Research in Higher Education

, Volume 51, Issue 8, pp 750–766 | Cite as

Initial Evidence on the Influence of College Student Engagement on Early Career Earnings

Article

Abstract

Using data from three waves of longitudinal surveys of the 2001 freshman cohort of the Gates Millennium Scholars (GMS) program, this study examined linkages between student engagement in college activities and early career earnings in the labor market. The results indicated that social engagement was positively related to early career earnings of college graduates while academic engagement was not. When considering students who majored in STEM fields versus those in non-STEM fields, results showed academic engagement to be positively related to early career earnings for non-STEM students but slightly negatively related to earnings in the labor market for STEM students. Social engagement was positive for graduates in the STEM fields but not significant for non-STEM students. Altogether, results show a complex relationship between student engagement and early career earnings. Implications for research and institutional policy are discussed.

Keywords

Student engagement Economic returns Labor market outcomes 

References

  1. Astin, A. W. (1993a). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. Phoenix, AZ: American Council for Education and Oryx Press.Google Scholar
  2. Astin, A. W. (1993b). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Barron's Profiles of American Colleges (2001). Barron's Educational Series, Hauppage, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Berger, J., & Milem, J. (1999). The role of student involvement and perceptions of integration in a causal model of student persistence. Research in Higher Education, 40, 641–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Björklund, A., & Kjellström, C. (2002). Estimating the return to investments in education: how useful is the standard Mincerian equation? Economics of Education Review, 21, 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, B. (1983). The higher education system. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cohn, E., & Geske, T. G. (1990). The economics of education (3rd ed.). New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davies, S., & Guppy, N. (1997). Fields of study, college selectivity, and student inequalities in higher education. Social Forces, 75, 1417–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feldman, K. A. (1969). Studying the impacts of college on students. Sociology of Education, 42, 207–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grubb, W. N. (1992). The economic returns to baccalaureate degrees: New evidence from the class of 1972. The Review of Higher Education, 15, 213–231.Google Scholar
  13. Grubb, W. N. (1997). The returns to education in the sub-baccalaureate labor market, 1984–1990. Economics of Education Review, 16, 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D. (2003). Maximizing what students get out of college: Testing a learning productivity model. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hu, S., Scheuch, K, Schwartz, R., Gayles, J., & Li, S. (2008). Reinventing undergraduate education: Engaging college students in research and creative activities. ASHE Higher Education Report, Vol. 33, no. 4. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  17. Knox, W. E., Lindsay, P., & Kolb, M. N. (1993). Does college make a difference? Long-term changes in activities and attitudes. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change, 35(2), 24–32.Google Scholar
  19. Kuo, V., Wilds, D., Garcia, P. B., Trent, W. T., Nichols, L., Bronwyn, Z., et al. (2006). The Gates Millennium Scholars research program: A conceptual framework. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  20. Leslie, L. L., & Brinkman, P. (1988). The economic value of higher education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Lin, N. (1999). Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 467–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lodato Nichols, B., Zimowski, M., Lodato, R. M., & Ghadialy, R. (2004). The survey of diverse students. In E. P. St. John (Ed.), Readings on equal education: Vol. 20. Improving access and college success for diverse students: Studies of the Gates Millennium Scholars Program (pp. 23–44). New York: AMS Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  23. McMahon, W. W. (2009). Higher learning, greater good: The private and social benefits of higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Merkowitz, D. (2004). Opportunities answered: Summary research findings on the Gates Millennium Scholars Program. In E. P. St. John (Ed.), Improving access and college success for diverse students: Studies of the Gates Millennium Scholars Program. Readings on equal education (Vol. 20, pp. 1–22). New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience, and earnings. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  26. Murphy, K., & Welch, F. (1989). Wage Premiums for College Graduates: Recent growth and possible explanations. Educational Researcher, 18, 17–26.Google Scholar
  27. National Survey of Student Engagement. (2004). Student engagement: Pathways to collegiate success. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.Google Scholar
  28. National Survey of Student Engagement. (2005). Student engagement: Exploring different dimensions of student engagement. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.Google Scholar
  29. Newcomb, T. M., & Wilson, E. K. (1966). College peer groups. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Pascarella, E. T. (1985). College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development: A critical review and synthesis. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 1, pp. 1–62). New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
  31. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  32. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  33. Paulsen, M. B. (2001). The economics of human capital and investment in higher education. In M. B. Paulsen & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The finance of higher education: Theory, research, policy, and practice (pp. 55–94). New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
  34. Paulsen, M. B., & St. John, E. P. (2002). Social class and college costs: Examining the financial nexus between college choice and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 73, 189–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Perna, L. W. (2005). The benefits of higher education: Sex, racial/ethnic, and socioeconomic group differences. Review of Higher Education, 29, 23–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosenfeld, R. A., & Kalleberg, A. L. (1990). A cross-national comparison of the gender gap in income. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 69–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rumberger, R., & Thomas, S. (1993). The economic returns to college quality, major, and performance. Economics of Education Review, 12, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sedlacek, W. E. (2004). Beyond the big test: Noncognitive assessment in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  39. Smart, J. C., Feldman, K. A., & Ethington, C. A. (2000). Academic disciples: Holland’s theory and the study of college students and faculty. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Thomas, S. (2000). Deferred costs and economic returns to college major, quality, and performance. Research in Higher Education, 41, 281–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thomas, S. (2003). Longer-term economic effects of college selectivity and control. Research in Higher Education, 44, 263–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89–125.Google Scholar
  43. Weidman, J. C. (1989). Undergraduate socialization: A conceptual approach. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 289–322). New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
  44. Wolniak, G. (2008, March). Initial evidence on the socioeconomic impacts of the Gates Millennium Scholars program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  45. Wolniak, G. C., Seifert, T. A., Reed, E. J., & Pascarella, E. T. (2008). College majors and social mobility. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 26, 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, College of EducationFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  2. 2.NORC at the University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations