Research in Higher Education

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 293–313

Situational and Personal Causes of Student Cheating

Article

Abstract

The causes of students’ academic dishonesty behavior were explored using survey and experimental vignette methods. Participants were surveyed about their own cheating behavior, neutralizing attitudes, performance/mastery orientation and perceptions of peer attitudes and behavior. As predicted, neutralizing attitudes influenced cheating behavior directly, but also indirectly, increasing the effect of individual attitudes. Observing others cheating was strongly correlated with one’s own cheating behavior. These variables are also shown to have different effects on exam cheating and plagiarism and cases of giving and receiving unauthorized information. Correlations were tested using experimental vignette methods, which supported the claims made from survey data.

Keywords

Academic integrity Student cheating Neutralizing attitudes Vignette experiment Higher education 

References

  1. Anderman, E. M., Griesinger, T., & Westerfield, G. (1998). Motivation and cheating during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 84–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2007). Core commitments: Educating students for personal and social responsibility. http://www.aacu.org/core_commitments/philosophy.cfm. Accessed 18 December 2007.
  3. Carrell, S. E., Malmstrom, F. V., & West, J. E. (2005). Peer effects in academic cheating. http://ssrn.com/abstract=842224. Accessed 7 August 2007.
  4. Dweck, C. S. (1988). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eison, J. A. (1981). A new instrument for assessing students’ orientations towards grades and learning. Psychological Reports, 48, 919–924.Google Scholar
  6. Eison, J. A., Pollio, H. R., & Milton, O. (1986). Educational and personal characteristics of four different types of learning- and grade-oriented students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Graham, M. A., Monday, J., O’Brien, K., & Steffen, S. (1994). Cheating at small colleges: An examination of student and faculty attitudes and behaviors. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 255–260.Google Scholar
  8. Haines, V. J., Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., & Clark, R. E. (1986). College cheating: Immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education, 25, 342–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hastie, R., & Dawes, R. M. (2001). Rational choice in an uncertain world: The psychology of judgment and decision making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Jordan, A. (2001). College student cheating: The role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes, and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics and Behavior, 11, 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kibler, W. L., & Kibler, P. V. (1993). When students resort to cheating. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 39(45), B1–B2.Google Scholar
  12. LaBeff, E. E., Clark, R. E., Haines, V. J., & Diekhoff, G. M. (1990). Situational ethics and college student cheating. Sociological Inquiry, 60, 190–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McCabe, D. L., & Treviño, L. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 522–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (1999). Academic integrity in honor code and non-honor code environments: A qualitative investigation. The Journal of Higher Education, 70(2), 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics and Behavior, 11, 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Messick, D. M., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (Eds.). (1997). Codes of conduct: Behavioral research into business ethics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Murdock, T. B., Hale, N. M., & Weber, M. J. (2001). Predictors of cheating among early adolescents: Academic and social motivations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 96–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Murdock, T. B., Miller, A. D., & Goetzinger, A. (2007). Effects of classroom context on university students’ judgments about cheating: mediating and moderating processes. Social Psychology of Education, 10, 141–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Murdock, T. B., Miller, A., & Kohlhardt, J. (2004). Effects of classroom context variables on high school students’ judgments of the acceptability and likelihood of cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 765–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Murdock, T. B., & Stephens, J. B. (2007). Is cheating wrong? Students’ reasoning about academic dishonesty. In E. A. Anderman & T. B. Murdock (Eds.), The psychology of academic cheating. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Press.Google Scholar
  21. Newstead, S. E., Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Armstead, P. (1996). Individual differences in student cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pulvers, K., & Diekhoff, G. M. (1999). The relationship between academic dishonesty and college classroom environment. Research in Higher Education, 40, 487–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rettinger, D. A., & Jordan, A. E. (2005). The relations among religion, motivation, and college cheating: A natural experiment. Ethics and Behavior, 15(2), 107–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rettinger, D. A., Jordan, A. E., & Peschiera, F. (2004). Evaluating the motivation of other students to cheat: A vignette experiment. Research in Higher Education, 45, 873–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stevens, G. E., & Stevens, F. W. (1987). Ethical inclinations of tomorrow’s managers revisited: How and why students cheat. Journal of Education for Business, 63(1), 24–29.Google Scholar
  26. Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wechsler, H., Nelson, T. F., Lee, J. E., Seibring, M., Lewis, C., & Keeling, R. P. (2003). Perception and reality: A national evaluation of social norms marketing interventions to reduce college students’ heavy alcohol use. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64(4), 484–495.Google Scholar
  28. Whitley, B. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education, 39(3), 235–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of Mary WashingtonFredericksburgUSA
  2. 2.Yeshiva CollegeYeshiva UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations