What Role May Admissions Office Diversity and Practices Play in Equitable Decisions?

Article

Abstract

Attending a selective college or university has a notable impact on the likelihood of graduation, graduate school attendance, social networks, and career earnings. Given these short-term and long-term benefits, surprisingly little research has directly explored the factors that might promote or detract from equitable admissions decisions at these schools. This study examined a unique national sample of 311 undergraduate admissions officers who work at selective institutions to explore this issue. Among the descriptive findings, more than half of respondents reported that they consider applicants’ demonstrated interest in attending their institution when making a recommendation, about two-thirds review at least 100 applications during busy weeks, and almost half were working at their alma mater. Moreover, in a simulation of admissions scoring, admissions officers from historically underrepresented groups were more likely to admit low-SES applicants, whereas participants with more work experience and who were employed at their alma mater provided less equitable recommendations.

Keywords

College admissions College access Equity Decision making Socioeconomic status 

References

  1. Astin, A. W., & Oseguera, L. (2004). The declining “equity” of American higher education. The Review of Higher Education, 27(3), 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Attewell, P., & Domina, T. (2008). Raising the bar: Curricular intensity and academic performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, M. J., & Dynarski, S. M. (2011). Gains and gaps: Changing inequality in US college entry and completion (No. w17633). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  4. Bastedo, M. N. (2014). Cognitive repairs in the admissions office: New strategies for improving equity and excellence at selective colleges. Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA, April 3–7, 2014.Google Scholar
  5. Bastedo, M. N. (2016). Enrollment management and the low-income student: How holistic admissions and market competition can impede equity. In A. P. Kelly, J. S. Howell, & C. Sattin-Bajaj (Eds.), Matching students to opportunity: Expanding college choice, access, and quality (pp. 121–134). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bastedo, M. N., & Bowman, N. A. (2017). Improving admission of low-SES students at selective colleges: Results from an experimental simulation. Educational Researcher, 46(2), 67–77.Google Scholar
  7. Bastedo, M. N., & Flaster, A. (2014). Conceptual and methodological problems in research on college undermatch. Educational Researcher, 43, 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bastedo, M. N., Glasener, K. M., Kelly, J. L., & Bowman, N. A. (2017). What are we talking about when we talk about holistic review? Selective college admissions and its effects on low-SES students. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  9. Bastedo, M. N., Howard, J. E., & Flaster, A. (2016). Holistic admissions after affirmative action: Does “maximizing” the high school curriculum matter? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38, 389–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bastedo, M. N., & Jaquette, O. (2011). Running in place: Low-income students and the dynamics of higher education stratification. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 318–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bielby, R., Posselt, J. R., Jaquette, O., & Bastedo, M. N. (2014). Why are women underrepresented in elite colleges and universities? A non-linear decomposition analysis. Research in Higher Education, 55, 735–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bound, J., Hershbein, B., & Long, B. T. (2009). Playing the admissions game: Student reactions to increasing college competition (No. 15272). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  13. Bowen, W. G., & Bok, D. (1998). The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., & McPherson, M. S. (2009). Crossing the finish line: Completing college at America’s public universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Brewer, D. J., Eide, E. R., & Ehrenberg, R. G. (1999). Does it pay to attend an elite private college? Cross-cohort evidence on the effects of college type on earnings. The Journal of Human Resources, 34(1), 104–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Buchmann, C., Condron, D. J., & Roscigno, V. J. (2010). Shadow education, American style: Test preparation, the SAT, and college enrollment. Social Forces, 89(2), 435–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carnevale, A. P., & Strohl, J. (2013). Separate and unequal: How higher education reinforces the intergenerational reproduction of White racial privilege. Washington, DC: Georgetown University.Google Scholar
  18. Clinedinst, M. (2015). State of college admission 2014. Washington, DC: National Association for College Admission Counseling.Google Scholar
  19. College Board. (2012). Best practices in admissions decisions: A report on the third College Board conference on admission models. New York, NY: College Board.Google Scholar
  20. Dale, S., & Krueger, A. B. (2011). Estimating the return to college selectivity over the career using administrative earnings data (No. w17159). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  21. Doncaster, C. P., & Davey, A. J. H. (2007). Analysis of variance and covariance: How to choose and construct models for the life sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duffy, E. A., & Goldberg, I. (1997). Crafting a class: College admissions and financial aid, 1955–1994. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Espenshade, T. J., & Radford, A. W. (2009). No longer separate, not yet equal: Race and class in elite college admission and campus life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Espinosa, L. L., Gaertner, M. N., & Orfield, G. (2015). Race, class, and college access: Achieving diversity in a shifting legal landscape. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
  25. Fernandez, R., & Weinberg, N. (1997). Shifting and sorting: Personal contacts and hiring in a retail bank. American Sociological Review, 62, 883–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fisher v. University of Texas, 570 U.S. (2013).Google Scholar
  27. Gaertner, M. N., & Hart, M. (2013). Considering class: College access and diversity. Harvard Law and Policy Review, 7, 367–387.Google Scholar
  28. Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Heck, R. H., & Thomas, S. L. (2009). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Holland, M. M. (2014). Navigating the road to college: Race and class variation in the college application process. Sociology Compass, 8(10), 1191–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Karabel, J. (2005). The chosen. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  32. Karen, D. (1990). Toward a political-organizational model of gatekeeping: The case of elite colleges. Sociology of Education, 63, 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klopfenstein, K. (2004). Advanced placement: Do minorities have equal opportunity? Economics of Education Review, 23, 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leonhardt, D. (2017). The assault on public colleges – and the American dream. The New York Times. Retrieved June 30, 2017, from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/25/opinion/sunday/the-assault-on-colleges-and-the-american-dream.html.
  35. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Long, B. T., & Kurlaender, M. (2009). Do community colleges provide a viable pathway to a baccalaureate degree? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(1), 30–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lucido, J. A. (2014). How admissions decisions get made. In D. Hossler & B. Bontrager (Eds.), Handbook of strategic enrollment management (pp. 147–170). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  38. McDonough, P. M. (1994). Buying and selling higher education: The social construction of the college applicant. Journal of Higher Education, 65(4), 427–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McDonough, P. M. (1998). Structuring college opportunities: A cross-case analysis of organizational cultures, climates, & habiti. In C. A. Torres & T. R. Mitchell (Eds.), Sociology of education: Emerging perspectives (pp. 181–210). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  40. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pager, D., & Shepherd, H. (2008). The sociology of discrimination: Racial discrimination in employment, housing, credit, and consumer markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 181–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Perna, L. W. (2004). The key to college access: Rigorous academic preparation. In W. G. Tierney, Z. B. Corwin, & J. E. Colyar (Eds.), Preparing for college: Nine elements of effective outreach (pp. 113–134). Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  43. Porter, S. R. (2006). What can multilevel models add to institutional research? In M. A. Coughlin (Ed.), Applications of intermediate/advanced statistics in institutional research. (Resources in Institutional Research, Vol. 16). Tallahassee, FL: Association for Institutional Research.Google Scholar
  44. Posselt, J. R. (2016). Inside graduate admissions: Merit, diversity, and faculty gatekeeping. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Posselt, J. R., Jaquette, O., Bielby, R., & Bastedo, M. N. (2012). Access without equity: Longitudinal analyses of institutional stratification by race and ethnicity, 1972–2004. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1074–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Rivera, L. A. (2012). Hiring as cultural matching: The case of elite professional service firms. American Sociological Review, 77(6), 999–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Roderick, M., Coca, V., & Nagaoka, J. (2011). Potholes on the road to college: High school effects in shaping urban students’ participation in college application, four-year college enrollment, and college match. Sociology of Education, 84(3), 178–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Saenz, V. B., Oseguera, L., & Hurtado, S. (2007). Losing ground? Exploring racial/ethnic shifts in enrollment at selective institutions. In G. Orfield, P. Marin, S. M. Flores, & L. M. Garces (Eds.), Charting the future of college affirmative action: Legal victories, continuing attacks, and new research (pp. 173–204). Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project at UCLA.Google Scholar
  50. Scheffé, H. (1959/1999). The analysis of variance (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. Steinberg, J. (2002). The gatekeepers: Inside the admissions process of a premier college. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
  52. Stevens, M. (2007). Creating a class. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Synott, M. G. (1979). The half-opened door: Discrimination and admissions at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, 1900–1970. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  54. Thomas, S. L., & Zhang, L. (2005). Post-baccalaureate wage growth within four years of graduation: The effects of college quality and college major. Research in Higher Education, 46(4), 437–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wechsler, H. S. (1977). The qualified student: A history of selective college admission in America. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  56. Weiss, N. A. (2011). Introductory statistics (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of IowaIowa CityUSA
  2. 2.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations