Advertisement

Research in Higher Education

, Volume 55, Issue 7, pp 650–685 | Cite as

Within-Year Retention Among Ph.D. Students: The Effect of Debt, Assistantships, and Fellowships

  • Pilar Mendoza
  • Pedro VillarrealIII
  • Alee Gunderson
Article

Abstract

This study employs the 2007–2008 National Postsecondary Student Aid Study and the National Research Center’s survey data, “A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States,” to investigate the (1) the effects of debt in relation to tuition and fees paid and (2) the effects of teaching assistantships, research assistantships, and fellowships on within year retention among Ph.D. students. We created an innovative conceptual model for this study by merging a socioeconomic model for graduate students and a graduate student socialization model. We used propensity score weights for estimating average treatment effects and average treatment effect on the treated as well as a series of control and balancing variables. This study provides timely insights into which of these financial strategies are likely to improve the already low doctoral retention rates nationwide. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that includes proxies of socialization variables in examining the role of various funding mechanisms in doctoral retention using a national representative dataset.

Keywords

Doctoral student retention Doctoral assistantships Fellowships Graduate debt Graduate students 

References

  1. Ampaw, F. D., & Jaeger, A. J. (2012). Completing the three stages of doctoral education: An event history analysis. Research in Higher Education, 53, 640–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: graduate school as socialization to academic careers. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bair, C. R. & Haworth, J.G. (1999). Doctoral student attrition and persistence: A metasynthesis of research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, San Antonio, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED437008).Google Scholar
  4. Bowen, W. G., & Rudenstine, N. L. (1992). In pursuit of the Ph.D.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Braskman, L., & Wergin, J. (1998). Forming new social partnerships. In W. Tierney (Ed.), The responsive university: Restructuring for high performance (pp. 62–91). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Burton, N. W., & Ramist, L. (2001). Predicting success in college: SAT studies of classes graduating since 1980. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.Google Scholar
  7. College Board. (2011). Trends in student aid. (Trends in Higher Education Series). Washington: Author.Google Scholar
  8. Cominole, M., Riccobono, J., Siegel, P., & Caves, L. (2010). 2007–08 National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS:08) Full-scale Methodology Report (NCES 2011-188). Washington: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  9. DesJardins, S. L., & McCall, B. P. (2010). Simulating the effects of financial aid packages on college student stop out, reenrollment spells, and graduation chances. Review of Higher Education, 33(4), 513–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dowd, A. C. (2008). Dynamic interactions and intersubjectivity: Challenges to causal modeling in studies of college student debt. Review of Educational Research, 78(2), 232–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gardner, S. K. (2009). Student and faculty attributions of attrition in high and low-completing US doctoral programs. Higher Education, 58, 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gardner, S. K., & Barnes, B. J. (2007). Graduate student involvement: Socialization for the professional role. The Journal of College Student Development, 48, 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gardner, S. K., & Holley, K. A. (2011). Those invisible barriers are real: The progression of first-generation students through doctoral education. Equity and Excellence in Education, 44(1), 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gardner, S. K., & Mendoza, P. (2010). On becoming a scholar: Socialization and development in doctoral education. Sterling: Stylus.Google Scholar
  15. Girves, J. E., & Wemmerus, V. (1988). Developing models of graduate student degree progress. The Journal of Higher Education, 59(2), 163–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glazer-Raymo, J. (1999). Shattering the myths: Women in academe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Golde, C. M. (2000). Should I stay or should I go? Student descriptions of the doctoral attrition process. Review of Higher Education, 23(2), 119–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Golde, C. M. (2005). The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: lessons from four departments. Journal of Higher Education, 76, 669–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guo, S., & Fraser, W. M. (2010). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Gururaj, S., Heilig, J. V., & Somers, P. (2010). Graduate student persistence: Evidence from three decades. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 40(1), 31–46.Google Scholar
  21. Hahs-Vaughn, D. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2006). Estimating and using propensity score analysis with complex samples. The Journal of Experimental Education, 73(1), 31–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Herzig, A. H. (2004). Becoming mathematicians: Women and students of color choosing and leaving doctoral mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 74(2), 171–214.Google Scholar
  23. Hoffer, T. B., Welch, V., Webber, K., Williams, K., Lisek, B., Hess, M., et al. (2006). Doctorate recipients from United States universities: Summary report 2005. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.Google Scholar
  24. Hossler, D., Ziskin, M., Gross, J. P., Kim, S., & Cekic, O. (2009). Student aid and its role in encouraging persistence. Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 389–425). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Kim, D. (2007). The effect of loans on students’ degree attainment: differences by student and institutional characteristics. Harvard Educational Review, 77(1), 64–100.Google Scholar
  26. Kim, D., & Otts, C. (2010). The effect of loans on time to doctorate degree: Differences by race/ethnicity, field of study, and institutional characteristics. Journal of Higher Education, 81(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
  29. Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  30. Malcolm, L. E., & Dowd, A. C. (2012). The impact of undergraduate debt on the graduate school enrollment of STEM baccalaureates. The Review of Higher Education, 35(2), 265–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mendoza, P. (2007). Academic capitalism and doctoral student socialization: A case study. Journal of Higher Education, 78(1), 71–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morgan, S. L., & Winship, C. (2007). Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social science research. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Murnane, R. J., & Willett, J. B. (2011). Methods matter: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mwenda, M. N. (2010). Underrepresented minority students in STEM doctoral programs: The role of financial support and relationships with faculty and peers. Dissertation, University of Iowa.Google Scholar
  35. National Science Board. (2012). Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. Arlington: National Science Foundation (NSB 12-01).Google Scholar
  36. Nettles, M. T., & Millett, C. M. (2006). Three magic letters: Getting to Ph.D (1st ed.). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Kemper, E., Holford, T. R., & Feinstein, A. R. (1996). A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49, 1372–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schafer, J. L., & Kang, J. (2008). Average causal effects from non-randomized studies: A practical guide and simulated example. Psychological Methods, 13(4), 279–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schneider, B., Carnoy, M., Kilpatrick, J., Schmidt, W. H., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Estimating causal effects using experimental and observational designs: A think tank white paper. Washington: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  40. Shadish, W. R., Campbell, D. T., & Cook, T. D. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  41. Slaughter, S., Campbell, T., Hollernan, M., & Morgan, E. (2002). The “traffic” in graduate students: Graduate students as tokens of exchange between academe and industry. Science, Technology and Human Values, 27(2), 282–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. St. John, E. P., & Andrieu, S. C. (1995). The influence of price subsidies on within-year persistence by graduate students. Higher Education, 29, 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stata Press. (2011). Stata multiple imputation reference manual, release 12. College Station: Author.Google Scholar
  44. Tierney, W. (1992). Cultural leadership and the search for community. Liberal Education, 78(5), 16–21.Google Scholar
  45. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed., p. 296). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Walker, G. E., Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Conklin Bueschel, A., & Hutchings, P. (2008). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  47. Weidman, J. C., Twale, D. J., & Stein, E. L. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage?. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  48. Wendler, C., Bridgeman, B., Cline, F., Millett, C., Rock, J., Bell, N., et al. (2010). The path forward: The future of graduate education in the United States. Council of Graduate School: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  49. Winkle-Wagner, R. (2009). The unchosen me: Race, gender, and identity among Black women in college. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pilar Mendoza
    • 1
  • Pedro VillarrealIII
    • 2
  • Alee Gunderson
    • 3
  1. 1.Deparment of Educational Leadership & Policy Analysis, College of EducationUniversity of Missouri ColumbiaColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.College of EducationUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  3. 3.Youth Development and Agricultural EducationPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations