Abstract
This institutional case study examines the influence of a policy requiring outside offers for faculty salary increases on institutional retention efforts and faculty organizational commitment. Outside offers and policies governing them are rarely examined, and studied here from the perspective of administrators, leaving faculty, and faculty who receive outside offers and remain. Findings suggest such a policy has negative influences on institutional retention efforts and organizational commitment. Implications are drawn for campuses working to retain faculty and for future research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association of University Professors. (1961). Statement on recruitment and resignation of faculty members. Retrieved from http://www.aaup.org/file/recruitment-and-resignation.pdf.
Baldwin, R., DeZure, D., Shaw, A., & Moretto, K. (2008). Mapping the terrain of mid-career faculty at a research university: Implications for faculty and academic leaders. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 40(5), 46–55.
Barbezat, D. A. (2002). History of pay equity studies. New Directions for Institutional Research, 115, 9–39.
Barbezat, D. A. (2004). Revisiting the seniority wage effect for faculty. Economics Letters, 82(2), 289–294.
Barnes, L. L., Agago, M. O., & Coombs, W. T. (1998). Effects of job-related stress on faculty intention to leave academia. Research in Higher Education, 39(4), 457–469.
Birnbaum, R. (1991). How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Blackburn, R. T., & Lawrence, J. H. (1995). Faculty at work: Motivation, expectation, satisfaction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bluedorn, A. C. (1982). The theories of turnover: Causes, effects and meaning. In S. B. Bacharach (Ed.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations (pp. 75–128). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Crothers, L. M., Hughes, T. L., Schmitt, A. J., Altman, C. L., Theodore, L., Lipinski, J., et al. (2010). Has equity been achieved? Salary and promotion negotiation practices of a national sample of school psychology university trainers. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 13(1), 40–59.
Daly, C., & Dee, J. (2006). Greener pastures: Faculty turnover intent in urban public universities. Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 776–803.
Eckes, S., & Toutkoushian, R. K. (2006). Legal issues and statistical approaches to reverse pay discrimination in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 47(8), 957–984.
Fairweather, J. S. (1996). Faculty work and public trust: Restoring the value of teaching and public service in American academic life. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
Fairweather, J. S. (2005). Beyond the rhetoric: Trends in the relative value of teaching and research in faculty salaries. Journal of Higher Education, 76(4), 401–422.
Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 115–130.
Gardner, S. K. (2012). A mixed methods study of women faculty satisfaction and departure from one research institution. Journal about Women in Higher Education, 5(1), 71–95.
Gardner, T. M., Stansbury, J., & Hart, D. (2010). The ethics of lateral hiring. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(3), 341–369.
Glazer, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway: Aldine Transaction.
Hagedorn, L. S. (2000). Conceptualizing faculty job satisfaction: Components, theories, and outcomes. New Directions for Institutional Research, 105, 5–20.
Johnsrud, L. K., & Rosser, V. J. (2002). Faculty members’ morale and their intention to leave: A multilevel explanation. Journal of Higher Education, 73(4), 518–542.
Kezar, A., & Eckel, P. D. (2002). The effects of institutional culture on change strategies in higher education: Universal principles or culturally responsive concepts? Journal of Higher Education, 73(4), 435–460.
Kreuter, N. (2012, September 5). Salary realities. Inside Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2012/09/05/essay-what-new-faculty-members-need-know-about-salaries.
Kvale, S., & Brinkman, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Lawler, E. (1994). Motivation in work organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Reviews of Sociology, 14, 319–340.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163–188). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Lind, E. A. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
Lindholm, J. (2003). Perceived organizational fit: Nurturing the minds, hearts, and personal ambitions of university faculty. Review of Higher Education, 27(1), 125–149.
Maertz, C. P., & Griffeth, R. W. (2004). Eight motivational forces and voluntary turnover: A theoretical synthesis with implications for research. Journal of Management, 30(5), 667–683.
Matier, M. W. (1990). Retaining faculty: A tale of two campuses. Research in Higher Education, 31(1), 39–61.
Maxwell, J. A. (2012). A realist approach for qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Mills, M., Bettis, P., Miller, J. W., & Nolan, R. (2005). Experiences of academic unit reorganization: Organizational identity and identification in organizational change. Review of Higher Education, 28(4), 597–619.
Mobley, W. (1982). Employee turnover: Causes, consequences, and control. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Morrison, E., Rudd, E., Picciano, J., & Nerad, M. (2011). Are you satisfied? PhD education and faculty taste for prestige: Limits of the prestige value system. Research in Higher Education, 52(1), 24–46.
Mowday, R., Porter, L., & Steers, R. (1982). Employee-organization linkages. New York: Academic Press.
National Science Foundation. (2006). ADVANCE: Increasing the participation and advancement of women in academic science and engineering careers. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5383.
O’Meara, K. (2004). Beliefs about post-tenure review: The influence of autonomy, collegiality, career stage, and institutional context. Journal of Higher Education, 75(2), 178–202.
O’Meara, K. (2011). Inside the panopticon: Studying academic reward systems. In J. C. Smart & M. B. Paulsen (Eds.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 26, pp. 161–220). New York: Springer.
Ponjuan, L., Conley, V. M., & Trower, C. (2011). Career stage differences in pre-tenure track faculty perceptions of professional and personal relationships with colleagues. Journal of Higher Education, 82(3), 319–346.
Price, J. (1997). Handbook of organizational measurement. International Journal of Manpower, 18(4), 303–558.
Price, J., & Mueller, C. (1986). Handbook of organizational measurement. Marshfield: Pitman.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University.
Rice, R. E., Sorcinelli, M.D., & Austin, A. E. (2000). Heeding new voices: Academic careers for a new generation (New Pathways Working Paper Series Inquiry No. 7). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
Rosser, V. J. (2004). Faculty members’ intentions to leave: A national study on their work-life and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 45(3), 285–309.
Rosser, V. J., & Townsend, B. K. (2006). Determining public 2-year college faculty’s intent to leave: An empirical model. Journal of Higher Education, 77(1), 125–147.
Ryan, J. F., Healy, R.,& Sullivan, J. (2009, May). Oh won’t you stay? Predictors of faculty intent to leave a public research university. Paper presented at the 49th Annual forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Atlanta, GA.
Schuster, J. H., & Finkelstein, M. J. (2006). The American faculty: The restructuring of academic work and careers. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Smart, J. C. (1990). A causal model of faculty turnover intentions. Research in Higher Education, 31(5), 405–424.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of grounded theory methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Tierney, W. G., & Bensimon, E. (1996). Promotion and tenure: Community and socialization in academe. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Trower, C. A. (2012). Success on the tenure track: Five keys to faculty job satisfaction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Tyler, T., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 913–930.
Volkwein, J. F., & Sweitzer, K. (2006). Institutional prestige and reputation among research universities and liberal arts colleges. Research in Higher Education, 47(2), 129–148.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
West, M. S. (1995). Women faculty: Frozen in time. Academe, 81(4), 26–29.
Williams, J.C. (2013, October 15). It’s cheaper to keep her: Building a department in anera of tight budgets [Webinar]. In AWIS Webinar for AWIS Institutional Partners (Deans, Department Chairs, HR Departments, Administrators) Series. Retrieved from http://www.toolsforchangeinstem.org/.
Xu, Y. J. (2008). Faculty turnover: Discipline-specific attention is warranted. Research in Higher Education, 49(1), 40–61.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Zhou, Y., & Volkwein, J. F. (2004). Examining the influences of faculty departure intentions: A comparison of tenured versus non tenured faculty at research universities using NSOPF-99. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 139–176.
Acknowledgments
I gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments provided by the anonymous reviewers, Leslie Gonzales, Andy Lounder, and Corbin Campbell on earlier drafts of this manuscript. I further recognize this article is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. HRD-1008117.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Meara, K. Half-Way Out: How Requiring Outside Offers to Raise Salaries Influences Faculty Retention and Organizational Commitment. Res High Educ 56, 279–298 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-014-9341-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-014-9341-z