education deserts: The continued significance of “place” in the twenty-first century. Viewpoints: Voices from the field. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
  38. Hoxby, C., & Turner, S. (2013). Expanding college opportunities for high-achieving, low income students. In: Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper 12–014.Google Scholar
  39. Hoxby, C. M., & Avery, C. (2012). The missing “One-offs”: The hidden supply of high-achieving, low income students. Working Paper 18586. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  40. Huntington-Klein, N., Cowan, J., & Goldhaber, D. (2017). Selection into online community college courses and their effects on persistence. Research in Higher Education, 58(3), 244–269.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-016-9425-z. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-016-9425-z.
  41. Jepsen, C., & Montgomery, M. (2009). Miles to go before I learn: The effect of travel distance on the mature person’s choice of a community college. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(1), 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kane, T. J. (1995). Rising public college tuition and college entry: How well do public subsidies promote access to college? Working Paper 5164. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  43. Kane, T. J. (1996). College cost, borrowing constraints and the timing of college entry. Eastern Economic Journal, 22(2), 181–194.Google Scholar
  44. Leslie, L. L., & Brinkman, P. T. (1987). Student price response in higher education: The student demand studies. Journal of Higher Education, 58(2), 181–204.Google Scholar
  45. Little, R. J. A. (1992). Regression with missing X’s: A review. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(420), 1227–1237.Google Scholar
  46. Long, B. T. (2004). How have college decisions changed over time? An application of the conditional logistic choice model. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 271–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Long, M. C. (2010). Changes in the returns to education and college quality. Economics of Education Review, 29(3), 338–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lovenheim, M. F., & Reynolds, C. L. (2011). Changes in postsecondary choices by ability and income: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Surveys of Youth. Journal of Human Capital, 5(1), 70–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ma, J., et al. (2016). Trends in college pricing., Trends in higher education series New York: The College Board.Google Scholar
  50. Manski, C. F., & Wise, D. A. (1983). College choice in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McFadden, D. (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105–142). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  52. National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). ELS: Education Longitudinal Study of 2002.Google Scholar
  53. Niu, S. X., & Tienda, M. (2008). Choosing colleges: Identifying and modeling choice sets. Social Science Research, 37(2), 416–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Paulsen, M., & Smart, J. C. (2001). The finance of higher education: Theory, research, policy, and practice. New York: Algora Publishing.Google Scholar
  55. Perna, L. W. (2006). Studying college choice: A proposed conceptual model. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 21, pp. 99–157). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  56. R Core Team. (2016). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  57. Rouse, C. E. (1995). Democratization or diversion? The effect of community colleges on educational attainment. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13(2), 217–224.Google Scholar
  58. Snyder, T. D., de Brey, C., & Dillow, S. A. (2016). Digest of education statistics 2014. NCES 2016-006. Washington, D.C: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  59. Snyder, T. D., Dillow, S. A., & Hoffman, C. M. (2007). Digest of Education Statistics 2006. NCES 2007-017. Washington, D.C: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  60. Snyder, T. D., & Hoffman, C. M. (1995). Digest of Education Statistics 1995. NCES 95-029. Washington, D.C: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  61. StataCorp. (2015). Stata statistical software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
  62. Tate, W. F. (2008). Geography of opportunity: Poverty, place, and educational outcomes. Educational Researcher, 37(7), 397–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. The Delta Cost Project. (2016). The Delta Cost Project Database.Google Scholar
  64. Toutkoushian, R. K., & Paulsen, M. (2016). Economics of higher education: Background, concepts, and applications. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Turner, S. E. (2004). Going to college and finishing college: Explaining different educational outcomes. In M. C. Hoxby (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 13–62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Umbach, P. D. (2007). How effective are they? Exploring the impact of contingent faculty on undergraduate education. The Review of Higher Education, 30(2), 91–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2011). The effectiveness of distance education across virginia’s community colleges: Evidence from introductory college-level math and english courses. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 360–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2013). The impact of online learning on students’ course outcomes: Evidence from a large community and technical college system. Economics of Education Review, 37, 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations