Research in Higher Education

, Volume 56, Issue 6, pp 622–644 | Cite as

You Expect What? Students’ Perceptions as Resources in Acquiring Commitments and Capacities for Civic Engagement

  • Cassie L. Barnhardt
  • Jessica E. Sheets
  • Kira Pasquesi
Article

Abstract

This mixed-method analysis presents a model of college students’ civic commitments and capacities for community action. Quantitative findings indicate that after controlling for background characteristics, campus contexts, and college experiences, students’ acquisitions of commitments to and skills for contributing to the larger community are largely influenced by the extent to which students perceive their campus as one that advocates for its students to be active and involved citizens. Qualitative findings convey the behaviors and types of speech that students view as legitimate public advocacy by peers, faculty, and administrators. Qualitative insights also reveal the ways in which students’ exposure to campus-based public advocacy influences their civic skills, and their understandings of social responsibility.

Keywords

Civic engagement Campus advocacy Student outcomes Social responsibility 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Association of American Colleges & Universities for providing access to the Core Commitments data.

References

  1. AAC&U. Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2006a). Core Commitments: Educating Students for Personal and Social Responsibility. Retrieved from http://www.aacu.org/core_commitments/documents/CORECOMM.BROCHURE.pdf.
  2. AAC&U. Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2006b). Core Commitments: Educating Students for Personal and Social Responsibility Pledge. Retrieved from http://www.aacu.org/core_commitments/pledge.cfm.
  3. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.Google Scholar
  4. Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297–308.Google Scholar
  5. Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Astin, A. W., & Sax, L. J. (1998). How undergraduates are affected by service participation. Journal of College Student Development, 39(3), 251–263.Google Scholar
  7. Astin, A. W., Sax, L. J., & Avalos, J. (1999). Long-term effects of volunteerism during the undergraduate years. Review of Higher Education, 22(2), 187–202.Google Scholar
  8. Barber, B. R. (1992). An aristocracy of everyone: The politics of education and the future of America. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  9. Barnhardt, C. L. (2014). Campus-based organizing: Tactical repertoires of a contemporary student movement. In C. Broadhurst & G. L. Martin (Eds.), Radical Academia? Understanding the Climates for Campus Activists (New Directions for Higher Education, No. 167, pp. 43–58). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Barnhardt, C. L., Antonaros, M., Holsapple, M. C., Ott, M. C., & Dey, E. L. (2010). Technical and administrative guide for the personal & social responsibility institutional inventory. Washington DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar
  11. Bastedo, M. N., & Jaquette, O. (2011). Running in place: Low-income students and the dynamics of higher education stratification. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 318–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Battistoni, R., & Hudson, W. E. (2011). Experiencing citizenship: Concepts and models for service-learning in political science (AAHE’s Series on Service-Learning in the Disciplines). Sterling, VA: Stylus.Google Scholar
  13. Bliuc, A., Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., & Hendres, D. M. (2011). The role of social identification as university student in learning: relationships between students’ social identity, approaches to learning, and academic achievement. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 31(5), 559–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brammer, L., Dumlao, R., Falk, A., Hollander, E., Knutson, E., & Poehnert, J. (2012). Core competencies in civic engagement. Retrieved from Center for Engaged Democracy Publications. http://scholarworks.merrimack.edu/ced_pubs/1/.
  15. Bryant, A. N., Gayles, J. G., & Davis, H. A. (2012). The relationship between civic behavior and civic values: A conceptual model. Research in Higher Education, 53(1), 76–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Butin, D. W., & Seider, S. (2012). The engaged campus: Certificates, minors and majors as the new community engagement. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cabrera, A. F., Nora, A., Terenzini, P. T., Pascarella, E., & Hagedorn, L. S. (1999). Campus racial climate and the adjustment of students to college: A comparison between White students and African-American students. Journal of Higher Education, 70(2), 134–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cress, C. M., Astin, H. S., Zimmerman-Oster, K., & Burkhardt, J. C. (2001). Developmental outcomes of college students’ involvement in leadership activities. Journal of College Student Development, 42(1), 15–27.Google Scholar
  19. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Culbertson, H. M. (1992). Linkage beliefs: What are the links. Public Relations Review, 18(4), 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dewey, J. (1909). Moral principles in education. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Dey, E. L. (1997). Working with low survey response rates: The efficacy of weighting adjustments. Research in Higher Education, 38(2), 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ehrlich, T. (2000). Civic responsibility and higher education. Westport, CT: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
  26. Einwohner, R. L., & Spencer, J. W. (2005). That’s how we do things here: Local culture and the construction of sweatshops and anti-sweatshop activism in two campus communities. Sociologial Inquiry, 75(2), 249–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eyler, J., & Giles, D. (1999). Where’s the learning in service-learning?. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  28. Fox, H. (2012). Their highest vocation: Social justice and the Millenial generation. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  29. Gibson, C., & Levine, P. (2003). The civic mission of schools. New York: The Carnegie Corporation of New York.Google Scholar
  30. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  31. Gonyea, R. M. (2005). Self-reported data in institutional research: Review and recommendations. In P. D. Umbach (Ed.), Survey research: Emerging issues (New Directions for Institutional Research No. 127, pp. 73–89): San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  32. Harry, B., Sturges, K. M., & Klinger, J. K. (2005). Mapping the process: An exemplar of process and challenge in grounded theory analysis. Educational Researcher, 34(2), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hartley, M., & Saltmarsh, J. (2011). Creating the democratically engaged university—possibilities for constructive action. In J. Saltmarsh & M. Hartley (Eds.), “To serve a larger purpose”: Engagement for democracy and the transformation of higher education (pp. 289–299). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Levine, M. (2012). When other people are heaven, when other people are hell: How social identity determines the nature and impact of social support. In J. Jetten, C. Haslam, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social cure: Identity, health and well-being (pp. 157–174). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hatcher, J. A. (2011). Assessing civic knowledge and engagement. In J. D. Penn (Ed.), Assessing complex general education student learning outcomes (New Directions for Institutional Research No. 149, pp. 81–92). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  36. Hogg, M. A., & Mullin, B. A. (1999). Joining groups to reduce uncertainty: Subjective uncertainty reduction and group identification. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 249–279). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  37. Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2001). Social identity processes in organizational contexts. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hopkins, N., & Blackwood, L. (2011). Everyday citizenship: Identity and recognition. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 21(3), 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jacoby, B., et al. (2009). Civic Engagement in higher education: Concepts and practices. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  40. Jetten, J., Haslam, C., & Haslam, S. A. (2012). The social cure: Identity, health and well-being. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  41. Knefelkamp, L. L. (2008). Civic identity: Locating self in community. Diversity & Democracy: Civic Learning for Shared Futures, 11(2), 1–3.Google Scholar
  42. Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J., et al. (2010). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  43. Lawry, S., Laurison, D., & Van Antwerpen, J. (2009). Liberal education and civic engagement: Ford Foundation’s knowledge, creativity and freedom program. New York, NY: Ford Foundation.Google Scholar
  44. Loeb, P. R. (1994). Generation at the crossroads: Apathy and action on the American campus. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Mael, F. A., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mael, F. A., & Tetrick, L. E. (1992). Identifying organizational identification. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 813–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moran, E. T., & Volkwein, J. F. (1992). The cultural approach to the formation of organizational cliamte. Human Relations, 45(1), 19–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Morse, J. M., & Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press Inc.Google Scholar
  49. Nussbaum, M. (2002). Education for citizenship in an era of global connection. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21(4–5), 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). San Fransico, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  52. Peterson, M. W. (1988). The organizational environment for student learning. In J. S. Stark, & L. A. Mets (Eds.), Improving teaching and learning through resarch (New Directions for Institutional Research No. 57, pp. 23–37). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  53. Peterson, M. W., & Spencer, M. (1990). Understanding academic culture and climate. In W. G. Tierney (Ed.), Assessing academic climates and cultures (New Directions for Institutional Research No. 68, pp. 3–18). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  54. Reason, R. D. (Ed.). (2013). Special issue: Developing and assessing personal and social responsibility in college. New Directions for Higher Education (Vol. 164): Wiley Periodicals, Inc.Google Scholar
  55. Ridgeway, C. L. (2014). Why status matters for inequality. American Sociological Review, 79(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ryder, A. J., & Mitchell, J. J. (2013). Measuring campus climate for personal and social responsibility. In R. D. Reason (Ed.), Developing and assessing personal and social responsibility (New Directions for Higher Education No. 164, pp. 31–48) San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  57. Sax, L. J. (2004). Citizenship development and the American college student. In J. C. Dalton, T. R. Russell, & S. Kline (Eds.), Assessing character outcomes in college (New Directions for Instiuttional Research No. 122, pp. 65–80). San Franscico, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  58. Seyranian, V. (2014). Social identity framing communication strategies for mobilizing social change. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 468–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Seyranian, V., & Bligh, M. C. (2008). Presidential charismatic leadership: Exploring the rhetoric of social change. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), 54–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smyth, L., Mavor, K. I., Platow, M. J., Grace, D. M., & Reynolds, K. J. (2013). Discipline social identification, study norms and learning approach in university students. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2013.822962.
  61. Sobieraj, S. (2006). The implications of transitions in the voluntary sector for civic engagement: A case study of association mobilization around the 2000 presidential campaign. Sociological Inquiry, 76(1), 52–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  63. Swaner, L. E. (2004). Educating for personal and social responsibility: Review of existing literature. Resource document. American Association of Colleges and Universities. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/core_commitments/resources.cfm.
  64. Tajfel, H. (1978). The achievement of group differentiation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 77–98). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  65. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  66. Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. The National Task Force on Civic Learning and Democratic Engagement. (2012). A crucible moment: College learning and democracy’s future. Washington DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar
  68. Tidwell, M. V. (2005). A social identity model of prosocial behaviors within nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15(4), 449–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tompkins, E. V. (1986). Possible antecendents and outcomes of identification with a parturient organization (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Iowa City, IA: The University of Iowa.Google Scholar
  70. U.S. Department of Education. (2012). Advancing civic learning and engagement in democracy: A road map and call to action. Washington DC: Author.Google Scholar
  71. Vogelsang, L. J., & Astin, A. W. (2000). Comparing the effects of community service and service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 7, 25–34.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cassie L. Barnhardt
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jessica E. Sheets
    • 1
  • Kira Pasquesi
    • 1
  1. 1.University of IowaIowa CityUSA
  2. 2.College of EducationIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations