Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Student Swirl at a Single Institution: The Role of Timing and Student Characteristics

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Back-and-forth enrollment at different institutions—student swirl—and concurrent enrollment at two or more institutions—double-dipping—have become common experiences for students in the United States. However, empirical studies explaining student mobility are rather rare. This study examines how student departures from and returns to a single institution are affected by college attendance elsewhere. The model presented here demonstrates that departure rates are higher for students concurrently attending another college. Return rates, on the other hand, are substantially lower for those students who attend other colleges after departure from the study institution. The effect of multi-institutional attendance differs by college type, with the effect of 4-year out-of-state institution attendance being most pronounced. The simultaneous analysis of departures and returns provides the study institution with a more accurate and complete picture of student mobility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the toolbox: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and Bachelor’s degree attainment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adelman, C. (2005). Moving into town—and moving on: The community college in the lives of traditional-age students. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J., Robbins, S. B., Casillas, A., & Oh, I. S. (2008). Third-year college retention and transfer: Effects of academic performance, motivation, and social connectedness. Research in Higher Education, 49(7), 647–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahr, P. R. (2009). Educational attainment as process: Using hierarchical discrete-time event history analysis to model rate of progress. Research in Higher Education, 50(7), 691–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahr, P. R. (2011). Student flow between community colleges: Investigating lateral transfer. Research in Higher Education (in print).

  • Barber, J. S., Murphy, S. A., Axinn, W. G., & Maples, J. (2000). Discrete-time multilevel hazard analysis. Sociological Methodology, 30(1), 201–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bontrager, B., Clemetsen, B., & Watts, T. (2005). Enabling student swirl: A community college/university dual enrollment program. College and University Journal, 80(4), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borden, V. M. H. (2004). Accommodating student swirl: When traditional students are no longer the tradition. Change, 36(2), 10–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braxton, J. M. (2000). Reworking the student departure puzzle. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caison, A. L. (2007). Analysis of institutionally specific retention research: A comparison between survey and institutional database methods. Research in Higher Education, 48(4), 435–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. S., & Gonyea, R. M. (2010). Accuracy of self-reported SAT and ACT test scores: Implications for research. Research in Higher Education, 51(4), 305–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, B., & Pullaro, N. (2010). College graduation rates: Behind the numbers. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • De los Santos, A., Jr., & Wright, I. (1990). Maricopa’s swirling students: Earning one-third of Arizona state’s bachelor’s degrees. Community, Technical, and Junior College Journal, 4(6), 32–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • DesJardins, S. L., Ahlburg, A. A., & McCall, B. P. (2002). Simulating the longitudinal effects of changes in financial aid on student departure from college. Journal of Human Resources, 37(3), 653–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DesJardins, S. L., Ahlburg, A. A., & McCall, B. P. (2006a). An Integrated model of application, admission, enrollment, and financial aid. Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 381–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DesJardins, S. L., Ahlburg, A. A., & McCall, B. P. (2006b). The effects of interrupted enrollment on graduation from college: Racial, income, and ability differences. Economics of Education Review, 25, 575–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DesJardins, S. L., & McCall, B. P. (2010). Simulating the effects of financial aid packages on college student stopout, reenrollment spells, and graduation chances. The Review of Higher Education, 33(4), 513–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DesJardins, S. L., & Toutkoushian, R. K. (2005). Are students really rational? The development of rational thought and its application to student choice. In J.C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 20, pp. 191–240). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Ehrenberg, R. G. (2005). The perfect storm and the privatization of public higher education. Working papers 59. Retrieved on April 15, 2011, from http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/workingpapers/59

  • Goldrick-Rab, S., Harris, D. N., & Trostel, P. A. (2009). Why financial aid matters (or does not) for college success: Toward a new interdisciplinary perspective. In J. C. Smart (Ed.) Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XXIV, pp. 389–426). New York: Agathon Press.

  • Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005). Applied choice analysis: A primer. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, S. (2005). Measuring determinants of student return vs. dropout vs. transfer: A first-to-second year analysis of new freshmen. Research in Higher Education, 46(8), 883–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J. L., & Lowitzki, K. E. (2005). Predicting college success with high school grades and test scores: Limitations for minority students. The Review of Higher Education, 28(4), 455–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (1998). Stopouts or stayouts? Undergraduates who leave college in their first year (NCES 1999–087). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D., Ziskin, M., Gross, J. P. K., & Kim, S. (2009). Student aid and its role in encouraging persistence. In J. C. Smart (Ed.) Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XXIV, pp. 389–426). New York: Kluwer.

  • Johnson, I. Y. (2006). Analysis of stopout behavior at a public research university: The multi-spell discrete-time approach. Research in Higher Education, 47(8), 905–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski, C. F., & Wise, A. D. (1983). College choice in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, A. C. (1997). Transfer behavior among beginning postsecondary students: 1989–1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, A. C. (2003). Swirling and double-dipping: New patterns of student attendance and their implications for higher education. New Directions for Higher Education, 121, 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melguizo, T. (2011). A review of theories developed to describe the process of college persistence. In J. C. Smart, & M. B. Paulsen (Eds.). Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 26, pp. 125–160). New York: Springer.

  • Mullane, L. (2005). Taking transfer credit beyond traditional boundaries. American Council on Education. Retrieved on April 12, 2011, from http://www.acenet.edu/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=12215

  • Munro, B. H. (1981). Dropouts from higher education: Path analysis of a national sample. American Educational Research Journal, 18(2), 133–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noel, L., Levitz, R., & Saluri, D. (1985). Increasing student retention. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, D. M., Stratton, L. S., & Wetzel, J. N. (2003). A longitudinal analysis of the frequency of part-time enrollment and the persistence of students who enroll part time. Research in Higher Education, 44(5), 519–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, A. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2008). Multilevel modeling of educational data. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. (1980). Predicting freshman persistence and voluntary dropout decisions from a theoretical model. Journal of Higher Education, 51(1), 60–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1983). Predicting voluntary freshman year persistence/withdrawal behavior in a residential university: A path analysis validation of Tinto’s model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (2005). How college affects students—a third decade of research (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M. B. (2001). The economics of human capital and investment in higher education. In M. B. Paulsen & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The finance of higher education: Theory, research, policy, and practice (pp. 55–94). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, K., Cataldi, E. F., & Carroll, C. D. (2005). The road less traveled? Students who enroll in multiple institutions. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R., & Askew, J. W. (1990). The impact of fraternity or sorority membership on academic involvement or learning outcomes. NASPA Journal, 28, 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R., Hansen, M. J., & Lin, C. H. (2011). Using instrumental variables to account for selection effects in research on first-year programs. Research in Higher Education, 52(2), 194–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter S. (2002). Including transfer-out behavior in retention models: Using the NSLC enrollment search data. IR Professional File, 82.

  • Porter, S. (2003). Understanding retention outcomes: Using multiple data sources to distinguish between dropouts, stopouts, and transfer-outs. Journal of College Student Retention, 5(1), 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, B. T. (2010). Is Colorado’s voucher system worth vouching for? Change, July–August. Retrieved on April 15, 2011, from http://www.changemag.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/July-August%202010/Colorado-voucher-full.html

  • Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 11–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronco, S. L. (1994). Meandering ways: Studying student stopout with survival analysis. Paper Presented at the 34th annual conference of the association for institutional research, New Orleans, LA.

  • Ronco, S. L. (1996). How enrollment ends: Analyzing the correlates of student graduation, transfer and dropout with a competing risks model. AIR Professional File, 61.

  • Singell, L., & Stater, M. (2006). Going, going, gone: The effects of aid policies on graduation at three large public institutions. Policy Sciences, 39(4), 379–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John, E. P., Cabrera, A. E., Nora, A., & Asker, E. H. (2000). Economic influences on persistence reconsidered. How can finance research inform the reconceptualization of persistence models? In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 29–47). Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, F. (2005). Event history analysis. A national centre for research methods briefing paper. University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. Retrieved on April 29, 2011, from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/88/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-004.pdf

  • Stewart, C. H. (2010). Multilevel modelling of event history data: Comparing methods appropriate for large datasets. PhD thesis. University of Glasgow. Retrieved on September 29, from http://theses.gla.ac.uk/2007/01/2010stewartphd.pdf

  • Stratton, L. S., O’Toole, D. M., & Wetzel, J. M. (2008). A multinomial logit model of college stopout and dropout behavior. Economics of Education Review, 27, 319–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toutkoushian, R. K., & Shafiq, M. N. (2010). A conceptual analysis of state support for higher education: Appropriations versus need-based financial aid. Research in Higher Education, 51(1), 40–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Pilarzyk, T. (2009). Understanding student swirl: The role of environmental factors and retention efforts in the later academic success of suspended students. Journal of College Student Retention, 11(2), 211–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, C. C., & Horn, L. (2009). A profile of successful pell grant recipients: Time to bachelor’s degree and early graduate school enrollment (NCES 2009-156). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, J. N., O’Toole, D., & Peterson, S. (1999). Factors affecting student retention probabilities: A case study. Journal of Economics and Finance, 23(1), 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willett, J. B., & Singer, J. D. (1995). It’s Déjá Vu all over again: Using multi-spell discrete-time survival analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20(1), 41–67.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Drew Clark, David Muse and two anonymous reviewers for their numerous valuable comments and suggestions. The authors would also like to thank Sam Lowther and Matthew Campbell for help with data retrieval for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment, Auburn University, 203 Samford Hall, Auburn, AL, 36849-5111, USA

    Iryna Y. Johnson

  2. Department of Mathematics and Philosophy, Columbus State University, 218 University Hall, Columbus, GA, 31907, USA

    William B. Muse

Authors
  1. Iryna Y. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William B. Muse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iryna Y. Johnson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, I.Y., Muse, W.B. Student Swirl at a Single Institution: The Role of Timing and Student Characteristics. Res High Educ 53, 152–181 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9253-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9253-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation