Skip to main content
Log in

Departmental Climate and Student Experiences in Graduate Geography Programs

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores how graduate students enrolled in M.A./M.S. and Ph.D. geography programs perceive the social and academic climate of their departments. A second objective is to understand how these students self-assess their own professional abilities, values, and goals, and whether these self-assessments differ across demographic and institutional contexts. The survey instrument for this research is based on data collected from graduate student focus groups and on validated constructs of academic culture and climate from previous research. T-tests, ANOVA, and regression analyses identified significant differences among graduate students and their perceptions of departmental climate when compared on the basis of gender, citizenship, race/ethnicity, disciplinary subfield, and institutional type. Interview data provide additional context for analysis of the survey data. The primary areas in which we detected differences in graduate students’ experiences were 1) diversity issues, 2) disciplinary and institutional cultures, 3) career planning and development, 4) financial matters, and 5) quality of the learning environment. These differences result from the varying social and academic dynamics of graduate programs, illustrating the importance of the local environment in shaping student experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In order to limit the length of this manuscript, the 14 regression tables were not included. Readers may contact the authors directly for a copy of the regression tables.

References

  • Anderson, M. (1996). Collaboration, the doctoral experience, and the departmental environment. The Review of Higher Education, 19, 305–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antony, J., & Taylor, E. (2004). Theories and strategies of academic career socialization: Improving paths to the professoriate for Black graduate students. In D. Wulff & A. Austin (Eds.), Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty (pp. 92–114). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of American Geographers. (2006). Guide to Geography Programs in the Americas. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialisation to the academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 94–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. E., & McDaniels, M. (2006). Using doctoral education to prepare faculty to work within Boyer’s four domains of scholarship. New Directions for Institutional Research, 129, 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bair, C. R., & Haworth, J. G. (2004). Doctoral student attrition and persistence: A meta-synthesis of research. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory, research (Vol. 29, pp. 481–534). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieber, J. P., & Worley, L. K. (2006). Conceptualising the academic life: Graduate students’ perspectives. The Journal of Higher Education, 77, 1009–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boice, R. (1992). The new faculty member. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boice, R. (2000). Advice for new faculty members: Nihil nimus. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K. S., & Ettington, D. R. (1988). The conceptual foundations of organizational culture. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory, research (Vol. 4, pp. 356–396). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J., & Steven, D. (Eds.). (2002). Tenure in the sacred grove: Issues and strategies for women and minority faculty. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Graduate Schools (CGS). (2003). Inclusiveness series. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R. G., & Mavros, P. G. (1992). Do doctoral students’ financial support patterns affect their time-to-degree and completion probabilities?. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, M. (Ed.). (2000). Succeeding in an academic career: A guide for faculty of color. Westport, Conn. and London: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia, PA: The Pew Charitable Trusts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2004). The survey of doctoral education and career preparation: The importance of disciplinary contexts. In D. H. Wulff & A. E. Austin (Eds.), Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty (pp. 19–45). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning. In R. Barnett (Ed.), Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching (pp. 67–78). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermanowicz, J. (2005). Classifying universities and their departments: A social world perspective. Journal of Higher Education, 76, 26–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komaki, J. (2005). Faculty climate survey report. Boulder, CO: Office of Institutional Research at the University of Colorado.

  • Kuh, G. D., & Whitt, E. J. (1988). The invisible tapestry: Culture in American colleges and universities. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. J. (2004). Comparing institutional relationships with academic departments: A study of five academic fields. Research in Higher Education, 45, 603–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. J. (2007). The shaping of the departmental culture: Measuring the relative influences of the institution and discipline. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29, 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, C., & Murray, J., Jr. (2002). New faculty: A practical guide for academic beginners. New York: Palgrave Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, J. (2001). Valuing service. AAG Newsletter, 36, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerad, M., & Miller, D. S. (1996). Increasing student retention in graduate and professional programs. New directions for institutional research, 92, 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyquist, J. D., Manning, L., Wulff, D. H., Austin, A. E., Sprague, J., Fraser, P. K., Calcagno, C., & Woodford, B. (1999). On the road to becoming a professor: The graduate student experience. Change, 31(3), 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. W., & Spencer, M. G. (1990). Understanding academic culture and climate. In W. G. Tierney (Ed.), Assessing academic climates and cultures. New Directions for Institutional Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, G., Gouran, D., Kuehn, S., & Wood, J. (Eds.). (1994). Survival in the academy. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pion, G. M. (2001). The early career progress of NRSA predoctoral trainees and fellows. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice University (2003). Academic climate survey technical report. Accessed July 22, 2007 at: http://professor.rice.edu/images/professor/AcademicClimate.pdf.

  • Rosser, V. (2004). Faculty members’ intentions to leave: a national study on their worklife and satisfaction. Research in higher education, 45, 285–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solem, M. N., & Foote, K. E. (2004). Concerns, attitudes, and abilities of early career geography faculty. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94, 889–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toma, D. (1997). Alternative inquiry paradigms, faculty cultures, and the definition of academic lives. Journal of higher education, 68, 681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulff, D. H., & Austin, A. E. (Eds.). (2004). Paths to the professoriate: strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Solem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solem, M., Lee, J. & Schlemper, B. Departmental Climate and Student Experiences in Graduate Geography Programs. Res High Educ 50, 268–292 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9117-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9117-4

Keywords

Navigation