Advertisement

Research in Higher Education

, Volume 50, Issue 7, pp 623–648 | Cite as

Capital Conversion and Accumulation: A Social Portrait of Legacies at an Elite University

  • Nathan D. MartinEmail author
  • Kenneth I. Spenner
Article

Abstract

Legacies, or students with a family member who graduated from the same college or university, have been the source of much debate. We add to the existing literature by providing a detailed empirical portrait of legacies at a private, selective university across the college years. We examine how legacies are distinctive in their admissions profiles, within-college achievement and post-graduation plans, using data from a panel study of students attending Duke University. We find that legacies enter college with an abundance of economic, cultural and social capital, but also have lower levels of human capital compared to other students with college graduate parents. Due to this human capital deficit, legacies have lower grades in the first college year, but show little academic underperformance in subsequent semesters. Additionally, legacies are less likely to plan to be a medical doctor or engineer and have somewhat lower degree aspirations than other students.

Keywords

Academic achievement College admissions Cultural capital Human capital Postsecondary education 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge grants supporting this research from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Duke University. The authors bear sole responsibility for the contents of this article. An earlier version was presented at the 2008 American Sociological Association Annual Meetings. We would like to thank Sarah Mustillo for assistance with the data, and the Editor and anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.

References

  1. Alderson, A. S., Junisbai, A., & Heacock, I. (2007). Social status and cultural consumption in the United States. Poetics, 35, 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Babcock, P., & Marks, M. (2008). The falling time cost of college: Evidence from half a century of time use data. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Economics, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1975). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, with special reference to education.Google Scholar
  5. Berkner, L., Wei, C. C., He, S., Lew, S., Cominole, M., & Siegel, P. (2005). 2003–2004 National Postsecondary Aid Study (NPSAS:04): Undergraduate Financial Aid Estimates for 2003–2004 by Type of Institution (NCES 2005–163). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics. US Department of Education.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1973). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In R. Brown (Ed.), Knowledge, education, and cultural change (pp. 71–112). London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1983/1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1989/1996). The state nobility. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977/1990). Reproduction in education, society, and culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Bowen, W. G., & Bok, D. (1998). The shape of the river: Long term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bowen, W. G., Kurzweil, M. A., & Tobin, E. M. (2005). Equity and excellence in American higher education. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bryant, A. Y., Spenner, K. I., & Martin, N. D. (2007). The campus life and learning project: A report on the college years. Durham, NC: Duke University.Google Scholar
  13. Burke, P. J. (2004). Identities and social structure: The 2003 Cooley-Mead award address. Social Psychological Quarterly, 67, 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dagger, J. (2006, January/February). Top of the crop: Inside admissions. Duke Magazine, 92(1). Retrieved September 21, 2008, from http://www.dukemagazine.duke.edu/dukemag/issues/010206/crop-admissions1.html.
  17. Erikson, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2002). Intergenerational inequality: A sociological perspective. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Espenshade, T. J., & Chung, C. Y. (2005). The opportunity cost of admission preferences at elite universities. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Espenshade, T. J., Chung, C. Y., & Walling, J. L. (2004). Admission preferences for minority students, athletes, and legacies at elite universities. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 1422–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Featherman, D. L., & Hauser, R. M. (1978). Opportunity and change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Fetter, J. H. (1995). Questions and admissions: Reflections on 100, 000 admissions decisions at Stanford University. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Finder, A. (2006, September 16). Princeton stops its early admissions, joining movement to make process fairer. New York Times, p. A.16.Google Scholar
  23. Finder, A., & Arenson, K.W. (2006, September 12). Harvard ends early admission, citing barrier to disadvantaged. New York Times, p. A. 1.Google Scholar
  24. Golden, D. (2006). The price of admission. New York: Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  25. Howell, C., & Turner, S. E. (2004). Legacies in black and white: The racial composition of the legacy pool. Research in Higher Education, 45, 325–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jencks, C., & Riesman, D. (1968/1992). The academic revolution. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Karabel, J. (2005). The chosen: The hidden history of admission and exclusion at Harvard. New York: Mariner Books, Yale, and Princeton.Google Scholar
  28. Karen, D. (1991). ‘Achievement’ and ‘ascription’ in admission to an elite college: A political-organizational analysis. Sociological Forum, 6, 349–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Katchadourian, H., & Boli, J. (1994). Cream of the crop: The impact of an elite education in the decade after college. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  30. Kingston, P. W., & Smart, J. C. (1990). The economic pay-off of prestigious colleges. In P. W. Kingston & L. S. Lewis (Eds.), The high status track (pp. 147–174). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  31. Landerman, L. R., Land, K. C., & Pieper, C. F. (1997). An empirical evaluation of predictive mean matching method for imputing missing values. Sociological Methods and Research, 26, 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race and family Life. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lareau, A., & Weininger, E. B. (2003). Cultural capital in educational research: A critical assessment. Theory and Society, 32, 567–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Liptak, A. (2008, January 15). A hereditary perk the founding fathers failed to anticipate. New York Times, p. A12.Google Scholar
  36. Martin, N. D. (2009). Quantifying social class: A latent clustering approach. In K. Robson & C. Sanders (Eds.), Quantifying theory: Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 161–183).  Springer Science + Business Media B.V.Google Scholar
  37. Massey, D. S., Charles, C. Z., Lundy, G. F., & Fischer, M. J. (2003). The source of the river: The social origins of freshmen at America’s selective colleges and universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Massey, D. S., & Mooney, M. (2007). The effects of America’s three affirmative action programs on academic performance. Social Problems, 54, 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McDonough, P. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  40. Morgan, S. L., & Mehta, J. D. (2004). Beyond the laboratory: Evaluating the survey evidence for the disidentification explanation of black-white differences in achievement. Sociology of Education, 77, 82–101.Google Scholar
  41. National Association of College and University Business Officers. (2007). 2007 NACUBO endowment study. Washington, DC: NACUBO.Google Scholar
  42. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  43. Persell, C. H., Catsambis, S., & Cookson, P. W., Jr. (1992). Differential asset conversion: Class and gendered pathways to selective colleges. Sociology of Education, 65, 208–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Peterson, R. A., & Kern, R. M. (1996). Changing highbrow taste: From snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review, 61, 900–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rau, W., & Durand, A. (2000). The academic ethic and college grades: Does hard work help students to ‘make the grade’? Sociology of Education, 73, 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reay, D., David, M. E., & Ball, S. (2005). Degrees of choice: Social class, race and gender in higher education. Sterling, VA: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  47. Reitzes, D. C., & Burke, P. J. (1980). College student identity measurement and implications. Pacific Sociological Review, 23, 46–66.Google Scholar
  48. Rosenberg, M., Schooler, C., Schoenbach, C., & Rosenberg, F. (1995). Global self-esteem and specific self-esteem: Different concepts, different outcomes. American Sociological Review, 60, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sallaz, J. J., & Zavisca, J. R. (2007). Bourdieu in American sociology, 1980–2005. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review, 51, 1–17.Google Scholar
  51. Schuman, H., Walsh, E., Olson, C., & Etheridge, B. (1985). Effort and reward: The assumption that college grades are affected by quantity of study. Social Forces, 63, 945–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Selingo, J. (2004). U.S. public’s confidence in colleges remains high. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 50(35), A12–A13.Google Scholar
  53. Shulman, J. L., & Bowen, W. G. (2001). The game of life: College sports and educational values. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Spenner, K. I., Buchmann, C., & Landerman, L. R. (2005). The black-white achievement gap in the first college year: Evidence from a new longitudinal case study. In D. Bills (Ed.), Research in social stratification and mobility (pp. 187–216). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  55. Spenner, K. I., Mustillo, S., & Martin, N. D. (2008). Within-college human capital and racial ethnic differences in academic performance. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Sociology, Duke University.Google Scholar
  56. Zweigenhaft, R. L. (1993). Prep school and public school graduates of Harvard: A longitudinal study of the accumulation of social and cultural capital. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zwick, R. (2002). Fair game? The use of standardized admissions tests in higher education. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations