Explaining Estimated Economies of Scale and Scope in Higher Education: A Meta-Regression Analysis

Article

Abstract

Numerous studies have investigated economies of scale and scope in higher education as a means of providing public and private providers of college and university teaching, research and other services and their stakeholders with knowledge of the cost structures that underpin provision in this economically and socially important sector. However, debate continues on the precise nature of the economies of scale and scope in higher education given the mixed findings, largely because of significant institutional and other differences across studies. To address this, we employ meta-regression analysis to explore not only the overall level of scale and scope economies across more than 40 international studies conducted in Australia, the US, the UK, Italy, China, and elsewhere since the early 1980s, but also those factors that potentially affect their presence in the higher education sector. Our findings suggest that functional form and allowances for managerial efficiency have a significant impact on the estimated scale economies. In contrast, for scope economies, the key discriminating factors appear to be when the analysis was conducted, the diversity of the sample, and the national level of economic development.

Keywords

Economies of scale Economies of scope Meta-regression analysis Higher education 

References

  1. Agasisti, T. (2016). Cost structure, productivity and efficiency of the Italian public higher education industry 2001–2011. International Review of Applied Economics, 30(1), 48–68. doi:10.1080/02692171.2015.1070130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agasisti, T., & Dal Bianco, A. (2007). Cost structure of Italian public universities: An empirical analysis. Higher Education in Europe, 32(2–3), 261–275. doi:10.1080/03797720701840856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agasisti, T., & Johnes, G. (2010). Heterogeneity and the evaluation of efficiency: The case of Italian universities. Applied Economics, 42(11), 1365–1375. doi:10.1080/00036840701721463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agasisti, T., & Johnes, G. (2015). Efficiency, costs, rankings and heterogeneity: The case of US higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(1), 60–82. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.818644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bailey, E. E., & Friedlaender, A. F. (1982). Market structure and multiproduct industries. Journal of Economic Literature, 20(3), 1024–1048. doi:10.2307/2724410.Google Scholar
  6. Baumol, W. J. (1975). Scale economies, average cost and the profitability of marginal cost pricing. In R. E. Grieson (Ed.), Essays in Urban Economics and Public Finance in Honor of William S. Vickrey (pp. 43–57). Lexington, Mass: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  7. Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C., & Willig, R. D. (1982). Contestable markets and the theory of industry structure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  8. Bel, G., & Fageda, X. (2009). Factors explaining local privatization: A meta-regression analysis. Public Choice, 139(1–2), 105–119. doi:10.1007/s11127-008-9381-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bel, G., & Warner, M. E. (2016). Factors explaining inter-municipal cooperation in service delivery: A meta-regression analysis. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 19(2), 91–115. doi:10.1080/17487870.2015.1100084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carvalho, P., Marques, R. C., & Berg, S. (2012). A meta-regression analysis of benchmarking studies on water utilities market structure. Utilities Policy, 21, 40–49. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2011.12.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chavas, J., Barham, B., Foltz, J., & Kim, K. (2012). Analysis and decomposition of scope economies: R&D at US research universities. Applied Economics, 44(10–12), 1387–1404. doi:10.1080/00036846.2010.541151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheng, G., & Wu, K. (2008). The internal efficiency in higher education: An analysis based on economies of scope. Frontiers of Education in China, 3(1), 79–96. doi:10.1007/s11516-008-0005-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohn, E., & Cooper, S. T. (2004). Multi-product cost functions for universities: Economies of scale and scope. In G. Johnes & J. Johnes (Eds.), International handbook on the economics of education (pp. 579–612). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  14. Cohn, E., Rhine, S., & Santos, M. (1989). Institutions of higher education as multi-product firms: Economies of scale and scope. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(2), 284–290. doi:10.2307/1926974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colegrave, A. D., & Giles, M. J. (2008). School cost functions: A meta-regression analysis. Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 688–696. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.05.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Groot, H., McMahon, W., & Volkwein, J. (1991). The cost structure of American research universities. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(3), 424–431. doi:10.2307/2109566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Doucouliagos, C. (2005). Publication bias in the economic freedom and economic growth literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(3), 367–387. doi:10.1111/j.0950-0804.2005.00252.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. (1995). Departmental productivity in American universities: Economies of scale and scope. Economics of Education Review, 14(2), 119–144. doi:10.1016/0272-7757(95)90393-M.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Filippini, M., & Lepori, B. (2007). Cost structure, economies of capacity, utilization and scope in Swiss higher education institutions. In A. Bonaccorsi & C. Daraio (Eds.), Universities and strategic knowledge creation (pp. 272–305). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  20. Foltz, J. D., Barham, B. L., & Kim, K. (2007). Synergies or trade-offs in university life sciences research. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89(2), 353–367. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01014.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fu, T., Huang, C. J., & Tien, F. (2008). University cost structure in Taiwan. Contemporary Economic Policy, 26(4), 651–662. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7287.2008.00104.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fu, T., Huang, C., & Yang, Y. (2011). Quality and economies of scale in higher education: A semiparametric smooth coefficient estimation. Contemporary Economic Policy, 29(1), 138–149. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7287.2010.00201.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gana, R. (1996). Scale and scope economies for higher education institutions. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ann Arbor: University of Delaware.Google Scholar
  24. Glass, C. J., Hyndman, N. S., & McKillop, D. G. (1995a). The achievement of scale efficiency in UK universities: A multiple-input multiple-output analysis. Education Economics, 3(3), 249–263. doi:10.1080/09645299500000023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Glass, C. J., Hyndman, N. S., & McKillop, D. G. (1995b). Efficiency in the provision of university teaching and research: An empirical analysis of UK universities. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10(1), 61–72. doi:10.1002/jae.3950100106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hashimoto, K., & Cohn, E. (1997). Economies of scale and scope in Japanese private universities. Education Economics, 5(2), 107–115. doi:10.1080/09645299700000010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Izadi, H., Johnes, G., Oskrochi, R., & Crouchley, R. (2002). Stochastic frontier estimation of a CES cost function: The case of higher education in Britain. Economics of Education Review, 21(1), 63–71. doi:10.1016/S0272-7757(00)00044-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnes, G. (1996). Multi-product cost functions and the funding of tuition in UK universities. Applied Economics Letters, 3(9), 557–561. doi:10.1080/135048596355943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnes, G. (1997). Costs and industrial structure in contemporary British higher education. The Economic Journal, 107(442), 727–737. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.1997.tb00038.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnes, G. (1998). The costs of multi-product organizations and the heuristic evaluation of industrial structure. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 32(3), 199–209. doi:10.1016/S0038-0121(97)00035-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnes, G., & Johnes, J. (2009). Higher education institutions’ costs and efficiency: Taking the decomposition a further step. Economics of Education Review, 28(1), 107–113. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2008.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnes, G., & Johnes, J. (2016). Costs, efficiency, and economies of scale and scope in the English higher education sector. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 32(4), 596–614. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grw023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnes, G., Johnes, J., Lenton, P., Thanassoulis, E., & Emrouznejad, A. (2005). An exploratory analysis of the cost structure of higher education in England. London: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
  34. Johnes, G., Johnes, J., & Thanassoulis, E. (2008). An analysis of costs in institutions of higher education in England. Studies in Higher Education, 33(5), 527–549. doi:10.1080/03075070802372901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnes, G., & Salas-Velasco, M. (2007). The determinants of costs and efficiencies where producers are heterogeneous: The case of Spanish universities. Economics Bulletin, 4(15), 1–9.Google Scholar
  36. Johnes, G., & Schwarzenberger, A. (2011). Differences in cost structure and the evaluation of efficiency: The case of German universities. Education Economics, 19(5), 487–499. doi:10.1080/09645291003726442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Koshal, R. K., & Koshal, M. (1999). Economies of scale and scope in higher education: A case of comprehensive universities. Economics of Education Review, 18(2), 269–277. doi:10.1016/S0272-7757(98)00035-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Koshal, R. K., & Koshal, M. (2000). Do liberal arts colleges exhibit economies of scale and scope? Education Economics, 8(3), 209–220. doi:10.1080/096452900750046715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Koshal, R. K., Koshal, M., & Gupta, A. (2001). Multi-product total cost function for higher education: A case of bible colleges. Economics of Education Review, 20(3), 297–303. doi:10.1016/S0272-7757(00)00016-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Laband, D. N., & Lentz, B. F. (2003). New estimates of economies of scale and scope in higher education. Southern Economic Journal, 70(1), 172–183. doi:10.2307/1061638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lewis, D. R., & Dundar, H. (1995). Economies of scale and scope in Turkish universities. Education Economics, 3(2), 133–157. doi:10.1080/09645299500000013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Li, F. (2016). Economies of scale and scope in internationalisation: Evidence from Chinese universities. China: An International Journal, 14(2), 189–200.Google Scholar
  43. Li, F., & Chen, X. (2012). Economies of scope in distance education: The case of Chinese research universities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(3), 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lloyd, P., Morgan, M., & Williams, R. (1993). Amalgamations of universities: Are there economics of scale or scope? Applied Economics, 25(8), 1081–1092. doi:10.1080/00036849300000088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  46. Longlong, H., Fengliang, L., & Weifang, M. (2009). Multi-product total cost functions for higher education: The case of Chinese research universities. Economics of Education Review, 28(4), 505–511. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2008.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mamun, S. A. K. (2012). Stochastic estimation of cost frontier: Evidence from Bangladesh. Education Economics, 20(2), 211–227. doi:10.1080/09645292.2010.494836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Maripani, J. F. (2007). Efficiency in higher education: An analysis of the “traditional universities” in Chile. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  49. Nemoto, J., & Furumatsu, N. (2014). Scale and scope economies of Japanese private universities revisited with an input distance function approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 41(2), 213–226. doi:10.1007/s11123-013-0378-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. OECD. (2016). List of OECD member countries. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/about/membersandpartners/list-oecd-member-countries.htm.
  51. Olivares, M., & Wetzel, H. (2014). Competing in the higher education market: Empirical evidence for economies of scale and scope in German higher education institutions. CESifo Economic Studies, 60(4), 653–680. doi:10.1093/cesifo/ifu001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Panzar, J. C., & Willig, R. D. (1975). Economies of scale and economies of scope in multi-output production. Bell Laboratories Economic Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
  53. Rufino, C. C. (2006). Estimating the degree cost functions of the Philippines public and private higher educational institutions. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(1), 32–40. doi:10.1007/BF03036782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sav, G. T. (2004). Higher education costs and scale and scope economies. Applied Economics, 36(6), 607–614. doi:10.1080/0003684042000217643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sav, G. T. (2010). Managing public higher education restructuring. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 15(2), 1–23.Google Scholar
  56. Sav, G. T. (2011). Panel data estimates of public higher education scale and scope economies. Atlantic Economic Journal, 39(2), 143–153. doi:10.1007/s11293-011-9273-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stanley, T. D., & Doucouliagos, H. (2012). Meta-regression analysis in economics and business. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Stanley, T. D., Doucouliagos, H., Giles, M., Heckemeyer, J. H., Johnston, R. J., Laroche, P., et al. (2013). Meta-analysis of economics research reporting guidelines. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27(2), 390–394. doi:10.1111/joes.12008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stanley, T. D., & Jarrell, S. B. (1989). Meta-regression analysis: A quantitative method of literature surveys. Journal of economic surveys, 3(2), 161–170. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.1989.tb00064.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stanley, T. D., & Jarrell, S. B. (2005). Meta-regression analysis: A quantitative method of literature surveys. Journal of economic surveys, 19(3), 299–308. doi:10.1111/j.0950-0804.2005.00249.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Velickovski, I., & Pugh, G. T. (2010). Constraints on exchange rate flexibility in transition economies: A meta-regression analysis of exchange rate pass-through. Applied Economics, 43(27), 4111–4125. doi:10.1080/00036846.2010.485927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Worthington, A. C., & Higgs, H. (2011). Economies of scale and scope in Australian higher education. Higher Education, 61(4), 387–414. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9337-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang, L.-C., & Worthington, A. C. (2015). Evaluating the accuracy of scope economies: comparisons among Delta method, Bootstrap, and Bayesian approach. Paper presented at the 2015 Australian Conference of Economists, QUT Gardens Point Brisbane, Australia. Retrieved from http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/handle/10072/69409.
  64. Zhang, L.-C., & Worthington, A. C. (2016). Scale and scope economies of distance education in Australian universities. Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1126817.Google Scholar
  65. Zhang, L.-C., Worthington, A. C., & Hu, M. (2016). Cost economies in the provision of higher education for international students: Australian evidence. Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s10734-016-0078-9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Accounting, Finance and EconomicsGriffith UniversityNathanAustralia
  2. 2.Australian Council for Educational ResearchCamberwellAustralia

Personalised recommendations